|
6macros: discussing the finer points of Perl 6 macros, Qtrees, and how to stay sane | irclog: irclog.perlgeek.de/6macros/today Set by moderator on 28 July 2015. |
|||
|
02:58
ilbot3 joined
08:53
cgfbee joined
|
|||
| masak | yes, and I want to understand that better | 12:21 | |
| I feel I should write something down, like in a gist, the mdoel I envision, and the things that it solves | |||
| a consistent model, that I *know* solves all the problems we've found, is kind of what I was aiming for with the scope-exploration | 12:22 | ||
| but I feel I'm now in a better place to get all the way there, or almost all the way, without having to implement it | 12:23 | ||
| also, it would be useful to be "excruciatingly clear" with concepts like block, scope, frame, variable, identifier... so that they only mean one thing consistently within the text. | 12:24 | ||
|
12:28
Ven`` joined
|
|||
| masak | Ven``: but there's a recent central point that I would hope I could get you to agree with, or at least reach some kind of consensus on | 12:29 | |
| Ven`` | go ahead? | 12:30 | |
| masak | namely "the blocks that we insert to mess with scoping in and out of the injectile are subject to the same need to update their OUTER as ordinary blocks" | ||
| I realize that this is stated from my point of view, where we use blocks like that in the first place | 12:31 | ||
| but I maintain that the *problem* remains even under your proposed model | 12:32 | ||
| I would probably be able to come up with a concrete example that highlights this | 12:33 | ||
| Ven`` | that would be helpful | 12:39 | |
| masak | ok, expect both the start of a gist and a concrete example this afternoon | 12:40 | |
| Ven`` | Ok. not sure internet won't disconnect by then, but I'm watching the irclog anyway :). | 12:43 | |
| masak .oO( stay tuned ) | |||
| Ven`` | ™soon | ||