|
08:43
RabidGravy joined
|
|||
| timotimo | RabidGravy: you had some code that pretended to synthesize some sine wave or something; do you still have that? | 09:33 | |
| i wonder if it got noticably faster what with all the recent improvements to everything | |||
| RabidGravy | d y'know I haven't looked at it for a while, going to have a bit of a catch up day today so will make a new rakudo and have a play | 09:36 | |
| timotimo | OK :) | 09:42 | |
| i'll be AFK for a long bit in between, likely | |||
|
13:23
tadzik joined
|
|||
| timotimo | i'm back | 15:32 | |
| do you happen to have the link to that gist still? | |||
| RabidGravy: highlight for good measure | 15:37 | ||
| RabidGravy | I think it was gist.github.com/jonathanstowe/5e43...82c2166a52 | 15:39 | |
| timotimo | that looks like it, yeah | 15:40 | |
| still looking for some synthesia tutorials that might be worth trying ... finding far too many that are way too hard | |||
| RabidGravy | which is still an order of magnitude too slow | 15:43 | |
| but I think we found some optimisations before | 15:44 | ||
| timotimo | tell me again what numbers we should have there? | ||
| gist.github.com/timo/d97a284b884274e9e375 - i do have this still around | 15:45 | ||
| RabidGravy | well my dumb figure is (1/44100)*256 | ||
| strangely that one is slower by half than the original one, I thought it was faster | 15:48 | ||
| timotimo | interesting | ||
| could be because of recent improvements, or just different versions i tried in succession | |||
| i figured out a few ways to make it slower at least | 17:24 | ||