Fire is step THREE! | github.com/perl6/toolchain-bikeshed | Channel logs: irclog.perlgeek.de/perl6-toolchain/today | useful prior art: metacpan.org/pod/CPAN::Meta::Spec
Set by moderator on 1 May 2016.
01:15 sufrostico joined
[Coke] tadzik: two more pull requests for you. I'll have one or two more tomorrow once I'm back behind the firewall. 01:18
01:48 ilbot3 joined
moderator Fire is step THREE! | github.com/perl6/toolchain-bikeshed | Channel logs: irclog.perlgeek.de/perl6-toolchain/today | useful prior art: metacpan.org/pod/CPAN::Meta::Spec
03:17 cognominal joined
MadcapJake nine_: I think we could actually utilize the options in the path-spec to handle this for us but I would need to extend the option values to include periods, any reason why it was only `<[\\w-]>+` ? 05:16
05:33 Kassandry joined 05:40 domidumont joined 05:42 domidumont joined 05:45 domidumont joined 06:10 domidumont joined
nine_ MadcapJake: I guess that's just because nothing else was needed at the time 06:16
07:46 domidumont joined 07:58 llfourn joined 07:59 hoelzro joined 08:00 ribasushi joined 08:08 pnu_ joined 11:27 TimToady joined 12:14 sjn joined
[Coke] tadzik: diakopter applied those 2. 12:17
tadzik oh, sweet :) 12:24
[Coke] and, I was finally able to use rakudobrew to install something last night. whee! 12:36
now to fix it for work. :)
12:39 domidumont joined 12:41 domidumont1 joined
[Coke] looks like diakopter didn't merge the PRs, though, it looks like I just committed to master. ah well. 12:49
12:52 ribasushi joined
[Coke] should we complain if GIT_PROTOCOL is set to something other than https or git? 12:56
(or http, I suppose?) 12:57
github.com/tadzik/rakudobrew/pull/97 - added a comment for a potentially better way to get to my git@ urls and still leave git:// available. 13:08
dunno how standard GIT_PROTOCOL is. 13:09
oh, duh. 13:10
Yah, I think my comment is the right way to go. (have git/http|s/ssh, and my way is ssh)
... reworking, one sec.
github.com/tadzik/rakudobrew/pull/97 is updated, should work the same as before unless you use GIT_PROTOCOL=ssh 13:21
(and that works for me. I can use https or ssh, but git protocol isn't going to work behind a firewall)
anyone have any feedback on github.com/tadzik/rakudobrew/issues/92 ? 13:36
(remove rakudobrew support for pre-glr)
moritz as a user, I'd be totally fine with that. 13:37
tadzik [Coke]: sounds good to me 13:38
perlpilot same here 13:39
[Coke] ok. Need a PR for that? Should be handled by the removal of that part of the impls hash. 13:40
tadzik I'd happily accept a PR :) 13:41
[Coke] dammit. :) 13:45
tadzik :P
[Coke] github.com/tadzik/rakudobrew/pull/98 13:48
I'm also wondering if we want "list-available" to be slightly less verbose (ala #80), but have a -all that does show all tags. 13:49
tadzik hmm 13:50
I'd like that, as long as it at least shows the last 3-ish tags
[Coke] Oh, short term, I was just going to say any date tags that are 2015.12 or later. :) 13:51
tadzik that works too :)
but the problem will reappear in a few... maybe years :) 13:52
[Coke] and we can make it smarter later to deal with latest/stable/whatever. (except we don't have "stable" as a release type)
tadzik: at which point I hope it's not our problem! ;)
tadzik right, for that we need to either put some more information in rakudo tags or have some external source for release 13:59
14:03 domidumont joined
stmuk what like github.com/tadzik/rakudobrew/pull/75 ? 14:10
I dont think that cleanly applies anymore BTW 14:11
14:54 sufrostico joined 17:05 domidumont joined 17:06 lizmat joined 17:18 sufrostico joined 18:49 Kassandry joined
MadcapJake github.com/MadcapJake/rakudo/commi...b0699e1d90 19:14
nine_: ^^ I ended up implementing the single-file per short-id version as I wouldn't need anything under short-id's besides their long-spec. 19:16
I would still be alright with changing to a folder but I don't see what each file would contain. The lookup has to be on the entire spec (otherwise how would you handle a different version?) 19:17
I could see it being a dist-id filename but then how would need-repository/need locate which one is right? 19:18
Anyways, I've hit a wall with this "Error while compiling, type X::Package::Stubbed packages: (CompUnit::RepositorySpecification,CompUnit::Repository::Unknown)" 19:22
Either I have stubs in the wrong place or not enough stubs somewhere
19:34 hoelzro joined 19:51 lizmat joined, tadzik joined, JimmyZ joined, stmuk joined, sufrostico joined, cognominal joined, Brock joined 21:34 patrickz joined