pugscode.org/ | nopaste: sial.org/pbot/perl6 | pugs: [~] <m oo se> (or rakudo:, kp6:, smop: etc.) || We do Haskell, too | > reverse . show $ foldl1 (*) [1..4] | irclog: irc.pugscode.org/ Set by TimToady on 25 January 2008. |
|||
00:05
thoughtpolice joined
|
|||
meppl | good night | 00:10 | |
00:32
bsb joined
00:36
thoughtpolice joined
00:41
thoughtpolice joined
01:02
Schwern joined
01:06
lyokato_ joined
01:23
mncharity joined
01:27
phil__ joined
01:30
phil__ left
|
|||
mncharity | oh, yay. rakudo parser getting attention. that makes the next bit a little less nutty... | 01:32 | |
Juerd_ | Nutty? | 01:42 | |
mncharity | re nutty, my line for this evening was going to be "ok, I'm getting really tired of the struggle to get a usable p6 parser on which to stand. the foundation for a rapid backend bootstrap. using a "simple and direct to p5" emitter/runtime. so let's just pretend that we know the scraped rakudo parser is strong enough to support the bootstrap. even though | 01:56 | |
we don't yet. and it's not clear there are the resources fix that if it becomes a blocker. I'm just going to pretend for a bit, and sketch out the full bootstrap. perhaps it will attract resources. and even if rakudo parse doesn't work out, I'm leaning towards then falling back to | 01:58 | ||
the "pretend ruby is a p6 dialect, and its parse tree a p6 parse" approach. I need the backend bootstrapped into p6 this week for next to be free for rx and prelude work. so finger's crossed, we'll see how it goes." | 02:00 | ||
that was going to be the vision. having something else pushing to improve the parse, and finding resources for it, takes the edge off the biggest risk - "cute sketch, but can't really parse, so utterly useless". | 02:01 | ||
rakudo --target=parse -> scrape -> ir -> emit direct to p5. supporting enough p5-ish oo to then immediately translate the scraper, ir, and emitter into p6. | 02:04 | ||
the largest hunk of effort is the scrape -> ir. the rakudo parser nodes aren't tagged with their originating rules, so a big 'node was labeled X and has fields A B C' -> so that's a DumbIR::ForLoop node. Then emitting a p5 for loop is comparatively trivial. | 02:08 | ||
the largest risk is that you start handing the rakudo parser simple class declarations for the scrapper/ir/emitter, and find out, well... thing Q isn't quite working yet... and thus descend into the "trying to write p6 oo code while working around p6 implementation bugs" which has squandered so much effort on pugs. | 02:10 | ||
Juerd_: thus, nutty. :) | 02:11 | ||
building a house on unchecked foundations in the hope that even if it can't stand, it attracts developers/homesteaders. | 02:12 | ||
02:13
Psyche^ joined
|
|||
Juerd_ | mncharity: Whoa, I come back and find your monologue. Great explanation, though :) | 02:25 | |
Interesting strategy too. | |||
02:26
stevan__ joined
|
|||
mncharity | :) | 02:27 | |
02:31
jhorwitz joined
|
|||
mncharity | the idea would be to then translate yet_another_regex_engine from p5 to p6, extending it a bit, then take the rakudo p6 grammar, and you have a full and usable bootstrap. which works on anything p5-like (ruby, common-lisp, etc). then address need for better grammar and ir and emitter/runtimes, working in p6. | 02:40 | |
or I suppose could translate PCR instead of yare. I'll likely do yare, though if someone else does PCR first, would use that instead. :) | 02:41 | ||
02:41
thoughtpolice joined
02:53
Zygo joined
02:58
pbuetow joined
03:04
TimToady joined,
pbuetow joined,
Zygo joined,
thoughtpolice joined,
stevan__ joined,
Patterner joined,
mncharity joined,
lyokato_ joined,
cognominal_ joined,
Grrrr joined,
lambdabot joined,
gbacon joined,
qmole joined,
IllvilJa joined,
Daveman joined,
Lorn_ joined,
[particle] joined,
alester joined,
xinming joined,
Southen_ joined,
FurnaceBoy joined,
spx2 joined,
peepsalot joined,
thepler joined,
fullermd joined,
zamolxes joined,
RayMagini joined,
simcop2387 joined,
r0bby joined,
lisppaste3 joined,
mj41 joined,
Maddingue joined,
Lunchy joined,
dalek joined,
bocksp joined,
integral joined,
rafl joined,
pugs_svnbot joined,
agentzh joined,
Helios joined,
GeJ joined,
shachaf joined,
IRSeekBot joined,
charsbar joined,
mugwump joined,
irc.freenode.net sets mode: +o TimToady,
bbkr__ joined,
allbery_b joined,
arguile joined,
kcwu joined,
buu joined,
pasteling joined,
ting_ joined,
ycheng joined,
pugsbot_r17185 joined,
kolibrie joined,
Qiang joined,
Botje joined,
avar joined,
nnunley joined,
TreyHarris joined,
arcady joined,
Khisanth joined,
yahooooo joined,
whiteg joined,
cj joined,
nothingmuch joined,
zostay joined,
spinclad joined,
SubStack joined,
moritz_ joined,
cxreg joined,
mtve joined,
PerlJam joined,
orafu joined,
REPLeffect joined,
pravus joined,
diakopter joined,
jiing joined,
Caelum joined,
baest_ joined,
nipotan joined,
rakudo_svn joined,
buubot joined,
pmichaud joined,
ruz joined,
drbean joined,
mattz_ joined,
SamB joined,
Alias_ joined,
dmq joined,
rhr joined,
silug_ joined,
araujo joined,
eternaleye joined,
aindilis joined,
kanru joined,
bockmabe joined,
hcchien joined,
Juerd_ joined,
jjore joined,
ead joined,
audreyt joined,
tcliouAway joined,
meteorjay joined,
BinGOs joined,
cosimo_ joined,
lumi joined,
obra joined,
jql joined,
cookys joined,
felipe joined,
clkao joined,
sunnavy joined,
ilbot2 joined,
tewk joined,
Eidolos joined
03:06
jnthn joined,
ingy joined
03:14
peepsalot joined
03:45
_SamB_ joined
03:47
charsbar_ joined
|
|||
pugs_svnbot | r20098 | putter++ | misc/winter_jig/ast_rakudo/scrape: start mutation into a backend bootstrap. | 03:47 | |
diff: dev.pugscode.org/changeset/20098 | |||
lambdabot | Title: Changeset 20098 - Pugs - Trac | ||
mncharity | very crufty, but end of day. | 03:48 | |
./scrape -e '3' will show the --target=parse dump, a hash version of same, another with tags added, the tags which weren't recognized (all of them), and some placeholders (for IR and emitted p5). | 03:52 | ||
good night & | 03:53 | ||
./scrape FILE also works. | |||
err, should work. untested... "and so doesn't work, by definitition". | 03:54 | ||
03:55
Lorn joined
04:15
luqui joined
04:20
RayMagini joined
04:28
justatheory joined
04:45
alc joined,
thoughtpolice joined
05:04
lyokato_ joined
05:15
lambdabot joined
|
|||
TimToady | update: it's not B12 deficiency, but likely some kind of GI bleeding, since my hemoglobin dropped over the last week. more tests likely tomorrow, and not the pleasant sort... | 05:34 | |
PerlJam | yikes! | 05:36 | |
PerlJam dccs some warm fuzzies to TimToady | |||
(it sounds like you need them) | |||
05:39
kanru joined
05:47
stevan_ joined
06:05
xinming joined
06:11
devogon_ joined
06:12
lambdabot joined
|
|||
spinclad | TimToady's GI tract: get well soon please! | 06:12 | |
06:28
Jedai joined
06:33
bsb joined
06:53
lambdabot joined
|
|||
allbery_b | yug | 06:55 | |
06:57
lambdabot joined
07:52
Aankhen`` joined
07:57
meppl joined
08:07
iblechbot joined
08:50
penk joined
09:17
xinming_ joined
09:38
ruoso joined
|
|||
rakudo_svn | r26309 | allison++ | [pdd17pmc] Merging the pdd17pmc branch into trunk (r24435 to r26307). | 09:50 | |
09:52
ebassi joined
10:14
ebassi joined
10:46
masak joined
11:02
chris2 joined
11:09
rindolf joined
11:39
devogon joined
11:47
pbuetow joined
11:55
smtms joined
12:12
iblechbot joined
12:21
pbuetow joined
12:28
cmarcelo joined
12:30
clintongormley joined
|
|||
pugs_svnbot | r20099 | ruoso++ | [smop] Finally, the issue was solved. All tests pass again, and now we have the lowlevel scalar implementation working. | 12:45 | |
diff: dev.pugscode.org/changeset/20099 | |||
lambdabot | Title: Changeset 20099 - Pugs - Trac | ||
12:47
gbacon joined
|
|||
pugs_svnbot | r20100 | ruoso++ | [smop] two small memory leaks fixed. | 12:54 | |
diff: dev.pugscode.org/changeset/20100 | |||
lambdabot | Title: Changeset 20100 - Pugs - Trac | ||
ruoso | it's interesting to note that test/11_lowlevel_scalar.sm0p already uses the SMOP__SLIME__CurrentFrame.move_capturize operation... | 12:56 | |
12:56
FurnaceBoy joined
13:22
rhr joined
13:37
hanekomu joined
13:49
Helios joined
13:54
Helios_ joined
13:57
rindolf joined
14:01
Lorn joined
14:07
ebassi joined
14:15
eternaleye joined
14:19
ebassi joined
14:35
jhorwitz joined
14:37
TJCRI joined
15:01
peeps[work] joined
15:33
ruz joined
15:36
Aankh|Clone joined
15:39
jferrero joined
15:59
TJCRI joined
|
|||
ruoso | [particle], BTW... I managed to fix the KP6 sm0p implementation... but it would still be nice to have it working with rakudo instead, as rakudo's performance is much better than KP6 | 16:07 | |
and rakudo seems to be able to work with a closer-to-STD grammar than KP6 (as you can see in the differences between Grammar.pm and KP6sm0p.p6... | 16:09 | ||
16:10
iblechbot joined
|
|||
cognominal_ | I am working to support self in inner method blocks by declaring as a lexical variable | 16:12 | |
in rakudo | 16:13 | ||
necessary for any but trivial p6 code in rakudo | 16:14 | ||
PerlJam | you mean $self or was the "lexical variable" part just an implementation detail? | 16:16 | |
cognominal_ | this will be an implementation detail | 16:17 | |
16:17
ebassi joined
|
|||
cognominal_ | blocks are defined as subs with outer context. | 16:19 | |
16:23
ebassi joined
16:26
mncharity joined
16:30
pmurias joined
|
|||
pmurias | ruoso: do you think it would be worth to have smop RI declarations in some sort of a declarative way? | 16:34 | |
a DSL like %method SMOP__ID__FETCH\n...code..\n%method SMOP__ID__DESTROYALL\n | 16:35 | ||
ruoso | pmurias, maybe... writing the cascading ifs may be quite boring.... | 16:36 | |
but that's why there will be s1p after all | |||
pmurias | i can try to come up with/implement something and see if it works | 16:37 | |
16:39
cosimo joined
16:41
marmic joined
|
|||
pmurias | ruoso: why do we need s1p? | 16:42 | |
ruoso | pmurias, because writing sm0p is boring also ;) | ||
pmurias | i mean how is it diffrent from p6 | ||
ruoso | www.perlfoundation.org/perl6/index....p_language | ||
lambdabot | Title: SMOP s1p Language / Perl 6 | ||
ruoso | it's a simplification | 16:43 | |
not of the syntax | |||
but of the runtime | |||
16:43
stevan_ joined
|
|||
ruoso | pmurias, take a look at the fibonacci example | 16:43 | |
pmurias | ruoso: i remember, because the object metamodel and related stuff aren't loaded yet, right? | 16:47 | |
ruoso | yep... | 16:48 | |
it's what MOP.pm does in KP6 | |||
16:53
Jamtech joined
16:57
FurnaceBoy joined,
clintongormley left,
b2gills joined
|
|||
pmurias | ruoso: is the order of methods accidential or intensional? | 16:59 | |
i.e. the most common ones first? | 17:00 | ||
ruoso | pmurias, order where? | ||
pmurias | in foo_message | 17:01 | |
ruoso | it's in random order ;) | ||
17:08
justatheory joined
17:12
BinGOs joined
17:15
meppl joined
|
|||
pugs_svnbot | r20101 | putter++ | ast_rakudo/scrape becomes elf_on_rakudo/elf_zero_generate.pl. Switch to metaprogramming because while the ruby elf_zero doesn't need it, the p6 elf_one will. | 17:15 | |
diff: dev.pugscode.org/changeset/20101 | |||
lambdabot | Title: Changeset 20101 - Pugs - Trac | ||
pmurias | ruoso: where should i put the translator and and example of how smop_s1p_scalar.c would look like with it? | 17:16 | |
17:18
meppl joined
|
|||
mncharity ponders forking the kp6 ast... | 17:19 | ||
pmurias | mncharity: what do you want to change? | 17:20 | |
pugs_svnbot | r20102 | pmurias++ | [sm0p] a proposal for more declarative RI description | ||
diff: dev.pugscode.org/changeset/20102 | |||
lambdabot | Title: Changeset 20102 - Pugs - Trac | ||
ruoso | pmurias, you can create a new root level dir | 17:21 | |
mncharity | pmurias: not to change, just to decouple. elf needs an IR. infrastructure already exists to metaprogram a kp6 one. forking the code just isn't warm fuzzies. :/ | 17:23 | |
pmurias | ruoso: i'm not sure if the translator is actually usefull | ||
17:24
eternaleye joined
|
|||
mncharity | lazy forking, waiting until there is a change, seems too messy. | 17:24 | |
ah well. | |||
cognominal_ | IR? | 17:26 | |
pmurias | itermidate representation | 17:27 | |
mncharity: you might want to fork it to avoid havind a Pad | 17:28 | ||
spinclad | forking could be good if it leads to convergence down the road; if it gives room to develop a common AST; to clone for another domain (elf, if i read right) | ||
mncharity | re Pad, :) | ||
17:28
rindolf joined
|
|||
mncharity | re flexibility for convergence, indeed. | 17:28 | |
17:29
rdice joined
|
|||
pmurias | * having | 17:29 | |
spinclad | fork-and-merge kp6, rakudo, pugs ASTs... | 17:31 | |
(just to speak of our own) | 17:32 | ||
pugs_svnbot | r20103 | putter++ | Fork ../ast_kp6/'s node definitions, to become the basis for a new IR. | 17:34 | |
diff: dev.pugscode.org/changeset/20103 | |||
lambdabot | Title: Changeset 20103 - Pugs - Trac | ||
pugs_svnbot | r20104 | putter++ | [elf_on_rakudo] Get imported kp6_ast infrastructure working. | 17:40 | |
diff: dev.pugscode.org/changeset/20104 | |||
lambdabot | Title: Changeset 20104 - Pugs - Trac | ||
mncharity | re common ast, I suspect we may end up with more than one, just like many compilers have multiple intermediate representations, because different organizations lend themselves to different kinds of use. | 17:41 | |
but it would be nice to avoid entropy by historical artifact. :) | |||
17:55
barney joined
18:20
peepsalot joined,
TJCRI joined
18:28
FurnaceBoy joined
18:33
rindolf joined
18:37
Psyche^ joined
18:45
IllvilJa joined
|
|||
b2gills | I wonder if anyone has information about cross compiling a WIN32 parrot on a linux distribution, I already have the MingW GCC. | 18:58 | |
barney | I don't. You might want to ask in #parrot on MagNet. | 19:09 | |
spinclad | on irc.perl.org | 19:12 | |
(is that MagNet?) | 19:13 | ||
19:15
buchetc joined
|
|||
rindolf | spinclad: yes, it's MAGNet | 19:25 | |
pugs_svnbot | r20105 | putter++ | misc/winter_jig/elf_on_rakudo: first light - ./elf_zero_generate.pl -e '3' makes it through the pipe to p5. | 19:41 | |
diff: dev.pugscode.org/changeset/20105 | |||
lambdabot | Title: Changeset 20105 - Pugs - Trac | ||
pugs_svnbot | r20106 | putter++ | [elf_on_rakudo]: -e 'say(3)' works. | 19:50 | |
diff: dev.pugscode.org/changeset/20106 | |||
lambdabot | Title: Changeset 20106 - Pugs - Trac | ||
19:50
b2gills left
|
|||
mncharity | So that's the drill. Try new code with ./elf_zero_generate.pl -e. Add any missing parse tags to rakudo_ast.data, and a corresponding IR node constructor to ir_nodes in elf_zero_generate.pl. If the ir node has a missing or inadequate p5 emitter, correct that in emit_p5(). Done. Repeat. | 19:53 | |
spinclad | putter++ | 19:56 | |
mncharity | I'll sketch in elf_one_generate.pl, to create p6 rather than ruby. As soon as that generated p6 can be processed into p5 by elf_zero, elf_zero can be frozen, and work shift to elf_one. | ||
19:57
buchetc joined
20:08
Lorn joined
|
|||
mncharity | TimToady: re health issues, sadness. :( | 20:14 | |
20:16
meppel-san joined
20:22
lisppaste3 joined
20:23
peeps[work] joined
|
|||
aindilis | Is there any work ongoing to make a ginormous standard library like might come with Java for Perl6? | 20:29 | |
20:34
buchetc left
20:35
thesh0ck joined
20:36
buchetc joined
20:40
TJCRI joined
|
|||
spinclad | aindilis: that should be covered by modules found in CP6AN, a smallish subset only of which will be core. (my guess) | 20:43 | |
pugs_svnbot | r20107 | putter++ | misc/winter_jig/elf_on_rakudo/: a first sketch of elf_one, intended to eventually become a p6 bootstrapped backend (ie, p6 code which, with the assistance of an external (rakudo) parser, can compile itself (to p5)). | ||
diff: dev.pugscode.org/changeset/20107 | |||
20:44
marmic joined,
pmurias joined
|
|||
mncharity | aindilis: re standard library, what spinclad said: smallish core + CPAN. re any work ongoing, not so much. there is some old work in svn.pugscode.org/pugs/ext/ . but we've been stuck for a couple of years without an implementation which can handle not-small projects, so people are waiting. hopefully we will be unstuck rsn. | 20:48 | |
aindilis | well I am interested in knowledge based systems, linguistics, etc. I would like to see a very vivid and powerful set of commands, and I'd be interested in doing some data collection and design to see what types of code to implement, like iterators and all those things. | 20:49 | |
the other day I saw a java function called firstElement or something, and while that's kind of lame in and of itself, the notion of having such a detailed language is nice | 20:50 | ||
20:51
gbacon joined
|
|||
mncharity | p6 is designed to be extremely extensible. as in extend or replace the entire parser on a lexically scoped basis. so eventually even ...p6... { use Java; ...java... } ...p6... or what ever other DSL one wants to use. so a core/non-core issue is less important than usual. as for "the language defined by an objects methods", I'm a bit fuzzy on the plans (which are perhaps | 20:53 | |
themselves a bit fuzzy). | |||
repeat: as for "the language defined by an objects methods", I'm a bit fuzzy on the plans (which are perhaps themselves a bit fuzzy). | 20:54 | ||
aindilis | I see | ||
mncharity | some form of MOP, so you can override object dispatch within a lexical scope, seems likely. at which point you can separate the "language *I* want to use when talking to objects of type Foo" from the "language the author of Foo indended". | 20:55 | |
aindilis | are there books on this? | 20:56 | |
or sources, so I don't voice my ignorance more | |||
mncharity | not so much. | ||
re books, re sources... hmm, also not so much. there are some language docs at | |||
feather.perl6.nl/syn/ | 20:57 | ||
lambdabot | Title: Official Perl 6 Documentation | ||
aindilis | I suppose I will start whatever this idea I have as a project and attempt to build its vocabulary and then show people when I have some real data. | 20:58 | |
mncharity | but since "Perl 6" is a language specification, rather than an implementation, a lot of "we'll may/probably do foo, but we're not quite sure what it will look like", doesn't end up there. | ||
aindilis | ah | ||
mncharity | re 'start with vocabulary/langauge, and then worry about implementation after', sounds like a plausible plan. the p6 intent is to permit people to run the languages they want to be using, rather forcing them to shape their languages into a particular style. though with caveats that | 21:00 | |
Erlang style feather-weight massive parallelism, and prolog style massive backtracking, are not likely to be near-term objectives. we're more in a "more flexible p5, ruby, smalltalk, python" space. and... while we have hopes for a usable p6 rsn, this is a volunteer project with just a few volunteers, so... | 21:03 | ||
so... it's not clear when, calendar wise, we will finally get something you can actually use. it's been a nasty bootstrap problem. | |||
aindilis | well maybe that's good as it leaves the ability to adapt to developments in PL | 21:05 | |
my personal interest is in semantic web type stuff, I will we could bring some of that to it | 21:06 | ||
s/will/wish/ | |||
maybe just a module tho | |||
mncharity | re developments in PL, well, it's been more developments in PL are starting to catch up with what we've been planning for years now. :/ | ||
aindilis | hehe | 21:07 | |
well I'm no PL guru but I can execute grunt tasks | |||
right now I'm autopackaging software from sf/fm to debian | |||
mncharity | the author of the haskell implementation of p6, pugs, was to be the invited keynote(?) at POPL a year or two back. | 21:08 | |
on p6 | |||
aindilis | nice | ||
Audrey? | 21:09 | ||
spinclad | working out specs on vocabulary will be part of designing good modules. | ||
so that would be welcome. | |||
mncharity | re semantic web, I was slightly tempted to try FLORA-2 as a compiler infrastructure, but my experience has been they really don't test their code enough, and it just wasn't critical path. but a prolog backend is down there on my todo list somewhere. | 21:10 | |
aindilis | okay, well I'll use p5 to organize everything and approach it from a Ontological/Linguistics end | ||
mncharity | re audrey, eys | ||
*yes | |||
aindilis | I'll make good use of existing AI knowledge sets for deriving properties that apply to specific objects | 21:11 | |
and classes, etc. | |||
mncharity | re 'use p5 to organize everything', well, p5 or ruby. mine is perhaps a minority opinion (not sure), but I find it much easier to prototype p6 code in ruby rather than in p5. | ||
aindilis | I don't use anything but p5 | 21:12 | |
mncharity | np | ||
spinclad | use more Moose; | ||
aindilis | don't know anything | ||
me | |||
I mean | |||
I don | |||
't know anything other than p5 | |||
mncharity | ooo, Moose, good idea. | ||
spinclad | (Moose adds a p6ish MOP to p5) | 21:13 | |
mncharity | search.cpan.org/~stevan/Moose-0.38/lib/Moose.pm | ||
lambdabot | Title: Moose - A postmodern object system for Perl 5 - search.cpan.org | ||
aindilis | (I'm a little afraid to program in anything else because I think it will antagonize my understanding of P5.) | ||
21:13
cmarcelo joined
|
|||
aindilis | I've been meaning to learn Moose | 21:13 | |
I'm not exactly at the forefront | |||
I once got a copy of one of Damien's books on OO Perl. That's as far as I've gotten | 21:14 | ||
21:14
NyxVladi joined
|
|||
aindilis | I'm kind of poor. btw, do you know where I can get legal DRM free ebooks for $? | 21:14 | |
mncharity | I should get back to hacking. My window for the day is closing. It's been interesting chatting with you. | ||
:) | |||
aindilis | thanks, my name is Andrew, ttyl! | ||
21:15
mugwump left
|
|||
spinclad | good talking, andrew, and welcome | 21:15 | |
21:15
NyxVladi left
21:20
chris2 joined
21:34
meppel-san joined
|
|||
pugs_svnbot | r20108 | buchetc++ | [t/spec] some thread methods | 21:40 | |
diff: dev.pugscode.org/changeset/20108 | |||
lambdabot | Title: Changeset 20108 - Pugs - Trac | ||
pmurias | aindilis: re antagonizing i think it's highly unlikly | 21:43 | |
22:01
jferrero joined
|
|||
pugs_svnbot | r20109 | putter++ | [elf_on_rakudo]: elf_zero_generate.pl -e 'class A { method m(){4} }' generates p5. Messiness is increasing, and will need to be pruned back. | 22:04 | |
diff: dev.pugscode.org/changeset/20109 | |||
lambdabot | Title: Changeset 20109 - Pugs - Trac | ||
mncharity | Re the "add features to elf_zero" drill, i may have overstated it's accessibility. The last set was not straightforward. | 22:07 | |
but... getting there. back at it tomorrow. and folks are welcome to poke at it. I can always tweak the changes. | 22:09 | ||
anyone know what the current Moose performance hit is, roughly? it might simplify emitting has() and such. | 22:12 | ||
will backlog. cheers & | |||
actually, doesn't matter what it is, within reason. simple == good. can tune later. | 22:13 | ||
22:29
ebassi joined
|
|||
spx2 | I have a problem | 22:42 | |
22:47
spx2 joined
22:48
Limbic_Region joined
22:51
eternaleye joined
23:34
eternaleye joined
|
|||
FurnaceBoy | spx2: the first step is to admit it. well done. | 23:42 | |
23:48
wknight8111 joined
|