pugscode.org/ | nopaste: sial.org/pbot/perl6 | pugs: [~] <m oo se> (or rakudo:, kp6:, elf: etc.) (or perl6: for all) | irclog: irc.pugscode.org/
Set by Tene on 29 July 2008.
ruoso sleep & 01:29
pugs_svn r21918 | Auzon++ | [gsoc_spectest] new test for closure parameters. (added 9 tests) 01:53
Auzon TimToady: STD.pm's tryfile doesn't like the file I just added, and the syntax I used agrees with S06 from what I can tell 01:55
pugs_svn r21919 | pmurias++ | [mold] mold {...} is supported 09:47
pmurias @tell ruoso what license are we using for m0ld? i have to choose from ["GPL2","GPL3","LGPL2","LGPL3","BSD3","BSD4","PublicDomain","AllRightsReserved"] for hackage 11:00
lambdabot Consider it noted.
pugs_svn r21920 | pmurias++ | [smop] cabalised m0ld, anyone should point out erros in the cabalization *before* i upload to hackage 11:17
pmurias masak: re perl5 interoperability if perl5 is not made stackless, smop still will be able to interoperate with it but a call to the perl5 interpreter will create a barrier for continuations 13:40
masak pmurias: what does that mean in practice?
pmurias masak: you won't be able to invoke a continuation from within the perl5 code, unless you are prepared to leak memory 13:43
masak ah, so you won't be able to (1) create a continuation in the p6 world, (2) pass it to the p5 world, and then (3) invoke it there. did I understand you correctly? 13:44
pmurias yes 13:45
masak that's not a problem at this point, since the CPAN modules we're interested in don't depend on that :)
besides, continuations are deliberately unspecced in Perl 6, so right now there's not even a way to create/pass them
unless, of course, an implementation has'em anyway :) 13:46
pmurias masak: where does the source to your wiki live? 13:52
masak pmurias: github.com/viklund/november/
lambdabot Title: viklund's november at master — GitHub
s1n pmichaud: check your pm 15:28
pmurias rindolf: you are familiar with CMake? 18:17
rindolf pmurias: to some extent. 18:26
pmurias i think i'll switch smop to it 18:27
rindolf pmurias: ah. 18:29
pmurias it'll add yet another non-standard dependency, but i don't know how to get autotools to work properly 18:31
pmurias rindolf: do you know how can i add custom rules to cmake? 19:12
rindolf pmurias: let me see. 19:13
rindolf pmurias: see svn.berlios.de/svnroot/repos/fc-sol...mmon.cmake 19:15
lambdabot tinyurl.com/5sw2mt
pmurias rindolf: thanks 19:18
shower&
rindolf pmurias: ah.
pmurias rindolf: have you consider compiling ruby 1.9 from source if you have all the STD.pm dependencies and ghc it should be the last and not very hard step 19:30
rindolf pmurias: no, I didn't yet. 19:30
pmurias * considered 19:32
rindolf pmurias: maybe I will. 19:39
pmurias: don't know. 19:40
pmurias renormalist: hi 19:44
renormalist pmurias: hi 19:58
It seems I'm a bit slow. :-)
rindolf Hi renormalist
pmurias renormalist: it's a good thing if you're doing something productive instead of staring at irc ;) 19:59
renormalist Actually I just put my child to bed. :-) 20:02
rindolf renormalist: how old is he/she?
renormalist 3 :-)
rindolf renormalist: ah.
renormalist: boy or girl?
renormalist A little Lisa. 20:03
Girl
rindolf renormalist: ah.
renormalist Mini monger :-) 20:03
rindolf renormalist: yes.
pugs_svn r21921 | gaal++ | * M0ld.hs: trivial golfing 20:05
pugs_svn r21922 | lwall++ | [STD] fix Auzon++'s sig bug 20:16
pmurias gaal: all tests still pass after your commit 20:29
:)
pugs_svn r21923 | audreyt++ | * Net::IRC - Chase spec change to use \c[13,10] instead of \d[13,10]. 20:35
r21924 | audreyt++ | * Makefile.PL When building third-party/, clean dist/ before building
r21924 | audreyt++ | packages to avoid package version mismatch errors.
pugs_svn r21925 | audreyt++ | * Net::IRC and Net::IRC::OO - Add support for server passwords 20:45
r21925 | audreyt++ | in the form of the "password" attribute.
Patterner Net::IRC..? 20:50
pugs_svn r21926 | lwall++ | [gimme5] tweak a couple overzealoous optimizations 20:51
pugs_svn r21927 | pmurias++ | [smop] start of a port of the build system to cmake, does *not* work yet 21:06
rhr is sub foo(-->) valid syntax, or do you have to use Void? 21:08
TimToady --> requires a following type 21:09
rhr OK, thanks
pugs_svn r21928 | rhr++ | syntax fixes from STD++ 22:20