»ö« Welcome to Perl 6! | perl6.org/ | evalbot usage: 'perl6: say 3;' or rakudo:, niecza:, std:, or /msg p6eval perl6: ... | irclog: irc.perl6.org/ | UTF-8 is our friend! | Rakudo Star Released! Set by diakopter on 6 September 2010. |
|||
00:08
risou joined
00:11
whiteknight joined,
rgrau_ left
00:16
kst` is now known as kst
00:32
QinGW joined
00:41
ggoebel left
00:51
ggoebel joined
01:00
Khisanth left
01:02
risou left
01:04
molaf_ joined
01:06
xivix left
01:08
molaf left,
xivix joined
01:10
redicaps joined
|
|||
colomon | \o | 01:11 | |
01:24
Khisanth joined
01:27
xivix left
01:31
meppl joined
01:40
redicaps left
01:43
ggoebel left
01:46
ggoebel joined
01:47
silug left
01:50
leprevost joined
01:55
thowe joined
01:56
ruoso left
02:02
meppl left
02:18
Khisanth left
02:25
meppl joined
02:44
whiteknight left
03:20
Khisanth joined
03:27
meppel joined,
meppel left
03:30
meppl left
03:33
agentzh joined
03:40
meppl joined
03:47
Khisanth left
03:51
leprevost left
03:59
satyavvd joined,
molaf_ left
04:23
pythonian4000 is now known as pythonian4000afk
04:46
[particle]1 joined
04:48
[particle] left
04:51
kaare joined
04:52
kaare is now known as Guest14588
05:03
sftp_ left
05:05
skids left
05:06
mfollett joined
05:12
[particle]1 left
05:13
[particle] joined
05:15
xinming joined
05:17
xinming_ left
05:24
envi joined
05:30
steez joined
05:37
Guest14588 is now known as kaare_
05:41
justatheory left
05:42
ggoebel left
05:49
xinming_ joined
05:50
xinming left
05:54
ironcame1 is now known as ironcamel
05:55
rvrgs joined
06:01
nymacro joined
06:07
zby_home_ joined
06:09
uniejo joined
06:16
rvrgs left,
rvrgs joined
06:17
rvrgs left,
rvrgs joined,
thowe left
06:19
mfollett left,
takadonet left
06:28
takadonet joined
06:35
masonkramer left
06:36
masonkramer joined
06:41
rvrgs left
06:45
araujo left
06:51
qwebirc33294 joined
06:54
mavrc joined
07:02
bbkr left
07:07
baest joined
|
|||
mathw | jnthn: Good blog post. Sounds like the multi-dispatch spec needs some more work. | 07:21 | |
07:21
mavrc left
07:24
Mowah joined
07:34
bbkr joined
|
|||
jnthn | mathw: Yes, I'd certainly appreciate some answers to some of the issues I wrote about. | 07:36 | |
07:37
mavrc joined
07:46
baux joined
|
|||
sorear | interesting | 07:47 | |
firefox is rendering the open quotes in jnthn's blog as em quads | 07:48 | ||
but they copy to the clipboard as U+201C LEFT DOUBLE QUOTATION MARK | |||
mathw | Firefox bug, or font bug... | 07:49 | |
07:49
am0c joined
|
|||
sorear | fwiw, multiple dispatch of this sort is very confusing to me too | 07:49 | |
which is why I modified v6/STD.pm6 to not use it | |||
mathw | I don't find it so confusing, or at least I didn't | 07:50 | |
I wasn't actually aware there was a spec change around it so that confused me | |||
sorear | in other "spec change without asking" news, I find the new spec for Nil much less strangely consistent than the old one | 07:51 | |
07:51
baux left
07:52
baux joined
07:53
mavrc left
07:54
Khisanth joined
07:55
mavrc joined,
baux left
|
|||
mathw | Hmm we still have Nil? | 07:55 | |
Oh it was undef we got rid of | |||
08:02
baux joined
08:13
rvrgs joined,
rvrgs left
08:21
shabble left
08:30
qwebirc33294 left,
molecules left
08:50
Trashlord joined
08:54
masak joined
|
|||
masak | good morning, #perl6! | 08:54 | |
08:55
szabgab left
|
|||
masak | sorear: re Nil: I hear ya. however, I think that the most recent Nil changes were an improvement. | 08:58 | |
and I don't think that the one suggestion you have made so far -- to make Nil undefined -- would fly. | |||
09:00
xabbu42 joined
|
|||
sorear | masak: no | 09:02 | |
masak: Nil being undefined is one of the parts of the CURRENT SPEC that I am complaining about | |||
09:04
daxim joined
|
|||
masak | oh, sorry. I meant '[...] suggestion to make () undefined' | 09:05 | |
flussence | Are type objects without a value considered undefined? | 09:09 | |
masak | type objects are undefined, period. at least to a first approximation. | 09:12 | |
flussence | I can sorta see Nil-as-undef making sense there, as being a type object that can never have a value. | 09:13 | |
(assuming it works that way) | 09:14 | ||
sorear | Nil isn't a type object | ||
it's a super magic parcel that has a CANDO and is not defined, but is a perfectly valid zero-item parcel | |||
unlike Parcel, whcih is not defined and NOT a valid zero item parcel | |||
also, () and {}.() used to both return Nil because they were exactly the same | 09:15 | ||
now, the strange consistency of ( ... ) being a normal statement list is broken! | |||
flussence | this all sounds a lot more complicated than it needs to be | 09:16 | |
sorear | That's what I said. | ||
09:18
Schwern left
|
|||
masak | here's one thing that we would like to be true: when we use .+ and .* and .?, the results come back in a Parcel. when the Parcel is empty, it's also undefined. that way, we can use infix:<//> to supply another value on failure. | 09:19 | |
09:24
cognominal left
|
|||
masak | here's another thing that we would like to be true: when we do a map or a grep of a for loop, the results come back in a Parcel. when the Parcel is empty, (etc) | 09:25 | |
sorear | what bothers me *most* is the part where assigning Nil to a variable causes it to assume its declared default value or to become empty and undefined | ||
while assigning () causes it to remain defined | |||
so LISTSTORE needs to differentiate between Nil and (), also every % and @ variable needs extra slots to store .defined and default value | 09:26 | ||
this drives me up the wall as an optimization studier | |||
sorear out | 09:27 | ||
masak | I agree that this whole area is full of corner cases. the waterbed is bulging more than usual. | 09:28 | |
Tene | jnthn: very good blog post. I have some vague ideas about answers, but I need more thought. | 09:29 | |
09:31
QinGW left
09:32
QinGW joined
|
|||
masak | jnthn: "A candidate list is a list of things that we can work out way through calling." -- I don't understand this sentence. 6guts.wordpress.com/2010/10/17/wres...-dispatch/ | 09:34 | |
jnthn | typo | ||
s/out/our/ | |||
masak | ah. | 09:35 | |
I read it as "work out way instain mother" :) | |||
jnthn | You need to frigth back against the lolinstinct now and then. :P | 09:38 | |
masak | I am truely sorry. :P | 09:40 | |
frettled | masak: look, a kitten! | 09:41 | |
masak | and it's being chased by big angry brown things! | 09:42 | |
mathw | DO NOT WANT | ||
frettled | Domoku? | 09:44 | |
not to be confused with pedobear | |||
n | |||
masak | "domokun" sounds familiar, yes. | 09:45 | |
frettled | upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/1...kitten.jpg | 09:46 | |
Actually, it's just "Domo", but with the diminutive -kun added. | 09:47 | ||
masak knew he could count on frettled++ to sort out the details | 09:48 | ||
frettled | \§/ | 09:49 | |
09:57
QinGW left
09:58
QinGW joined
10:10
ggoebel joined
10:12
QinGW left
|
|||
dalek | albot: 66aacfe | moritz++ | / (10 files): move build scripts to a separate directory |
10:26 | |
10:27
ggoebel left
|
|||
Infinoid | diakopter: ping | 10:29 | |
dalek | albot: 671fe6e | moritz++ | build-scripts/rebuild- (3 files): [build-scripts] be more robust about startup directory |
10:37 | |
albot: dd14296 | moritz++ | build.pl: add generic build script |
|||
albot: 801ef54 | moritz++ | build (2 files): [build.pl] thinko |
|||
albot: 928e895 | moritz++ | build.pl: mode changes |
|||
albot: 85abe2a | moritz++ | build.pl: [build] fix paths |
|||
albot: bdbef9e | moritz++ | build-scripts/rebuild-rakudo.pl: missing shebang line |
|||
albot: edbd64a | moritz++ | build-scripts/rebuild-rakudo.pl: don't die in absence of revision file |
10:42 | ||
szbalint | moritz_: good morning, I take it? :) | 10:44 | |
moritz_ | good localtime() szbalint :-) | ||
vacations here | |||
masak | \o/ | 10:45 | |
moritz_ | \o/ indeed | 10:47 | |
masak | jnthn: "These are the good consequences, and I don’t disagree with they are improvements." s/with/that/ | 10:51 | |
jnthn: post is very good so far. | |||
jnthn | :P | ||
Apart from the typos...and grammaros... | |||
It'd be so much easier if I could blog without having to use words. | 10:52 | ||
Oh, wait... | |||
masak | an entire blog post consisting only of smilies and lolcats. | ||
jnthn | It's call icanhascheezburger.com :P | ||
...called! | 10:53 | ||
masak | :) | ||
dalek | albot: eacb7e6 | moritz++ | run.sh: add run script |
||
jnthn | I had this hope that writing the post would make the problem a bunch more clear to me. | 10:54 | |
moritz_ | did it? | ||
jnthn | I don't feel like it helped find a solution, but having to articulate the issues helped me understand them a bit better. | 10:55 | |
masak | I feel the same reading it. | ||
jnthn++ | |||
jnthn | I figured it was better to spend the time writing a coherentish post on them than trying to discuss it from scratch on IRC though. | ||
moritz_ found it quite impressive | |||
jnthn | The issues are, I fear, quite deep. | ||
10:55
whiteknight joined
|
|||
jnthn | Either that or I'm missing something obvious. | 10:56 | |
10:56
timbunce joined
|
|||
masak | I'm now convinced that things need to change, one way or another. also modulo me missing something obvious. | 10:56 | |
jnthn | I'd kinda prefer it to be that I'm missing something, but I fear that we actually do just have some design issues to work through. | 10:57 | |
masak | it'll be really nice to get to those, though. | ||
jnthn | Yes, and I think we really need to. | ||
masak | lunch & | 10:58 | |
jnthn | I also wonder how far the exception dispatcher thing goes. | ||
10:58
steez left
|
|||
jnthn | Can you nextsame to the next exception handler for example. | 10:58 | |
Not in current spec, but maybe there's an interesting unification to consider here. | 10:59 | ||
11:11
steez joined
11:15
ggoebel joined
|
|||
moritz_ | moritz.faui2k3.org/tmp/visitors.svg # non-search engine referral breakdown for perlgeek.de | 11:16 | |
generated with Perl 6, of course | |||
colomon | of course | ||
11:16
ggoebel left
|
|||
moritz_ | :-) | 11:16 | |
11:18
Mowah left
11:23
p6eval left,
p6eval joined,
ChanServ sets mode: +v p6eval
|
|||
moritz_ | perl6: say 'now on new host, diakopter++' | 11:24 | |
p6eval | pugs, rakudo d35769: OUTPUT«now on new host, diakopter++» | ||
dalek | albot: 2710cd8 | moritz++ | lib/EvalbotExecuter.pm: fix a path |
||
colomon | jnthn: What's the status of R* MSI on Windows? | 11:26 | |
(it looks like I've got R* from July on my Windows box, wondering if there is a more recent release available.) | 11:28 | ||
moritz_ | ftp://x3n.info/pub/apps/win32/x86/rakudo-star/ | 11:29 | |
colomon | moritz_++ | 11:30 | |
sweet! | 11:32 | ||
jnthn | Aye, somebody++ != me did a more up to date one. | 11:34 | |
colomon | I'm slowly getting ready to swap a new harddrive into my MBP, and making sure I can do my current $work project on my Windows box is an important paranoid step. :) | ||
hmmm, guess I need ufo, too. :) | 11:36 | ||
errr, does ufo work on Windows yet? | |||
moritz_ would be surprised | 11:41 | ||
11:42
Mowah joined
11:43
ggoebel joined
|
|||
colomon | well, it generated a very nice makefile | 11:43 | |
which doesn't work | |||
11:44
icwiener joined
|
|||
jnthn | If it's anything like the ones pls makes, it'll be a pile of fail on Windows. | 11:45 | |
11:45
ggoebel left
|
|||
colomon | suppose I can probably get things working on my Linux box.... :\ | 11:46 | |
colomon rebuilding Rakudo there... | 11:53 | ||
11:53
satyavvd left
11:59
Italian_Plumber joined
|
|||
colomon | oh, neutro++ | 12:03 | |
masak | tadzik++ | ||
12:05
Kodi joined
|
|||
Kodi | rakudo: sub f (:$a) { say "hai" }; f "a" => 1; # Known? | 12:06 | |
p6eval | rakudo d35769: OUTPUT«Too many positional parameters passed; got 1 but expected 0 in 'f' at line 1:/tmp/L0Ace0iz4a in main program body at line 22:/tmp/L0Ace0iz4a» | ||
colomon | rakudo: sub f (:$a) { say "hai" }; f("a" => 1); # Known? | 12:07 | |
p6eval | rakudo d35769: OUTPUT«Too many positional parameters passed; got 1 but expected 0 in 'f' at line 1:/tmp/EdMrIcaFcT in main program body at line 22:/tmp/EdMrIcaFcT» | ||
Kodi | rakudo: sub f (*%h) { say "hai" }; f now => 1; # Trickier. | ||
p6eval | rakudo d35769: OUTPUT«Too many positional parameters passed; got 1 but expected 0 in 'f' at line 1:/tmp/xSZ3HiYL6B in main program body at line 22:/tmp/xSZ3HiYL6B» | ||
jnthn | colomon: Correct | 12:08 | |
colomon: I'ts only a named arg if the LHS is unquoted iirc. | |||
colomon | ! | ||
Kodi | rakudo: sub f (:$a) { say "hai" }; f(|("a" => 1)); | 12:09 | |
p6eval | rakudo d35769: OUTPUT«Too many positional parameters passed; got 1 but expected 0 in 'f' at line 1:/tmp/VOEZjn4aET in main program body at line 22:/tmp/VOEZjn4aET» | ||
Kodi | Should that work? | ||
colomon | rakudo: sub f (:$a) { say "hai" }; f(a => 1); # Known? | ||
jnthn | rakudo: sub f (:$a) { say "hai" }; f(|{"a" => 1}); | ||
p6eval | rakudo d35769: OUTPUT«hai» | ||
jnthn | Needs to be a hash I guess | ||
moritz_ | aye | ||
jnthn | Maybe pair after | could be made to work | ||
moritz_ | a list will interpolate as positional pairs | ||
12:10
nymacro left
12:11
Woody4286 is now known as Woody2143
12:18
lamstyle left
12:19
nymacro joined
12:20
lamstyle joined,
MayDaniel joined
12:27
Grimnir_ left,
[particle]1 joined
12:28
[particle] left
12:29
cognominal joined,
ggoebel joined
12:37
MayDaniel left
12:39
Italian_Plumber left
|
|||
masak | jnthn: if you got to decide, how would the multi/proto model look? as it did before the last big spec change? | 12:42 | |
12:42
shabble joined,
shabble left,
shabble joined
12:45
Italian_Plumber joined
|
|||
jnthn | masak: As mentioned, there were genuine problems with that model too. | 12:48 | |
So I'm not sure going back to it is really progress. | 12:49 | ||
The real user-visible problem with the current design is the need to write a proto. | 12:51 | ||
The more minor one is we need to sort out or dispatcher vs code object story. | |||
The other issues are much more about implementability. | |||
masak | I think I could stand writing a proto in a lexical scope, but I'd hate it in a class. | 12:52 | |
implementability is important for the user too. at least for the power user, who relies on a sound mental model of what's happening under the hood. | |||
jnthn | Yes, true. | 12:53 | |
12:53
am0c left,
bluescreen joined
|
|||
jnthn | As somebody who has given a lot of Perl 6 talks, I do get nervous when I feel we're heading for an implementation that's too comlex to explain. | 12:53 | |
masak | TheDamian once said about multi dispatch that it needs to be really really simple. much thanks to that sentiment, we ended up with the current rules for tightness. | 12:54 | |
(for a while we had manhattan distances and stuff) | |||
jnthn | Well, this is actually sort of orthogonla. | ||
The problem isn't about the candidate sorting here. | 12:55 | ||
But yes, simple++. | |||
masak | I know it's a completely different problem. | 13:00 | |
but I'm taking candidate sorting as an example because I consider that to be an area where we Got It Right(tm). | |||
jnthn | *nod* | ||
masak | right now it seems to be that we're in a bad situation: (1) old model was bad in some ways, (2) new model better in some ways, worse in some, and appears unimplementable, (3) no sane model in sight. | 13:01 | |
jnthn | I'm still trying to understand where the problem really is, tbh. | 13:02 | |
I think part of it is that we've tried too hard to conflate dispatchers and code objects. | |||
13:04
kaare_ left
|
|||
moritz_ eats a slize of self-made hazelnut cake with a topping of white chocolate and nougat | 13:04 | ||
jnthn | Sharing the description without sharing the cake is cruel. :P | 13:05 | |
That sounds SO nice! | |||
moritz_ | and it is.. just visit me if you want a slice :-) | 13:06 | |
just a random thought... would it help to make the dispatcher-curried-with-candidate-list more explicit? | 13:07 | ||
currently the spec tries to hide it under the hood, which might not work out too well | 13:08 | ||
jnthn | moritz_: That's somewhat what I'm thinking may help. | 13:10 | |
moritz_: It still doesn't answer everything though. | |||
Particularly the "how do we associate the {*} in the proto with the correct candidate list" | |||
13:10
rgrau_ joined
|
|||
jnthn | Which is the really big headache here. | 13:10 | |
moritz_ | another thought (mostly unrelated): maybe &foo.wrap having an in-place, mutating effect is the real problem? | 13:11 | |
jnthn | Not quite | ||
13:11
Schwern joined
|
|||
jnthn | What is the real problem is that we expect &foo to refer to the proto | 13:11 | |
13:11
tom_tsuruhara joined
|
|||
jnthn | But also to imply something about the candidate list | 13:11 | |
Which differs in different scopes | |||
And you can't just say something like "oh, it's the calling scope" | 13:13 | ||
Because referencing &foo in a given scope needs to capture that scope's idea of the candidate list | |||
Wherever we end up doing the invocation from. | |||
BTW, pondering submitting a Perl 6 talk to www.scandevconf.se/2011/call-for-papers/ | 13:14 | ||
masak: It's in Sweden, dunno if you're interested in submitting to ^ too. | 13:15 | ||
masak | will check it out. thanks. | 13:16 | |
jnthn | (Was thinking for the Emerging Technologies track) | ||
masak | ooh, it's in Göteborg. | 13:18 | |
13:19
Patterner left
|
|||
jnthn | aye | 13:19 | |
De talar funny. ;-) | |||
masak | my favourite Swedish dialect. :) | 13:20 | |
13:25
[particle]1 is now known as [particle]
|
|||
jnthn | Huh? I thought Skanska was everyone's favourite. :P | 13:26 | |
daxim | ♪ vinna kinky roligt ♪ | 13:28 | |
masak | whoa :) | ||
13:30
uniejo left
|
|||
jnthn | ...win kinky really? | 13:30 | |
daxim | the hat is yours, jnthn | 13:31 | |
jnthn | .oO( Sounds like it's a wizard hat...now, where's my coat... ) |
||
masak | jnthn: www.youtube.com/watch?v=MT9ZNJ2YS64 | ||
13:31
Psyche^ joined,
Psyche^ is now known as Patterner
|
|||
slavik1 | jnthn: robe | 13:33 | |
not coat | |||
masak | slavik1: damn I gotta write down your names or something | 13:35 | |
slavik1 | ? | ||
it should be slavik ... but auto auth doesn't work sometimes | |||
masak | thought you'd catch the reference. slightly obscure in-joke, perhaps. | ||
slavik1 | I didn't catch it all :( | 13:36 | |
jnthn | Oh noes, epic lolknowledge fails. | ||
masak | there are three canonical bloodninja dialogues. | ||
the above quote is from the third and shortest one. | |||
13:37
ruoso joined
|
|||
jnthn remembers it now :-) | 13:37 | ||
slavik1 | oh yeah | ||
HA! | |||
slavik1 read it again | |||
masak | :) | 13:38 | |
daxim | I collected internet memes before they went mainstream | ||
my next birthday party will be meme-themed | |||
13:38
Schwern left
|
|||
jnthn | I can already guess what the food is going to be. :-) | 13:39 | |
13:40
_kaare joined
13:41
skids joined
13:43
mavrc left
13:44
mavrc joined
|
|||
dalek | ok: 3e7c09b | moritz++ | src/multi-dispatch.pod: [multi] remove a now obsolete comment |
13:45 | |
13:46
standz left
13:47
agentzh left,
standz joined
13:51
PacoLinux joined,
plainhao joined
13:54
sECuRE left
|
|||
dalek | ok: a0e9bcb | moritz++ | src/multi-dispatch.pod: [multi] re-work introductory section based on feedback from jkeenan++ in github.com/perl6/book/issues/#issue/26 |
13:56 | |
jnthn | moritz_: I did a commit to subs-n-sigs.pod not so long back that may have helped with some of jkeenan++'s issues. | ||
Feel free to see if you think the patch closes any. | |||
13:59
Kodi left
|
|||
BooK | I need to ignore dalek | 14:00 | |
moritz_ | feel free :-) | 14:01 | |
slavik1 | dalek is not to be ignored! | 14:11 | |
masak | BooK: your complaint is essentially that we commit too much around here? :) | 14:17 | |
14:19
MayDaniel joined
14:20
bbkr left,
Schwern joined,
bbkr joined
|
|||
BooK | masak: if I had a complaint, it would be about you guys having a project named after me ;-) | 14:22 | |
14:24
_twitch joined
|
|||
masak | BooK: that was my idea; sorry :/ | 14:24 | |
14:25
pothos joined
14:27
whiteknight left
14:29
_twitch left
|
|||
moritz_ | rakudo: say 'book' eq 'Book' | 14:29 | |
p6eval | rakudo d35769: OUTPUT«Bool::False» | ||
moritz_ doesn't know what BooK means | |||
masak | rakudo: say 'book' eq 'Book' eq 'BooK' | 14:30 | |
p6eval | rakudo d35769: OUTPUT«Bool::False» | ||
14:30
timbunce left
14:36
perlygatekeeper joined
|
|||
moritz_ | rakudo: say (a => 3).key.WHAT | 14:39 | |
p6eval | rakudo d35769: OUTPUT«Str()» | ||
moritz_ | rakudo: say (a => 3).key.PARROT | ||
p6eval | rakudo d35769: OUTPUT«String» | ||
moritz_ | this is not good[tm] | ||
rakudo: say (a => 3).key.trans(['a'] => ['b']) | 14:40 | ||
p6eval | rakudo d35769: OUTPUT«too few positional arguments: 2 passed, 3 (or more) expected in main program body at line 22:/tmp/dyqTwRjc8F» | ||
14:40
silug joined
|
|||
masak | we have that problems in more places than that. | 14:41 | |
moritz_ | that's one that kills the to-json multi in the book :( | ||
masak | :( | ||
14:42
steez left
14:43
_twitch joined
14:47
bitofbuntu joined
14:50
justatheory joined
14:52
bbkr left
14:58
cls_bsd left,
Grimnir_ joined
15:00
timbunce joined
15:07
MayDaniel left
|
|||
colomon | rakudo: class A { method aaa() { say "aaa"; }; }; $b.aaa; | 15:08 | |
p6eval | rakudo d35769: OUTPUT«===SORRY!===too few positional arguments: 2 passed, 3 (or more) expected» | ||
colomon | LTA | ||
masak | colomon: my $b | ||
known bug. | |||
rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=78252 | 15:09 | ||
colomon | I see your response was much the same as mine. ;) | ||
15:10
bitofbuntu left
|
|||
colomon | is anyone working on it? | 15:11 | |
masak | not aware of anyone working on any RT ticket at the moment. | 15:12 | |
15:12
bitofbuntu joined
|
|||
colomon | masak++ for knowing what is up | 15:12 | |
masak | "I'm not aware" is not the same as "knowing what is up" :P | ||
colomon | wish this wasn't a distraction from $work at the moment. | ||
masak | I feel like that most every day. | 15:13 | |
15:16
timbunce_ joined
|
|||
colomon | "knowing what is up" means finding the RT ticket in seconds, BTW. | 15:16 | |
masak | ah :) that's more a special sort of benign brain damage, if you ask me :P | 15:17 | |
szbalint | masak has a neural interface to any issue trackers related to P6, or so it seems... :) | 15:18 | |
15:18
timbunce left,
timbunce_ is now known as timbunce
15:19
mavrc left
|
|||
masak | it's quite convenient. except for the nightmares. *shudder* | 15:19 | |
15:20
mavrc joined
15:22
mblackmer joined
15:23
mblackmer left
15:26
araujo joined
15:27
spq1 joined
|
|||
masak | rakudo: sub f { print "OH HAI" }; &f.wrap: { print "-> "; callsame; print " <-" } for ^3; f | 15:27 | |
p6eval | rakudo d35769: OUTPUT«-> -> -> OH HAI <- <- <-» | ||
masak | \o/ | ||
colomon | wacky | 15:28 | |
(in a good way) | |||
masak | rakudo: sub f { "OH HAI" }; &f.wrap: { "-> {callsame} <-" } for ^3; say f # even shorter | 15:29 | |
p6eval | rakudo d35769: OUTPUT«-> -> -> OH HAI <- <- <-» | ||
slavik1 | callsame is a keyword? | ||
or what is it's meaning? | |||
masak | it's a subroutine. | ||
slavik1 | of what object? | 15:30 | |
colomon | rakudo: sub f { "OH HAI" }; &f.wrap: { "-> {callsame} ||| {callsame} <-" } for ^3; say f | ||
p6eval | rakudo d35769: OUTPUT«-> -> -> OH HAI ||| OH HAI <- ||| -> OH HAI ||| OH HAI <- <- ||| -> -> OH HAI ||| OH HAI <- ||| -> OH HAI ||| OH HAI <- <- <-» | ||
slavik1 | how does it translate to the string "OH HAI" | ||
masak | slavik1: it's a subroutine, hence not of any object. | ||
slavik1 | ahh | ||
right | |||
a special/global subroutine? | |||
masak | slavik1: "callsame" in the context of wrapping means "call the thing being wrapped". | ||
yes, it's global and a bit special. | 15:31 | ||
slavik1 | gotcha | ||
masak | it talks to the dispatcher. | ||
slavik1 | perl6 is not so simple :( | ||
unless I am trying to understand it more than I understand perl5 | |||
masak | you probably are :) | ||
Perl 6 has a simple centre, with paths leading away to more specialized areas, which are consequently more... involved. | 15:32 | ||
15:36
timbunce_ joined
15:38
timbunce left,
timbunce_ is now known as timbunce
|
|||
moritz_ just commented on RT #78252 | 15:39 | ||
colomon | moritz_++ | 15:40 | |
15:43
sftp joined
|
|||
Juerd | Hm, I would have expected something like inner instead of callsame. | 15:43 | |
15:46
timbunce_ joined
|
|||
masak | Juerd: multi dispatch and wrapping are unified in Perl 6, so both use [call|next][with|same]. | 15:46 | |
15:47
timbunce_ left
15:49
timbunce left,
bitofbuntu left,
Schwern left
15:50
Schwern joined
|
|||
Juerd | masak: Ah, that makes it a little clearer: "same" should be read as "same arguments"? | 15:52 | |
masak | it should indeed. | ||
Juerd | I was reading it as "same subroutine" | 15:53 | |
Which to me, would be the wrapper itself, and thus infinite recursion :) | 15:54 | ||
15:54
risou joined
|
|||
masak | reading A12, 'nextsame' used to be spelled 'next METHOD'. | 15:56 | |
16:00
Ross joined,
Ross left,
Ross joined
16:01
rvrgs joined
|
|||
masak | rakudo: sub rot13 { $^input.trans([$_] => [.rotate(13)]) given "A".."Z" }; say "BU UNV".&rot13 | 16:07 | |
p6eval | rakudo d35769: OUTPUT«OH HAI» | ||
16:09
MayDaniel joined
|
|||
jnthn back from $dayjob | 16:21 | ||
masak: (next METHOD) interesting, I guess then it was just for method dispatch, not generalized... | |||
masak | not sure where wrappers fit into that scheme. or if they did. | ||
16:22
cdarroch joined,
cdarroch left,
cdarroch joined,
kcwu left,
isBEKaml joined
|
|||
jnthn | masak: Don't know they did. Certainly I only became aware that they should share a mechanism recently-ish. | 16:23 | |
masak: I think it was at Go Open in Oslo, I'd been asking about this, and the answer was in TimToady's keynote. :-) | |||
masak | :) | ||
swim & | 16:24 | ||
16:24
masak left,
meppl left
16:27
Ross left,
Ross joined,
Ross left,
Ross joined
|
|||
isBEKaml | rakudo: sub foo { "HAI!" }; &f.wrap: { " # -> {nextsame} +++ {nextsame} <-- #" } for ^3; f.say; | 16:32 | |
p6eval | rakudo d35769: OUTPUT«Could not find sub &f in <anon> at line 22:/tmp/ucQ5dWZOLP in main program body at line 1» | ||
isBEKaml | rakudo: sub foo { "HAI!" }; &f.wrap: { " :: -> {nextsame} +++ {nextsame} <- ::" } for ^3; f.say; | 16:33 | |
p6eval | rakudo d35769: OUTPUT«Could not find sub &f in <anon> at line 22:/tmp/_s4jClr2jK in main program body at line 1» | ||
isBEKaml | rakudo: sub foo { "HAI!" }; &foo.wrap: { " :: -> {nextsame} +++ {nextsame} <- ::" } for ^3; foo.say; # OH, right! :/ | ||
p6eval | rakudo d35769: ( no output ) | ||
isBEKaml | taking upon colomon++/masak++'s work - callsame isn't same as nextsame? | 16:34 | |
I thought they were | |||
jnthn | They both pass on the original arguemnt set | 16:35 | |
But callsame returns | |||
And nextsame doesn't | |||
isBEKaml | I guess that's why nextsame is used within wrappers in roles... | ||
rakudo: sub foo { "HAI!" }; &foo.wrap: { " :: -> {callsame} +++ {callsame} <- ::" } for ^3; foo.say; | 16:36 | ||
p6eval | rakudo d35769: OUTPUT« :: -> :: -> :: -> HAI! +++ HAI! <- :: +++ :: -> HAI! +++ HAI! <- :: <- :: +++ :: -> :: -> HAI! +++ HAI! <- :: +++ :: -> HAI! +++ HAI! <- :: <- :: <- ::» | ||
isBEKaml | nice. jnthn, can you tell me what .wrap does here? It takes any block and constructs something out of it? | 16:37 | |
not necessarily a sub, right? | |||
16:38
baux left
|
|||
jnthn | isBEKaml: It replaces the thing that the sub executes when called with what you pass with a dispatcher, which then works through a candidate list made up of the wrappers, in the order they were added, down to the original sub. | 16:39 | |
isBEKaml: callsame is just saying "I want to call the next thing down the list" | |||
isBEKaml | jnthn: ah, ha! So you can go on adding more wrappers and then .wrap would successively peel them away down to the original sub implementation.... /time_to_test_that/ :) | 16:41 | |
rakudo: sub foo { "HAI" }; &foo.wrap { "Hej" } for ^3 ; foo.say; | 16:42 | ||
p6eval | rakudo d35769: OUTPUT«===SORRY!===Confused at line 22, near "&foo.wrap "» | ||
isBEKaml | rakudo: sub foo { "HAI" }; &foo.wrap: { "Hej" } for ^3 ; foo.say; | ||
p6eval | rakudo d35769: OUTPUT«Hej» | ||
isBEKaml | uhh, that's replaced entirely. | 16:43 | |
rakudo: sub foo { "HAI" }; &foo.wrap: { "Hej"; &foo.wrap: { "Ahoj" }; } for ^3 ; foo.say; #nesting, anyone? | |||
p6eval | rakudo d35769: OUTPUT«5» | ||
isBEKaml | heh | ||
jnthn | isBEKaml: Something like that, yes | 16:44 | |
No, it didn't replace it entirely. You just chose not to defer to the next thing in the list. | |||
YOu have to do it explicitly. | |||
isBEKaml | rakudo: sub foo { "HAI" }; &foo.wrap: { "Hej";{ &foo.wrap: { "Ahoj" }; }; } for ^3 ; foo.say; | 16:45 | |
p6eval | rakudo d35769: OUTPUT«5» | ||
isBEKaml | rakudo: sub foo { "HAI" }; &foo.wrap: { "Hej"; callsame; { &foo.wrap: { "Ahoj"; callsame; };}; } for ^3 ; foo.say; | ||
p6eval | rakudo d35769: OUTPUT«7» | ||
isBEKaml | rakudo: sub foo { "HAI" }; &foo.wrap: { "Hej"; callsame; }; &foo.wrap: { "Ahoj"; callsame; }; foo.say; | 16:46 | |
p6eval | rakudo d35769: OUTPUT«HAI» | ||
isBEKaml | jnthn: the numbers don't make sense. :( | 16:47 | |
skids | Should be last statement evaluated, so if you wanted to concat or say you'd have to say so. | 16:48 | |
jnthn | isBEKaml: It's working as expected - what skids said. | ||
isBEKaml | no, I meant the numbers - 5 and 7 above. | ||
colomon | rakudo: sub foo { "HAI" }; say &foo.wrap: { ">" ~ callsame ~ "<" }; say foo | ||
p6eval | rakudo d35769: OUTPUT«2>HAI» | ||
skids | return value of wrap. | ||
jnthn | Oh | ||
Yeah, wrap just returns integer wrap handles at the moment | 16:49 | ||
There's an RT whining about that. | |||
colomon | rakudo: sub foo { "HAI" }; say &foo.wrap: { ">" ~ callsame() ~ "<" }; say foo | ||
p6eval | rakudo d35769: OUTPUT«2>HAI<» | ||
colomon | interesting. | ||
isBEKaml | Oh, I see... | ||
jnthn | Quite what a wrap handle would stringify to though, who knows. :-) | 16:50 | |
isBEKaml | rakudo: sub foo { "HAI" }; say &foo.wrap: { "Hej";{ say &foo.wrap: { "Ahoj" }; }; } for ^3 ; foo.say; | 16:51 | |
p6eval | rakudo d35769: OUTPUT«2345Bool::True» | ||
isBEKaml | interesting.... | ||
16:52
sECuRE joined
|
|||
isBEKaml | rakudo: sub foo { "HAI" }; &foo.wrap: { "Hej{" ~ callsame ~ "}";{ &foo.wrap: { "Ahoj::" ~ callsame ~ "::" }; }; } for ^3 ; foo.say; | 16:53 | |
p6eval | rakudo d35769: OUTPUT«5» | ||
isBEKaml | rakudo: sub foo { "HAI" }; &foo.wrap: { "Hej{" ~ callsame ~ "}";{ &foo.wrap: { "Ahoj::" ~ callsame ~ "::" }; }; }; foo.say; | 16:54 | |
p6eval | rakudo d35769: OUTPUT«3» | ||
isBEKaml | rakudo: sub foo { "HAI" }; sub b { &foo.wrap: { "Hej{" ~ callsame ~ "}"; }; }; &b.wrap: { "Ahoj::" ~ callsame ~ "::" }; b.say; | 16:56 | |
p6eval | rakudo d35769: OUTPUT«Ahoj::2» | ||
jnthn | Guess I should figger out some noms. bbl. | 16:57 | |
isBEKaml | Guess I should just go figgering the wraps of wraps... | 16:58 | |
17:05
rvrgs left
17:06
Schwern left,
mberends joined
17:09
mfollett joined
|
|||
jnthn | o/ mberends | 17:29 | |
17:29
envi left,
Schwern joined
|
|||
mberends | oh hai jnthn! I'm about to commit a slightly less broken 6model/java update | 17:30 | |
jnthn | Ooh! :-) | ||
mberends | the now-fixed problem was that LexPad was a struct, not a class, and Java has no structs :( | 17:31 | |
jnthn | ouchyouchouch | 17:32 | |
It's a struct to save an allocation per context. | |||
mberends | the dotnet Context contained a LexPad that was never created, it just "was". | ||
jnthn | But anyway, make it work first. :-) | ||
Right. | |||
'cus structs need not be. | |||
You may wnat to hand-inline it at some point though. | 17:33 | ||
If that isn't the fix you've already done. | |||
mberends | I just jammed in a "new" at the appropriate spot ;) | 17:35 | |
17:36
mfollett left
|
|||
diakopter | rakudo: 'faster now?'.say | 17:37 | |
p6eval | rakudo d35769: OUTPUT«faster now?» | ||
jnthn | mberends: Well, that's the easy fix. :-) | 17:38 | |
17:39
_twitch left
17:40
Entonian joined
17:42
pyrimidine joined,
_twitch joined
17:50
whiteknight joined
17:54
Mowah left
17:57
kcwu joined
|
|||
PerlJam | Anyone got any good names for this month's Rakudo release? | 17:58 | |
17:58
mfollett joined
|
|||
colomon | woah, is it that time of the month again? | 17:59 | |
PerlJam | yep | ||
diakopter | aunt flo | ||
scnr | |||
PerlJam | There's only one suggestion in the release guide: BristolBath.pm | 18:00 | |
dalek | odel: c025d33 | mberends++ | / (8 files): [java:bugfix] make a Lexpad object to resemble the struct Lexpad in dotnet |
||
PerlJam | oh, I'm suppoed to invite people to update the ROADMAP/ChangeLog/etc. so ... have at it! :) | 18:01 | |
18:02
MayDaniel left
18:03
orafu left
18:04
orafu joined
18:11
daxim left
|
|||
mberends | PerlJam: the Paris osdc.fr conference last weekend was very Perl6-friendly :) | 18:12 | |
er, weekend before last | 18:13 | ||
jnthn | Ooh, yes. That could work as a name. | 18:15 | |
PerlJam | "Paris"? or "osdc.fr"? | 18:16 | |
I guess in keeping with the monger tradition it would have to be "Paris" | 18:17 | ||
jnthn | Aye | ||
PerlJam | so be it. | 18:18 | |
18:32
am0c joined,
ggoebel left
18:35
eternaleye left,
masonkramer left
18:36
eternaleye joined,
masonkramer joined
18:39
MayDaniel joined
18:51
masak joined
|
|||
masak | ahojte! | 18:51 | |
takadonet | masak: hey | 18:52 | |
mberends | ahoy masak! | ||
masak | takadonet, mberends: hejsan :) | ||
18:53
nymacro left
18:57
_twitch left
|
|||
mberends | masak: the first Lego Mindstorms project just reached the walking and talking stage :) | 18:57 | |
masak | clearly there's some potential in wrapping subs and producing fractals, as evidenced by isBEKaml's experiments in the log :) | ||
mberends: wow, cool! | |||
18:59
_twitch joined
|
|||
masak | mberends: so the gift was appreciated by both father and son, I take it? :) | 18:59 | |
18:59
risou left
|
|||
mberends | masak: exactly :) | 18:59 | |
masak | that's the best form of gift, if you ask me. :) | 19:00 | |
19:02
timbunce joined
19:07
mavrc left,
kjeldahl joined
19:10
MayDaniel left
19:11
mavrc joined
19:12
rvrgs joined,
_twitch left
19:13
wamba joined
19:20
Schwern left
19:21
ggoebel joined
19:22
wamba left
19:24
ggoebel left
19:29
plainhao left
|
|||
moritz_ | oh hai | 19:30 | |
"All in all the release team hopes to have these blockers sorted out by | |||
the end of October, which would allow a release before Christmas." | |||
19:30
masak` joined
|
|||
moritz_ | from debian-devel-announce | 19:30 | |
19:30
timbunce left
19:31
masak` left
19:32
masak left
19:40
Entonian left
19:41
ggoebel joined
|
|||
moritz_ | further results for RT #78252: bisecting in rakudo was non-conclusive, ie identified the last revision... so it could be a parrot change :( | 19:58 | |
19:59
Italian_Plumber left
20:02
araujo left
20:05
eternaleye left,
eternaleye joined
20:08
EdwardIII joined
20:10
araujo joined
20:11
bluescreen left
20:15
justatheory left
20:16
mfollett left
20:18
meppl joined,
justatheory joined
20:19
rvrgs left
20:20
ggoebel left
20:26
bluescreen joined,
s_mosher joined
|
|||
s_mosher | hi folks | 20:26 | |
I noticed higher-arity reduce() is unimplemented | 20:28 | ||
after poking around, it seems like the obvious change works | |||
but it was already in, just commented out, plus there was a test guard against $arity>2... which makes me ask: what did I just break? | 20:30 | ||
jnthn | s_mosher: Did you try make spectest to see if there was any fallout there? | 20:31 | |
Other than that, I'm not sure why it's commented out - I guess there's no explanatory comment? | |||
s_mosher | good idea | ||
no, I hadn't | |||
no, aside from the test guard, it just had "$res = $expression.(|@args);" commented out, replaced with "...(@args[0],@args[1])" | 20:32 | ||
my best guess is maybe it has something to do with trailing terms causing unexpected behaviour | 20:33 | ||
I'll wait to see if there's any explosions from spectests | 20:34 | ||
20:35
Entonian joined
20:37
justatheory left
20:39
justatheory joined
|
|||
dalek | kudo: 7c90370 | moritz++ | src/core/Temporal.pm: [Temporal] stylistic cleanup; no functional changes |
20:43 | |
s_mosher | jnthn, not failing any new tests in reduce | 20:47 | |
some are failing because of conflicting expectations in the comparison tests, but they dwim the same | 20:49 | ||
21:01
Schwern joined
21:09
ggoebel joined
21:10
nadim_ joined,
rgrau__ joined
21:11
skids left,
Raynes_ joined,
MOAR-f00li5h joined
21:12
sjn__ joined,
pnu_ joined,
Raynes left,
Raynes_ is now known as Raynes,
Raynes left,
Raynes joined
|
|||
dalek | odel: 30e4673 | jnthn++ | dotnet/runtime/Runtime/Ops.cs: [dotnet] Add a couple of missing coercion ops to the runtime. |
21:13 | |
odel: 1b9b061 | jnthn++ | dotnet/compiler/PAST2DNSTCompiler.pm: Turn down constant optimization a notch, to un-regress a test. |
|||
odel: 579b172 | jnthn++ | dotnet/runtime/Runtime/Ops.cs: [dotnet] euqal_refs op (for giving =:= functionality). |
|||
odel: cf07e79 | jnthn++ | common/NQP/NQPSetting.pm: [common] Some initial cuts of prefix + and ~, Stringy and Numeric in the NQPSetting. |
|||
odel: 98e707b | jnthn++ | common/NQP/NQPSetting.pm: [common] =:= |
|||
jnthn | s_mosher: OK. It'd be interesting to know why the original thing was commented out. But feel free to send a patch in - that'll hopefully get someone to comment. | 21:14 | |
s_mosher | sure, I'm going to investigate a bit more here first | ||
I might add a guard test to ensure that arity agrees with the list length | 21:15 | ||
21:15
Ross left,
spq1 left
|
|||
s_mosher | jnthn, what's the best place to send a patch? | 21:15 | |
21:16
cdarroch left,
rgrau_ left,
takadonet left,
f00li5h left,
LionMadeOfLions left,
BinGOs left,
sjn left,
nadim left,
IllvilJa left,
HarryS left,
pnu left
|
|||
jnthn | s_mosher: [email@hidden.address] | 21:17 | |
s_mosher | kthx | ||
jnthn | (it's for patches as well as bugs :-)) | ||
21:18
pythonian4000afk is now known as pythonian4000
21:19
zostay left
21:21
zostay joined
21:23
pythonian4000 is now known as pythonian4000afk,
pythonian4000afk is now known as pythonian4000
21:24
IllvilJa joined,
LionMadeOfLions joined
21:25
cdarroch joined,
cdarroch left,
cdarroch joined
21:26
takadonet joined
21:28
pythonian4000 is now known as pythonian4000afk
21:29
kjeldahl left
21:30
BinGOs joined
21:31
_kaare left,
zby_home_ left
|
|||
dalek | kudo: 6f065b0 | KodiB++ | src/Perl6/Grammar.pm: [Grammar] Permit "time" or the like on the LHS of a fatarrow. |
21:31 | |
21:32
bluescreen left
|
|||
dalek | ast: 26c1e24 | KodiB++ | S02-literals/pairs.t: Added tests for "time" and the like on the LHS of a fatarrrow. |
21:34 | |
21:36
timbunce joined
21:37
ruoso left
|
|||
dalek | odel: 7e36dac | jnthn++ | common/NQP/NQPSetting.pm: Give NQPList a .new method. |
21:45 | |
odel: 832586c | jnthn++ | dotnet/compiler/PAST2DNSTCompiler.pm: Implement PAST::Op with pasttype list. |
|||
21:47
MOAR-f00li5h is now known as f00li5h
21:49
silug left,
silug joined
|
|||
dalek | odel: ca4842a | jnthn++ | dotnet/compiler/Actions.pm: [dotnet] Fix sub vivitype up a little. my @a won't crash and burn during the compile now (though certainly arrays don't really work yet either). |
21:51 | |
odel: 1e105a5 | jnthn++ | t/nqp/10-cmp.t: We now pass 10-cmp.t. |
|||
22:00
mavrc left
22:01
sjn__ is now known as sjn
|
|||
dalek | odel: 8325634 | jnthn++ | dotnet/compiler/DNST2CSharp.pm: Fix up string escaping - or at least, this should be enough for now. |
22:02 | |
22:05
timbunce left
22:19
ggoebel left
|
|||
dalek | odel: 2de860c | jnthn++ | dotnet/compiler/PAST2DNSTCompiler.pm: [dotnet] Support literals showing up in the PAST tree, as is allowed. |
22:28 | |
odel: c05a516 | jnthn++ | dotnet/compiler/Actions.pm: [dotnet] Override quote_delimited from HLL::Actions in JnthnNQP; it relies on :pirop<concat>, which of course won't fly on .Net. (One for pmichaud++ to ponder how to genericise, I guess. :-)) |
|||
odel: ea3a9cb | jnthn++ | common/NQP/NQPSetting.pm: [common] Lists and arrays numify to number of elements. |
|||
sorear wonders how JnthnNQP's PAST will collide with PIRATE's POST when the two are merged | 22:30 | ||
22:31
slavik1 left
|
|||
jnthn | sorear: I've not got any extra PAST nodes, I just compile various bits of NQP to different PAST in a few places. However, in nqp-rx's nom branch a bunch of those differences are already transfered. | 22:32 | |
(Far from all, mind.) | |||
Anyway, yes, there'll be some effort to unify things, but I expect it can be done in lots of little steps. | |||
22:35
Schwern left
|
|||
jnthn | phenny: tell pmichaud I'm very uncomfortable with ++ and -- ops in NQP. They're very assigny, in an otherwise purely bindy language. The hack way to do them without assignment will corrupt my constants table ('cus, I haz one ;-)). Having them in Parrot's nqp-rx will only prevent us from doing that optimization. Vote to deprecate. | 22:36 | |
phenny | jnthn: I'll pass that on when pmichaud is around. | ||
dalek | odel: cfdd2fc | jnthn++ | dotnet/compiler/Actions.pm: [dotnet] Another de-Parrotification in JnthnNQP. Now interpolation of embedded closures works. |
22:39 | |
odel: 70dfa83 | jnthn++ | t/nqp/38-quotes.t: We now pass 38-quotes.t. |
|||
sorear | you don't want to interpret $x++ as $x := $x + 1 ? | 22:44 | |
jnthn | Well, works for pre-increment, but not post-increment. | 22:45 | |
I guess you could find a way to make it work... | |||
But it feels kinda...odd. | 22:46 | ||
It's a better option than what happens now, though, if we want to keep it. | |||
sorear | I take it NQP currently implements FORTRAN-66 style constants? :) | 22:47 | |
jnthn | NQP on Parrot doesn't have constants. :/ | 22:48 | |
NQP on .Net actually does build a constant table for all the PAST::Val nodes. | |||
Because, well, it's just not that hard to do, so I did it. :-) | |||
22:49
ggoebel joined
|
|||
jnthn | I wouold say I'm not old enough to remember FORTRAN-66, but you're younger than me, so it's no excuse. :P | 22:50 | |
22:52
Schwern joined
22:59
Schwern left
23:03
tom_tsuruhara left
23:06
xinming_ left
23:11
icwiener left
23:13
risou joined
|
|||
dalek | odel: abac6f9 | jnthn++ | t/nqp/53-knowhow.t: We pass 53-knowhow.t for ages, but forgot to add it here. :-) |
23:22 | |
odel: 7054cd8 | jnthn++ | dotnet/runtime/Init.cs: [dotnet] Enable the hack say/print to take many args. |
|||
odel: cbdd49b | jnthn++ | / (2 files): [dotnet] Out with one bad hack, in with a slightly less bad one for undefined scalars. |
|||
odel: eaa51af | jnthn++ | t/nqp/23-named-args.t: We now pass 23-named-args.t. |
|||
odel: 0d31eba | jnthn++ | t/nqp/06-args-pos.t: Also passing 06-args-pos.t already. |
|||
23:22
cdarroch left
|
|||
jnthn | A few more baby steps towards NQP on .Net. :-) It's nice to have the energy to be writing code again. :-) | 23:24 | |
jnthn -> sleep, gotta make $dayjob at something resembling morning tomorrow :-) | 23:27 | ||
23:29
Schwern joined
23:33
rvrgs joined
23:41
stkowski joined
23:50
pythonian4000afk is now known as pythonian4000,
Schwern left
23:55
rvrgs left
23:56
rgrau__ left
23:57
ggoebel left
|