»ö« Welcome to Perl 6! | perl6.org/ | evalbot usage: 'perl6: say 3;' or rakudo:, niecza:, std:, or /msg p6eval perl6: ... | irclog: irc.perl6.org/ | UTF-8 is our friend! | Rakudo Star Released! Set by diakopter on 6 September 2010. |
|||
00:01
ruoso joined
00:11
pythonian4000 is now known as pythonian4000afk
00:25
Schwern joined
00:45
aindilis joined
00:49
QinGW joined
00:50
isBEKaml left
00:58
QinGW left,
QinGW joined
01:07
ruoso left
01:09
stkowski left
01:26
ruoso joined
01:30
risou left
01:39
redicaps joined
01:44
thowe joined
01:45
pythonian4000afk is now known as pythonian4000
01:47
thowe left
01:52
araujo left
01:54
Entonian left
01:55
bluescreen joined
02:12
rvrgs joined
02:15
whiteknight left
02:16
araujo joined
02:19
zostay left
02:20
zostay joined
02:44
redicaps left
02:48
redicaps joined
02:55
redicaps left
03:01
mfollett joined
03:25
meppel joined
03:28
mfollett left
03:30
meppl left
03:32
mfollett joined
03:34
_twitch joined
03:37
agentzh joined
03:43
Trashlord left
03:47
pythonian4000 is now known as pythonian4000afk
04:01
satyavvd joined,
rvrgs left
04:04
nymacro joined
04:13
Bucciarati left
04:14
Bucciarati joined,
Schwern left
|
|||
mfollett | Is the official return type of a subroutine part of what the dispatcher uses to determine which subroutine to dispatch? | 04:33 | |
04:36
dukeleto left,
dukeleto joined
04:40
davidfetter joined
|
|||
davidfetter | hello | 04:40 | |
i'm looking for places where people are using perl6 in production. any pointers? | |||
mfollett | n/m, I found my answer, it doesn't seem to work for arrays for some reason. | 04:46 | |
oh, no, it doesn't seem to be doing it at all. | 04:47 | ||
04:51
kjeldahl joined
|
|||
eternaleye | mfollett: Is it declared multi? as in 'multi sub foo( Int @foo )' | 05:07 | |
Oh wait, misread | |||
It's not possible to be multi on *return* types, see past discussion on want() and wantarray() for reasoning | 05:08 | ||
mfollett | eternaleye: It wasn't, but yeah, as you point out I can't anyway. | ||
05:16
sftp left
05:27
mberends left
05:30
araujo left,
meppel left,
meppl joined
|
|||
davidfetter | anybody? | 05:32 | |
05:33
kjeldahl left,
araujo joined
05:37
betterworld left,
betterworld joined
05:40
mfollett left
05:41
mfollett joined,
Juerd left,
pmichaud left
05:42
zb left,
zb joined
05:47
pmichaud joined
05:49
synth joined
05:51
kaare joined,
kaare is now known as Guest89532
05:52
[synth] joined
05:53
synth left
05:55
araujo left
05:57
Guest89532 is now known as kaare_,
[synth] left
05:58
jhuni joined
05:59
synth joined
06:02
[synth] joined
06:03
synth left
06:07
wamba joined,
[synth] left
06:09
synth joined,
justatheory left
06:12
mfollett left
06:13
rhr left
06:16
zby_home_ joined
06:17
kjeldahl joined
06:25
wtw joined
06:36
masonkramer left,
masonkramer_ joined
06:41
xabbu42 left
06:42
Juerd joined
06:58
rindolf joined
|
|||
rindolf | Hi all. | 06:58 | |
Tene | hi! | 06:59 | |
07:00
nymacro left
|
|||
rindolf | Tene: what's up? | 07:00 | |
07:02
nymacro joined
|
|||
diakopter | davidfetter: as usual it depends on what you mean by "in production" | 07:05 | |
07:06
baux joined,
rindolf left
07:19
envi joined,
zostay left
07:20
zostay joined
07:30
mavrc joined
|
|||
jnthn | morning, #perl6 | 07:36 | |
07:42
_twitch left
07:59
Ghost9998_ joined
|
|||
Ghost9998_ | ok | 07:59 | |
hi guys | |||
perl6 | 08:00 | ||
rakudo | |||
wtf commands dont work | |||
08:01
Ghost9998_ left
08:02
mavrc left
08:03
meway joined,
kensanata joined
|
|||
meway | Hey if anyone is interested in video game development pm me I need some developers sorry for brodcasting this in this channel | 08:04 | |
08:05
Nahem joined,
Nahem left
08:07
timbunce joined,
timbunce left,
timbunce joined
08:10
mavrc joined
08:12
flatwhatson_ joined
08:18
cls_bsd joined
08:23
xabbu42 joined
08:26
ggoebel joined
08:31
ggoebel left
|
|||
moritz_ | good morning | 08:32 | |
08:34
wamba left
08:36
ggoebel joined
|
|||
jnthn | o/ moritz_ | 08:43 | |
moritz_ | \o/ we have a submission to the challenge | 08:44 | |
the wording isn't optimal in places, but the logic seems to be fine | |||
jnthn | Nice! | 08:46 | |
08:53
Trashlord joined
09:01
dakkar joined
09:02
IllvilJa left
09:04
pythonian4000afk is now known as pythonian4000
09:07
REPLeffect left
09:14
masak joined
|
|||
masak | oh hai #perl6! | 09:15 | |
09:17
meway left
|
|||
moritz_ | oh hai masak | 09:17 | |
patch pushed to hypererr branch | |||
I want to do another test run on a different machine | 09:18 | ||
masak | it's so confusing that 'patch' is a nick... | 09:19 | |
moritz_ | man context :-) | 09:20 | |
masak | No manual entry for context | 09:22 | |
:( | |||
moritz_ | there's a debian package with such manual entries | ||
masak | not surprised. | ||
09:23
REPLeffect joined
|
|||
masak | "(1,2,3,{cat => 1, dog => 2}) >>+<< (3,4,5,{cat => [6,7], dog => 8}) \n Structures are of uneven length and not dwimmy at element [3, cat]. Length 1 vs. 2." -- if that patch goes in, I might have a crack at making the path location look more like .[3]<cat> | 09:23 | |
moritz_ | actually I thought about that too | 09:25 | |
just remember that <foo bar> is not the same as .{'foo bar'} | 09:26 | ||
so you need proper escaping | |||
masak: patch is in the hypererr branch - feel free to improve it :-) | 09:27 | ||
masak | aye aye sir. | ||
masak goes to it | |||
hm, didn't think about the escaping issue. tricky. | 09:28 | ||
moritz_ | you can just use .perl output | 09:29 | |
masak | hm. .substr'd on both sides. | 09:34 | |
moritz_ | why? | 09:35 | |
masak | oh, you mean for the .{'foo bar'} case specifically? right, then I can just use the string. | 09:36 | |
but actually, I need to escape in the .<cat> case as well. | |||
moritz_ | .<cat\ dog> ? | 09:37 | |
masak | or .<cat\>dog> | ||
moritz_ would prefer .{ $str.perl } | 09:38 | ||
moritz_ gives it a shot | 09:39 | ||
masak | ++moritz_ | ||
moritz_ would be much more productive if it didn't take 12 or 15 minutes to recompile the setting | 09:44 | ||
masak | compiling the setting is such a bottleneck. | ||
jnthn | It takes...12 or 15 minutes now?! | 09:45 | |
jnthn last had it at 3 or 4... | |||
09:49
mj41_ joined,
kolibrie_ joined,
moritz__ joined,
hillu_ joined,
pjcj_ joined,
masak left,
xabbu42 left,
pjcj left,
moritz_ left,
cosimo left,
mj41 left
09:50
literal left,
larsen left,
hillu left,
kolibrie left,
larsen joined,
mj41_ is now known as mj41,
masak joined,
cosimo joined,
xabbu42 joined
09:51
moritz__ is now known as moritz_
09:54
EdwardIII left
09:55
literal joined
|
|||
moritz_ | setting compilation has now been running for 15 mins 45 sec | 09:59 | |
10:11
QinGW left
|
|||
moritz_ | 33min, and counting :( | 10:16 | |
nymacro | you need a better 486 | 10:21 | |
moritz_ | no, I need a better parrot | 10:22 | |
and now it complains that it can't read the old packfile format | 10:23 | ||
nymacro: how long does it take on your machine, with latest parrot? | 10:28 | ||
nymacro | I'll give it a check | 10:30 | |
haven't actually timed it before | |||
10:34
rhr joined
|
|||
nymacro | moritz_, timing perl configure w/ --gen-parrot | 10:36 | |
real3m41.757s | |||
I assume you're not doing anything extra? | 10:38 | ||
10:39
IllvilJa joined
|
|||
IllvilJa | o/ | 10:39 | |
nymacro | lo | 10:41 | |
11:10
ruoso left
11:19
ggoebel left
|
|||
moritz_ | nymacro: I'm talking about the 'make' step, not the configure stop | 11:26 | |
nymacro | moritz_, this included the make :) | 11:27 | |
moritz_ | oh | ||
nymacro | under 4 mins for parrot, under 6 for rakudo | 11:28 | |
moritz_ | and that's with the newest parrot, and newest rakudo? | ||
moritz_ can't believe it | |||
baest | and not using deep blue? | ||
s/deep blue/blue gene/, but anyhow a super computer | 11:30 | ||
11:30
pythonian4000 is now known as pythonian4000afk
11:31
ggoebel joined
11:32
allbery_b left
|
|||
moritz_ | masak: please take another look at the hypererr branch | 11:33 | |
nymacro | moritz_, was I supposed to be building from non-master branch? | ||
moritz_ | nymacro: no; the branch doesn't really matter | 11:34 | |
nymacro: it didn't used to be so slow for me, and I suspect it was a change to the parrot GC | |||
nymacro | even so, 33min+ seems a little steep | ||
moritz_ | yes | 11:35 | |
11:35
ggoebel left
|
|||
moritz_ | PerlJam: just a small reminder that you're the release manager this month | 11:35 | |
masak | moritz_: I'm kind of on the move; will look when I have the time. | 11:37 | |
moritz_ | masak: no hurry | 11:38 | |
11:38
zby_home__ joined
11:40
zby_home_ left,
_ilbot2 left,
_ilbot2 joined,
ChanServ sets mode: +v _ilbot2
11:44
satyavvd left
11:46
masak left
11:59
zby_home_ joined
12:01
zby_home__ left
12:15
_twitch joined,
ggoebel joined
12:16
Schwern joined
12:37
meraxes left
12:46
bluescreen left
12:51
plainhao joined
12:59
bluescreen joined
13:00
tzhs joined
|
|||
colomon | profiling runcore works again! (according to parrot release notes) | 13:11 | |
jnthn | Ooh, nice | ||
colomon | sounds like they made a number of improvements based on things from this channel in the last two weeks. parrot team++ | 13:13 | |
davidfetter | diakopter, by "production," i mean software actually deployed to the public. a working web site powered by perl6, e.g. | 13:17 | |
moritz_ | davidfetter: then strangelyconsistent.org/ is an example of Perl 6 use in production | ||
13:19
Patterner left
|
|||
davidfetter | moritz_, so perl6 is serving that page somehow, or...? | 13:20 | |
davidfetter sees some very cool docs, etc., but isn't quite seeing the where the perl6 is acting rather than being described | 13:21 | ||
moritz_ | davidfetter: it generates the HTML pages that are served from this page | ||
davidfetter | k | ||
13:22
Schwern left
|
|||
davidfetter | that's pretty great. what else is out there? :) | 13:23 | |
13:30
skids joined
13:31
Psyche^ joined,
Psyche^ is now known as Patterner
|
|||
davidfetter | one context of my questions is that i'm pitching pl/parrot, a parrot embedding in postgresql. pl/perl6 is a supported language | 13:34 | |
well, pl/rakudo | |||
if there are DSLs or other kinds of super-moby perl6 magic people are using out in the real world, that could help me write up examples, pitch to different segments of interest, etc. | |||
dalek | kudo: 3905e0e | moritz++ | build/PARROT_REVISION: bump PARROT_REVISION to the 2.9.0 release |
13:39 | |
kudo: 6f30584 | moritz++ | src/core/metaops.pm: Improve error message for non-dwimmy hyper ops Patch courtesy by Timothy Bollman With some wording improvements by moritz. This recursively tracks the indexing path in hyperops, and prints that path on error. Also elaborates on the nature of the different shapes, either different length or types (Hash vs Scalar/List or so) |
|||
kudo: f17e400 | moritz++ | src/core/metaops.pm: [hyper] emit proper indexing path with .[] and .{} on error |
|||
ast: 0fed615 | moritz++ | S11-modules/require.t: [require.t] fudge a test that never passed |
13:42 | ||
13:46
satyavvd joined
13:47
davidfetter left,
kaare_ left
13:53
plobsing left
|
|||
moritz_ | std: (] | 13:54 | |
p6eval | std : ( no output ) | ||
moritz_ | oh | ||
jnthn | mmm...if you tilt your head it looks like a muffin. | ||
Clearly std nommed it :-) | 13:55 | ||
colomon | moritz_++ | ||
moritz_ | turns out I forgot to clone std on the new p6eval server | ||
13:56
xinming joined
14:06
kjeldahl left
14:09
pythonian4000afk is now known as pythonian4000
14:10
Schwern joined
|
|||
pmichaud | good morning, #perl6 | 14:13 | |
phenny | pmichaud: 18 Oct 22:36Z <jnthn> tell pmichaud I'm very uncomfortable with ++ and -- ops in NQP. They're very assigny, in an otherwise purely bindy language. The hack way to do them without assignment will corrupt my constants table ('cus, I haz one ;-)). Having them in Parrot's nqp-rx will only prevent us from doing that optimization. Vote to deprecate. | ||
jnthn | morning, pmichaud | ||
14:13
szabgab joined
|
|||
pmichaud | jnthn: I strongly resisted placing ++ and -- into NQP but was loudly outvoted/criticized for it. | 14:14 | |
how about if we make them "macros"? | 14:16 | ||
i.e., $a++ is translated by the compiler to be $a := $a + 1 | |||
(in the PAST) | |||
jnthn | pmichaud: Well, then it's ++$a ratehr than $a++ | 14:19 | |
14:19
wtw left
14:20
_kaare joined
|
|||
pmichaud | then whatever sequence gives us the correct semantics (e.g., a temporary result before the increment) | 14:20 | |
jnthn | Yeah, guess that's easier but still...how hard is it for folks to write $x := $x + 1; | 14:21 | |
pmichaud | I'm just saying that "lack of increment" got very loud complaints from nqp users | ||
14:21
agentzh left
14:22
rgrau_ joined
14:23
MayDaniel joined,
Italian_Plumber joined
|
|||
jnthn | pmichaud: OK, at least you tried to keep things sane. :-) | 14:26 | |
pmichaud | the other possibility would be to create an 'inc' opcode that does what we want :-) | 14:27 | |
jnthn | Well, but since we want to bind... | ||
We need to know the name of the thing. | |||
pmichaud | oh, true | 14:28 | |
silly ++ operator. | |||
jnthn | My feelings exactly. ;) | ||
It's a fine operator - when you have assignment. :-)_ | |||
pmichaud | in this case, I'm guessing that perhaps inc/dec really want their own pasttype, then. they're very common to languages | ||
jnthn | I fear that's missing the point (more) | 14:29 | |
Having them in a language properly means it needs to have some model of assignment, so far as I can see. | |||
PerlJam | Good morning! | ||
jnthn: so ... you're adding assignment to NQP :-) | |||
? | 14:30 | ||
pmichaud | I'm not entirely certain that's the case. | ||
jnthn | PerlJam: uh, no :P | ||
pmichaud: Consider my $a := 2; my $b := $a; $a++; say($b); | |||
If we re-write it to $a := $a + 1; then $b is no longer bound the result | |||
I guess it works | |||
It's just...not that you'd expect in real Perl 6, which does have assignment. | 14:31 | ||
pmichaud | right, I don't necessarily see a huge problem with that. | ||
jnthn | Which means we get a semantic mis-match. | ||
It may not be a big deal. | |||
pmichaud | there are a few places where semantic mismatches will occur no matter what we do. | ||
(short of making NQP into full Perl 6, or giving it full-on assignment) | |||
jnthn | True. | 14:32 | |
I'm not opposed to re-writing it to $foo := $foo + 1 | |||
I don't think the current implementation can stand though. | |||
pmichaud | I'm not entirely opposed to eliminating ++ for now and see what we end up with. | ||
there are only 5 occurrences in Rakudo, afaict | 14:33 | ||
there's one instance in NQP itself | 14:34 | ||
go ahead and deprecate/eliminate it for now, and we'll see about adding it back in when we decide we really need it | 14:35 | ||
jnthn | OK, thanks. | 14:37 | |
colomon | my rakudo build seems to be taking a very long time this morning? | 14:43 | |
moritz_ | colomon: mine too | 14:44 | |
colomon: 33min or so | |||
moritz_ is glad he's not the only one | |||
colomon | I haven't been paying enough attention to know how long, just that I would have expected it to be done by now. | ||
PerlJam | Hmm. I didn't notice my build taking too long, but the spectests seem to be taking longer than I thought they would. | 14:45 | |
14:48
ikes joined,
ikes left
|
|||
pmichaud tries a build | 14:49 | ||
14:49
MayDaniel left
14:52
x3nU is now known as piwnicowy,
piwnicowy is now known as x3nU
14:57
MayDaniel joined
14:59
mfollett joined
15:07
orafu left
15:08
orafu joined
15:09
satyavvd left
|
|||
jnthn | Decommute | 15:11 | |
15:11
slavik1 joined
15:12
tzhs left
|
|||
pmichaud | yes, the build is taking a horrendously long time | 15:13 | |
probably time to bisect | 15:14 | ||
15:15
jhuni left
15:16
allbery_b joined
|
|||
colomon | pmichaud: seems like it was a very recent change -- at least, I certainly didn't notice my build from a day or two ago being particularly slow. | 15:24 | |
pmichaud | colomon: yes, I'm running some tests now | 15:25 | |
colomon | pmichaud++ | ||
15:25
TimTom joined
|
|||
moritz_ can confirm that | 15:26 | ||
15:30
pythonian4000 is now known as pythonian4000afk
|
|||
TimTom | rakudo: my %a = (a => 1, b => 2, c => 3); say (%a >>=><< (1, 2, 3)).perl | 15:30 | |
p6eval | rakudo d35769: OUTPUT«Sorry, right side is too short and not dwimmy. in 'hyper' at line 251:CORE.setting in main program body at line 1» | ||
TimTom | rakudo: my %a = (a => 1, b => 2, c => 3); say (%a >>=>>> (1, 2, 3)).perl | 15:31 | |
p6eval | rakudo d35769: OUTPUT«{"a" => 1 => ((1, 2, 3)), "b" => 2 => ((1, 2, 3)), "c" => 3 => ((1, 2, 3))}» | ||
15:31
kjeldahl joined
|
|||
TimTom | It may just be me, but that seems like it's not what we want to reporting. | 15:31 | |
colomon | TimToady: latest build says this: | ||
TimTom | err returning | ||
colomon | Sorry, structures on both sides of non-dwimmy hyperop are not of same shape: | ||
left: Hash | |||
right: Parcel | |||
TimTom, sorry. | |||
TimTom | yea, I understood | 15:32 | |
colomon | that's for the first one, latest build. | ||
moritz_ | colomon: fwiw, TimTom++ submitted the original patch | 15:33 | |
which reminds me, I forgot to reply to the mail on p6c | |||
TimTom | Well, my patch didn't have the Hash, parcel thing | ||
colomon | ah, TimTom++ indeed! | ||
moritz_ | TimTom: right, I added that | ||
TimTom | I saw it, but wasn't sure what we wanted to do with it, so I mulled it over the night | 15:34 | |
moritz_ | TimTom: your patch kept the "shorter" thing, which can be very confusing for {a => 1} >>+<< [1, 2, 3, 4, 4, 5, 6] | ||
it would complain that the right side is too short, even though it looks much longer than the right | |||
TimTom | Well, it just kept whatever was a hash | ||
moritz_ | ss/than the right/than the left/ | ||
TimTom | err Associative | 15:35 | |
The only thing I can think of for % >>x>> @ is that they would want to match each hash key randomly with some array elment (based on the hash key iteration) | 15:36 | ||
moritz_ | well, random behaviour is bad | 15:37 | |
colomon | you could do .kv on the @ and make a hash, I suppose... | ||
15:38
kcwu left,
Ross joined,
Ross left,
Ross joined
|
|||
TimTom | It's not completly random. The thought is that it would be used to have the hash elements transformed into a index, value pair. For something like %h >> (1 .. *) | 15:38 | |
I like colomon's better though | |||
15:38
kcwu joined
|
|||
moritz_ | let me rephrase: when mechanisms become too magical, they get hard to understand, and produce weird results in corner cases | 15:39 | |
15:39
lihaitao joined
|
|||
moritz_ | so I'd rather have less magic, and better error messages :-) | 15:39 | |
TimTom | Oh, I wasn't disagreeing, I was just stating that there's really no good way to make it do anything that someone would want | ||
that I could see at least | 15:40 | ||
pmichaud | for comparison, time needed to build rakudo 2010.09 on my box ("perl Configure.pl --gen-parrot; time make"): 3m44s | ||
moritz_ | then I misunderstood, and we're all in violent agreement :-) | ||
TimTom | Quite :) | ||
pmichaud | time needed for rakudo head with parrot 2.9.0: 7 minutes and counting | ||
I'll cancel it at 10 minutes and bisect to an earlier parrot | 15:41 | ||
PerlJam blames parrot but secretly hopes he's wrong. | |||
15:42
MayDaniel left
|
|||
pmichaud | yeah, if it's parrot.... we're going to be in for a not-so-fun couple of days :( | 15:42 | |
15:43
am0c left
|
|||
TimTom | It just promotes a... different... build style. You do half the work, compile. Then work on the other half while it compiles. You can then check if your first half was a good change or not. | 15:43 | |
pmichaud | 10m30s | ||
cancelling build -- trying with r49387 (sep 30) | 15:44 | ||
15:47
lihaitao left,
molaf joined
15:48
mfollett left
15:49
davidfetter joined
|
|||
davidfetter | perl6: say "Hello to my little frien'!" | 15:49 | |
p6eval | pugs, rakudo d35769: OUTPUT«Hello to my little frien'!» | ||
pmichaud | rakudo head on parrot r49387: 4m16s | 15:52 | |
trying r49541 | |||
15:56
molaf left
15:57
flatwhatson_ left
|
|||
TimTom | moritz: the patch you submitted for hyperops has a copy-paste mistake at line 66 of metaops.pm, it should be @rhs not @lhs. Also, I think lines 144 and 158 should maybe be $rhs.WHAT.perl() as well in case the Associative isn't a hash | 15:58 | |
15:58
flatwhatson left
|
|||
TimTom | moritz: and the recursive hyperop integrate that I did for Associative omitted [ ] around the Iterable call that was in the Iterable hyperop (line 124). I'm not sure if those were neccessary, but I assume they were | 16:00 | |
moritz: ... or maybe those were actually because we were using "push", and they aren't neccessary | 16:01 | ||
pmichaud | 49541: 4m22s | ||
so it's something very recent. | |||
16:01
justatheory joined
16:02
kensanata left,
ruoso joined
|
|||
pmichaud | gist.github.com/634456 # current table of build times on my machine | 16:03 | |
moritz_ | TimTom: looking... | ||
16:03
araujo joined
|
|||
PerlJam | pmichaud: check out -r49557 | 16:06 | |
that at 49556 mess with GC and the other revisions seem to be mostly doc patches and such. | 16:07 | ||
16:07
flatwhatson_ joined
|
|||
pmichaud | PerlJam: should I cancel my current build to try 49557? | 16:07 | |
PerlJam | I'm just guessing based on the log messages. I haven't run it yet. | 16:08 | |
pmichaud | I'd like to get a complete timing of the build on 2.9.0 to be able to report that | ||
I can probably try 49557 on another machine just to see | |||
16:10
PacoLinux left,
flatwhatson joined
16:11
PacoLinux joined
|
|||
jnthn home | 16:13 | ||
davidfetter work | 16:14 | ||
jnthn | pmichaud: (build speed) Ouch. | 16:16 | |
pmichaud: Want me to run a build of anything here at all? | |||
pmichaud | only if you want to see a painfully slow build :-) | ||
jnthn | :P | ||
pmichaud | I suppose it would be interesting to see if it's slow on mswin, though. | 16:17 | |
jnthn | *nod* | 16:18 | |
I'll try 49556 and 49557. | 16:19 | ||
16:19
mberends joined
|
|||
jnthn | yayitsmberends! | 16:20 | |
16:20
risou joined
|
|||
davidfetter very sorry to be trolling like this, but is looking around desperately for any perl6 production deployment anywhere. failing that, something that's gotten to staging, and failing that, to development | 16:20 | ||
this isn't perl6 itself, but software written in it | |||
jnthn | november-wiki.org/ used to be up... :-( | 16:21 | |
pivo.jnthn.net/ uses a few bits of Perl 6 and there's source at github.com/jnthn/pivo | 16:22 | ||
pmichaud | I'm trying 49556 right now on a different box | ||
jnthn | It's tiny but demonstrates working usage of MiniDBI, JSON::Tiny plus uses Blizkost to get at a Perl 5 module. | ||
pmichaud: Aye, that's building here at the moment. | |||
pmichaud | I'll try it on my "timing box" when my timing box gets done building against trunk (20 minutes so far) | 16:23 | |
jnthn | *sigh* | ||
16:23
Kodi joined,
Ross left
|
|||
Kodi | rakudo: class C { has $.x }; sub f($x) { C.new: :$x }; say (f (1, 2)).perl; | 16:23 | |
p6eval | rakudo d35769: OUTPUT«C.new(x => ((1, 2)))» | ||
pmichaud | lists.parrot.org/pipermail/parrot-d...04929.html # message to parrot-dev | ||
jnthn | Yes, that just landed here. | 16:24 | |
16:24
Ross joined
|
|||
Kodi | ^ Known? This seems to be the root cause of the failure in trans.t, although it predates the Rakudo change that caused the failure. | 16:25 | |
pmichaud | Kodi: we know that a change to rakudo resulting in a trans.t failure, yes. | 16:26 | |
we haven't quite figured out why yet. | |||
(but we know that the change is correct) | |||
16:27
TimTom left
|
|||
pmichaud | r49556 builds in a reasonable amount of time. | 16:28 | |
16:28
cdarroch joined,
cdarroch left,
cdarroch joined
|
|||
pmichaud | now passing 25 minutes | 16:29 | |
(still working on core.pir) | |||
ah, core.pir just finished | |||
16:30
risou_ joined
|
|||
pmichaud | gist.github.com/634507 # 26m41s with 2.9.0 release | 16:31 | |
16:31
risou left
|
|||
jnthn | pmichaud: 6:48 on 49556 | 16:34 | |
16:34
coldboot left
|
|||
pmichaud | yes, I had 7m on my slow box | 16:34 | |
I'm trying it now on my timing box | |||
jnthn | OK. Trying 49557 now. | ||
pmichaud | it's looking very much like 49557 is the culprit on my second box | 16:35 | |
s/second/slow/ | 16:36 | ||
49556 is 4m20s on my timing box | 16:38 | ||
16:41
flatwhatson_ left
16:42
flatwhatson left,
zby_home_ left
16:43
flatwhatson_ joined
16:45
meppl left
16:46
baux left
16:48
flatwhatson_ left
16:49
MayDaniel joined,
MayDaniel left,
MayDaniel joined
|
|||
moritz_ | phenny: tell masak I'm sure you've seen it before -- if not, look at ds9a.nl/amazing-dna/ | 16:49 | |
phenny | moritz_: I'll pass that on when masak is around. | ||
jnthn | pmichaud: Confirm big difference here between 49556 and 49557. | 16:51 | |
(The latter hasn't finished yet, but it's almost reached double now) | 16:52 | ||
PerlJam | It runs the GC potentially 16 times as often | ||
pmichaud | PerlJam: more than 16, I'd think | 16:54 | |
PerlJam | yes, you're probably right | ||
jnthn | That or we're being really, really dominated by GC. | ||
pmichaud | jnthn: based on the other tests I've done, I suspect we are being dominated by gc (e.g., some of the strings tests) | 16:55 | |
jnthn: my results are mirroring yours -- I'm at 15 minutes now in r49557, where r49556 took 4m20s previously | 16:56 | ||
PerlJam | I wonder if that gc_threshhold is really implemented correctly. If whatever counter is being used to set the allocations so far isn't reset when it hits 16M, then you'll get a GC run for every allocation above 16M | ||
jnthn | Yup, over 16 here. | ||
pmichaud | chromatic weighed in on parrot-dev that he thinks it's r49557 also | 16:57 | |
moritz_: that dna url is fascinating | |||
moritz_ | indeed :-) | ||
16:59
flatwhatson_ joined
17:01
dakkar left
|
|||
jnthn | .oO( Maybe it's dominating 'cus it's actually a Sweep and Mark collector ;-) ) |
17:02 | |
23 minutes...still on core.pm. | 17:03 | ||
PerlJam | How many objects are typically allocated during a rakudo compile? | 17:05 | |
17:06
flatwhatson joined
|
|||
jnthn | Finally done - 26:04 | 17:06 | |
17:08
xabbu42 left
17:09
sftp joined,
Axius joined
17:10
MayDaniel left
|
|||
pyrimidine | moritz_: good link (DNA URL) | 17:11 | |
pmichaud | PerlJam: millions... maybe more | 17:12 | |
every subroutine or method call creates at least one object | |||
jnthn | Context + LexPad + exception handler + RPA that holds it # 4 already... | 17:15 | |
#phasers in 102 mins? | 17:17 | ||
moritz_ | yes | 17:18 | |
jnthn | k | ||
dalek | kudo: fbe7445 | moritz++ | src/core/metaops.pm: fix a typo noticed by TimTom++ |
||
17:19
alester joined
|
|||
pmichaud | gist.github.com/634604 # build timings | 17:22 | |
afk, lunch | |||
jnthn | :/ | 17:23 | |
Even if we get back to 49556's performance, it's still a regression from 2010.09. | |||
jnthn -> noms, bbfp | |||
pmichaud | (regression) yes, but it's hard to claim that's a Parrot issue. Rakudo did add some features in that time that could account for the increased time. | 17:24 | |
(now afk) | 17:25 | ||
diakopter | trac.parrot.org/parrot/ticket/1829 | ||
pmichaud | we could potentially try building 2010.09 on 2.8.0 and see how long that takes. | ||
er, 2010.09 on a more recent parrot | 17:26 | ||
pmichaud tries 2010.09 on r49556, just to see wha thappens. | |||
17:27
isBEKaml joined
17:31
M_o_C joined,
timbunce left
17:34
Entonian joined
17:37
rgrau_ left,
MayDaniel joined
17:38
timbunce joined
|
|||
davidfetter | jnthn, um, please tell me this is generated code. github.com/jnthn/pivo/blob/master/j...4.2.min.js | 17:40 | |
moritz_ | davidfetter: it is. The .min is "minimized" javascript | ||
PerlJam | davidfetter: it is. That's your standard minimized jquery | ||
17:41
risou_ left
17:42
risou joined
|
|||
davidfetter | ah | 17:42 | |
17:47
nymacro left
17:49
rgrau left
17:53
M_o_C left
18:03
Axius left,
Axius joined
18:04
rvrgs joined
18:06
ab5tract joined
18:07
mikehh joined
|
|||
Util | Pushed fix for long build time | 18:08 | |
18:10
synth left
|
|||
dalek | kudo: d497078 | Util++ | build/PARROT_REVISION: Bump PARROT_REVISION to resolve abnormally long R build |
18:12 | |
colomon | Util++ | 18:14 | |
moritz_ | Util: note that the rakudo releases always target parrot releases; so we need to do something about that | ||
18:15
_twitch left
|
|||
Util | moritz_: I expect that a release manager will make a 2.9.1 release as soon as everyone agrees that the problem is fixed. | 18:15 | |
jnthn back | 18:25 | ||
davidfetter: Yes, minimized. ;-) | 18:26 | ||
18:26
jaldhar left
18:27
ylando joined,
ylando left,
isBEKaml left
18:28
risou_ joined
18:31
risou left
|
|||
pmichaud | Rakudo Parrot Time needed for rakudo's "make" | 18:32 | |
2010.09 49192 2.8.0 03m44s | |||
2010.09 49556 04m14s | |||
davidfetter | jnthn, know of other perl6 deployments? | ||
pmichaud | So yes, Parrot exhibits a 13% slowdown between 2.8.0 and 2.9.0 . | 18:33 | |
18:34
envi left
18:35
ggoebel left,
masonkramer_ left
18:36
masonkramer joined
18:38
isperl6doneyet joined
|
|||
isperl6doneyet | hi, my name is my question | 18:38 | |
PerlJam | isperl6doneyet: it's a bogus question. | ||
isperl6doneyet | how so? | ||
PerlJam | isperl6doneyet: Is Perl 5 done yet? If so, why are they still working on it? | ||
isperl6doneyet | true, i should be more specific about "done" | ||
i'll work on that.. thanks | |||
18:39
isperl6doneyet left
|
|||
PerlJam hopes he comes back | 18:39 | ||
BinGOs | bellowing noiseholes making sounds that could be words. | ||
jnthn | pmichaud: Unlucky... | 18:44 | |
davidfetter: No...maybe we should start a wiki page somewhere for collecting them. | |||
PerlJam | jnthn++ | 18:45 | |
sorear | good * #perl6 | ||
jnthn | '*, sorear | 18:46 | |
18:46
Axius left
18:53
ggoebel joined
19:00
flatwhatson left,
rgrau joined
|
|||
pmichaud | -1 to #phasers | 19:02 | |
er, T-1 to #phasers | |||
(not voting it down :-) | |||
jnthn | :P | ||
pmichaud | davidfetter: masak++'s blog is written using Perl 6 (strangelyconsistent.org/) | 19:03 | |
(didn't know if that had been mentioned yet) | 19:04 | ||
19:04
timbunce left
|
|||
sorear | it's the only thing that's been mentioned yet | 19:04 | |
19:11
timbunce joined,
estrabd left
19:12
flatwhatson joined
19:13
snearch joined
19:17
risou joined,
risou_ left
19:22
MayDaniel left,
MayDaniel joined,
MayDaniel left
19:28
Trashlord left
19:30
risou_ joined,
risou left
19:35
estrabd joined
19:38
synth joined
19:40
plainhao left
|
|||
davidfetter | pmichaud, what sorear said. | 19:40 | |
19:43
icwiener joined
19:52
tylercurtis joined,
mfollett joined
|
|||
sorear | tylercurtis! | 19:55 | |
hi! | |||
tylercurtis | Hi, sorear. | ||
19:56
ylando joined,
Entonian left
|
|||
ylando | hello | 19:56 | |
mberends | hi ylando | 19:57 | |
ylando | it is a chat room about developing perl6? | 19:58 | |
moritz_ | yes | ||
ylando | do you have an help chat room | 19:59 | |
so i will not waste your time | |||
moritz_ | we also answer Perl 6 questions here | ||
19:59
Italian_Plumber left
|
|||
ylando | perl6 can run on server ? | 20:00 | |
do cgi ? | |||
moritz_ | yes | ||
20:00
patspam joined
|
|||
ylando | do you have doc about it? | 20:00 | |
20:01
mfollett left
|
|||
moritz_ | well, the common gateway interface is language agnostic | 20:01 | |
ylando | but you have an appche guide | ||
moritz_ | and the "November" wiki has a module for it - should be somewhere in github.com/viklund/november/ | 20:02 | |
ylando | thanks | ||
i will check it out | 20:03 | ||
bye | |||
20:03
ylando left
|
|||
sorear | tylercurtis: how goes bennu? | 20:03 | |
BinGOs | wouldn't traditional cgi be hideously slow | 20:05 | |
moritz_ | it is | ||
flussence | yes, but everyone uses fcgi these days | ||
or if not that, something like it | 20:06 | ||
x3nU | cgi can be fust if used smartly | ||
davidfetter | so the common gateway interface is...uncommon? | ||
x3nU | i mean, dont generate whole page every visit | ||
tylercurtis | sorear: not much progress (though a little) due to lack of tuits. How goes Niecza? | ||
x3nU | but generate static html files | ||
and use cgi only for commiting changes | |||
moritz_ | then it's not CGI, is it? | ||
x3nU | like posting comment | ||
etc | |||
davidfetter | .oO(UGI) |
20:07 | |
flussence | I used to have a trick for that actually... | ||
in apache-speak, "DirectoryIndex index.html index.cgi", then have the second save its output to the first when accessed | |||
of course, it only works for urls ending in / ... | 20:08 | ||
davidfetter | how would you decide when to expire the .html? | ||
sorear | tylercurtis: irclog.perlgeek.de/phasers/2010-10-19#i_2925857 | ||
flussence | davidfetter: that's a caching issue. caching is hard ;) | 20:09 | |
davidfetter | let's go shopping! | ||
</barbie> | 20:10 | ||
20:12
xabbu42 joined
|
|||
tylercurtis | sorear: impressive. | 20:15 | |
davidfetter | niecza? | 20:17 | |
sorear | niecza: say "Hello, world" | 20:18 | |
p6eval | niecza 4f60774: OUTPUT«sh: /opt/perl-5.12.1/bin/perl: not found» | ||
20:18
molaf joined
|
|||
moritz_ | oops | 20:19 | |
sorear | it's a lot faster now | ||
moritz_ | lol | ||
sorear | anyways davidfetter it's an implementation of Perl 6 I've been playing with | 20:20 | |
20:20
p6eval left
|
|||
sorear | probably the most awkward to set up atm | 20:20 | |
20:20
p6eval joined,
ChanServ sets mode: +v p6eval
|
|||
moritz_ | niezca: say 3 | 20:20 | |
davidfetter | niecza: say "'Hello' to my little frien'!" | ||
p6eval | niecza 4f60774: OUTPUT«'Hello' to my little frien'!» | ||
davidfetter | al pacino as niecza | 20:21 | |
dalek | albot: 6a11357 | moritz++ | evalbot.pl: fix niecza target |
20:22 | |
sorear | davidfetter: I'm trying to get STD to run a bit faster | 20:23 | |
davidfetter a little scared | |||
what does STD stand for? | |||
sorear | STanDard | ||
20:28
rvrgs left
20:31
ruoso left
20:34
patspam left
20:35
justatheory left
|
|||
colomon | with latest rakudo, it appears $file.close isn't called automagically after writing a file. | 20:35 | |
20:36
ggoebel left
20:38
risou_ left
|
|||
colomon | gist.github.com/635055 | 20:38 | |
above gist is my first attempt at golfing the issue. | 20:39 | ||
I suspect something to do with GC? | |||
pmichaud | I suspect it's something to do with the filehandle not being closed | ||
or flushed | |||
colomon | pmichaud: right, but that's supposed to happen automatically, no? | 20:40 | |
jnthn | You can't rely ont he file handle being closed at block exit in Perl 6, afaik. | ||
colomon | (it certainly did happen automatically last time I tried the code in question, but that was a bit back.) | ||
nor at program exit? | |||
jnthn | Equally, not flushing it when it gets collected feels...odd. | ||
pmichaud | rakudo's program exit is.... odd | 20:41 | |
jnthn | colomon: I'd have kinda hoped it'd make it before program exit. | ||
pmichaud | we made some workarounds in order to avoid the odd exit code to the test harness, iirc. | ||
moritz_ | over in #parrotsketch chromatic argues that extrem slowness isn't "broken" | ||
pmichaud | i.e., Rakudo's program exit isn't a default exit | ||
moritz_ | pmichaud: you mean the explicit call to exit 0? | ||
colomon | ah, for what it's worth, I get the same behavior in d357695b83624648d594bf78518a5c907da965d9, which is from Sunday. | 20:42 | |
pmichaud | moritz_: right | ||
moritz_ | pmichaud: that's to bypass global destruction | ||
colomon | so I jumped to conclusions thinking it was another bug from the latest parrot. | ||
pmichaud | and global destruction is where I would expect PMCs to be flushed/closed :) | 20:43 | |
jnthn | moritz_: *sigh* | ||
moritz_ | some weeks ago I tried to remove it | ||
and got some endless loops during spectests | |||
dalek | odel: d89333d | mberends++ | java/compiler/compile.pir: [java/compiler] add compile.pir which was being .gitignored |
20:45 | |
20:46
pythonian4000afk is now known as pythonian4000
20:47
bluescreen left
|
|||
colomon | RT #78454 | 20:48 | |
pmichaud | 20:41 <moritz_> over in #parrotsketch chromatic argues that extrem slowness isn't "broken" | 20:55 | |
I'm not planning to take a strong position for/against the extreme slowness, fwiw. Except to say that if Rakudo compiles are going to take 25+ minutes, I'm likely to do a lot less work on it. | |||
szbalint | Yes it is. That's why nuclear power plants are running timing tests even after formal proofs verifying a system :) | 20:56 | |
moritz_ would recommend to ship the R* release with the old rakudo+parrot, unless there's a fix to that | |||
pmichaud | oh, that's a possibility as well. | ||
anyway, I'm willing to see where Parrot decides they want to put their priorities and react to that, rather than try to push for any particular outcome. | 20:57 | ||
PerlJam | moritz_: if R* ships with an older rakudo, what then is new in R*? | ||
pmichaud | might be nothing... and that could be okay. | 20:58 | |
20:58
bluescreen joined
20:59
pyrimidine left
|
|||
PerlJam | a "book changes only" release of R* seems weird (that's all I can think of that's changed) | 20:59 | |
20:59
molaf left
21:01
pothos left,
pothos joined
21:02
Italian_Plumber joined
|
|||
pmichaud | PerlJam: that's one of the possiblities of monthly releases, though. There could be some months w/o significant changes. | 21:02 | |
PerlJam | sure. It just seems weird. | ||
21:03
Ross left
|
|||
PerlJam | looks like #ps is collectively sane today. :) | 21:03 | |
21:03
Ross joined,
ggoebel joined,
pothos left
21:04
pothos joined
|
|||
pmichaud | I am planning to go ahead and run spectests on 2.9.0.... just to see what it ends up looking like :) | 21:04 | |
sorear | tylercurtis: Anyways, I've been experimenting with some backend portability stuff for Niecza | 21:06 | |
I have CLR dependencies pushed all to the back end, except for a few yaks left in RxOp | 21:07 | ||
21:09
skids left
|
|||
tylercurtis | sorear: interesting. Are you planning on working on a non-CLR backend anytime soon? | 21:12 | |
21:12
Ross left
|
|||
sorear | FSVO soon, yes | 21:14 | |
21:14
justatheory_ joined
|
|||
tylercurtis | What targets are you interested in? | 21:16 | |
sorear | CLR-sans-C#, simple bytecode, custom VM, Parrot | 21:19 | |
I am doubtful of how much short-term benefit I'll be able to get with a custom VM, though | 21:20 | ||
I'd be giving up Mono's generational garbage collector | 21:21 | ||
also, I would probably still have to simulate a stack for CALLER:: to work | |||
(custom VM = LLVM based) | |||
21:22
ggoebel left
|
|||
jnthn | nqp: my @l := (1,2,3,4,5); @l[2] := 42; say(@l); | 21:22 | |
p6eval | nqp: OUTPUT«sh: ./nqp: not found» | ||
jnthn | my @l := (1,2,3,4,5); @l[2] := 42; say(@l[2]); # 42 | ||
pmichaud: ^^ This probably would not work in Perl 6 since a parcel is read-only, but does work in NQP since we use RPA. Do you see things staying this way? | 21:23 | ||
e.g. (1,2,3,4,5) actually makes something mutable? | |||
pmichaud | jnthn: I'm not sure that the resulting bind becomes a Parcel -- it might end up being a Seq | ||
jnthn | Ah, OK | 21:24 | |
And Seq is...mutable? | |||
moritz_ | nqp: say(1) | ||
p6eval | nqp: OUTPUT«1» | ||
pmichaud | well, at present all lists (including Seq) allow push/pop | ||
so they're mutable in that sense | |||
I don't see a problem with saying that elements of a Seq can be rebound | |||
jnthn | And @foo[52] := blah style things? | ||
OK | 21:25 | ||
pmichaud | but that might not work out. There are still a lot of gray areas and corner cases to be addressed. | ||
21:25
_kaare left
|
|||
pmichaud | ultimately I'd probably be happer with my @l := @(1,2,3,4,5) to explicitly make a list or array | 21:25 | |
jnthn | *nod* | 21:26 | |
I'll make it work like NQP on Parrot for now. | |||
pmichaud | wfm | ||
sorear | ooh then we could finally have hash constructors | ||
21:26
plobsing joined
|
|||
sorear out | 21:26 | ||
jnthn | 5 out of 7 tests in 17-positional.t pass :-) | 21:27 | |
pmichaud | I'm been toying with the notion of giving PCT/PAST a 'hash' constructor type to go along with the 'list' constructor type. :-) | ||
jnthn | Hashes are next on my NQP.NET hit list I think. :-) | 21:28 | |
Tssk. I need return at some point before I can even think about ClassHOW too. | 21:29 | ||
21:30
kjeldahl left
|
|||
tylercurtis | Metamodel implementation-detail question... Classes are packages, but what is the thing that is a package for classes? Is it the HOW, the WHAT, or is there just a package that corresponds to the class? | 21:31 | |
21:32
rvrgs joined
|
|||
jnthn | .WHO gets the underlying package. | 21:33 | |
.WHAT is the type object, .HOW is the meta-object. | 21:34 | ||
21:34
Entonian joined
|
|||
moritz_ | rakudo: say Int.WHO | 21:34 | |
p6eval | rakudo d35769: OUTPUT«Int» | ||
moritz_ | rakudo: say Int.WHO.WHAT | ||
p6eval | rakudo d35769: OUTPUT«Method 'WHAT' not found for invocant of class 'Int' in main program body at line 22:/tmp/FDRhTD0kkY» | ||
21:35
Schwern left
21:36
ggoebel joined
21:39
zby_home_ joined
|
|||
dalek | odel: 17d7665 | jnthn++ | dotnet/compiler/Actions.pm: A little more undef removal. |
21:39 | |
odel: 704d03a | jnthn++ | dotnet/runtime/Runtime/Ops.cs: A little tweak to lllist_bind_at_pos to make life easier for code generators and enhance op consistency. |
|||
odel: ebb368a | jnthn++ | common/NQP/NQPSetting.pm: [common] NQPArray.bind_pos plus some missing coercion methods. |
|||
odel: 5cac036 | jnthn++ | dotnet/compiler/PAST2DNSTCompiler.pm: [dotnet] Get keyed_int in place enough for array lookups (but can not has binding yet). |
|||
tylercurtis | Ah, right. I forgot about WHO. | 21:40 | |
21:40
bluescreen left
21:44
ggoebel left
21:45
snearch left
21:53
timbunce left
22:00
stkowski joined
22:01
meppl joined
22:02
sftp left
22:09
mavrc left
22:16
zby_home_ left
|
|||
dalek | odel: d22037d | jnthn++ | dotnet/compiler/PAST2DNSTCompiler.pm: [dotnet] Refactor the way we compile binds. Pass the thing to bind down in a contextual rather than relying on the structure of the tree that comes back up, otherwise we're very restricted with what kinds of stuff PAST::Var nodes can produce. |
22:22 | |
odel: e6de8a1 | jnthn++ | t/nqp/17-positional.t: We now pass 17-positional.t. |
|||
takadonet | jnthn++ | 22:25 | |
22:26
ab5tract left
|
|||
dalek | odel: 4d3bf73 | jnthn++ | t/nqp/21-contextual.t: Turns out we have enough in place to pass 21-contextual.t too. :-) |
22:27 | |
odel: 7a40c79 | jnthn++ | t/nqp/36-callable.t: 36-callable.t also passes - it just checks subs are first class. |
22:33 | ||
jnthn | Mmmm. Staropramen++ | 22:34 | |
22:40
xabbu42 left
|
|||
dalek | odel: 03d4813 | jnthn++ | dotnet/compiler/PAST2DNSTCompiler.pm: [dotnet] Implement a basic first cut of keyed scope of PAST::Var. Gets 18-associative.t to compile, but of course we crash and burn immediately - no NQPHash type yet! :-) |
22:43 | |
22:45
silug left
22:47
justatheory_ left
|
|||
dalek | odel: 666a4f4 | jnthn++ | dotnet/runtime/ (3 files): [dotnet] Add a very basic P6mapping representation that is used to provide a low level hash storage. |
22:49 | |
odel: 435bd24 | jnthn++ | common/NQP/NQPSetting.pm: [common] Stub in NQPHash. Doesn't do anything yet other that .new. |
|||
22:49
justatheory joined
|
|||
diakopter | jnthn: do your RakudoObjects implement GetHashCode ? | 22:57 | |
jnthn | diakopter: No :-) | 23:00 | |
23:00
icwiener_ joined
|
|||
jnthn | diakopter: Got it doing string keys locally instead and coercing to strings. | 23:00 | |
Will do proper object ones at some point. | |||
23:00
icwiener left
|
|||
diakopter | k | 23:00 | |
jnthn | But for now I want to support the bunch of NQP that we can on Parrot. | ||
And Parrot only does string-keyed hashes too ;-) | |||
diakopter | k cuz I was wondering/looking at the mapping thing | 23:01 | |
Dictionary<RakudoObject, RakudoObject> | |||
jnthn | It's Dictionary<string, RakudoObject> now | 23:02 | |
diakopter | I definitely saw Dictionary<RakudoObject, RakudoObject> somewhere | ||
jnthn | Right, in my commit a moment ago. :-) | ||
diakopter notes the use of resharper | 23:03 | ||
:) | 23:04 | ||
23:05
kulp joined
|
|||
jnthn | ...resharper? | 23:05 | |
No, I didn't get along with it. | |||
Tried it for a bit, though. | 23:06 | ||
dalek | odel: 017a5ef | jnthn++ | dotnet/runtime/Metamodel/Representations/P6mapping.cs: [dotnet] Actually, just go with string keys for now; it's plenty enough. |
23:10 | |
odel: bae7cdf | jnthn++ | dotnet/runtime/Runtime/Ops.cs: [dotnet] Three ops for working with P6mapping. |
|||
odel: 88190a8 | jnthn++ | common/NQP/NQPSetting.pm: [common] Fill out NQPHash a bit and...we have basically functioning hashes. |
|||
23:11
ggoebel joined
23:30
Kodi left
23:35
jaldhar joined
23:40
dju left
23:41
dju joined,
rgrau left
23:48
whiteknight joined
23:52
davidfetter left
23:54
alester left,
dju left,
dju joined
23:58
cdarroch left
|