pugscode.org/ | nopaste: sial.org/pbot/perl6 | pugs: [~] <m oo se> (or rakudo:, kp6:, smop: etc.) || We do Haskell, too | > reverse . show $ foldl1 (*) [1..4] | irclog: irc.pugscode.org/
Set by TimToady on 25 January 2008.
ludan hi 00:03
cj lo 02:44
pugs_svnbot r19928 | putter++ | misc/red_STD/std.rb: more careless transliteration. Added comments with the remaining needed STD.pm careless transliteration. ruby std.rb still runs, but currently only on ruby 1.9. 05:15
diff: dev.pugscode.org/changeset/19928
TimToady fg 05:50
perigrin I think it's already in the foreground ;) 05:51
TimToady so it would seem...
alester TimToady: You're not in Minneapolis are you? 06:08
perigrin He wasn't at dinner tonight, he would easily have been invited. 06:12
pugs_svnbot r19929 | lwall++ | [gimme5] version of metholate to translate to Perl 5 (does about 50% so far) 07:19
diff: dev.pugscode.org/changeset/19929
diakopter moritz_: until dev.pugscode.org self-resurrects, you could point the logger's revision links to the SVN::Web locations instead. (or set up a smart redirector that preferentially chooses) :) 12:49
rhr_ diakopter: where is pugs's SVN::Web? 13:28
masak what's sigspace a short form of? 14:58
pmurias masak: significant space 15:07
masak pmurias: thank you 15:08
masak and both :ii and :sigspace are modifiers to s///, not to m//, right? 15:08
pmurias masak: why shouldn't they apply to m//? 15:09
masak hm, becuase preserving case does not make sense when only matching
but I think I'm wrong about :sigspace 15:10
pmurias S05:254
but you are right on :ii 15:11
masak ah, good
pmurias the harder problem is what is :ii long form ;) 15:12
masak :)
':iiggnnoorreeccaassee'?
actually, I think of it as ':preservespace', but that doesn't fit well into the ':ii' form 15:15
um, I meant ':preservecase'
rhr_ the function behind it is called samecase (:bb is samebase) 15:16
pmurias is the example at S05:2086 correct? ($antler is used instead of $<antler>) 15:27
diakopter rhr_: it's at www.perlsix.org/svn/pugs/browse 17:17
rhr_ diakopter: thanks! 17:20
diakopter rhr_: it's the same SVN::Web instance as, say, parrotvm.org/svn/parrot/revision/?rev=25767 17:27
personally, I kinda hope the pugs trac instance doesn't resurrect; the contents of its wiki have all been ported over to the new wiki at tPF's site 17:29
nothingmuch ah 17:30
diakopter that and it was a major pain to get working on Feather 1.0
re-working, I mean 17:31
under apache 2.0
now on Feather 2.0, I don't know if I want to tackle it again :D
Juerd diakopter: What are feather 1.0 and feather 2.0? 17:46
feather0, feather1, feather2, and feather3 are not version numbers :) 17:47
SamB are they ... CPU numbers? 17:48
diakopter Juerd: oh, I was using them to mean release editions. 17:49
where 0.0 was the original configuration (original to me), with all the separate apache instances, and then Feather 1.0 was the one with all the sites integrated into one apache 2.0 17:50
Juerd Aha 17:56
SamB: feather0 is a xen domain0, feather1..3 are xen domainUs. feather is the name of the physical machine.
diakopter: It looks like the current dist-upgrade is hugely fucking up the apache config 17:57
juerd-cgiirc still works 18:10
pmurias ruoso: wouldn't it be better if s1p generated c code directly, sm0p is sluggish 18:46
? 18:47
Juerd diakopter: I'm sorry, it appears to be fixed now 18:49
diakopter: You know what to do to break it though. But please do put a friendly redirect there if you do. :)
ruoso pmurias, well when I say s1p will generate sm0p+C it doesn't really needs to mean that it will be go through sm0p.pl again... but the code that the s1p comipiler will generate will have blocks that will be the same as the blocks generated by sm0p.pl 20:02
pmurias ruoso: oj 21:12
ok ;)
what is the right gcc invocantion to compile foo.c using smop? 21:15
ruoso: figured it out 21:19
wolverian can you define your own sigils? 21:22
pmurias wolverian: not easily
wolverian mmhm 21:23
pmurias you can extend the grammar
wolverian is the definition of a sigil's interface interleaved in the grammar? 21:23
that was probably badly worded :) 21:25
if I wanted to define my own sigil, would I add it to the grammar and then define its behaviour through a MOP?
pmurias "MOP" = Meta Object Protol ? 21:26
wolverian yes 21:27
might be the wrong name here
I just mean an API
pmurias wolverian: i think it's unspeced 21:28
wolverian righto
pugs_svnbot r19930 | buchetc++ | [coro.t] simple coro tests 23:27
diff: dev.pugscode.org/changeset/19930

Powered by Cro and the Raku® Programming Language.

Please report any issues / comments / feature requests as an issue on App::Raku::Log.

Thank you!