»ö« Welcome to Perl 6! | perl6.org/ | evalbot usage: 'perl6: say 3;' or rakudo:, niecza:, std:, or /msg p6eval perl6: ... | irclog: irc.perl6.org/ | UTF-8 is our friend!
Set by sorear on 4 February 2011.
sorear generally, that means that some code tried to use $!foo when "self" isn't defined 00:00
it can be secondary to trying to call methods on undefined values 00:01
[Coke] hurm. thanks. 00:08
I suspect this is an issue with the conversion of everything to a method. 00:10
[Coke] nqp: class EEK {}; my $a:= EEK.new(); say +$a; 00:23
p6eval nqp: OUTPUT«No applicable candidates found to dispatch to for 'Numeric'. Available candidates are:␤␤current instr.: 'Numeric' pc 3450 (src/stage2/gen/NQPCORE.setting.pir:1608) (src/stage2/NQPCORE.setting:171)␤»
[Coke] nqp: class EEK {method Numeric() {return 3}}; my $a:= EEK.new(); say(+$a);
p6eval nqp: OUTPUT«No applicable candidates found to dispatch to for 'Numeric'. Available candidates are:␤␤current instr.: 'Numeric' pc 3450 (src/stage2/gen/NQPCORE.setting.pir:1608) (src/stage2/NQPCORE.setting:171)␤»
[Coke] how do I fix that one?
cognominal TimToady, I wish one could write .%a for %a{$_} so that (*++).%a became { %a{$_}++ } # need sleep to say if it make any sense. See you tomorrow. 00:27
[Coke] r: class EEK {method Numeric() {return 3}}; my $a:= EEK.new(); say(+$a); 00:29
p6eval rakudo fb11f1: OUTPUT«3␤»
[Coke] hurm. nqpbug?
sorear good question; no clue. 00:31
[Coke] : class EEK {method Numeric() {return 3}}; my $a:= EEK.new(); say(+$a); 00:32
n: class EEK {method Numeric() {return 3}}; my $a:= EEK.new(); say(+$a);
p6eval niecza v22-6-g9e5350d: OUTPUT«3␤»
[Coke] github.com/perl6/nqp/issues/59 00:34
[Coke] nqp: module String { sub eek() { say("eek");} } String::eek(); 01:08
p6eval nqp: OUTPUT«Confused at line 2, near "module Str"␤current instr.: 'panic' pc 19999 (src/stage2/gen/NQPHLL.pir:7315) (src/stage2/gen/NQPHLL.pm:324)␤»
[Coke] nqp: module String { sub eek() { say("eek");} }; String::eek();
p6eval nqp: OUTPUT«invoke() not implemented in class 'NQPMu'␤current instr.: '' pc 91 ((file unknown):53) (/tmp/sA6ucNekpn:1)␤»
[Coke] rakudo: module String { sub eek() { say("eek");} }; String::eek();
p6eval rakudo fb11f1: OUTPUT«Could not find symbol '&eek'␤ in method <anon> at src/gen/CORE.setting:9934␤ in at src/gen/Metamodel.pm:2380␤ in any find_method_fallback at src/gen/Metamodel.pm:2368␤ in any find_method at src/gen/Metamodel.pm:922␤ in at src/gen/BOOTSTRAP.pm:827␤ in any a…
[Coke] rakudo: module ring { sub eek() { say("eek");} }; ring::eek(); 01:09
p6eval rakudo fb11f1: OUTPUT«Could not find symbol '&eek'␤ in method <anon> at src/gen/CORE.setting:9934␤ in at src/gen/Metamodel.pm:2380␤ in any find_method_fallback at src/gen/Metamodel.pm:2368␤ in any find_method at src/gen/Metamodel.pm:922␤ in at src/gen/BOOTSTRAP.pm:827␤ in any a…
[Coke] Should that work (in rakudo or nqp?)
sorear [Coke]: last one should not work, since subs are "my" by default. 02:15
sorear nr: module ring { our sub eek() { say("eek");} }; ring::eek(); 02:16
p6eval rakudo fb11f1, niecza v22-6-g9e5350d: OUTPUT«eek␤»
sorear nqp: module ring { our sub eek() { say("eek");} }; ring::eek();
p6eval nqp: OUTPUT«eek␤»
adeux helo 03:43
hello
sorear ehlo 03:44
adeux i think i have to have lunch 03:46
mjreed is HLL supposed to work in NQP still? 05:00
sorear What do you mean by HLL?
Also, which of the three incompatible languages named NQP do you mean? 05:01
mjreed in this case, the one I get when I configure rakudo star with --gen-nqp.
and by HLL I mean the high-level-language compiler parent classes loaded by 'use HLL' from inside said NQP. 05:02
> use HLL;
A method named 'backtrack' already exists in class 'PAST;Regex'. It may have been supplied by a role.
> class TinyLang::Grammar is HLL::Grammar { }
Null PMC access in find_method('new')
sorear mjreed1: it's certainly still possible to write hll compilers in the new nqp which rakudo star has shipped with for a year or less. it's possible some details have changed 05:10
mjreed1 ok, I'll poke around some more.. 05:17
guess my example code is out o fdate
sorear quite likely 05:18
sorear alas I'm not much use as an nqp resourse 05:18
mjreed1 np. thanks for answering! 05:19
moritz good morning 05:53
sorear good morning moritz. 05:54
moritz \o sorear 05:56
raiph hi sorear, moritz 06:05
sorear hello raiph 06:06
raiph I emailed Viacheslav Tykhanovskyi who runs perltuts.com/. He said "Perl6 would be nice. ... isn't a problem if it's a .deb package. .. As for motivation... That's simple. A tutorial in Perl6 ;)" I said I'd share this on #perl6. 06:20
raiph exit 07:17
grondilu n: say pack "s", -1 07:50
phenny grondilu: 03 Oct 21:25Z <_edwin> tell grondilu you could use the known digest of some constant data to find out (e.g. digest of empty message)
grondilu: 03 Oct 21:25Z <sorear> tell grondilu Why not just have the digest function return a Buf?
p6eval niecza v22-6-g9e5350d: OUTPUT«===SORRY!===␤␤Undeclared routine:␤ 'pack' used at line 1␤␤Unhandled exception: Check failed␤␤ at /home/p6eval/niecza/boot/lib/CORE.setting line 1437 (die @ 5) ␤ at /home/p6eval/niecza/src/STD.pm6 line 1147 (P6.comp_unit @ 37) ␤ at /home…
grondilu r: say pack "s", -1 07:52
p6eval rakudo fb11f1: OUTPUT«Unrecognized directive 's'␤ in block at src/gen/CORE.setting:7231␤ in method reify at src/gen/CORE.setting:5282␤ in method reify at src/gen/CORE.setting:5184␤ in method reify at src/gen/CORE.setting:5184␤ in method gimme at src/gen/CORE.setting:5562␤ in meth…
grondilu if I submit a patch for signed integers in pack/unpack, do I have submit one for the spectest as well? 07:53
moritz it would be nice if you did 07:54
kresike good morning all you happy perl6 people 08:11
tadzik hello #perl6 08:45
sorear tadzik! 08:46
tadzik sorear! 08:48
kresike hello tadzik o/ 08:49
grondilu I've noticed something. If I make a modif in one of src/core/ module (Buf.pm for instance), I must recomple everything thing to test it, right? Is there a way not to? 08:53
moritz you can augment classes and redefine subroutines from outside the setting 08:54
grondilu Oh I can redefine subroutines? I thought I had tried that with no success once. I'll try again. It's MONKEY_PATCH or something, right? 08:57
tadzik r: my &sort = sub (*@a) { say @a.perl }; sort <a b c> 08:58
p6eval rakudo fb11f1: OUTPUT«Array.new("a", "b", "c")␤»
tadzik this way probably
grondilu would it work with class methods? 08:59
tadzik for that you probably have to augment class 09:00
and use MONKEY_TYPING I think
grondilu that's what I tried once. I could add methods, but I don't think I managed to redefine one. 09:01
tadzik maybe what you want is to subclass it 09:03
grondilu yeah that's probably the best, but I'll have to use a custom name everywhere in the code. But I guess that makes sense for a customization. 09:04
grondilu will do that. 09:05
moritz grondilu: you can also remove the method from the class once, recompile 09:06
then augment
and once you're done, you can copy the method back in
grondilu moritz: oh yeah, that's smart 09:09
though if I remove a method form a core class, isn't there a risk that compilation fails? 09:12
moritz only for something central as Attribute or List or so 09:13
if you remove some helper method, or from IO/Buf/Version/... it won't care
tadzik do we catch missing methods in compile time?
moritz no
the compilation can only fail if the compiler calls that method
tadzik right
grondilu has an other question about panda 09:14
tadzik go ahead 09:15
grondilu Once I added a personal module in ~/.perl6/lib, and panda messed it up when I reboostraped it.
tadzik oh yes, sorry for that :(
panda clears ~/.perl6/lib when you rebootstrap
grondilu that's not nice 09:16
tadzik it should probably only clear things that it installed before
I know, sorry
grondilu :)
no problem.
moritz I now firmly believe that panda should never touch ~/.perl6/lib 09:17
and that we shouldn't look there by default either
grondilu it was a symlink anyway, so panda did not actually remove anything.
moritz it makes it impossible to use two different rakudos
grondilu moritz: where should I put my personal modules, then?
tadzik true
moritz grondilu: rakudo should offer a variable containing an install path for that specific rakudo version 09:18
r: say @*INC
p6eval rakudo fb11f1: OUTPUT«/home/p6eval/.perl6/lib /home/p6eval/nom-inst/lib/parrot/4.8.0-devel/languages/perl6/lib␤»
moritz so probably $INSTALL/lib/parrot/$PARROT_VERSION/languages/perl6/custom-lib/ or so
grondilu so you advise me to put *my* modules there?
moritz once we have that mechanism in place, yes 09:19
if you still want a global location, you can just set PERL6LIB
sorear sleep&
grondilu ok 09:20
r: role Foo { method gist { "Foo" } }; my $x = Mu but Foo; say $x; 09:26
p6eval rakudo fb11f1: OUTPUT«Foo␤»
grondilu ^ maybe I can use this to redefine methods? 09:27
r: role Foo { method gist { "Foo" } }; my $x = Mu but Foo; say $x.WHAT;
p6eval rakudo fb11f1: OUTPUT«Foo␤»
grondilu ah, no actually. Nevermind. 09:29
dalek rlito: 805d42e | (Flavio S. Glock)++ | / (2 files):
Perlito5 - perl5 - fix emitted code for $$x[0]
 11:11
jnthn evening o/ 11:12
phenny jnthn: 03 Oct 20:15Z <moritz> ask jnthn to please check my latest reply to rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=75640 for sanity
jnthn: 03 Oct 20:30Z <mathw> tell jnthn his YAPC::Asia talk is awesome
jnthn moritz: In your "if we work around..." section, it looks like you mean tto add "multi", but forgot? 11:13
moritz jnthn: erm, yes 11:15
copy&paste gone wrong :(
r: proto sub f(Int) { nextsame }; multi sub f() { }; f(3)
p6eval rakudo fb11f1: OUTPUT«===SORRY!===␤CHECK FAILED:␤Calling 'f' will never work with argument types (int) (line 1)␤ Expected any of:␤ :()␤»
moritz r: proto sub f(Int) { nextsame }; multi sub f(*@) { }; f(3) 11:16
p6eval rakudo fb11f1: OUTPUT«nextsame is not in the dynamic scope of a dispatcher␤ in block at src/gen/CORE.setting:485␤ in sub f at /tmp/7oyYakAueD:1␤ in block at /tmp/7oyYakAueD:1␤␤»
moritz and I think the line above is a premature optimization
jnthn hm...
moritz but the real question from that ticket is if 'nextsame is not in the dynamic scope of a dispatcher' is the correct error message
or if nextsame should try to re-dispatch to the multis of the proto 11:17
jnthn r: sub foo() { nextsame }
p6eval rakudo fb11f1: ( no output )
jnthn er
r: sub foo() { nextsame }; foo()
p6eval rakudo fb11f1: OUTPUT«nextsame is not in the dynamic scope of a dispatcher␤ in block at src/gen/CORE.setting:485␤ in sub foo at /tmp/REGItfmhny:1␤ in block at /tmp/REGItfmhny:1␤␤»
jnthn I expect consistency with that, which is what we have
No, the syntax for entering the dispatcher is {*}. nextsame is for iterating in a dispatch that is already ongoing, not for entering a dispatcher.
Plus nextsame in a proto method already has a meaning :) 11:18
moritz ok, then what I wrote in the ticket seems fine
modulo copy&paste error
jnthn aye
dalek rlito: 27eaafa | (Flavio S. Glock)++ | / (5 files):
Perlito5 - js - fix local(); use hash and array through accessors
 13:03
grondilu ==> Testing MongoDB 13:27
t/find.t .... 3/9 No such method 'id' for invocant of type 'Any'
[Coke] sorear++ for the my/our sub note. now my little sample works, but partcl is still complaining that it can't find the sub in the module. hurm. 13:35
[Coke] ah. the module is being defined /inside/ a class. 13:40
[Coke] nqp: class One { module Two { our sub Three() {say(3)} } ; method Four() {Two::Three()} }; One.new().Four() # can Four be written in a way that invokes Three? 13:41
p6eval nqp: OUTPUT«3␤»
[Coke] ... locally that doesn't work. hurm.
can we get nqp to tell us which version it's running?
Bother. wonder if I hadn't run "make install" on my nqp build in a few days. 13:43
moritz it wouldn't hurt to add the NQP revision to the evalbot output
just needs doing
[Coke] argh. now /that/ sample works, but partcl still doesn't. ;) 13:45
grondilu what's the equivalent of perl 5's -X File ? 13:55
grondilu I mean "file test", like -f, -r, -x and so on. 13:56
flussence star: say '.'.IO.d 13:57
p6eval star 2012.07: OUTPUT«True␤»
moritz r: say '.'.path.d
p6eval rakudo fb11f1: OUTPUT«True␤»
moritz .IO will be deprecated eventually
(or will open the path)
jnthn Oh? 13:58
jnthn didn't know that :)
flussence on everything? or just dirs?
grondilu ok, thanks. But once it's deprecated, what will be used?
moritz .path
grondilu even for a file? 13:59
moritz the idea is that if you want to deal with paths, you use .path
and if you want to deal with file or dir *HANDLES*, you use .io or .IO or some such
or maybe .open
grondilu ok 14:00
moritz wonders if anybody ever read his huge refactorings to S32::IO
grondilu moritz: I will. I swear :) 14:01
yet I kind of liked Perl5's syntax for this.
moritz in p6 you can say if $p.path ~~ :d { say "$p is a directory" } 14:03
if you like that better
grondilu not bad indeed 14:04
jnthn sleep & 14:07
grondilu how do I negate a smart match in a 'when'? 14:10
r: given "foo" { when not /z/ { say "no match" } }
p6eval rakudo fb11f1: OUTPUT«No such method 'match' for invocant of type 'Any'␤ in method Bool at src/gen/CORE.setting:10182␤ in sub prefix:<not> at src/gen/CORE.setting:2312␤ in block at /tmp/D4H9u_ayrW:1␤␤»
grondilu see what I mean? 14:11
timotimo yeah, when takes an object to match against, not takes a thing that can Bool and returns the other Bool
colomon moritz: where are your refactorings?
moritz in the specs repo
grondilu r: given "foo" { when not $_ ~~ /z/ { say "no match" } }
p6eval rakudo fb11f1: OUTPUT«no match␤»
moritz done about 2 months ago or so
grondilu r: given "foo" { when not $_ ~~ /z/ { say "not very elegant" } } 14:12
p6eval rakudo fb11f1: OUTPUT«not very elegant␤»
[Coke] nqp: class Builtins { method concat() { say(String::trim()) }; module String { our sub trim() { say("ALIVE") } } }; say(Builtins.new().concat());
p6eval nqp: OUTPUT«invoke() not implemented in class 'NQPMu'␤current instr.: 'concat' pc 195 ((file unknown):95) (/tmp/aWEIm6KA__:1)␤»
[Coke] there we go.
moritz r: given 'foo' { when !/z/ { say "oh hai" } } 14:13
p6eval rakudo fb11f1: OUTPUT«No such method 'match' for invocant of type 'Any'␤ in method Bool at src/gen/CORE.setting:10182␤ in sub prefix:<!> at src/gen/CORE.setting:2308␤ in block at /tmp/PwjtiOuuyV:1␤␤»
[Coke] Should that work?
grondilu would like to write: given "foo" { not when /z/ { say "no match" } }
grondilu r: given "foo" { unless /z/ { say "no match" } } 14:15
p6eval rakudo fb11f1: OUTPUT«no match␤»
grondilu ^ is that the same? 14:15
colomon grondilu: no 14:16
grondilu: I agree that not when would be handy. or when not? 14:17
moritz: is it S32 or S16?
grondilu maybe a whennot or notwhen keyword? 14:18
moritz colomon: I've changes some stuff in S16 too, but mostly S32::io
[Coke] jnthn: any ideas on nqp#59?
r: class Builtins { method concat() { say(String::trim()) }; module String { our sub trim() { say("ALIVE") } } }; say(Builtins.new().concat());
p6eval rakudo fb11f1: OUTPUT«Could not find symbol '&trim'␤ in method <anon> at src/gen/CORE.setting:9934␤ in at src/gen/Metamodel.pm:2380␤ in any find_method_fallback at src/gen/Metamodel.pm:2368␤ in any find_method at src/gen/Metamodel.pm:922␤ in at src/gen/BOOTSTRAP.pm:827␤ in any … 14:19
grondilu n: given "foo" { when not /z/ { say "no match" } } 14:22
p6eval niecza v22-6-g9e5350d: OUTPUT«Use of uninitialized value in string context␤ at /home/p6eval/niecza/lib/CORE.setting line 1289 (warn @ 5) ␤ at /home/p6eval/niecza/lib/CORE.setting line 266 (Mu.Str @ 15) ␤ at <unknown> line 0 (ExitRunloop @ 0) ␤ at /home/p6eval/niecza/lib/CORE.setting…
colomon moritz: actually, S32 IO looks pretty good to me now. The only thing that gives me any hesitation is IO as a role which does nothing... should it just be a module? (p6 doesn't have namespaces, right?) 14:23
moritz: how much of that works in rakudo now? 14:24
dalek rlito: bd0dff3 | (Flavio S. Glock)++ | / (5 files):
Perlito5 - js - tie() placeholder
colomon should have said moritz++ moritz++ and apologized for negative comments on the state of S32 IO -- I hadn't seen the new stuff. (Or at least, I hadn't remembered seeing the new stuff.)
moritz colomon: (re IO being a role that does nothing) that's called a "tag role", ie it's used to identify stuff as being IO related 14:29
colomon: and if it were just a module, we would have to check the name of classes, instead of doing a typecheck (if we want to know if they are related to IO) 14:30
colomon moritz: but when would you want to know if something was "related" to IO?
moritz colomon: when you write something that tries to DWIM 14:31
colomon example? 14:32
moritz colomon: or maybe filter out any potentially dangerous object from a list, or so
colomon: for example a template system that has a "source" parameter
and if it's IO, it tries to read from it (or open it, and then read, or whatever)
and otherwise it treats it as a string
not saying it's a great use case, just saying it doesn't hurt to have such a thing 14:33
colomon but wouldn't that be more clearly handled as "If it's IO::Handle, it reads from it; if it's IO::Path, it tries to open it; otherwise it treats it as a string"?
moritz that doesn sound cleaner 14:35
grondilu rn: constant x = "foo" ~~ /bar/; 14:41
p6eval niecza v22-6-g9e5350d: ( no output )
..rakudo fb11f1: OUTPUT«===SORRY!===␤Cannot assign to a non-container␤»
colomon moritz: actually, this is a pretty good mental exercise.
because how do you open an IO::Path? 14:42
colomon moritz: right now the only way I'm seeing is open($path.Str, ... blah) which seems like it would work but is less than awesome 14:43
moritz IO::Path.open
r: say "README".path.open.get
p6eval rakudo fb11f1: OUTPUT«Unable to open filehandle from path 'README'␤ in method open at src/gen/CORE.setting:7338␤ in sub open at src/gen/CORE.setting:7585␤ in method open at src/gen/CORE.setting:7524␤ in block at /tmp/hK64ZcELEO:1␤␤»
moritz is that missing from S32::IO? 14:44
r: say "nom/README".path.open.get
p6eval rakudo fb11f1: OUTPUT«Rakudo Perl 6␤»
colomon yes
at least, it's not in S32 IO on perlcabal 14:45
moritz I don't have a secrect copy with extra stuff :-)
colomon but sometimes perlcabal is slow to match spec changes
but in this case, it's not there either. 14:46
hey, with git it's easy enough to have secret copies with extra stuff.
colomon has had entire months where his version of niecza had special, not quite working functions in it... 14:47
dalek rlito: bc4bbb3 | (Flavio S. Glock)++ | / (3 files):
Perlito5 - js - tie() placeholder; more
 14:59
colomon just got a "Malformed UTF-8 string" error from Rakudo 15:13
kresike bye folks 15:18
dalek rlito: 9a2d51f | (Flavio S. Glock)++ | / (5 files):
Perlito5 - js - tie() emitter
 15:31
_edwin hi perl6! 16:58
TimToady++, nice cleanups of my rosettacode contribution 16:59
sirrobert \o
_edwin I especially like the my $M = 1 + [+] (numers Z/ denoms) ... * < 1e-6; # wouldn't hace thought of this 17:00
have* 17:01
sorear, I think your gut feeling about the longest trail problem being NP-complete was right 17:03
because it is possible to transform the longest path problem into a longest trail problem by splitting each vertex into two vertices, one with all the incoming edges, one with all the outgoing edges, and a new edge inbetween 17:04
TimToady glad you liked it. these days I tend to think of "shift" as a code smell, an imperative smell, if not exactly a bad smell 17:05
I'm also tending to use \foo declarations for SSA-style naming of temp results 17:06
sirrobert r: "abc:def".subst(/<-[ A..Z a..z 0..9 ]>/, *.ord.fmt("%%%02X"), :g); 17:07
p6eval rakudo fb11f1: OUTPUT«===SORRY!===␤Invalid hard reference syntax at line 2, near "%%02X\"), :"␤»
sirrobert That's the "url-encode" example from Rosetta Code 17:08
rosettacode.org/wiki/URL_encoding#Perl_6
Not sure what a "hard reference syntax" means
any tips? =)
_edwin that lends itself particularly well to (sequences of) mathematical expressions, i think (resp. sigilless style)
TimToady especially when the original was specified using mathematical italics and such, since Unicode has those :) 17:09
sirrobert: it doesn't like the %%%
n: "abc:def".subst(/<-[ A..Z a..z 0..9 ]>/, *.ord.fmt("%%%02X"), :g); 17:10
p6eval niecza v22-6-g9e5350d: OUTPUT«===SORRY!===␤␤Invalid hard reference syntax at /tmp/1QjgREgqT7 line 1:␤------> st(/<-[ A..Z a..z 0..9 ]>/, *.ord.fmt("%⏏%%02X"), :g);␤␤Parse failed␤␤»
TimToady try single quotes
sirrobert TimToady: Ok, hm
trying
yeah, thanks
might be worth fixing in Rosetta Code 17:11
TimToady it tests the %% before it realizes there's no {}, which might or might not be easy to fix 17:11
feel free to fix RC, it's a wiki :)
sirrobert =) 17:12
TimToady rosettacode.org/wiki/Kaprekar_numbe...8fast.29_2 17:15
I had to write the loops using loop rather than for
using 'for' was very slow 17:16
sirrobert huh
TimToady slower than the non-casting-out-nines solution
(under niecza, but probably under rakudo as well, except it blew up my memory first)
we could probably use an optimizer that recognizes when a for can be rewritten into a loop 17:17
or find some way to expedite binding of simple loop variables 17:19
maybe we're getting bit by unnecessary closure cloning or some such
TimToady or maybe it's the "not realizing the loop is in sink context" problem again 17:21
TimToady (a gather is supposed to sink its innards) 17:23
propagating sink context to avoid storing stuff is going to be another important optimization 17:25
TimToady seems to leak badly in rakudo even if I explicitly sink the loops 17:30
TimToady here's the 'for' version if anyone wants to fiddle with it: wall.org/~larry/kap9for.p6 17:31
(doesn't leak in niecza, is just slowwww) 17:32
compared to the 'loop' version on RC, that is
diakopter explicitly sink? 17:38
TimToady putting a () after and/or putting sink before 17:40
diakopter how long does it take in rakudo and niecza 17:41
_edwin is it possible to tell eval not to introduce a lexical scope? 18:10
_edwin I thought of doing something like 'file.pl'.path.open.slurp.eval; for rosettacode.org/wiki/Include_a_file 18:14
_edwin but it does not "splice" into the current lexical scope. I see that it is cleaner this way, but is it possible to force an "unhygienic" eval? 18:19
_edwin nr: BEGIN { eval 'say "foo"' } 18:21
p6eval rakudo fb11f1, niecza v22-6-g9e5350d: OUTPUT«foo␤»
_edwin hm, missing somthing, I got a "Confused" locally 18:22
_edwin nr: BEGIN { eval 'say "foo"' }␤say "bar" 18:26
p6eval niecza v22-6-g9e5350d: OUTPUT«foo␤bar␤»
..rakudo fb11f1: OUTPUT«foo␤===SORRY!===␤Confused␤at /tmp/q40bpgnGUA:1␤»
_edwin that's the one
timotimo r: BEGIN { eval 'say "foo"' }; say "bar" 18:27
p6eval rakudo fb11f1: OUTPUT«foo␤bar␤»
timotimo go figure!
_edwin rakudobug?
std: BEGIN { eval 'say "foo"' }␤say "bar" 18:28
p6eval std 77327a4: OUTPUT«ok 00:00 43m␤» 18:28
timotimo seems like a rakudobug indeed. 18:33
sorear good * #perl6 18:35
rindolf sorear: hello. 18:53
TimToady nr: proto infix:<of> (|) is equiv(&infix:<X>) {*}; multi infix:<of>(\slice, @a) { @a[slice] }; multi infix:<of>(\slice, %h) { %h{slice} }; say 'HOME','SHELL' of %*ENV; 19:08
p6eval niecza v22-6-g9e5350d: OUTPUT«/home/p6eval /bin/bash␤»
..rakudo fb11f1: OUTPUT«===SORRY!===␤Cannot call 'trait_mod:<is>'; none of these signatures match:␤:(Mu:U $child, Mu:U $parent)␤:(Attribute:D $attr, :rw(:$rw)!)␤:(Attribute:D $attr, :readonly(:$readonly)!)␤:(Attribute:D $attr, :box_target(:$box_target)!)␤:(Routine:D $r, :rw(:$rw)!)␤:(Rout…
TimToady interesting, my rakudo gives Null PMC access in get_string() 19:09
updating to see if that helps 19:10
_edwin hi sorear! I think your gut feeling about the longest trail problem being NP-complete was right 19:11
because it is possible to transform the longest path problem into a longest trail problem by splitting each vertex into two vertices, one with all the incoming edges, one with all the outgoing edges, and a new edge inbetween
dalek rlito: 74e2045 | (Flavio S. Glock)++ | / (5 files):
Perlito5 - js - TIEARRAY, STORE, FETCH; add tie() example to html/perlito5.html
TimToady nr: proto infix:<of> (|) {*}; multi infix:<of>(\slice, @a) { @a[slice] }; multi infix:<of>(\slice, %h) { %h{slice} }; say 'HOME','SHELL' of %*ENV; 19:14
p6eval rakudo fb11f1, niecza v22-6-g9e5350d: OUTPUT«HOME/bin/bash␤» 19:15
dalek rlito: 9536f4a | (Flavio S. Glock)++ | / (2 files):
Perlito5 - ChangeLog
TimToady nr: proto infix:<of> (|) {*}; multi infix:<of>(\slice, @a) { @a[slice] }; multi infix:<of>(\slice, %h) { %h{slice} }; say *-1 of lines;
p6eval rakudo fb11f1: OUTPUT«WhateverCode.new()␤»
..niecza v22-6-g9e5350d: OUTPUT«{ ... }␤»
TimToady nr: proto infix:<of> (|) {*}; multi infix:<of>(\slice, @a) { @a[slice] }; multi infix:<of>(\slice, %h) { %h{slice} }; say *-1 of @(lines); 19:16
p6eval rakudo fb11f1: OUTPUT«WhateverCode.new()␤»
..niecza v22-6-g9e5350d: OUTPUT«{ ... }␤»
TimToady nr: proto infix:<of> (|) {*}; multi infix:<of>(\slice, @a) { @a[slice] }; multi infix:<of>(\slice, %h) { %h{slice} }; say 0 of @(lines); 19:17
p6eval rakudo fb11f1: OUTPUT«Land der Berge, Land am Strome,␤Land der Äcker, Land der Dome,␤Land der Hämmer, zukunftsreich!␤Heimat bist du großer Söhne,␤Volk, begnadet für das Schöne,␤vielgerühmtes Österreich,␤vielgerühmtes Österreich!␤␤Heiß umfehdet, wild umstritten␤liegst dem Erdteil du inmi…
..niecza v22-6-g9e5350d: OUTPUT«Land der Berge, Land am Strome,␤»
TimToady umm...
_edwin hm, how can I pass a Str argument to a macro (instead of an AST)?
TimToady still get the Null PMC locally 19:18
do you mean foo("string") or foo(string)? 19:19
the latter would be $ast.Str or some such
the former would require evaluating the $ast 19:20
but I believe that everything comes in as AST currently
_edwin I meant the former 19:21
TimToady might need an inside helper macro to evaluate an OUTER::<$ast> 19:22
though presumably there's some more direct way
that is probably non-portable
_edwin $ast.Str gives me something like AST<-993599824> in rakudo :/
tadzik _edwin: I don't think string macros are implemented 19:23
TimToady if $ast gives you positional info you could extract the string from the original text, I suppose 19:24
but a helper macro might be cleaner and more portable
you'd just have to call the helper macro from the body of the outer macro 19:25
assuming the helper macro can see your outer $ast somehow
_edwin tadzik: ah, that might be why I get "too few positional arguments: 2 passed, 3 (or more) expected" when trying to return a string 19:26
TimToady, you mean something like returning the AST from the inner macro so it is evaluated in the body of the outer macro? 19:27
TimToady nodnod
_edwin ok, thanks
TimToady we should probably spec something that just does that though 19:28
TimToady nr: proto infix:<of> (|) {*}; multi infix:<of>(\slice, @a) { @a[|slice] }; multi infix:<of>(\slice, %h) { %h{|slice} }; say 0 of lines; 19:30
p6eval niecza v22-6-g9e5350d: OUTPUT«Unhandled exception: Unable to resolve method Capture in type Int␤ at /home/p6eval/niecza/lib/CORE.setting line 3278 (prefix:<|> @ 4) ␤ at /tmp/Y3_BA0ynWR line 1 (infix:<of> @ 4) ␤ at /tmp/Y3_BA0ynWR line 1 (mainline @ 7) ␤ at /home/p6eval/niecza/lib/CO…
..rakudo fb11f1: OUTPUT«===SORRY!===␤CHECK FAILED:␤Undefined routine '&prefix:<|>' called (lines 1, 1)␤»
_edwin when I try to call the inner macro I always get "too few positional arguments: 2 passed, 3 (or more) expected" 19:31
regardless of the signature I declare for the inner macro 19:32
TimToady ENOKLOO
all our domain experts are vacating at the moment, I suspect 19:33
TimToady or prioritizing their family, as they should be 19:37
TimToady nr: proto infix:<of> (|) {*}; multi infix:<of>(\slice, @a) { @a[|slice] }; multi infix:<of>(\slice, %h) { %h{|slice} }; my @lines = lines; say 0 of @lines; 19:42
p6eval niecza v22-6-g9e5350d: OUTPUT«Unhandled exception: Unable to resolve method Capture in type Int␤ at /home/p6eval/niecza/lib/CORE.setting line 3278 (prefix:<|> @ 4) ␤ at /tmp/SHKejJ6D38 line 1 (infix:<of> @ 4) ␤ at /tmp/SHKejJ6D38 line 1 (mainline @ 8) ␤ at /home/p6eval/niecza/lib/CO…
..rakudo fb11f1: OUTPUT«===SORRY!===␤CHECK FAILED:␤Undefined routine '&prefix:<|>' called (lines 1, 1)␤»
TimToady nr: proto infix:<of> (|) {*}; multi infix:<of>(\slice, @a) { @a[slice] }; multi infix:<of>(\slice, %h) { %h{slice} }; my @lines = lines; say 0 of @lines; 19:42
p6eval rakudo fb11f1: OUTPUT«Land der Berge, Land am Strome,␤Land der Äcker, Land der Dome,␤Land der Hämmer, zukunftsreich!␤Heimat bist du großer Söhne,␤Volk, begnadet für das Schöne,␤vielgerühmtes Österreich,␤vielgerühmtes Österreich!␤␤Heiß umfehdet, wild umstritten␤liegst dem Erdteil du inmi…
..niecza v22-6-g9e5350d: OUTPUT«Land der Berge, Land am Strome,␤»
TimToady nr: proto infix:<of> (|) {*}; multi infix:<of>(\slice, @a) { @a[slice] }; multi infix:<of>(\slice, %h) { %h{slice} }; my @lines = lines; say *-1 of @lines;
p6eval rakudo fb11f1: OUTPUT«WhateverCode.new()␤»
..niecza v22-6-g9e5350d: OUTPUT«{ ... }␤»
TimToady nr: proto infix:<of> (|) {*}; multi infix:<of>(\slice, @a) { @a[slice] }; multi infix:<of>(\slice, %h) { %h{slice} }; my @lines = lines; say (*-1) of @lines; 19:43
p6eval rakudo fb11f1: OUTPUT«WhateverCode.new()␤»
..niecza v22-6-g9e5350d: OUTPUT«{ ... }␤»
TimToady nr: say lines[0]
p6eval rakudo fb11f1: OUTPUT«Land der Berge, Land am Strome,␤Land der Äcker, Land der Dome,␤Land der Hämmer, zukunftsreich!␤Heimat bist du großer Söhne,␤Volk, begnadet für das Schöne,␤vielgerühmtes Österreich,␤vielgerühmtes Österreich!␤␤Heiß umfehdet, wild umstritten␤liegst dem Erdteil du inmi…
..niecza v22-6-g9e5350d: OUTPUT«Land der Berge, Land am Strome,␤»
TimToady sure looks like a rakudobug to me 19:44
b: say lines[0]
p6eval b 922500: OUTPUT«Land der Berge, Land am Strome,␤»
TimToady a regression, in fact
p: say lines[0]
p6eval pugs: OUTPUT«*** No such subroutine: "&lines"␤ at /tmp/cfZa6ba0ww line 1, column 5 - line 2, column 1␤»
_edwin submitted rakudobug about the BEGIN { eval } confusion: rt.perl.org/rt3/Public/Bug/Display...?id=115134 19:47
rindolf TimToady: did you see Shmuel's comment here: mail.perl.org.il/pipermail/perl/201...12838.html ?
_edwin is it worthwhile to also submit a spectest for a rakudobug (if I'm pretty sure it is a bug)? 19:51
TimToady spectests are a good thing
but if you don't, the fixer will presumably write one 19:52
flussence
.oO( why would someone go to a perl conference then complain that people are talking about perl there all the time? )
rindolf flussence: are you referring to Shmuel's comment? 19:53
flussence yeah. it just comes off as needlessly bitter.
diakopter flussence: yes, if one doesn't include "Perl 6" in "Perl"
_edwin what is the preferred way to contribute to roast? pull request or something? I didn't find something about that in the README 19:54
flussence _edwin: usually you ask and then end up getting a commit bit anyway :) 19:55
_edwin ok, that would be nice :)
TimToady is just amused by the slippage into the typical phraseology of old religion advocates vs new religion evangelists: "stuff it down our throats" 19:56
_edwin: do you have a github id? 19:57
[Coke] gives up on modules in classes and re-refactors partcl
_edwin TimToady, hm I really have to check . o O (ETOOMANYWEBSITEACCOUNTS) 19:58
_edwin no, I haven't. going to get myself one 20:03
TimToady not terribly hard, but you do have to have to privide an RSA public key 20:06
*provide
sjohnson openssl -genrsa technology 20:10
github has all the instructions though for you
colomon www.johndcook.com/blog/2012/10/02/s...th-powers/ 20:20
_edwin TimToady, I think I made it. id "edwinst" 20:22
TimToady hugme: add edwinst 20:25
hugme: hug someone 20:26
hugme hugs someone
sjohnson hugs 20:27
i wonder if hugme has any STDs yet 20:28
colomon on the sum-of-4th-powers: gist.github.com/3836214 # not sure if I should be proud of this or ashamed
sorear comment on 5th powers: for all large w, below w^5, there are about w fifth powers and therefore about w^2 sums of two fifth powers. making the (very unjustifiable) assumption that sums of two fifth powers are distributed randomly, by the birthday bounds there is about a w^-1 chance of finding a number which is a sum of two fifth powers, so there probably aren't any. 20:33
colomon interesting, niecza is nearly 10x faster than rakudo for that script. I thought rakudo had pretty much caught up with niecza these days... 20:34
TimToady _edwin: okay, you should have commit access to the repos that the perl6 team can modify, including roast 20:35
dunno why hugme didn't work, offhand...
_edwin TimToady, thanks, that's awsome 20:36
sorear TimToady: I don't think hugme has worked since we converted perl6 to an org acct 20:37
TimToady I seem to recall seeing moritz making it work, so maybe I'm just not on the right list... 20:41
grondilu nr: my @a = [ <a b> ], [ <d e> ]; say @a».[0] 20:42
p6eval rakudo fb11f1, niecza v22-6-g9e5350d: OUTPUT«a b d e␤»
grondilu was expecting "a d"
_edwin installing niecza to crosscheck potential spectests
sorear grondilu: that's how it's supposed to work but nobody implements the new spec yet 20:43
TimToady grondilu: that would be correct if either niecza or rakudo followed current spec
grondilu ok. Good to know. 20:44
TimToady or even if either followed the previously specced duckmap semantics :)
but they both do deepmap currently
so follow .[] structure in preference to calling .[] on top level 20:45
mst Bedamned quack cartographers going round mapping our ducks ... 20:48
grondilu r: say (<a b>)»[*] 20:50
p6eval rakudo fb11f1: OUTPUT«a b␤»
grondilu cool 20:51
So I don't actualy need to type the period between » and [ ?
sorear correct, you don't 20:51
grondilu nice
sorear r: say <a b>.».[*] # this works too 20:52
p6eval rakudo fb11f1: OUTPUT«===SORRY!===␤Confused␤at /tmp/ahPbN0oART:1␤»
sorear n: say <a b>.».[*] # this works too
p6eval niecza v22-6-g9e5350d: OUTPUT«a b␤»
sorear std: say <a b>.».[*] # this works too
p6eval std 77327a4: OUTPUT«ok 00:00 43m␤»
sorear rakudobug?
grondilu r: say <a b>»[*]
p6eval rakudo fb11f1: OUTPUT«a b␤»
sorear r: $_.++
p6eval rakudo fb11f1: OUTPUT«===SORRY!===␤CHECK FAILED:␤Undefined routine '&postfix:<.>' called (line 1)␤»
sorear std: $_.++
p6eval std 77327a4: OUTPUT«ok 00:00 41m␤»
sorear seems rakudo doesn't support dots before postfixes in general 20:53
r: .++
p6eval rakudo fb11f1: OUTPUT«===SORRY!===␤Method 'unshift' not found for invocant of class 'NQPMu'␤»
sorear std: .++ 20:54
p6eval std 77327a4: OUTPUT«ok 00:00 41m␤»
sorear phenny: tell masak possible rakudobugs, "r: .++" and "r: $_.++"; STD is fine with both; are they known?
phenny sorear: I'll pass that on when masak is around.
sorear phenny: tell masak well, rakudobugs for sure, possibly *new* 20:55
phenny sorear: I'll pass that on when masak is around.
grondilu the same shortcut does not work with function, though: 21:00
r: say (&cos, &sin)»(pi) 21:01
p6eval rakudo fb11f1: OUTPUT«Too many positional parameters passed; got 3 but expected 2␤ in sub METAOP_HYPER_POSTFIX at src/gen/CORE.setting:12161␤ in block at /tmp/fQtKotv0au:1␤␤»
grondilu n: say (&cos, &sin)»(pi)
p6eval niecza v22-6-g9e5350d: OUTPUT«-1 1.2246063538223773E-16␤»
grondilu r: say (&cos, &sin)».(pi) # here the period is needed
p6eval rakudo fb11f1: OUTPUT«-1 -3.52688866664137e-10␤» 21:02
raiph n: gist.github.com/3836214 # don't understand why colomon wouldn't be proud of this and post it at the original blog 21:03
p6eval niecza v22-6-g9e5350d: OUTPUT«===SORRY!===␤␤Confused at /tmp/f0MznW5rjS line 1:␤------> https⏏://gist.github.com/3836214 # don't under␤␤Undeclared routine:␤ 'https' used at line 1␤␤Parse failed␤␤»
raiph n: my @fourth-powers = (1..*).map(* ** 4) ... * >= 635318657; my %counts; for @fourth-powers X+ @fourth-powers -> $sum { %counts{$sum}++; }; for %counts.keys.grep({ %counts{$_} > 2 }) -> $sum { say "$sum has { %counts{$sum} } fourth power sums"; } 21:04
p6eval niecza v22-6-g9e5350d: OUTPUT«635318657 has 4 fourth power sums␤»
colomon raiph: its kind of excessively brute force even as it is kind of elegant 21:04
it's 21:05
also that version has a factor of two error in its reported output. :) 21:06
raiph colomon: ah. My answer to the first concern is "You have to love brute force" (from the comments). But, yeah, I glossed over the factor of two error... 21:08
colomon it's minor and unimportant as far as errors go. :) 21:09
the thing that impressed me was that our p6 implements are now fast enough that a brute force approach is fine. 21:10
*implementations # typing sideways while hanging out with a 4yo 21:11
colomon n: gist.github.com/3836214 21:15
p6eval niecza v22-6-g9e5350d: OUTPUT«635318657 has 2 fourth power sums␤»
TimToady grondilu: I believe you're looking for "when none /z/"
raiph colomon: i'm impressed. gonna post it to the blog? 21:16
colomon maybe? 21:16
grondilu r: given "Foo" { when none /z/ { say "no match" } } 21:20
p6eval rakudo fb11f1: OUTPUT«no match␤»
grondilu TimToady: indeed. Thanks.
colomon I love the first line and the X+. It's the rest of it that seems slightly inelegant to me. 21:21
grondilu TimToady: yet I confess I don't understand how it works. I thought 'none' was a junction, and /z/ is not a scalar. 21:25
sorear here's a question for the ages: how MANY numbers can be expressed as a sum of two squares of squares in two different ways?
my heuristic argument from above suggests that the answer is not infinity, but does not prove any specific value
shachaf «I went to visit him while he was lying ill at the hospital. I had come in taxi cab number 14 and remarked that it was a rather dull number. "No" he replied, "it is a very interesting number. It's the smallest number expressible as the product of 7 and 2 in two different ways."» 21:26
sorear shachaf, what's your point here?
shachaf No mathematical point. 21:27
Hmm, squares of squares.
sorear is your point that you don't like our discussion?
TimToady sorear: you're taking it wrong, I think 21:28
7*2 and 2*7 is a very uninteresting interesting way to make 14
shachaf Your discussion is great!
sorear I guess that's possible
grondilu I think shachaf for a second thought that "two different ways" meant "in a different order".
TimToady it's more of a linguistic point 21:29
shachaf Point? It's just a joke that I found very funny the first time I came across it.
TimToady was amused by it
sorear ah, I did not see it as a joke, my apologies 21:30
I see I too have a problem with seeing cloaked insults where there are none
diakopter hm, I wonder if there's a limit to the number of interesting comments on particular numbers 21:31
TimToady yes, well, most of us here are not at the neurotypical end of the spectrum :)
_edwin sorear, but if you find one such number, isn't it that you can generate an infinity of them? a^4+b^4 = c^4+d^4 --> (na)^4+(nb)^4 = (nc)^4+(nd)^4 for any n
colomon wait, classify! 21:33
sorear diakopter: have you encountered en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interesting_...er_paradox ? 21:35
_edwin: ooo 21:36
raiph colomon: re first line: I don't like seeing ^ used with > instead of just >=
sorear _edwin: integral points on a homogenous polynomial eh. someday I need to properly learn algebraic geometry
colomon raiph: it's not the same thing. ^ and > there means "up to and not including the first value > N" ; just >= would be "up to and including the first value >= N" 21:39
sorear _edwin: now you can interpret (a,b,c,d) as the homogenous coordinates of a point in projective 3-space, your polynomial describes an algebraic surface in 3-space, and we're talking about rational points *waves hands vigorously* 21:41
the obvious question is then "what does this projective variety look like" 21:43
raiph colomon: d'oh
_edwin right, you could collapse these uninteresting multiples this way
hehe, i like this paradox 21:44
I'm afraid my mono build hangs :(
colomon n: say (^10).classify({ * %% 2 ?? "even" !! "odd" }).perl
p6eval niecza v22-6-g9e5350d: OUTPUT«Unhandled exception: Unable to resolve method classify in type Range␤ at /tmp/KQtr9CypON line 1 (mainline @ 3) ␤ at /home/p6eval/niecza/lib/CORE.setting line 4198 (ANON @ 3) ␤ at /home/p6eval/niecza/lib/CORE.setting line 4199 (module-CORE @ 574) ␤ at /h…
sorear to which I say: let x^4 + y^4 = 1 + z^4 ; the constant-z cross sections are superellipses
diakopter sorear: no 21:45
colomon r: say (^10).classify({ * %% 2 ?? "even" !! "odd" }).perl
p6eval rakudo fb11f1: OUTPUT«("even" => [0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9]).hash␤»
colomon r: say (^10).classify({ $_ %% 2 ?? "even" !! "odd" }).perl 21:45
p6eval rakudo fb11f1: OUTPUT«("even" => [0, 2, 4, 6, 8], "odd" => [1, 3, 5, 7, 9]).hash␤»
colomon n: say (^10).classify({ $_ %% 2 ?? "even" !! "odd" }).perl
p6eval niecza v22-6-g9e5350d: OUTPUT«Unhandled exception: Unable to resolve method classify in type Range␤ at /tmp/fKVEyDHo38 line 1 (mainline @ 3) ␤ at /home/p6eval/niecza/lib/CORE.setting line 4198 (ANON @ 3) ␤ at /home/p6eval/niecza/lib/CORE.setting line 4199 (module-CORE @ 574) ␤ at /h…
_edwin r: say (^10).classify(* %% 2 ?? "even" !! "odd" ).perl 21:46
p6eval rakudo fb11f1: OUTPUT«Nominal type check failed for parameter '&t'; expected Callable but got Str instead␤ in method classify at src/gen/CORE.setting:1143␤ in block at /tmp/02jL5p_sZj:1␤␤»
grondilu sorear: circles rather than ellipses, no?
sorear I'll just call this thing a squircular hyperboloid and leave it for someone who knows more about projective varieties to pick up 21:47
_edwin * does not thunk enough of the code for this to work, i think
grondilu they are not projective anymore since you reduced to 3 parameters. You already projected.
TimToady jetlag nap attack & 21:49
colomon n: say (^10).list.classify({ $_ %% 2 ?? "even" !! "odd" }).perl
p6eval niecza v22-6-g9e5350d: OUTPUT«("even" => [0, 2, 4, 6, 8], "odd" => [1, 3, 5, 7, 9]).list␤»
_edwin rn: (* %% 2).WHAT 21:50
p6eval rakudo fb11f1, niecza v22-6-g9e5350d: ( no output )
_edwin rn: (* %% 2).WHAT.say
p6eval rakudo fb11f1: OUTPUT«WhateverCode()␤»
..niecza v22-6-g9e5350d: ( no output )
_edwin rn: (* %% 2 ?? 1 !! 2).WHAT.say 21:51
p6eval rakudo fb11f1, niecza v22-6-g9e5350d: OUTPUT«Int()␤»
sorear
.oO( hmm, I think this would be a great shape for a hat. maybe I'll bring one to austin )
 21:52
_edwin * ?? ... !! ... does not autothunk at all. is that intentional?
grondilu sorear: actually you just reduced the search domain, but not all the points are solutions. They are still tricky to find. 21:57
sorear grondilu: I think that all the rational points of the new affine variety are solutions, except for those lying on a finite number of trivial planes corresponding to non-solutions like x^4 + y^4 = x^4 + y^4 22:00
grondilu I very much doubt so. 22:01
sorear suppose (x/d), (y/d), (z/d) is a rational point
grondilu hang on 22:02
sorear that is (x/d)^4 + (y/d)^4 = (z/d)^4 + 1
multiply through by d^4, x^4 + y^4 = z^4 + d^4
grondilu sorry, you were right. It's just that finding such rationals is tricky.
grondilu probably just as tricky as the problem in its initial formulation. 22:05
sorear I get the impression that if I knew more algebraic geometry, I'd have tools I could use to help solve rational point problems 22:07
grondilu That would help. Indeed algebraic geometry is notoriously linked to number theory. 22:09
as far as I know anyway. 22:10
sorear Actually that variety has no nontrivial rational points at infinity. 22:15
Fermat's last theorem.
dalek rlito: 1ec6ea0 | (Flavio S. Glock)++ | / (6 files):
Perlito5 - js - add UNTIE
sorear Oops I got a sign wrong, it's more corset-shaped than hat-shaped 22:19
grondilu btw, can a variety "cut through space" without enountering any rational? That would be weird.
sorear sure, try the plane z = pi 22:19
grondilu sorear: indeed. 22:20
sorear or z^3 + z = 1 if you want it to be algebraic over Z
taggart I am looking for documentation on the perl6 "form" built-in, pointers? 22:22
sorear a couple years back formats were kicked out of the perl 6 core and into a module, Perl6::Form, which I don't know if it's maintained 22:23
taggart sorear: I found this one github.com/mathw/form/ and in perl5 there is Perl6::Form (pretty old now) 22:28

Powered by Cro and the Raku® Programming Language.

Please report any issues / comments / feature requests as an issue on App::Raku::Log.

Thank you!