»ö« Welcome to Perl 6! | perl6.org/ | evalbot usage: 'perl6: say 3;' or rakudo:, niecza:, std:, or /msg camelia perl6: ... | irclog: irc.perl6.org | UTF-8 is our friend! Set by sorear on 25 June 2013. |
|||
japhb | lue: Sorry, got pulled away. Looking again. | 00:04 | |
1: .elems is unnecessary when peforming math ops on an array | 00:05 | ||
2: $end doesn't need to be computed; it's just .end | |||
3: 'if ... { return True; }' more idiomatic as 'return True if ...' | 00:06 | ||
4: No parens needed on params of -> block of for | 00:07 | ||
lue | japhb: Seems like those things would be best as your own comment, rather than me editing them into mine :) | 00:08 | |
japhb | 5. Don't need to use a $-sigil scalar to store a Code reference; just use a & sigil and call it normally | 00:09 | |
Oh, I was just giving you examples. | |||
But sure, I suppose so. | |||
Commit commented on. | 00:11 | ||
00:23
denisboyun left
00:25
daniel-s joined
00:27
pecastro left
00:29
jeffreykegler joined
|
|||
dalek | pan style="color: #395be5">perl6-examples: e5eac13 | lue++ | 99-problems/P08-viklund.pl: [99-probs] Fix P08-viklund.pl Now, that 'our multi' fix is no longer needed, and in fact breaks the script. |
00:40 | |
00:40
vky joined
00:53
stevan_ joined,
stevan_ left
00:54
stevan_ joined
00:58
araujo joined
00:59
araujo left
|
|||
clsn | So. I think I have Signature and Parameter matching and .perling working well. | 01:00 | |
01:01
jnap left
|
|||
timotimo | \o/ | 01:01 | |
clsn | I guess I should format a patch or something. | ||
(had the most infuriating bug earlier. Ever notice that anything ~~ $_ is always True? Annoying when you expect $_ to be something) | 01:02 | ||
01:03
thou left
|
|||
clsn | Wonder if I should do an eqv for Signatures/Parameters too. | 01:03 | |
Enh, I suppose X ~~ Y and Y ~~ X is about right. | 01:04 | ||
I made up a few test cases for Signature matching; I suppose I should submit them to roast. | 01:07 | ||
<clsn> Enh, I suppose X ~~ Y and Y ~~ X is about right. -- Actually, not really... ~~ doesn't take rw into account, for example. Glah. well, I'll think about it. | 01:10 | ||
01:14
denis_boyun joined
01:17
denis_boyun left
01:19
jnap joined
01:24
Ben_Goldberg is now known as BenGoldberg
01:42
skids joined
01:54
vky left
02:10
panchiniak left
02:15
daniel-s left
02:21
skids left
02:29
Mouq left
02:32
MARGELYSR_MORA21 joined
02:33
skids joined
02:36
rurban1 joined
02:39
bluescreen__ left
02:41
slavik1 left
02:45
rurban1 left
02:46
jnap left
02:49
kaleem joined
02:52
Vlavv__ left,
dayangkun left
02:54
slavik joined
02:57
jeffreykegler left
02:59
jeffreykegler joined
03:02
kaleem left
03:03
Mouq joined
03:04
MARGELYSR_MORA21 left
03:05
dayangkun joined
03:32
labster joined
03:35
kbaker_ joined
03:50
jeffreykegler1 joined
03:51
jeffreykegler left
03:56
thou joined
04:01
mumukshu joined
|
|||
mumukshu | hi | 04:02 | |
04:02
mumukshu left
04:09
gfldex joined
04:12
preflex_ joined,
ChanServ sets mode: +v preflex_
04:14
preflex left,
preflex_ is now known as preflex
04:24
SamuraiJack joined
04:34
thou left
|
|||
dalek | t--IRC/concurrency: 8f8e477 | (Geoffrey Broadwell)++ | lib/Net/IRC/Logger.pm: Minor readability cleanup |
04:34 | |
t--IRC/concurrency: 1543ec9 | (Geoffrey Broadwell)++ | lib/Net/IRC/Logger.pm: Considerably speed up logging so it's not a bottleneck (for now at least) |
|||
t--IRC/concurrency: 30de528 | (Geoffrey Broadwell)++ | lib/Net/IRC/SocketConnection.pm: Various SocketConnection improvements * Better debugging output * Ability to log privacy-scrubbed messages * .sendln method * Factor out !start-threads from .new * Various minor code cleanups |
|||
04:44
raiph left
04:49
skids left
|
|||
BenGoldberg | .ping | 04:51 | |
moritz | .pong | 04:53 | |
04:53
BenGoldberg left
05:22
kbaker_ left
06:02
immortal joined
06:04
erkan left
06:18
kaleem joined
06:20
dayangkun left
06:21
mtj_- left
06:24
sergot left
06:25
sergot joined
06:26
mtj_ joined
06:29
dayangkun joined
06:40
darutoko joined
06:43
Mouq left
06:50
jeffreykegler1 left
06:52
xinming_ left
06:53
xinming joined
06:58
xinming left,
xinming_ joined
07:02
bjz left
07:09
FROGGS left,
grep0r left
07:16
yoleaux joined,
ChanServ sets mode: +v yoleaux
07:18
hummeleBop joined
|
|||
raydiak | well, I eventually got rakudo jvm to build on my laptop by putting more ram in it...seems 2 gigs was the minimum required in my case...never did figure out why it wouldn't swap | 07:28 | |
moritz | raydiak: maybe the JVM marks it memory pages as non-swappable, or something | 07:29 | |
I'm pretty sure there is such a mechanism, to avoid swapping of passwords, for example | |||
raydiak | moritz: that's a decent guess...though there are many wires I didn't jiggle like ulimits, kernel config, etc | 07:31 | |
07:33
AW3i joined
|
|||
raydiak | I'm mostly just trying to not have to invest too much energy into this sorry machine until I can replace it with something not half broken and with a hard drive :) | 07:33 | |
but I wanted something with multiple cores to develop Pray concurrency on, so now I have that at least | 07:34 | ||
07:40
FROGGS joined
07:47
immortal left
07:48
AW3i left
07:55
AW3i joined
07:57
berekuk joined
08:14
virtualsue joined
08:17
zakharyas joined
08:22
LLamaRider joined
08:26
[Sno] left
08:37
dmol joined
08:39
salv0 left
08:42
virtualsue left
08:44
salv0 joined
08:51
dayangkun left
08:56
grep0r joined
|
|||
hoelzro | morning #perl6 | 09:02 | |
yoleaux | 15 Jan 2014 22:37Z <raiph> hoelzro: questhub.io/realm/perl/quest/52bca7...e15d0000ca | ||
09:03
dayangkun joined
09:06
bjz joined
|
|||
tadzik | apparently you _do_ live twice | 09:06 | |
hello hoelzro | |||
09:07
rindolf joined
09:08
berekuk left
09:11
Vlavv` joined
|
|||
lizmat | good *, #perl6! | 09:12 | |
tadzik, hoelzro o/ | |||
09:12
salv0 left,
salv0 joined
|
|||
FROGGS | morning all | 09:12 | |
lizmat | FROGGS o/ | 09:13 | |
FROGGS | o/ | ||
lizmat is still looking at the my @a := 5 issue | 09:14 | ||
or more verbosely, and at run time: | 09:15 | ||
r: my @a; my $b=0; my @b := @a[$b] | |||
camelia | rakudo-parrot 4f66ce: OUTPUT«Type check failed in binding; expected 'Positional' but got 'Any' in block at /tmp/pBzmgOhCx1:1» | ||
..rakudo-jvm 4f66ce: OUTPUT«Type check failed in binding; expected 'Positional' but got 'Any'» | |||
lizmat | feels to me that so far we can think of a scalar value as a one element array/list | 09:16 | |
except when binding | |||
and I wonder whether that is consistent or wanted | 09:17 | ||
that it fails in the above cases | |||
some spelunking showed me that this will probably will have to be fixed in perl6_assert_bind_ok in C | 09:18 | ||
jnthn: any thoughts? | |||
hoelzro | ahoy tadzik and lizmat | 09:20 | |
09:24
AW3i left
|
|||
moritz | r: my @a; my $b=0; say @a[$b].WHAT | 09:25 | |
camelia | rakudo-parrot 4f66ce, rakudo-jvm 4f66ce: OUTPUT«(Any)» | ||
moritz | why fixing? it's correct | ||
hoelzro | .tell raiph why did you point that QH quest out to me? | ||
yoleaux | hoelzro: I'll pass your message to raiph. | ||
moritz | binding doesn't coerce (like assignment) | ||
hoelzro | thanks yoleaux! | 09:26 | |
lizmat | moritz: maybe it should? | ||
moritz | lizmat: nope | ||
lizmat: binding is a low-level operation | |||
lizmat: when you mess with it, you'd better know what you're doing :-) | |||
09:27
PZt left
|
|||
lizmat | ok, so how do you stand on slices returning scalars depending on number of elements? | 09:27 | |
if elemens == 1, return scalar from slice | |||
hoelzro | any further thoughts on how binding and type-constrained hash keys should interact? =) | ||
moritz | +1 | ||
hoelzro | ex. my %hash{Int} := MyHashImpl | 09:28 | |
er | |||
ex. my %hash{Int} := MyHashImpl.new | |||
09:28
thou joined
|
|||
moritz | hoelzro: is the {Int} a type constraint? Or a container initialization thingy? | 09:28 | |
lizmat | ok, so I implemented slices return a scalar if .elems == 1 | ||
hoelzro | moritz: it's a constraint on the keys | ||
lizmat++ impl'd it | |||
moritz | hoelzro: I know it is | ||
lizmat | and I get *massive* breakage in the spectest because my @a := @b[slice] sometimes returns a scalar | 09:29 | |
moritz | hoelzro: but that doesn't answer my question | ||
lizmat: then maybe it's not such a good idea after all :( | |||
hoelzro: let me explain: my %hash; constraints %hash to Positional, but initializes %hash with type Hash | |||
lizmat | well, if my @a := 5 would work, it *would* be a good idea and completely consistent | 09:30 | |
09:30
[Sno] joined
|
|||
moritz | hoelzro: so there are two things here: a property of the container, and a property of the object that's stored in it | 09:30 | |
09:30
pecastro joined
|
|||
moritz | s/Positional/Associative/, but you get the idea | 09:30 | |
lizmat | afk for a few hours& | ||
moritz | hoelzro: so, the question I'm asking: does the {Int} go into the container type constraint? | 09:31 | |
09:35
dakkar joined
|
|||
masak | good antenoon, #perl6 | 09:43 | |
arnsholt | 'lo | 09:44 | |
masak | lizmat, moritz: fwiw, I'd rather have the scalar/list semantics be consistent than dwimmy. | ||
that is, I don't mind if it's sometimes single-minded and doesn't give me exactly what I wanted -- as long as I can look at the code and figure out what it will give me, statically. | 09:45 | ||
09:45
salv0 left,
salv0 joined
09:46
DrEeevil is now known as AmazingPudding
|
|||
moritz | r: my %h; say so %h{'a'}:exists | 09:46 | |
camelia | rakudo-parrot 4f66ce, rakudo-jvm 4f66ce: OUTPUT«False» | ||
moritz | r: my @a; say so @a[0]:exists | ||
camelia | rakudo-parrot 4f66ce, rakudo-jvm 4f66ce: OUTPUT«False» | ||
moritz | r: my @a; say so @a[-> $ { 0 }]:exists | 09:47 | |
camelia | rakudo-parrot 4f66ce, rakudo-jvm 4f66ce: OUTPUT«True» | ||
moritz | r: my @a; say so @a[*+1]:exists | ||
camelia | rakudo-parrot 4f66ce, rakudo-jvm 4f66ce: OUTPUT«True» | ||
moritz finds that really unintuitive | |||
masak | what's the proximal cause? | ||
hoelzro | moritz: ooooooh | ||
FROGGS | r: my @a; say (@a[*+1]:exists).perl | 09:48 | |
camelia | rakudo-parrot 4f66ce, rakudo-jvm 4f66ce: OUTPUT«(Bool::False,)» | ||
hoelzro | I understand (I think) | ||
masak | ah, yes. | ||
'so' on a 1-elem list. | |||
hoelzro | I believe that (at least in terms of the implementation) it's a property of the underlying Hash | ||
moritz | hoelzro: if it's not a type constraint on the container, it won't interfere with binding. | ||
hoelzro | but that means I can do my %hash{Int} := MyHash.new; %hash<foo> = 'bar'; doesn't it? | 09:49 | |
moritz | yes | 09:54 | |
hoelzro | hmm | 09:59 | |
well, if that's the case | |||
then I think I will try my hand at implementing fixed size arrays in a simliar fashion | |||
10:03
labster left
10:10
labster joined
10:11
erkan joined
10:14
stevan_ left
|
|||
masak | when I make a language, it won't have the scalar-vs-1-element-list dwimming. :) | 10:38 | |
at least not in the main slang. | |||
moritz has a long mental "when I make a language" list | 10:40 | ||
"if I were a god, I'd be *nice*" podcastle.org/2012/06/26/podcastle-...y-brother/ | 10:45 | ||
10:46
berekuk joined
10:50
berekuk left
10:52
FROGGS[mobile] left,
FROGGS[mobile] joined
10:54
mtk left
10:59
d^_^b left
11:00
d^_^b joined,
mtk joined
11:04
FROGGS[mobile]2 joined
11:05
pnu left
11:06
denis_boyun joined
11:07
FROGGS[mobile] left
11:08
pnu_ joined
11:11
thou left
|
|||
masak | moritz: :) | 11:16 | |
11:16
smls joined
|
|||
smls | re recent log: I'm with masak here, I think array indexing vs array slicing should be distinguishable syntactically | 11:22 | |
11:24
FROGGS[mobile]2 left
11:26
FROGGS[mobile] joined,
FROGGS[mobile] left,
PZt joined
11:29
fhelmberger joined
11:32
thou joined
|
|||
lizmat | masak, moritz: perhaps a :parcel adverb ? | 11:37 | |
@a[@b]:parcel would guarantee a parcel, even if only 1 element? | 11:38 | ||
11:43
Ulti_ is now known as Ulti
11:47
rindolf left
11:48
rindolf joined
11:54
baest_ joined
11:56
baest left,
rindolf left,
rindolf joined
11:59
rindolf left,
rindolf joined
12:01
rindolf left,
rindolf joined,
bjz left
12:03
fhelmberger_ joined
12:04
fhelmberger left
|
|||
masak | lizmat: seems sane at first glance. | 12:09 | |
(that would mean sanity is still opt-in... but maybe Perl as a whole is too committed to the idea of scalar things being indistinguishable from 1-elem lists) | 12:10 | ||
moritz | r: say 1.Parcel | 12:14 | |
camelia | rakudo-parrot 4f66ce: OUTPUT«No such method 'Parcel' for invocant of type 'Int' in block at /tmp/s73rDTJwJ6:1» | ||
..rakudo-jvm 4f66ce: OUTPUT«No such method 'Parcel' for invocant of type 'Int'» | |||
moritz | maybe a Any.Parcel method | ||
and then we can get simply say .Parcel, and don't need to invent yet another adverb | |||
hoelzro | whoa, when did Gist start supporting Perl 6? | ||
masak | moritz: +1 | 12:15 | |
hoelzro | I swear that it didn't like 2 weeks ago, even though other parts of GH did | ||
tadzik | woo | ||
masak | hoelzro: nice! | ||
jnthn | morning, #perl6 | 12:16 | |
preflex | jnthn: you have 3 new messages. '/msg preflex messages' to read them. | ||
jnthn | uh...wait...which timezone am I...oh. :) | ||
moritz | hoelzro: iirc somebody said yesterday that it gist didn't support Perl 6 | ||
hoelzro: so might have started last night/today | |||
hoelzro | sweet | ||
jnthn | ooh, gist supporting Perl 6 is nice :) | 12:17 | |
FROGGS | cool! | ||
indeed, it works now | 12:18 | ||
lunch & | |||
xfix | codegolf.stackexchange.com/a/18616/3103 | ||
wow, code golf problem with two pages | 12:19 | ||
Perl 6 wins for now | |||
With -47 bytes. | |||
12:19
sftp_ joined
|
|||
moritz | r: say[+]1..5 | 12:19 | |
camelia | rakudo-jvm 4f66ce: OUTPUT«===SORRY!=== Error while compiling /tmp/qMi_ud_MSuPreceding context expects a term, but found infix + insteadat /tmp/qMi_ud_MSu:1------> say[+⏏]1..5» | ||
..rakudo-parrot 4f66ce: OUTPUT«===SORRY!=== Error while compiling /tmp/eTFl578ZSSPreceding context expects a term, but found infix + insteadat /tmp/eTFl578ZSS:1------> say[+⏏]1..5» | |||
moritz | r: say [+]1..5 | 12:20 | |
camelia | rakudo-jvm 4f66ce: OUTPUT«===SORRY!=== Error while compiling /tmp/JwTk5X5VJuTwo terms in a rowat /tmp/JwTk5X5VJu:1------> say [+]⏏1..5 expecting any of: argument list postfix infix stopper …» | ||
..rakudo-parrot 4f66ce: OUTPUT«===SORRY!=== Error while compiling /tmp/Io6d6SIQKdTwo terms in a rowat /tmp/Io6d6SIQKd:1------> say [+]⏏1..5 expecting any of: argument list postfix infix stopper …» | |||
moritz | r: say [+] 1..5 | ||
camelia | rakudo-parrot 4f66ce, rakudo-jvm 4f66ce: OUTPUT«15» | ||
moritz | r: say[+] 1..5 | ||
camelia | rakudo-jvm 4f66ce: OUTPUT«===SORRY!=== Error while compiling /tmp/UG8g7nBxW8Preceding context expects a term, but found infix + insteadat /tmp/UG8g7nBxW8:1------> say[+⏏] 1..5» | ||
..rakudo-parrot 4f66ce: OUTPUT«===SORRY!=== Error while compiling /tmp/_IgH6q9yilPreceding context expects a term, but found infix + insteadat /tmp/_IgH6q9yil:1------> say[+⏏] 1..5» | |||
moritz grumbles | |||
xfix | Yeah, [+] operator annoys me. | ||
moritz | r: say [+](1..5) | ||
camelia | rakudo-parrot 4f66ce, rakudo-jvm 4f66ce: OUTPUT«15» | ||
moritz | but you can get rid of that one whitespace | ||
cause you already have parens around the argument | 12:21 | ||
masak | jnthn! \o/ | ||
xfix | say [+] (1..get.eval)».comb | ||
But... I call at method on it. | |||
jnthn | o/ masak | ||
xfix | Won't this change precedence? | ||
12:21
sftp left
|
|||
xfix | call a method* | 12:21 | |
The parens here are for a reason. | 12:22 | ||
moritz | xfix: why don't you try? | 12:23 | |
r: say [+](4, 5).join | |||
camelia | rakudo-parrot 4f66ce, rakudo-jvm 4f66ce: OUTPUT«9» | ||
moritz | r: say [+] (4, 5).join | ||
camelia | rakudo-parrot 4f66ce, rakudo-jvm 4f66ce: OUTPUT«45» | ||
moritz | ok, it does change it. Never mind. | ||
12:34
thou left
|
|||
jnthn | lizmat: my @a := 5 # should fail, I remember a time when it did not and it was agreed that this was a bug. Binding is low level. Please don't try to put magic into binding; magical things going on in stuff that's supposed to be low level is already making optimization a huge pain | 12:35 | |
lizmat | fair enough | ||
jnthn | hoelzro: my %hash{Int} is a type constraint on the keys | ||
lizmat | but that means that if you want to bind the result of something that you don't know is going to be an array or not | 12:36 | |
you cannot use an array | |||
which in itself bars some optimizations, no? | |||
hoelzro | jnthn: right, but what does that mean if I bind another Associative to that hash? | ||
lizmat | my $a := @a[@b] | ||
rather than: | |||
my @a := @b[@c] | 12:37 | ||
jnthn | hoelzro: That it should be ~~ Hash[Mu, Int], iirc | 12:38 | |
lizmat: If you don't know what you're going to have then coerce it to be sure. | |||
lizmat: No, I don't see how it bars optimization. | |||
lizmat | because at compile time with @a you know you have a positional, whereas with $a you don't know what you're going to get at runtime | 12:39 | |
jnthn | lizmat: Well, I can maybe see...ish...but I'm pretty sure avoiding the check is a bigger win | ||
lizmat: The other thing to keep in mind is that if you want binding to be that magical, then for consistency one might well expect that: | |||
sub foo(@a) { }; foo(1) | |||
To also work. | |||
'cus signature binding is also a case of binding. | 12:40 | ||
And I'm pretty sure we can't do that, since relying on multi-dispatch distinguishing array vs scalar matters. | |||
lizmat | ok | ||
jnthn | In fact, I know to-json in JSON::Tiny relies on (and gets good use out of) this. | 12:41 | |
lizmat | but what do you think about slices returning a scalar depending on the number of values returned ? | ||
if .elems == 1, then scalar, else Parcel | |||
jnthn | I'm not sure it's about number of results so much as which of the multi candidates for postcircumfix you hit | 12:42 | |
Though, I can see that @a[0]:v is an icky case | |||
lizmat | well, that's just it | ||
jnthn | 'cus it's meant to strip, or whatever we call it | ||
lizmat | yup | ||
and even with *-1 | |||
jnthn | Yeah. I see the problem. | ||
lizmat | which is what originally spurred my spelunking | 12:43 | |
cause that's indistinguishable from -> {(0,1,2)} | |||
and *that* would return a Parcel | |||
jnthn | I'm pretty sure that we can't, performance wise, get away with constructing a Parcel for every array access. | ||
lizmat | and people expect *-1 to *not* return a Parcel | ||
jnthn | Yeah | 12:44 | |
hoelzro | jnthn: sorry, what does 'it' resolve to here? | ||
%hash, or the new Associative? | |||
lizmat | I implemented .elems == 1 returning a scalar | ||
jnthn | hoelzro: The new associative. Each symbol has a bind constraint. | ||
lizmat | and get rather massive failures in the spectest | ||
because of my @a = @b[@c] returning a scalar | 12:45 | ||
jnthn | lizmat: Hmm | ||
lizmat | * := | ||
hoelzro | jnthn: so the bind should fail if the new associative doesn't ~~ Hash[Mu, Int], you say? | ||
12:45
dakkar left
|
|||
jnthn | hoelzro: I think Hash may be too specific, actually | 12:46 | |
hoelzro: I mean, my Int @a := ... needs the ... to be ~~ Positional[Int] | |||
And I think the bind constraint on a %-y thing wants to be Associative[...] | |||
lizmat: I think that @b[@c] will always hit the Positional case in multi-dispatch | 12:47 | ||
lizmat: And could consistently be a Parcel | |||
lizmat: I guess the challenge is to think of simple rules | |||
lizmat | mode the Whatever case is ambiguous | ||
12:47
spider-mario joined
|
|||
lizmat | s/mode/but | 12:47 | |
jnthn | Yeah, the Whatever case is. That's about the only one where I can't see a better way than .elems, though that feels icky | 12:48 | |
xfix | std: foreach my $x (1) {} | ||
camelia | std 09dda5b: OUTPUT«===SORRY!===Unexpected block in infix position (two terms in a row, or previous statement missing semicolon?) at /tmp/PbZlA2qcKi line 1:------> foreach my $x (1) ⏏{} expecting any of: constraint infix or me…» | ||
lizmat | and with adverbs it becomes more blurry | ||
hoelzro | jnthn: I'm just wondering if my %hash{Int} := MyHashImpl.new is even valid | ||
xfix | It still doesn't require this Perl 5 construct? | ||
hoelzro | I'm guessing that the bind needs to check MyHashImpl for some properties on top of associative (namely, the type params) | ||
jnthn | Well, the adverbs all strip, so I could see "if you adverb we always Parel" as a rule | ||
hoelzro | on a side note, speaking of the gist coloring, I found this gem in the logs: | ||
irclog.perlgeek.de/perl6/2012-08-02#i_5868670 | |||
talk about foreshadowing =P | 12:49 | ||
jnthn | hoelzro: At the moment Associative only cares for the value type, and lacks a second key type parameter | ||
12:50
bjz joined
|
|||
lizmat | fwiw, I feel we need to be consistent | 12:50 | |
jnthn | hoelzro: that likely wants to change. | ||
hoelzro | jnthn: the reason I ask is because I'm interested in trying to impl fixed size/shaped arrays, and wonder how I should handle binding | ||
12:50
bjz left
|
|||
lizmat | since any scalar value can be assumed to be a 1 element list/array | 12:50 | |
there is no harm returning a scalar in case of a 1 element parcel | |||
12:50
bjz joined
|
|||
jnthn | hoelzro: Well, there's already a patch doing fixed size arrays | 12:50 | |
12:50
bjz left
|
|||
jnthn | hoelzro: Which has been through some code review. | 12:50 | |
12:51
bjz joined,
bjz left
|
|||
hoelzro | ah ha | 12:51 | |
Ulti | are the fixed size also native shaped? | ||
jnthn | lizmat: True, "if there's one result, you get a scalar" is an easy to remember rule | ||
Ulti | as in just offset arrays | ||
12:51
bjz joined
|
|||
lizmat | and then we just have to tell everybody that if you bind to a slice | 12:52 | |
jnthn | lizmat: Probably one for TimToady++ to weigh in on | ||
lizmat | you shouldn't use an array | ||
jnthn | lizmat: tbh the vast majority of folks assing rather than bind | ||
uh, assign | |||
lizmat | indeed | ||
jnthn | ...I hate that typo... | ||
...it's a pain in the butt. | |||
lizmat | but there's plenty of spectests that need to be fixed if my @a := 5 is not going to work | ||
and possibly in the core as well | 12:53 | ||
and most likely in the ecosystem as well | |||
not to mention darkpan | |||
jnthn | Well, I'm quite confidnet saying "my @a := 5" is not going to work. I'd be very surprised and kinda concerned if we ruled the other way on that one. | ||
s/we/TimToady/ | |||
lizmat | I can live with that | 12:54 | |
don't get me wrong | |||
jnthn | The "one elem = scalar" rule, I'm not so sure | ||
lizmat | well, at the moment, it is almost arbitrary what you get | ||
jnthn | I'd hold fire a little just to let TimToady have a chance to weigh in. He may have an answer we all missed. :) | ||
Yes, I'm not defending the status quo at all :) | |||
moritz | r: say (1..5).pick.^name | ||
camelia | rakudo-parrot 4f66ce, rakudo-jvm 4f66ce: OUTPUT«Int» | ||
moritz | r: say (1..5).pick(1).^name | ||
camelia | rakudo-parrot 4f66ce, rakudo-jvm 4f66ce: OUTPUT«Int» | ||
jnthn | The only thing I have a strong feeling on here is the := semantis | ||
moritz | r: say (1..5).pick(1..1).^name | ||
jnthn | *semantics | ||
camelia | rakudo-parrot 4f66ce, rakudo-jvm 4f66ce: OUTPUT«Int» | ||
moritz | r: say (1..5).pick(2).^name | ||
camelia | rakudo-parrot 4f66ce, rakudo-jvm 4f66ce: OUTPUT«List» | ||
moritz | r: say 1.map(*+1).^name | 12:55 | |
camelia | rakudo-parrot 4f66ce, rakudo-jvm 4f66ce: OUTPUT«List» | ||
moritz | jnthn: I agree with you on the binding semantics | ||
lizmat | jnthn: wrt to making @a := 5 work | 12:56 | |
the way I see it, is that this would not be a burden on current execution speed | |||
only if the initial test fails (which now throws the exception) | |||
only then would a list be created in which the scalar would be put, which would then be bound | 12:57 | ||
so the normal code path would not have any change | |||
jnthn | lizmat: Well, but the consistency with parameter binding is still a strong argument not to do it. | 12:58 | |
lizmat: And it's not just speed we should be concerned with, but code size | |||
lizmat | apart from some extra C-code, how would this affect code size ? | ||
jnthn | (Because more compact generated code = more of it in L1) | ||
lizmat | the generated code would still be the same, no? | ||
jnthn | You're only looking at the Parrot way of doing it, though | 12:59 | |
lizmat | ah, ok | ||
jnthn | On Moar it isn't a C op | ||
It emits istype | |||
And a branch | |||
lizmat | ok | ||
yes, looking only from Parrot standpoint atm | |||
jnthn | 'cus we want the type specializer to be able to deal with istype statically when it can | ||
whcih I guess with dead code elimination means it'd throw away the extra code you're suggesting at specialization point... | 13:00 | ||
...so it's not the end of the world. | |||
I think the inconsistency we'd introduce with parameter binding is the strongest argument here | |||
BUT, I am wary of relying on clever optimizations to make things we class as primitives efficient. | |||
lizmat | understood | 13:01 | |
jnthn | That's why I pushed for the postcircumfix becoming a sub rather than a method. So the code we send onwards to VMs for array/hash access is already a little better | ||
(Yes, I will look at the optimizer soon to ensure we're getting wins from that.) | 13:02 | ||
On the JVM it will inline a bunch of levels deep *but* after the code is hot. So we exaggerate the slow start effect, if we ain't careful. I think he CLR only goes one deep, but maybe they changed that. | 13:03 | ||
On Moar, we can implement what we like, but inlining multiple levels deep *and* keeping enough around to pretend the stack trace looked a certain way when an error occurs is...really good fun to make work. :) | 13:04 | ||
bah, I have a half-complete patch here and I can't remember what I was in the middle of trying to make work... :) | 13:06 | ||
13:13
dag_ joined
|
|||
FROGGS | and the weird thing is, you are still smiling | 13:13 | |
dag_ | xfix: Nice golf! How about replacing the eval with an expression grammar, just to blow the competition out of the water? ;-) | 13:14 | |
lizmat | jnthn: on closer inspection wrt parameter binding, | ||
Ulti | I think I found a new target for a Perl6 slang github.com/parrot/lolcode/blob/mas...grammar.pg | ||
lizmat | if we implement the .elems == 1 -> scalar rule | ||
we must have @a := 5 work as well | 13:15 | ||
otherwise we get this: | |||
$ perl6-p -e 'sub a (@x) { say @x }; my @a=0; a(@a[@a])' | |||
Nominal type check failed for parameter '@x'; expected Positional but got Int instead | |||
:-( | 13:16 | ||
timotimo | let's implement IntParcel, StrParcel, NumParcel and AnyParcel dual-derived types! :P | 13:21 | |
13:21
smls left
|
|||
jnthn | lizmat: Yes, well that probably tells us that the .elems == 1 -> scalar rule is gonna be problematic... | 13:22 | |
We kinda know we can't make binding do that or we seriously break multi-dispatch... | 13:23 | ||
13:25
Woodi left
|
|||
lizmat | r: sub a (@x) { say @x }; my @a=0; my $b:=0; a(@a[$b]) # fails | 13:26 | |
camelia | rakudo-jvm 4f66ce: OUTPUT«Nominal type check failed for parameter '@x'» | ||
..rakudo-parrot 4f66ce: OUTPUT«Nominal type check failed for parameter '@x'; expected Positional but got Int instead in sub a at /tmp/r0qbipx6Zk:1 in block at /tmp/r0qbipx6Zk:1» | |||
lizmat | r: sub a (@x) { say @x }; my @a=0; my $b:=(0,); a(@a[$b]) # does not fail | ||
camelia | rakudo-parrot 4f66ce, rakudo-jvm 4f66ce: OUTPUT«0» | ||
jnthn | lizmat: Well, I totally expect the first one to fail | ||
Second one perhaps should. | 13:27 | ||
lizmat | but I see your point about multi-dispatch | 13:28 | |
13:28
LLamaRider left
|
|||
lizmat | yuck | 13:28 | |
FROGGS | Ulti: sounds reasonable :o) | 13:30 | |
Ulti | KTHNX | 13:31 | |
FROGGS | that reminds me of nagging jnthn about slangs | 13:32 | |
jnthn | <- jetlagged and stupid today :P | 13:33 | |
FROGGS | I am not jetlagged :o) | 13:34 | |
I let others judge on stupidness | 13:35 | ||
13:36
LLamaRider joined
|
|||
dalek | Heuristic branch merge: pushed 20 commits to rakudo/moar-support by jnthn | 13:39 | |
lizmat | jnthn: thinking about it some more, wrt to parameter binding and mmd | 13:41 | |
r: multi a (@x) { say "array" }; multi a ($x) { say "scalar" }; my @a=0; a(@a[@a]) # says array | |||
camelia | rakudo-parrot 4f66ce, rakudo-jvm 4f66ce: OUTPUT«array» | ||
lizmat | if the .elems == 1 -> scalar rule would apply, then it would be say "scalar" | 13:42 | |
jnthn | Yeah. That's why I think the .elems == 1 rule isn't gonna fly | ||
I'm pondering something like: | |||
lizmat | but why would that be a problem? | ||
jnthn | 1) @foo[$x] is always a scalar | ||
2) @foo[@x] is always a Parcel | 13:43 | ||
3) Any adverb results in a Parcel | |||
lizmat | @foo[*-1] ? | ||
jnthn | 4) For WhateverCode, if evaluating the WhateverCode gives back a Positional then you get a Parcel, and if not then you get a Scalar. | ||
lizmat | @foo[ -> {(0,1,2)} ] | ||
timotimo | jnthn: if you have one or two rakudo-jvm tuits left over in the coming days, i'd really appreciate help in moving the dispatcher creation code from nqp to rakudo. i tried a month ago at least and there was a really strange error i ran into; i think the code disappeared somewhere >_< | ||
jnthn | That is, we go on what the WhateverCode returns... | ||
13:44
Lorn_ joined
|
|||
jnthn | In fact, do we not re-dispatch to postcircumfix:<[ ]> with the result of the WhateverCode? If so, we get this semantic for free. | 13:44 | |
timotimo: OK. I'm gonna focus on getting moar-support merged today/tomorrow, but we can look at that over the weekend. | 13:45 | ||
Or maybe tomorrow | |||
timotimo | cool :) | ||
jnthn | uh...is it me, or does building Rakudo on Parrot feel slower than building Rakudo on Moar? | 13:47 | |
lizmat | jnthn: if $x is bound to a Parcel in "1) @foo[$x] is always a scalar", then it would have to return a Parcel | ||
[Coke] wishes again he timed stuff. | |||
timotimo | jnthn: you would be right; i'm pretty sure that stage parse at least is faster. | 13:48 | |
13:48
kaleem left
|
|||
jnthn | lizmat: I'm pretty sure TimToady would tell us that we screwed up binding somehow... | 13:48 | |
(for the item case) | |||
timotimo | and as i said recently: the "stage post" + "stage pir" may be faster than "stage mast", but there's a second call to parrot to compile the pir code to pbc and *that* also takes a whole lot of time | ||
lizmat | ok, I'll wait until TimToady chimes in | ||
:-) | |||
jnthn | timotimo: Well, I more meant waiting for Grammar, Actions, etc. :) | 13:49 | |
lizmat: Yeah, I think that'd be wise. | |||
lizmat: I'm happy you're looking into this. It's a genuine issue. | |||
timotimo | well, those have some parse time to do, too :) | ||
jnthn | Moar stage parse on this machine is 67.438. On Parrot it's 108.610. | 13:50 | |
tadzik | :o | ||
jnthn | And while stage mast may be a hefty 53.466, post/pir are 42.542 and 3.948 respectively. | 13:51 | |
13:51
kaare_ left
|
|||
jnthn | That's without the pir => pbc thing which takes a few seconds. | 13:52 | |
So they're within a few seconds on the backend stages | |||
timotimo | a few seconds? i need to time that | ||
jnthn | And Moar is notably faster in stage parse, and spends 2 seconds less in stage parse | ||
uh, optimize on the end there | 13:53 | ||
and this is before Moar has gotten much optimization. | |||
timotimo | was about to say | ||
jnthn | r: say 67.438 / 108.610 | ||
camelia | rakudo-parrot 4f66ce, rakudo-jvm 4f66ce: OUTPUT«0.620919» | ||
jnthn runs spectest on Parrot in the moar-support branch to look for the interesting Hash.defined failure | 13:54 | ||
13:54
SHODAN left,
dag_ left
|
|||
timotimo | jnthn: they come from nqp::defor | 13:58 | |
i forgot where exactly, but it's always the same method or sub that causes the error | |||
jnthn | timotimo: Yeah, I found it | 14:00 | |
timotimo: I'm building a fix | |||
timotimo: It's code I remember changing in moar-support | |||
timotimo | ah, excellent | 14:02 | |
i looked and didn't see anything touching that, so i was very confused | |||
afaict, that's the only blocker for a moar-support merge | |||
jnthn | \o/ | ||
OK, then after I verify this is fixed I could just go for it... :) | |||
And let the daily roast tell us about any fallout. | |||
And then will jump on any that pops up | 14:03 | ||
Gonna do a JVM build also | |||
timotimo | jup =) | 14:04 | |
jnthn | Yeah, fix seeems to help | ||
dalek | kudo/moar-support: 1f34bcd | jonathan++ | src/core/Capture.pm: Unbust Capture.BUILD on Parrot. |
14:05 | |
jnthn | General question: how would folks feel about moving the NQP component of perl6-debug into the Rakudo repo? | 14:06 | |
We could leave the UI part as a normal module | 14:07 | ||
(Shipped in Star) | |||
lizmat | +1 | ||
timotimo | +1 | ||
jnthn | Which means we're good to have multiple UIs still | ||
14:08
smls joined
|
|||
jnthn | But it'd ease the build side of it. | 14:08 | |
And install | |||
Given it needs NQP | |||
lizmat | again, +1 :-) | 14:09 | |
jnthn | Also it's quite tightly bound to the Grammar and Actions, which means maint wise, it's easier to have it in Rakudo. | ||
OK, I'm hearing a loud +1 :) | |||
lizmat | well, only 2 so far | ||
jnthn | 3 :) | ||
oh, but you stuffed the ballot :P | |||
lizmat | yup :-) | 14:10 | |
[Coke] | jnthn: any chance this'll happen in the next 20m? | ||
jnthn | [Coke]: "this"? :) | ||
[Coke] | you know, the one random thing in backlog I care about. :) | 14:11 | |
jnthn | [Coke]: oh, moar-support merge... | ||
[Coke] | 09:02 < jnthn> OK, then after I verify this is fixed I could just go for it... :) | ||
wow, you did guess right. :) | |||
jnthn | [Coke]: Oh, if I make it happens in 20 mins do I get roast results later today? :) | ||
[Coke] | I can delay today's run if it's going to happen soon. | ||
hoelzro | dammit, why did this guy stop? spamusement.com/ | ||
jnthn | [Coke]: OK, lemme verify I didn't bust JVM build | 14:12 | |
timotimo | hoelzro: i think people in general are about as mad about tthat as they are about the cancellation of Firefly after the first season | ||
[Coke] | yes, if it happens in the next 20m, I can make one change now and it'll pick up during the daily run. | ||
timotimo: NO WHY DID YOU BRING UP THE PAIN | |||
14:12
araujo joined
|
|||
timotimo | [Coke]: ;( | 14:12 | |
14:12
araujo left
|
|||
jnthn | [Coke]: OK, will get it in the next 20 min then :) | 14:12 | |
[Coke] | ok, will tell moar to build just from nom then. | ||
hoelzro | timotimo: that's another tragedy | ||
timotimo | so many tragedies :( | ||
on a related note, i really should watch Dr. Horrible's Sing-Along Blog again | 14:13 | ||
dalek | rl6-roast-data: 9305507 | coke++ | bin/rakudo.moar.sh: Pull from default branch (in anticipation of mergeback to nom) jnthn++ |
14:14 | |
jnthn | Merging also means we hopefully get moar into p6eval :) | ||
[Coke] | ok, more like 15m. I can delay the daily build if needs be, just let me know. (I can easily kill and restart it too) | ||
colomon | timotimo: "Anarchy run by me" | 14:15 | |
14:16
kbaker_ joined
|
|||
timotimo | :D | 14:17 | |
14:17
SHODAN joined,
SHODAN left,
SHODAN joined
14:20
pmurias joined
|
|||
jnthn | [Coke]: est. 5 mins | 14:20 | |
timotimo | .o( mergeback mountain ) | ||
jnthn | # Your branch is ahead of 'origin/nom' by 251 commits. | 14:21 | |
Geez... :) | |||
timotimo | we should do something about that! | ||
it's unfair, you know? | |||
dalek | p: ea681df | jonathan++ | tools/build/MOAR_REVISION: Update MOAR_REVISION. |
14:22 | |
14:22
bjz left
|
|||
pmurias | jnthn: re moving the nqp part of perl 6 debugger into rakudo, the code seems very internalish | 14:23 | |
so +1 | |||
dalek | Heuristic branch merge: pushed 252 commits to rakudo/nom by jnthn | 14:25 | |
timotimo | \o/ | 14:26 | |
dalek | kudo/nom: 2e90c5c | jonathan++ | docs/ChangeLog: Add a ChangeLog entry about MoarVM. |
||
timotimo | there is no changelog entry big enough in the whole wide world | 14:27 | |
nwc10 | I disagree. I think it can be suitably summarised as "Rather good" | ||
14:28
bjz joined
|
|||
timotimo | :D | 14:28 | |
moritz | \o/ | ||
tadzik | timotimo: wrong | 14:30 | |
dalek | albot: b149ece | moritz++ | build-scripts/rebuild-rakudo.pl: build rakudo-m and nqp-m |
||
tadzik | timotimo | hoelzro: i think people in general are about as mad about tthat as they are about the cancellation of Firefly after the first season | ||
dalek | kudo/nom: dddd3ff | jonathan++ | README: Some README tweaks to mention MoarVM. |
||
tadzik | I *wish* it was cancelled *after* the first season :) | ||
hoelzro | indeed =/ | 14:31 | |
tadzik | at least there was Serenity | ||
timotimo | oh, that's what you mean | 14:32 | |
i thought you were complaining that they more or less tried to close off the story | |||
which isn't actually accurate | |||
except, you know, Serenity | |||
tadzik | I.. got confused reading those last 3 :) | 14:35 | |
dalek | albot: 2644d7e | moritz++ | evalbot.pl: experimental rakudo-moar support |
14:36 | |
tadzik | is there a --gen-moar? | 14:37 | |
14:37
jnap joined
|
|||
dalek | albot: 8d86eb0 | moritz++ | evalbot.pl: use rakudo's nqp-m |
14:37 | |
moritz | tadzik: aye | 14:38 | |
tadzik | oh oh :) | ||
dalek | atures: e8d1817 | jonathan++ | features.json: Split Rakudo by backend; improve concurrency items Makes it easier to see what is supported on what Rakudo backend, and also aligns concurrency section with current S17. |
14:42 | |
grondilu | m: say "hi?" | ||
jnthn | I hope I didn't mess it up :) | ||
moritz | grondilu: it's not active yet | ||
it's not even built :( | |||
timotimo | jnthn: there was a copypasto in your features commit: + "code" : [ "perl6advent.wordpress.com/2009/12/0...ping-forp- rj- rm-fun-and-profit/", | 14:44 | |
jnthn | lol | 14:45 | |
colomon is trying to build all three backends on one go.... | |||
moritz | I've been doing that on moar-support for some time | 14:46 | |
dalek | atures: 4b3184d | jonathan++ | features.json: Correct find/replace gone wild. |
||
jnthn | timotimo++ | ||
timotimo | oh, hehe, that was search&replace ... of course! :D | ||
tadzik | sounds like Seek&Destroy :) | 14:48 | |
14:48
bjz left,
bjz joined,
FROGGS[mobile] joined
|
|||
[Coke] | (build all 3 at the same time) I have been avoiding doing that, running each rakudo backend in a separate container. | 14:48 | |
14:49
FROGGS left
14:52
btyler joined
|
|||
smls is hacking on a Perl 5 script and can't stop thinking "Gosh, I'd love to have access to those Perl 6 cross/recude/hyper operators here..." | 14:53 | ||
14:53
FROGGS[mobile]2 joined
|
|||
JimmyZ | +1 | 14:54 | |
14:54
skids joined
14:57
FROGGS[mobile] left
|
|||
jnthn | JimmyZ: What's the +1 to? :) | 15:02 | |
JimmyZ | perl 6 debugger into rakudo | ||
:P | |||
jnthn | ah, k :) | 15:03 | |
lizmat | errands& | 15:06 | |
skids | can perl6-debug descend into included PIR? How? | ||
masak | skids: I'm going to go with "no". | 15:07 | |
skids | good answer :-) at least I'm not missing something obvious then. | 15:08 | |
jnthn | skids: no | 15:13 | |
skids: It'll treat it as a single expression/statement | 15:14 | ||
colomon | was all excited to have everything built, but... | 15:15 | |
colomon@melissa:~/tools/rakudo$ perl6-m | |||
Segmentation fault (core dumped) | |||
timotimo | oh, huh, that's new | 15:16 | |
colomon | clean checkout of rakudo, built all three in one go, the other two work. | ||
15:17
ajr joined,
ajr is now known as Guest52734,
Guest52734 is now known as ajr_
15:18
treehug88 joined
|
|||
colomon | stack trace: gist.github.com/colomon/8456640 | 15:19 | |
moritz | evalbot control restart | 15:20 | |
15:20
camelia left
15:21
camelia joined
|
|||
moritz | p: say 'just a test...' | 15:21 | |
timotimo | colomon: oh, i think the repl is b0rked | ||
15:22
ChanServ sets mode: +v camelia
|
|||
camelia | rakudo-parrot dddd3f: OUTPUT«just a test...» | 15:22 | |
colomon | timotimo++ # it does work if I give it a quick script | 15:23 | |
jnthn | colomon: Yeah, repl bust. Needs fixing before release | ||
colomon | seriously, 98%? that's crazy talk | ||
jnthn | colomon: Netcraft^W[Coke] confirms it | 15:24 | |
moritz | m: say 'Hi from Moar' | ||
camelia | rakudo-moar dddd3f: OUTPUT«(signal ABRT)While looking for 'RESTRICTED.setting.moarvm': no such file or directory at src/gen/m-ModuleLoader.nqp:345 (/home/p6eval/rakudo-inst-2/languages/nqp/lib/Perl6/ModuleLoader.moarvm::52) from src/gen/m-ModuleLoader.nqp:352 (/home/p6eval…» | ||
colomon | jnthn++ all involved++ | 15:25 | |
moritz | seems that RESTRICTED.setting.moarvm isn't installed? | ||
jnthn | moritz: Quite possible...make install likely needs some love | 15:26 | |
JimmyZ | jnthn: Does it mean you will add vtable io before release? :) | ||
jnthn | JimmyZ: No, nothing so big... :) | 15:27 | |
JimmyZ: Just "make it work" for now :) | |||
JimmyZ | I know why repl bust, I just don't know how to fix it. | 15:28 | |
15:35
kaleem joined
|
|||
jnthn discovers more free beer | 15:42 | ||
nwc10 | is it as good as the free beer in Frankfurt? | 15:43 | |
jnthn | nwc10: No :( | ||
moritz: You taking care of RESTRICTED or should I? | |||
nwc10 | Surely "f"ree" bud light has negative value? | 15:44 | |
at least one can make tea using real water. | |||
jnthn | nwc10: Well, it's Becks or Carlsberg... | ||
In Germany there was Franziskaner weissbier... | |||
tadzik | so the tea scenario is still an option :> | ||
[Coke] | "much moar" "so rakudo" | ||
[6~[6~ | |||
nwc10 | I'd forgotten exactly what the answer was | ||
I have to admit I'll drink Becks if someone else is paying and they don't expect anything in return | 15:45 | ||
timotimo | :D | ||
[Coke] is not a finicky beer drinker. Coke probably needs to drink moar beer. | |||
dalek | atures: 94a298f | jonathan++ | features.json: Correct notes. |
15:50 | |
timotimo | is there a spot i can look at to memadvise moarvm's heap spaces to be "no copy on fork" on linux? | ||
jnthn | timotimo: Why don't we want them to be copied? | 15:51 | |
nwc10 | jnthn: this is another airport? | ||
jnthn | timotimo: Or is this COW? | ||
nwc10 | or some other beer fountain? | ||
jnthn | nwc10: Heathrow | ||
nwc10 | oh | ||
different route home? | |||
jnthn | yeah | ||
timotimo | jnthn: it's COW and at least for forking off a new moarvm where the first thing i'll do is killing the existing thread context ... d) | 15:55 | |
it seems like i can just use the nursery addresses and sizes and give that to madvise directly before the fork and undo the stuff afterwards | |||
jnthn | yeah...well, the nursery tospace/fromspace and the pages in the gen2 allocator... | 15:56 | |
timotimo | yup | ||
15:58
Psyche^ joined
|
|||
timotimo | hm, the sizes of the gen2 bins is a function of the individual size class | 16:00 | |
jnthn | yeah | ||
timotimo marks it as todo | 16:01 | ||
how big is the gen2 going to be anyway! probably only a few kilobytes! :P | |||
(since the sandbox host process is likely going to be implemented in nqp) | |||
timotimo is noticing he's not following "do the simplest thing that could possibly work" | 16:03 | ||
and instead, he chases interesting thingies | |||
16:03
Psyche^_ left
|
|||
hoelzro | anyone else going to FOSDEM? | 16:06 | |
jnthn | r: say (27980 / 98.28) * 99 - 27980 | 16:07 | |
camelia | rakudo-moar dddd3f: OUTPUT«(signal ABRT)While looking for 'RESTRICTED.setting.moarvm': no such file or directory at src/gen/m-ModuleLoader.nqp:345 (/home/p6eval/rakudo-inst-2/languages/nqp/lib/Perl6/ModuleLoader.moarvm::52) from src/gen/m-ModuleLoader.nqp:352 (/home/p6eval…» | ||
..rakudo-parrot dddd3f, rakudo-jvm dddd3f: OUTPUT«204.981685» | |||
jnthn | FROGGS[mobile]2: Fixing remaining S05 Unicode prop things is enough to hit 99% ;) | 16:08 | |
r: say 471 - 261 | |||
camelia | rakudo-moar dddd3f: OUTPUT«(signal ABRT)While looking for 'RESTRICTED.setting.moarvm': no such file or directory at src/gen/m-ModuleLoader.nqp:345 (/home/p6eval/rakudo-inst-2/languages/nqp/lib/Perl6/ModuleLoader.moarvm::52) from src/gen/m-ModuleLoader.nqp:352 (/home/p6eval…» | 16:09 | |
..rakudo-parrot dddd3f, rakudo-jvm dddd3f: OUTPUT«210» | |||
jnthn | Otherwise we gotta fix everything else :P | ||
16:11
FROGGS[mobile]2 left
16:13
FROGGS joined,
FROGGS[mobile] joined,
FROGGS[mobile] left
|
|||
FROGGS | jnthn: true, but I'd need to talk to somebody how to do things to make that unicode stuff work | 16:14 | |
16:14
ajr_ left
|
|||
FROGGS | jnthn: I am even thinking about implementing NFG, for this I would need even more information | 16:15 | |
arnsholt | timotimo: Was it you who talked about wanting Qt bindings for Perl 6? | ||
jnthn | hoelzro: I'll be at FOSDEM | 16:16 | |
hoelzro | cool =) | ||
jnthn | hoelzro: Not sure if I was on your list of people who're going or not :) | ||
hoelzro | everyone here is on my list =) | ||
especially you, since I can bug you about low level stuff *and* have a good beer =) | |||
timotimo | arnsholt: yeah | 16:17 | |
jnthn | \o/ | ||
timotimo | arnsholt: why? do you have something crazy cool up your sleeves? | ||
because binding a C++ library is always painful | |||
jnthn | .oO( Arms? ) |
||
arnsholt | Not really, was just reading about Qt and got to thinking | ||
timotimo | Qt is crazy cool. | ||
hoelzro | Qt++ | ||
arnsholt | 'cuz yeah, that's essentially what I was going to ask you about: Did you have any ideas, or just pie-in-the-skying? | ||
hoelzro .oO( pie? I thought it was castles ) | 16:18 | ||
timotimo | no, just the desire to have it | ||
unfortunately, the Qt Jambi project is apparently dead | |||
otherwise we'd have bindings for the jvm we could use | |||
arnsholt | I guess we could look at how Python, Perl 5, etc do it | ||
timotimo | yeah, PySide may be interesting to look at | 16:19 | |
arnsholt | But first I want to finish NativeCall on JVM, and then perhaps looking back into ZMQ | ||
timotimo | yeah, nativecall pretty please :) | ||
what about NativeCall on moarvm? :D | |||
arnsholt | I've got CStruct about half-finished on my laptop I think | ||
A Moar port should be a lot easier than JVM, since we can probably steal most of it more or less verbatim from the Parrot version | 16:20 | ||
timotimo | yeah | ||
arnsholt | Would you be interested in digging into ZMQ/iPython again once I get NativeCall working on JVM? | ||
I think that could be a cool thing to have | 16:21 | ||
timotimo | i think it would be very cool, yes | ||
unfortunately i don't work like that :P | |||
arnsholt | 's ok | 16:22 | |
16:24
stevan_ joined
|
|||
FROGGS | JimmyZ: about fixing the REPL: I think we would need to set the u.fd in getstdstream, but this explodes when doing so on my box | 16:25 | |
(and it explodes within getstdstream) | 16:26 | ||
16:26
[Sno] left,
atroxaper joined
|
|||
jnthn | Time to go fly...bbl | 16:30 | |
FROGGS | o/ | ||
16:33
zakharyas left
16:39
stevan_ left
16:43
LLamaRider left
16:46
treehug88 left
16:49
treehug88 joined
|
|||
[Coke] gets a new phone from work that can display cyrillic, but not kana or hanzi. :| | 16:53 | ||
[Coke] adds some speed dial links in russian. :P | |||
16:54
kaleem left
16:55
fhelmberger_ left
17:00
thou joined
|
|||
japhb is slowly catching up in the backlog | 17:10 | ||
\o/ to the r-m merge! | |||
+1 to debugger NQP components in mainline | |||
+0 to jnthn's 4 rules of scalar v. Parcel for subscripting # Looks sane, but then I'm rather tired. | 17:12 | ||
raydiak | is that more positive than -0? | 17:16 | |
japhb | raydiak: Yes. | ||
17:17
atroxaper left
|
|||
japhb | raydiak: That's about as important as round-to-even | 17:18 | |
PerlJam | japhb: so ... extremely important? ;) | ||
japhb | PerlJam: Yep. My professor explained it as "Without the separation of +0 and -0, airflow simulations get screwed up, and people design planes that don't fly." | 17:20 | |
17:22
SamuraiJack left
|
|||
japhb | For the peanut gallery: round-to-even keeps stock markets and other high-transaction-volume systems from drifting due to bias in rounding half-ULP (Unit in the Last Place) numbers. | 17:22 | |
17:22
SamuraiJack joined
17:24
locsmif joined
|
|||
japhb | .oO( Oh Professor Kahan, thank you for bringing pedantry to a whole new level! ) |
17:25 | |
17:25
jeffreykegler joined
|
|||
raydiak | I could be confused, but seem to be having a problem which occurs after CHECK and before INIT, and FINAL doesn't appear to exist. How might I track down the line causing the error message (which has no line number)? | 17:29 | |
FROGGS .oO( paste a gist? ) | 17:31 | ||
raydiak | of the error? or of the Pray codebase? | 17:32 | |
FROGGS | the error | ||
raydiak | it's just your standard "no such method jast for NQPMu"...nothing uniquely helpful | 17:33 | |
FROGGS | btw, did you tried to pass --ll-exception to perl6? | ||
raydiak | nope | ||
FROGGS | ahh, well | ||
raydiak | trying --ll-exception now | 17:34 | |
FROGGS | I'd think that there is garbage in the ast | ||
raydiak | ast=symbol tree? | ||
japhb | raydiak: Abstract Syntax Tree | 17:35 | |
raydiak | --ll-exception doesn't change the output | ||
FROGGS | k | ||
raydiak | -c completes with OK | ||
FROGGS | can you pass --target=ast ? | ||
17:36
SamuraiJack left
|
|||
raydiak | trying | 17:36 | |
TimToady is in a quantum superposition of about five timezones, and his backbrain is not in one-to-one correspondence with the backlog... | 17:37 | ||
FROGGS | hmmm | 17:38 | |
raydiak | ah, rearranged params so --ll-exception actually gets passed in the right place...it does change the output | ||
FROGGS muses about TimToady's frontbrain and the frontlog | |||
TimToady | those are in a zero-to-zero correspondence at the moment... | 17:39 | |
FROGGS | I usually put it right after perl6 | ||
(the --ll-exception, not the brane) | |||
raydiak | gist.github.com/raydiak/8459623 | 17:40 | |
FROGGS | # variables with fallback can have side effects and cannot be elided | 17:41 | |
$il.append($last_res.jast) | |||
this is in (gen/jvm/stage2/QAST.nqp:3790) | |||
so, $last_res is Mu | 17:42 | ||
which should be the last statement of a block | |||
raydiak: can you golf it? | |||
17:43
SamuraiJack joined
|
|||
raydiak | FROGGS: I suppose I'll have to make a copy and start shearing chunks off until it un-breaks | 17:43 | |
17:44
benabik joined
|
|||
japhb | moritz: typo in github.com/perl6/evalbot/commit/26...24753b9R72 | 17:44 | |
17:44
dolnop joined
|
|||
FROGGS | raydiak: exactly | 17:44 | |
japhb | moritz: 'raudo-moar' | ||
dolnop | hello, any news about perl6 for android? | 17:45 | |
17:46
mtk left,
apejens left
|
|||
FROGGS | dolnop: there not active project for that I think | 17:46 | |
17:46
avar left
|
|||
FROGGS | might be not too hard since we have Perl 6 on the JVM, but I know nearly nothing about android | 17:46 | |
17:47
apejens joined
17:48
avar joined,
avar left,
avar joined
|
|||
japhb | FROGGS: I believe Dalvik and JDK have very differently designed VMs, so I doubt the code gen would work -- though the Java runtime code might, I dunno. | 17:48 | |
FROGGS | japhb: but we have some sort of pattern, so, it is at least possible :o) | 17:49 | |
dolnop | FROGGS: on perldroid Google Page is this note:2013-09-04: No work has been done anymore on this project due to the existence of a TPJ grant to improve cross compilation of perl | ||
17:49
SamuraiJack left
17:51
psch joined
|
|||
psch | hi #perl6 | 17:51 | |
colomon | o/ | ||
17:51
pecastro left
|
|||
japhb | FROGGS: Just found this: github.com/perl6/evalbot/commit/26...24753b9R72 | 17:51 | |
FROGGS | dolnop: I hope it succeeds | ||
[Coke] | psch: hi | 17:52 | |
FROGGS | japhb: is that the right link? | ||
[Coke] | TPJ grant? | ||
dolnop | the Perl journal? | ||
dalek | albot: 4e909dc | moritz++ | evalbot.pl: fix typos, japhb++ |
17:53 | |
moritz | japhb: success of rakudo-m in evalbot mostly depends on installed rakudo-m working fine :-) | 17:56 | |
japhb | FROGGS: Nope, that's the wrong link, heh | ||
stackoverflow.com/questions/230193/...-in-sun-vm | |||
17:57
jnap left
|
|||
japhb | Some of that is out of date now, but other stuff applies. According to Wikipedia, as of 2.2 Dalvik had a JIT, and as of 4.4 there's the ART install-time AOT compiler. | 17:57 | |
psch | warnings in the optimizer should come out as X::AdHoc i assume, seeing as that's how the grammar does them? | 17:59 | |
err, X::Comp::AdHoc in the grammar that is | |||
18:00
mtk joined
|
|||
moritz | actually no | 18:02 | |
that's how it's done, but that's not how it should be | |||
they should have typed exceptions just like everything else | |||
psch | okay | 18:03 | |
18:04
treehug88 left,
SHODAN left,
treehug88 joined
|
|||
psch | is 'straight up printing to stderr when a warning gets handled' another of those "that's just how it is right now" cases? S04 talks about continuations and lambdas wrt warnings | 18:05 | |
moritz | yes | ||
18:06
[Sno] joined
18:07
dolnop left
|
|||
psch | does that mean i've done nothing actually useful except learning about how stuff works right now, because stuff will change tremendously anyway? :) | 18:08 | |
moritz | it well change, but probably not tremendously | ||
a patch that uses old-style warnings/errors will likely not be rejected for that reason | |||
I just frown a bit about them, that's all :-) | 18:09 | ||
benabik | I keep getting `make: write error` the compilation finishes. Everything seems to work, just something get's OS X's make confused. | ||
psch | old-style means X::AdHoc in this case? i've introduced X::TypeCheck::Signature for the 'sub foo(Str) {}; foo 42' case | ||
in addition to 'make the optimizer throw and group typed exceptions in the first place' | 18:10 | ||
18:10
kaare_ joined
18:11
jnap joined
|
|||
psch | ... ihave also been changing the name of the sub-exception a few times and settled on X::TypeCheck::Argument instead of X::TypeCheck::Signature it seems | 18:13 | |
which does seem saner to me, because it's not actually the signature but the argument that's of the wrong type | 18:14 | ||
gist.github.com/peschwa/8459897 # this is how what i have behaves currently | 18:16 | ||
moritz | psch: looks good | 18:17 | |
psch: though I'd even use throws_like for block around lines 33-39 | 18:18 | ||
something like | |||
throws_like $code, X::TypeCheck::Argument, expectedSig => { .[0] ~~ Str }, ... | 18:19 | ||
psch: oh, and please rename that to expected-sig, we use CamelCase only for types in core | |||
18:19
darutoko left
|
|||
psch | okay, will do | 18:19 | |
moritz | or just 'signature' | 18:20 | |
because there's no other signature involved | |||
psch | right | ||
FROGGS | japhb: btw, I'd need a BlackBerry backend then :/ | 18:21 | |
benabik | moat-support got merged without the fixes for Moar vs Parrot CFLAGS I think. :-( | 18:25 | |
*moar-support | |||
btyler | benabik: I've been having linking errors when compiling rakudo on OSX. you got rakudo to build successfully (other than the make error)? | ||
benabik | btyler: Before the moar-support merge, I've been linking Rakudo successfully. | 18:26 | |
btyler: However I don't use the --gen-* options and install everything to /usr/local | |||
btyler | hm. I was just sticking the various install/project dirs into $PATH and using --prefix, which worked up through nqp and part of rakudo. trying a fresh run with the --gen-* options now | 18:27 | |
18:28
jdv79 left,
tadzik left
18:29
tadzik joined
|
|||
benabik | Looks like I can build parrot if I don't configure moar. But I'm getting linker failures for moar even without Parrot. | 18:29 | |
btyler | gist.github.com/kanatohodets/7ace7...474452ed02 # the specific failure, but that's a few revisions ago now. just got a similar one doing a --gen-* run from a clean rakudo clone | ||
18:29
SHODAN joined
|
|||
benabik | That's the linker failures I was getting as well. | 18:30 | |
btyler | oh, sorry, I should be more specific -- linking errors trying to build r-m | 18:31 | |
benabik | That's why I specified that I was able to build before moar-support. :-D | ||
btyler | clarity++ | 18:32 | |
benabik | Yeah, Moar build is borked on OS X. Can't link on its own and it messes with the parrot build as well. | ||
dalek | kudo/nom: 46b213d | moritz++ | tools/build/Makefile-Moar.in: fix a moar cleanup |
18:33 | |
moritz | in what way does it mess with the parrot build? | 18:34 | |
benabik | r-p fails building parrot exts with "unable to find header ffi.h" | ||
18:34
pochi left
|
|||
benabik | This is because ffi.h is in /usr/include/ffi on OS X and Moar seems to overwrite the Parrot CFLAGS. (Or something, I haven't investigated in detail.) | 18:35 | |
ISTR someone saying they had a partial patch for it, so I wasn't worrying about it. | |||
18:35
jdv79 joined
|
|||
benabik | Erm... Is rakudo trying to compile a moar extension with `-install_name .../libmoar.dylib` on OS X? That would be a mistake. | 18:38 | |
I think it wants its own -install_name and a -lmoar. | 18:40 | ||
18:41
pochi joined
|
|||
dalek | kudo/nom: 2a47e8e | moritz++ | tools/build/Makefile- (3 files): Build and install restricted setting |
18:42 | |
18:42
kshannon left
18:44
kshannon joined
18:45
ajr joined,
ajr is now known as Guest42336,
Guest42336 is now known as ajr_
18:47
treehug88 left
18:49
vky joined
|
|||
TimToady | FROGGS: the view that Nil turns into () is the older one; the docs are more up-to-date than the impl | 18:53 | |
FROGGS | ahh, I see | 18:54 | |
masak | so `say (Nil, Nil, Nil).elems` is supposed to print 3 nowadays? | 18:56 | |
19:04
raiph joined
|
|||
perigrin | will it stamp it's foot too? like my daughter when she was 6? | 19:05 | |
masak | nr: say (Nil, Nil, Nil).elems | 19:06 | |
camelia | niecza v24-109-g48a8de3: OUTPUT«3» | ||
..rakudo-parrot dddd3f, rakudo-jvm dddd3f: OUTPUT«0» | |||
dalek | kudo/nom: 347c9a4 | moritz++ | tools/build/Makefile- (2 files): avoid conflicts between Parrot and Moar Makefile variables |
19:13 | |
moritz | that's odd, I could have sworn I had resolved these conflicts ages ago | ||
masak | I have that feeling sometimes, too. | 19:14 | |
moritz | and I know I have built perl6-p and -m along side each other in moar-support | 19:15 | |
many times | |||
diakopter | I have that "I have that feeling many times" feeling many times | 19:19 | |
19:21
pecastro joined
|
|||
masak | diakopter: I don't. only just now. | 19:22 | |
diakopter | masak: welcome to the club. | 19:23 | |
19:25
raiph left
19:27
treehug88 joined
|
|||
dalek | p: 8688e89 | (Tobias Leich)++ | / (3 files): implement \x{} for P5 regexes |
19:30 | |
timotimo | what does that do? | 19:37 | |
19:42
vky left
|
|||
FROGGS | timotimo: it is just like \x[FE] | 19:43 | |
written as \x{FE} | |||
and \x{} would match NUL | |||
p: say chr(0) ~~ /\x[]/ # dunno if we need such behaviour | 19:47 | ||
camelia | rakudo-parrot 2a47e8: OUTPUT«===SORRY!=== Error while compiling /tmp/b7owCwvf16Unrecognized backslash sequence: '\x'at /tmp/b7owCwvf16:1------> say chr(0) ~~ /\⏏x[]/ # dunno if we need such behaviour expecting any of: p…» | ||
TimToady | on subscripting, use of .elems would be wrong in the way that introspection is usually wrong; it has to be distinguished on the basis of the type of the argument | 19:52 | |
if people have to put an extra comma or .[0] or .item here or there, so be it | 19:53 | ||
19:53
raiph joined
19:54
SHODAN left
|
|||
TimToady | iow, I think I agree with jnthn's formulation of the rules | 19:54 | |
but maybe we should leave :v orthogogonal to those rules, and require you to use comma when you want to force parcel | 19:56 | ||
TimToady is agog as his spelling | 19:57 | ||
20:00
Rotwang joined
20:01
treehug88 left
20:04
treehug88 joined
|
|||
diakopter | moritz: I keep having to add BAT = .bat back into the windows rakudo moar makefile as it tries to operate on non-existent files otherwise | 20:05 | |
don't know where to fix | |||
20:10
Mouq joined
|
|||
jnthn back | 20:11 | ||
TimToady: :v has existence filtering semantics, iirc? | 20:12 | ||
nwc10 | jnthn: yay! With real beer waiting for you? | ||
20:13
telex left
|
|||
jnthn | Yeah, though I seem to have mildly upset my stomach with something I ate at some point, or maybe just shoved too much food in it. So I'll go easy tonight :) | 20:13 | |
timotimo | easy on the beer but not easy on the code? :P | ||
FROGGS | hehe | 20:14 | |
20:16
telex joined
|
|||
TimToady | jnthn: yeah, so maybe that's an argument against orthogonal :v | 20:16 | |
due to the implicit grep | 20:17 | ||
plus arguably :v will strike some folks as cleaner that .[stuff,] | |||
though I can argue it the other way too | |||
lizmat | fwiw, the same applies for :k | 20:18 | |
jnthn | TimToady: Yes, I was thinking especially of :v when I said "adverb forces Parcel" | ||
TimToady: I can kinda argue it both ways too, but we're trying to avoid special things to remember and making :v different would feel odd | |||
20:18
rindolf left
|
|||
lizmat | wrt to being able to distinguish by the argument | 20:19 | |
if a scalar is bound to a parcel, and that scalar would be used as index in a slice | 20:20 | ||
would you expect a scalar to be returned, or a parcel ? | |||
jnthn | lizmat: I *think* TimToady would expect a scalar, but the mechanism is...hazy, at least to me. | 20:21 | |
This is the kinda reason we introduced my \x := ... | |||
lizmat | and what would that scalar contain then? the value of the first element of the Parcel? | ||
20:21
SHODAN joined
|
|||
jnthn | I think the expectation would be that it'd do what happens in | 20:23 | |
20:23
SHODAN left
|
|||
jnthn | r: my $a = (1,2,3); my @x = <a b c>; say @x[$a] | 20:23 | |
diakopter | jnthn: I'm surprised you don't get the same error with nmake install | ||
camelia | rakudo-jvm 2a47e8: OUTPUT«(timeout)» | ||
..rakudo-parrot 2a47e8, rakudo-moar 2a47e8: OUTPUT«(Any)» | |||
jnthn | um :) | ||
oh, duh | |||
r: my $a = (1,2,3); my @x = <a b c d>; say @x[$a] | |||
diakopter | m: ; | ||
camelia | rakudo-parrot 2a47e8, rakudo-jvm 2a47e8, rakudo-moar 2a47e8: OUTPUT«d» | 20:24 | |
( no output ) | |||
diakopter | m: say .say | ||
camelia | rakudo-moar 2a47e8: OUTPUT«NilTrue» | ||
jnthn | fail :) Anyway, d, because it numifies (1,2,3) which gives the number of elems. | ||
lizmat | r: my $a := (1,2,3); my @x = <a b c d>; say @x[$a] | ||
camelia | rakudo-parrot 2a47e8, rakudo-jvm 2a47e8, rakudo-moar 2a47e8: OUTPUT«b c d» | ||
20:27
pecastro left
20:42
NotJack joined
|
|||
dalek | p: 1595bd4 | (Tobias Leich)++ | src/QRegex/P5Regex/Grammar.nqp: allow more hexints in \x{} |
20:48 | |
20:48
colomon left
20:52
jeffreykegler left
|
|||
NotJack | it's not fun trying to steal algorithms from CPAN when your language doesn't have great regex support :( | 20:54 | |
FROGGS | NotJack: to which language do you want to steal it to? | 20:56 | |
NotJack | J | ||
timotimo | arnsholt: how much is missing after CStruct for jvm is implemented? | 20:57 | |
NotJack | Data structure-wise, J is like a uptight german | ||
20:57
colomon joined
|
|||
diakopter | timotimo: the things | 20:57 | |
NotJack | it's well-ordered or GTFO | ||
FROGGS | ohh wow, and they say Perl looks like line noise O.o | 20:58 | |
jnthn hands NotJack "quote of the day" award :) | 20:59 | ||
timotimo | NotJack: DAS NICHT STACKENBLACKEN! | 21:01 | |
NotJack | lol | 21:02 | |
21:02
dayangkun left
|
|||
NotJack | FROGGS: If Perl is line noise, J is nails on a blackboard | 21:03 | |
FROGGS | ICH WERDE DIESE SCHALLPLATTE NICHT KAUFEN, SIE IST ZERKRATZT!!! | ||
NotJack: yeah, feels like | |||
*shudder* | |||
timotimo | FROGGS: that doesn't have to be yelled | 21:05 | |
oh | |||
well, it *is* german | |||
so i guess it does have to be yelled | |||
NotJack | I'm pretty sure all proper German must be yelled | ||
damnit | |||
FROGGS | timotimo: you can't whisper KAMPFPANZERWAGEN, really | 21:06 | |
jnthn | Outlawing lowercase wasn't going to fly, so they compromised on just capitalizing all the nouns :P | ||
lue | .oO(Unless it starts with ß, grumble grumble...) |
21:07 | |
timotimo | that's right | 21:09 | |
DORT, EIN EICHHÖRNCHEN! | |||
arnsholt | timotimo: After CStruct we're pretty much there. Potentially a bit of trickyness with callbacks, but structs are the last remaining really tricky bit I expect | 21:10 | |
psch | but but, country of poets and thinkers... | ||
arnsholt | Any particular reason you wonder? | 21:11 | |
timotimo | more like ... shou..ets and ... screamers? | 21:12 | |
arnsholt: just trying to estimate when you may be able to finish it up and we get a rakudo star on the jvm :D | |||
FROGGS | timotimo: my kids tended to say ARSCHHÖRNCHEN, now it is more like EINHÖRNCHEN | 21:13 | |
both is cute somehow | |||
timotimo | haha | 21:14 | |
psch | "Die Deutschen tun nicht viel, aber sie schreien desto mehr. [...] Das sinnige deutsche Volk liebt es zu brüllen und zu kreischen, und zum Schreien hat es immer Zeit. " frei nach Wolfgang Menzel. | 21:17 | |
21:17
dayangkun joined
|
|||
psch | more on topic: i've decided that i have no idea how exactly warnings could be handled as typed exceptions | 21:17 | |
which means i'll probably have to get a PR finished soon, although i'm still missing a few test-cases i would like to...test | 21:18 | ||
e.g. i still miss a case for X::Undeclared::Method with !private set that falls into the responsability of the optimizer | 21:19 | ||
21:19
hummeleBop left
|
|||
psch | the naive case seems to be handled before, as i found out with FROGGS++ help the last time i was around | 21:20 | |
r: try EVAL 'class A { method doit { self!really; } }; my A $a .= new; $a.doit;'; $!.perl # as this is already typed | |||
camelia | rakudo-jvm 347c9a: OUTPUT«(timeout)» | ||
( no output ) | |||
psch | wait what | ||
ohh, same mistake, no say | 21:21 | ||
r: try EVAL 'class A { method doit { self!really; } }; my A $a .= new; $a.doit;'; say $!.perl # | |||
camelia | rakudo-parrot 347c9a, rakudo-jvm 347c9a, rakudo-moar 347c9a: OUTPUT«X::Method::NotFound.new(method => "!really", typename => "A", private => Bool::True)» | ||
skids | camelia: r: say -6 +| -2 | 21:27 | |
camelia | skids: rakudo-parrot 347c9a, rakudo-moar 347c9a: OUTPUT«-6» | ||
..rakudo-jvm 347c9a: OUTPUT«-2» | |||
colomon | :\ | 21:28 | |
skids | r-moar seems to have inherited r-parrot's libtommath | 21:29 | |
FROGGS | it has | ||
colomon | but hey, rakudo-moar works in camelia now! \o/ | ||
skids | \o/ | ||
FROGGS | n: say -6 +| -2 | ||
camelia | niecza v24-109-g48a8de3: OUTPUT«-2» | ||
skids | Yes, considering I only usually build star that is immensely helpful. | ||
FROGGS | is -2 the correct answer? | 21:30 | |
skids | yes. | ||
21:34
Mouq left
|
|||
jnthn | m: say 'moar' | 21:36 | |
camelia | rakudo-moar 347c9a: OUTPUT«moar» | ||
jnthn | yay | ||
diakopter | m: say `moar --version` | 21:37 | |
camelia | rakudo-moar 347c9a: OUTPUT«===SORRY!=== Error while compiling /tmp/UmrzhupyOhTwo terms in a rowat /tmp/UmrzhupyOh:1------> say ⏏`moar --version` expecting any of: argument list prefix or term prefix …» | ||
timotimo | but is it really moar? | ||
diakopter | m: say $*VM | 21:38 | |
camelia | rakudo-moar 347c9a: OUTPUT«(timeout)» | ||
skids | that shut it up. | ||
diakopter | m: say $*VM.perl | ||
skids | not supposed to be a stumper :-) | ||
camelia | rakudo-moar 347c9a: OUTPUT«(timeout)» | ||
benabik | r-p: say $*VM | ||
diakopter | m: print $*VM | ||
timotimo | it's very slow at that, yeah :( | ||
camelia | rakudo-parrot 347c9a: OUTPUT«("name" => "parrot", "config" => {"git_describe" => "RELEASE_5_9_0", "sha1" => "e8eebc017012a1ac97c704c48c1d3429395104ee", "a" => ".a", "ar" => "ar", "ar_extra" => "", "ar_out" => "", "archname" => "x86_64-linux-gnu-thread-multi", "arflags" => "cr", "as"…» | 21:39 | |
rakudo-moar 347c9a: OUTPUT«name moar config ccoptiflags -O1 uvrule $(AR) $(ARFLAGS) $@ $(UV_LINUX) tomobjects 3rdparty/libtommath/bn_error.o 3rdparty/libtommath/bn_fast_mp_invmod.o 3rdparty/libtommath/bn_fast_mp_montgomery_reduce.o 3rdparty/libtommath/bn_fast_s_mp_mul_digs.o | |||
..3rdpart…» | |||
itz | is there a FOSDEM Perl Room again this year? | ||
benabik | Problem with .gist? | ||
diakopter | itz: yes | ||
jnthn | m: say $*EXECUTABLE_NAME | ||
camelia | rakudo-moar 347c9a: OUTPUT«perl6-m» | ||
diakopter | m: print $*VM<name> | ||
camelia | rakudo-moar 347c9a: OUTPUT«moar» | ||
FROGGS | m: say nqp::backendconfig<version> | 21:40 | |
diakopter | r: print $*VM<name> | ||
camelia | rakudo-moar 347c9a: OUTPUT«2013.10-367-ga313c0a» | ||
rakudo-parrot 347c9a: OUTPUT«parrot» | |||
..rakudo-jvm 347c9a: OUTPUT«jvm» | |||
..rakudo-moar 347c9a: OUTPUT«moar» | |||
FROGGS | m: say nqp::backendconfig<config> | ||
camelia | rakudo-moar 347c9a: OUTPUT«--optimize --prefix=/home/p6eval/rakudo-inst-2 --make-install» | ||
21:41
vky joined
|
|||
jnthn | perl6.org/compilers/features now has all the backends, btw | 21:41 | |
21:42
krunen left
|
|||
timotimo | oh, set operations for character classes seems like something doable in not too much time | 21:43 | |
21:43
krunen joined
|
|||
timotimo | it'd give us one more green button :) | 21:43 | |
21:43
smls left
21:46
araujo joined,
vky left
|
|||
timotimo | since our character classes are currently "one long string of all candidate characters", it'd just be doing these set operations on these characters once at regex qast construction time | 21:50 | |
21:58
benabik left
22:00
colomon left
22:03
skids left,
colomon joined
|
|||
jnthn | Time for some rest...back tomorrow :) | 22:04 | |
22:05
treehug88 left
22:06
treehug88 joined
22:07
treehug88 left
22:09
treehug88 joined
|
|||
psch goes to sleep o/ | 22:13 | ||
22:13
psch left
22:14
spider-mario left
22:20
NotJack left
22:26
kbaker_ left
|
|||
dalek | rl6-roast-data: 69140ec | coke++ | / (5 files): today (automated commit) |
22:27 | |
rl6-roast-data: 7b2b4f9 | coke++ | perl6_pass_rates.csv: note that today's moar run on nom |
22:28 | ||
[Coke] | 98.31% #moar | 22:29 | |
22:31
treehug88 left
22:33
treehug88 joined
22:40
treehug88 left
|
|||
lizmat | also sleep& | 22:44 | |
22:45
baest_ is now known as baest,
jeffreykegler joined
22:59
Rotwang left
23:00
Mouq joined
23:03
dmol left,
d4l3k_ joined
23:04
dalek left,
d4l3k_ is now known as dalek,
ChanServ sets mode: +v dalek,
Mouq left
23:10
virtualsue joined
23:11
virtualsue left
23:14
grondilu left
23:16
dmol joined
23:23
vky joined
23:28
vky left,
AmazingPudding is now known as bonsaikitten
23:30
FROGGS left
23:44
Rotwang joined,
Rotwang left
23:49
filly left,
dmol left,
locsmif left
23:53
jeffreykegler1 joined,
jeffreykegler left
23:58
FROGGS joined
|