pugscode.org/ | nopaste: sial.org/pbot/perl6 | pugs: [~] <m oo se> (or rakudo:, kp6:, smop: etc.) || We do Haskell, too | > reverse . show $ foldl1 (*) [1..4] | irclog: irc.pugscode.org/ Set by TimToady on 25 January 2008. |
|||
00:00
thoughtpolice joined
|
|||
meppl | good night | 00:01 | |
00:03
meppl left
|
|||
mncharity | ok. STD_red->IR. at least for say(3). next, IR->p5. | 00:20 | |
00:28
lumi joined
00:31
jferrero joined,
lumi left
00:32
lumi joined
00:38
jferrero left
00:40
larsen joined
00:48
LazyJim left
|
|||
mncharity | say(3) makes it through. | 00:53 | |
01:07
japhb joined,
japhb left
01:10
kanru joined
|
|||
pugs_svnbot | r20141 | putter++ | [elf_a] Added IR construction and P5 emitting. ./elf_a_create.pl -e 'say(3)' makes it from p6 to p5. | 01:18 | |
diff: dev.pugscode.org/changeset/20141 | |||
lambdabot | Title: Changeset 20141 - Pugs - Trac | 01:19 | |
mncharity | going to regret the "late night commit" in the morning. but "early and often". | ||
The IR node info needs to be pulled out into a class. Then give elf_b ir node generation. And elf_a "class X {...}" IR construction and p5 emitting. At that point elf_on_STD_red will be caught up with elf_on_rakudo. Give elf_b p6 versions of elf_a's hand written p5 files. then incrementally bang on STD_red, the IR and p5 emitting until they compile and run. | 01:22 | ||
running late. good night all & | 01:24 | ||
01:25
mncharity left,
mncharity joined
|
|||
mncharity | pmurias: sorry I wasn't around much today. more over the weekend. | 01:27 | |
01:27
mncharity left
01:41
elmex left
02:10
thoughtpolice left
02:31
larsen left
|
|||
spinclad | TimToady: S05:1410: s/euro/eutero/ # it buys more lately, after all | 02:39 | |
i'm happy with the spelling 'Exodos', although i wonder then how to spell 'Leviticus', wishing to have a LXX at hand to see. | 02:43 | ||
and 'Deuteronomia' is englished, and 'Numeri' latined then englished; so consistency as a guide seems to only point toward tradition. | 02:52 | ||
Juerd | I thought it was Exodus | 02:57 | |
allbery_b | it is | 03:13 | |
well, it's ש×××Ŗ but who's counting :) | 03:14 | ||
or are you reaching for transliterations from the Septuagint? | 03:24 | ||
if so, "Leviticus" will be a problem as it's a Latinization of a Hellenization of Hebrew :) | |||
(well, Anglicization of ...) | 03:26 | ||
which is ridiculous as the Hebrew name is ××ק×Ø× (va-Yiqra, "and [G-d] called"), and more colloquially ×Ŗ××Ø×Ŗ ×××× ×× (Torat Kohanim, "Torah of the Priests"); the former makes *at least* as much sense as the made-up "Leviticus" and the latter is what "Leviticus" was presumably shooting for (and missing badly) | 03:30 | ||
03:34
wknight8111 is now known as wknight-away
|
|||
allbery_b | (and if you're serious about figuring out the Greek you can probably find the Septuagint online, try sacred-texts.org for starters) | 03:37 | |
03:44
Limbic_Region left
03:48
valrke left
03:55
wknight-away left
04:10
[particle] joined
04:23
lisppaste3 joined
04:53
Chillance left
05:35
kanru left
05:55
wknight-away joined
06:13
Alias__ joined,
Zygo left
06:22
BinGOs left,
justatheory left
07:04
FurnaceBoy left
07:20
buu left
07:22
buubot left
07:50
BinGOs joined
07:59
Aankhen`` joined
08:02
wknight-away left
08:30
alc joined
08:47
nothingmuch joined
08:51
buu joined,
buubot joined
09:55
Psyche^ joined
10:12
Patterner left,
Psyche^ is now known as Patterner
10:23
larsen joined
10:29
c9s_ is now known as c9s
10:33
rindolf joined
10:34
larsen left
11:02
luqui joined
11:13
LazyJim joined
11:24
wknight-away joined
11:39
meppl joined
11:49
chris2 joined
11:57
wknight-away left
12:07
wknight-away joined
12:24
rindolf left
12:44
pmurias joined
|
|||
ting | win 10 | 12:53 | |
12:59
turrepurre joined
13:04
rindolf joined
13:16
ntgrl joined
13:17
ntgrl is now known as integral
13:20
wknight-away left
13:21
Onyxyte joined
13:31
Onyx|Idle joined
13:39
Onyxyte left,
Onyx|Idle is now known as Onyxyte
13:45
wknight-away joined
13:50
Onyxyte left
13:54
eternaleye left
14:15
wknight-away left
14:18
mncharity joined
14:21
FurnaceBoy joined
14:23
FurnaceBoy left
14:34
FurnaceBoy joined
14:39
alc left
14:48
lollix joined
14:49
lollix left
14:55
kanru joined
15:01
wknight-away joined
|
|||
pmurias | mncharity: hi | 15:06 | |
15:07
luqui left
|
|||
pmurias | i wrote a simplistic script which generates a ctags file for STD should i ci it somewhere? | 15:07 | |
[particle] | yes yes yes | 15:08 | |
pmurias | where? ;) | ||
[particle] | util/gen_std_tags.pl ?? | 15:10 | |
pmurias | added util/gen_STD_ctags.pl, but can change the name ;) | 15:11 | |
pugs_svnbot | r20142 | pmurias++ | a simple hack to generate a tags file for STD.pm | ||
diff: dev.pugscode.org/changeset/20142 | |||
lambdabot | Title: Changeset 20142 - Pugs - Trac | ||
[particle] | yay | 15:12 | |
it's good to be home again, if only for two days | |||
pmurias | mncharity: would it be (easier|more fun) working on match2ir if one could just fill in STD.pm {*} actions | 15:13 | |
? | 15:14 | ||
mncharity: meaning should i implement it? | |||
15:17
araujo joined
|
|||
pugs_svnbot | r20143 | putter++ | [elf_a] Cleaned up elf_a_create and renamed files. Output a much more terse IR description. | 15:29 | |
diff: dev.pugscode.org/changeset/20143 | |||
lambdabot | Title: Changeset 20143 - Pugs - Trac | ||
TimToady | spinclad: I wasn't trying to mix in lxx spellings, it just happened. :) | 15:33 | |
[particle] | hey TimToady! how's things? | ||
TimToady | welcome temporarily back | ||
much better than a sesequiweek ago | 15:34 | ||
*sesqui | |||
[particle] | ah, good news from the doctors with the cameras? | ||
TimToady | well, not done with tests yet | ||
but I feel much better after topping up with half a gallon of blood | |||
diakopter has O- | 15:35 | ||
[particle] | camel blood, i hope. | ||
TimToady | ct scan, chest xray, upper endo (with ultrasound!) all negative | ||
in a week I'll probably go in for lower endo, joy | |||
diakopter | they can't use valgrind to find the leak, right | 15:36 | |
[particle] | i'll likely have one of those before year's end | ||
TimToady | but at this point it looks like best bet is some kind of angiodysplasia | ||
[particle] | lovely. | ||
TimToady | which is something like varicose veins on your insides | ||
well, my insides, in this case... | 15:37 | ||
[particle] | release the nanobots with lasers on their heads! | ||
TimToady | still several other things it could be too... | ||
I'd settle for a sayaka | 15:38 | ||
15:39
smtms left
|
|||
diakopter | well if the blood isn't pooling somewhere it's got to be leaving somehow... | 15:39 | |
[particle] | my arthritis is killing me today. can't lift my arms above my shoulders | ||
TimToady | symmetrical? | 15:40 | |
sorry, I shouldn't be trying to play doctor over irc :) | 15:42 | ||
[particle] | yes, it's crohn's arthritis | 15:44 | |
just like rheumatoid (sp?) but without permanent damage | |||
mncharity | pmurias: hi! | ||
[particle] | yesterday it was thumbs, wrists, shoulders, knees, and ankles | 15:45 | |
imagine how much fun it was to shovel snow, drive 2 hours, carry a snowboard, and fly 3 hours | 15:46 | ||
mncharity | pmurias: re STD.pm actions, hmm, there's an idea. | ||
though actions would be part of the parse phase, hmm. | |||
have you seen elf_a_src/ast_handlers.config ? the Match nodes are labeled with the rule which generated them, or in the case of some #= foo , a rule__foo or something like that. | 15:48 | ||
TimToady | I just have my _REDUCE method attaching the tag currently as a proxy for a rule pointer, since subs in p5 aren't really 1st class objects | 15:49 | |
mncharity | basically by the time STD_red hands us a Match tree, ... all we have is a match tree. | ||
TimToady | and my current EXPR just looks at /^infix/ on that tag to see if it should pop 2 terms instead of 1 | ||
mncharity | :) | ||
TimToady | nounphrase having moved into EXPR, more or less | 15:50 | |
but it's not quite right yet | |||
mncharity | re _REDUCE, yeah, STD_red is just using rule name too, well, the hand written rule name or mutant #= rule name. | ||
15:51
elmex joined
|
|||
TimToady | and there's something squirrely about prefixes and postfixes that dominate a nearby infix | 15:51 | |
mncharity | treating #= foo like implicit $<foo>=[ ... ] | ||
15:51
wknight-away left
|
|||
TimToady | because the prefix dominates a following infix, and for symmetry a postfix could dominate a preceding infix | 15:51 | |
-$x**$y is the canonical case in existing operators | 15:52 | ||
but the reverse of that could hold for a user-defined postfix | |||
but a prefix can't dominate to its left, nor a postfix to its right | |||
so $x**-$y can't make the - looser than the ** | 15:53 | ||
pugs_svnbot | r20144 | putter++ | [elf_a] Now quiet by default (-v gives the old behavior). And in the absence of -c, now eval()s the p5. | ||
diff: dev.pugscode.org/changeset/20144 | |||
lambdabot | Title: Changeset 20144 - Pugs - Trac | 15:54 | |
TimToady | and then there's the little case of what do you do if there's both a prefix that dominates what's after and a postfix that dominates what's before... | ||
say, for the sake of argument, there were a - postfix that did what - prefix does | 15:55 | ||
you can get cool stuff like $x**-$y-**$z | |||
which seems a bit bogus | 15:56 | ||
not to mention ambiguous | 15:57 | ||
the prefix would be trying to turn it into $x**(-($y-**$z)) while the postfix would be trying to do the mirror image | 15:58 | ||
mncharity | in redsix I ended up having separate left and right precedences, inferred from the fixity, because i was just finding it too confusing to try an work directly with both fixity and precedence in the OPP. | ||
assoc too, maybe? | 15:59 | ||
no, just precedence. | 16:00 | ||
plus a "needs an expression on left? on right?" | 16:02 | ||
TimToady | at the moment I just track whether to pop 1 or 2 args, assuming that prefix and postfix are just simple unary by then, but may have to rethink | 16:03 | |
this was a lot simpler before the mathematicians got involved with their -$x**$y :) | 16:04 | ||
mncharity | /me looks at $x**-$y-**$z , thinks Acme is going to get some *really* strange stuff. | ||
TimToady | well, that's obviously got to be asymmetrical or illegal | 16:05 | |
but the question remains whether the $x**$y- analog works | |||
and means ($x**$y)- | |||
mncharity | re illegal, but it could be a circumfix operator, or... ;) | ||
TimToady | well, if you have prefix:<-> and circumfix:<- -> you're already in a world of hurt even without the postfix:<-> | 16:06 | |
pmurias | TimToady: can't prefix and postfix get handled as part of the term instead of the OPP | ||
? | |||
TimToady | pmurias: that's what I had before | 16:07 | |
(with nounphrase) | |||
but it doesn't parse -$x**$y right | |||
s/right/"right"/ if rand < .5 | |||
s/rand/rand()/ | 16:08 | ||
so the way the mathematicians want it, it needs to be parsed more like 0-$x**$y | 16:09 | ||
ignoring the detail that prefix:<-> has a different precedence than infix:<-> | |||
and I can do that pretty easily in EXPR | 16:11 | ||
question is how/whether to apply the same logic to postfixes dominating a preceding infix | |||
[particle] | (didn't (lisp (solve (all (this (with (parens ;))))))) | 16:12 | |
TimToady | only for prefixes :) | ||
[particle] | the interesting bits of language are where symmetry is broken | 16:13 | |
mncharity | hi pmurias. i'm attempting to get elf_a to start running the t/01-sanity/ tests. then... something? | 16:14 | |
TimToady | indeed, but it's my job to figure out if the user is going to want the precedence of, say, postfix:<i> to be outside that of infix:<+> | ||
so that they can say 1+2i | 16:15 | ||
wait, that doesn't want to dominate the +, nevermind | |||
but some similar situation | |||
pmurias | mncharity: rehi | ||
TimToady | maybe the user wants listops that go at the end of the list instead of the beginning | ||
but postfixes are already syntactically distinguished | 16:16 | ||
since the require no whitespace | |||
16:16
ntgrl joined
|
|||
TimToady | *they | 16:16 | |
16:16
integral left
|
|||
pmurias | moving unarry prefix and postfix operators to the top of the precendence tables would "solve" the issue ;) | 16:16 | |
16:16
ntgrl is now known as integral
|
|||
TimToady | already the case for postfix, basically | 16:17 | |
I'm just wondering what happens if a user defines a looser postfix | |||
such as a hypothetical postfix:<-> | |||
[particle] | isn't there room for users to create their own precedence levels? | ||
TimToady | where $x**$y- could mean the same as -$x**$y | 16:18 | |
[particle] | leave dominating-postfix as an exercise | ||
TimToady | yes, but the question is what do you do next | ||
it's trivial to create a postfix:<-> with looser prec than ** | 16:19 | ||
but will it do anything with that precedence, and if so, what? | |||
pmurias | TimToady: is ** proper mathematical notation? | 16:22 | |
TimToady | and the crazy thing is that the leftward precedence of a term is specified by a postfix, while the rightward precedence of a term is specified by the prefix | ||
pmurias: no, we just have to parse superscripts correctly :) | 16:23 | ||
unfortunately Unicode doesn't have superscripts on superscripts... | |||
so it's hard to write $x**$y**$z | 16:24 | ||
anyway, ** has been "proper" ever since Fortran | 16:27 | ||
and arguably, ** is better huffman coding of a heavy operation than superscripting is | 16:29 | ||
so Backus was just fixing math notation :) | |||
16:29
rindolf left
16:31
elmex left
|
|||
pugs_svnbot | r20145 | putter++ | [STD_red] show a pretty picture of where the parse error occurred. | 16:39 | |
diff: dev.pugscode.org/changeset/20145 | |||
lambdabot | Title: Changeset 20145 - Pugs - Trac | ||
16:41
rindolf joined
16:43
jhorwitz joined
|
|||
pmurias | mncharity: it's possible to run the actions after the parse (they can't affect it of course) | 16:43 | |
mncharity | math notation regrettably has a great deal to be fixed. but that's for openmath or mathml or some such. | 16:44 | |
re actions, | 16:45 | ||
true. but one probably doesn't want to write them in ruby and do them inside of STD_red. so STD_red could include "do action here" tags in the Match tree, and they could be done afterwards, in elf. providing a match object so the action has the raw material to work with. ... which is what we have now. ;) eg, | 16:48 | ||
'if 3 {4} else {5}' has a Match labeled if__else, which isn't a real rule, but rather the rule if with the #= else tag. | 16:49 | ||
this was the #= thing I mentioned which I'm not sure is the right thing to be doing. but it does provide a place to hang "actions". :) | 16:50 | ||
TimToady | there's no requirement to hang an action on every tag :) | 16:51 | |
pmurias | TimToady: heavy operations means used commonly or slow? | ||
TimToady | the {*} is serving also to indicate explicitly where LTM must quit, if it hasn't quit before now (which it usually has) | 16:52 | |
** is higher order than * in the sense that ** can be defined (roughly) in terms of repeated * | 16:53 | ||
and you learn it later in school | |||
so "mentally" heavy | |||
pmurias | mncharity: i just wanted to know if it would be more fun filling in STD.pm and having a script extract the actions out | 16:54 | |
TimToady | and $x**$y tends to do more "violence" to the value than $x*$y, in some sense | ||
please do not put actions into STD.pm | 16:55 | ||
the main point of {*} is to avoid installing platform dependencies | |||
mncharity | re fun, :) hmm, | 17:00 | |
pmurias | TimToady: they would be kept in a seperate place | 17:01 | |
mncharity | prompted by the question, I'm filling in if... and noting it is heavy going. a combination of the elf infrastructure is still getting fleshed out, plus the kp6-derived IR needs tweaking to mesh with the STD Match tree. | 17:02 | |
so doing it in elf isn't quite fun yet. hopefully by tomorrow. | 17:03 | ||
17:03
Aankhen`` left
|
|||
mncharity | re STD, I wonder if it is time to give STD it's own directory? there's a lot of it src/perl6, plus more in winter_jig/STD, and now a bit in util/, ... as it becomes the focus of a lot of people/work, it will outgrow being directly in src/perl6/ at some point. | 17:06 | |
*it in | |||
ok. reality correction. elf_a does 'say(3)'. but little else. well, it could do 'class A { has $.x; ... }'. but it doesn't even parse strings, nor do if(), etc. and a lot of that will require nontrivial slogging. so... not yet ready for use. | 17:14 | ||
re STD, or just start collecting all the non-TimToady work in a misc/STD/ ? | 17:15 | ||
hmm, both <statement> and <statement_control:use> seem to be trying to <eat_terminator> | 17:18 | ||
(in STD.pm) | 17:19 | ||
17:21
smtms joined
17:28
Chillance joined
17:30
smtms left
17:31
smtms joined,
chris2 left
|
|||
pmurias | mncharity: you mean elf_a, or STD_red related slogging? | 17:31 | |
mncharity | both :/ | ||
17:32
elmex joined
|
|||
mncharity | I'd forgotten the STD_red "big hairy quoted everything" handling was just sketched in, and not yet running. | 17:32 | |
/me tempted to fake it. That section is slated for overhaul in STD.pm, and STD_red is doing something rather different anyway... but faking it would be a slippery slope. sigh. maybe fake ' ' to get sanity running an then go back to it? | 17:35 | ||
TimToady | yeah, the quoting in STD may be in for some refactoring as well, so I'd fake it for now. | ||
17:35
rindolf left
|
|||
TimToady | on <eat_terminator>, need to cogitate a bit or two | 17:36 | |
probably will end up deleting the call in use and no | |||
mncharity | ok | ||
TimToady | since eat_terminator is supposed to handle the need for ; when you stack to statement_control on the same line | 17:37 | |
since foo {...}; bar {...} requires the semi | 17:38 | ||
and the use/no calls probably predate that decision | |||
but that's just gut feeling, not thotthru | |||
but in any case <EXPR>? should be greedy enough to get us to the ';' anyway | 17:39 | ||
so we can rely on statement's call to e_t | 17:40 | ||
is a bit strange to reduce it (and having side effects!) before eating the semi, but seems benign, and you have to do that anyway if there's no semi | 17:41 | ||
'course, arguably, that means that eat_terminator doesn't need to be its own rule | 17:44 | ||
however, it's probably good to make it available for user-derived grammars | |||
(for similar reasons I've been tempted to make all the regex matching rules into multis, but I keep resisting that temptation. :) | 17:46 | ||
mncharity | lol :) | ||
TimToady | I did rename all the regex rules that have names that are too long though... | 17:47 | |
instead of all the ordered/unorderer mumbojumbo, it's now regex_{first,every,any,all} | 17:48 | ||
for || && | & respectively | |||
mncharity | ah, neat | ||
TimToady | should probably check in my current STD et al, though it might regress some things | 17:49 | |
but since I'm really the only one running it, that's okay :) | |||
break early, break often... | |||
mncharity | STD_red is so out of sync at this point, further STD.pm changes aren't a problem. :) | ||
though maybe I'll snarf a copy for STD_red. It's not _that_ out of sync. | 17:50 | ||
TimToady | well, you could at least glare at the diffs | ||
pugs_svnbot | r20146 | lwall++ | [STD et al.] snapshot of current state | ||
diff: dev.pugscode.org/changeset/20146 | |||
lambdabot | Title: Changeset 20146 - Pugs - Trac | ||
mncharity | lunch time, but, could you give me a hint how 'say 3' parses? | 17:51 | |
TimToady | term:listop | ||
mncharity | looking.... | ||
ah, ok. bbl. will attempt sanity, with fake quotes, after lunch and errands. | 17:53 | ||
thanks | |||
TimToady | walk & | ||
18:00
b_jonas joined
18:05
meteorjay joined
18:18
Psyche^ joined,
Patterner left,
Psyche^ is now known as Patterner
18:20
jferrero joined
18:50
eternaleye joined
18:56
rindolf joined
|
|||
spinclad | TimToady: for the record, Juerd++ first noticed Exodos. | 19:09 | |
TimToady | I've been reading too much greek lately, obvously... | 19:20 | |
19:20
elmex left
19:22
jferrero left,
jhorwitz left
|
|||
spinclad too... gimme that old time geometria | 19:23 | ||
TimToady | į½Ī“į½øĻ is one of those weird words that is structurally masculine but actually feminine... | ||
19:25
jferrero joined
19:26
alester joined
|
|||
TimToady | well, it's actually neither... | 19:27 | |
spinclad | neither? now i need a good input method cause i want to mangle something from memory... <isƩ 'Ʃ 'odos anw katw>... looks feminine to me | 19:32 | |
allbery_b | heh | 19:33 | |
TimToady | you want rough breathings there, not smooth | 19:34 | |
spinclad | true, s/'/`/, i was leaving them off for smooth | 19:35 | |
as an input method, it's a real mangle | |||
TimToady | but yes, į¼” į½Ī“į½øĻ | ||
when a real masc noun would take į½ instead of į¼” as an article | 19:37 | ||
but yeah, no decent greek input method here either... | 19:41 | ||
and likely to be modern greek in any case | |||
(no pun intended) | |||
spinclad | drat. here i was hoping you would suggest one in passing. so this has been cut and paste, or ...? | 19:43 | |
s/would/could/ | |||
TimToady | yes, just cnp | 19:45 | |
19:47
cognominal_ joined
|
|||
spinclad | [mock-translation from before: to an Ć©lekron, the way to the anode and the kathode are the same] | 19:48 | |
s/Ć©lekron/Ć©lektron/ # step on my own joke | 19:49 | ||
TimToady | there's some discussion at mail.nl.linux.org/linux-utf8/2006-0...00019.html | 19:57 | |
lambdabot | Title: Re: Experiments with classical Greek keyboard input | ||
TimToady | but looks like an overall mess | ||
spinclad | thanks, i take a look. can't be much worse than pali (paa.li) | 19:59 | |
TimToady | now if only I had a geek input method... | 20:01 | |
spinclad | *i'll # coffeee!! | ||
*psi* | 20:02 | ||
TimToady | most geeks already have an input method for coffee | ||
spinclad | i go exercise it now then & | 20:04 | |
20:28
lee__ joined
21:00
meteorjay left
21:01
alester left
21:48
LazyJim left
22:10
jferrero left,
jferrero joined
|
|||
mncharity | TimToady: in term:listop, and <nofat> <arglist> , the <!before \w> of <nofat> rejects an arglist beginning with 3? | 22:10 | |
b_jonas | hmm, is <nofat> something stolen from m?mix ? | 22:12 | |
22:12
jferrero left
|
|||
mncharity | hmm, no idea. | 22:14 | |
22:14
pmurias left
|
|||
b_jonas | (the world's first polyunsaturated computer) | 22:14 | |
(100% natural, too) | 22:15 | ||
22:29
justatheory joined
22:44
smtms_ joined
|
|||
TimToady | mncharity: fixed, listop shouldn't have have traversed \s before <nofat> | 22:51 | |
pugs_svnbot | r20147 | lwall++ | [STD] various whitespace snafus | ||
diff: dev.pugscode.org/changeset/20147 | |||
lambdabot | Title: Changeset 20147 - Pugs - Trac | ||
TimToady | the <!before \s> is only to prevent <nofat> from matching in the middle of an identifier | 22:52 | |
\w rather | |||
mncharity | ah, ok. thanks | 22:54 | |
22:54
smtms left
22:55
smtms_ is now known as smtms
23:02
rindolf left
23:15
Limbic_Region joined
23:32
larsen joined
23:45
xd joined
23:46
REPLeffect joined
|
|||
pugs_svnbot | r20148 | putter++ | [STD_red] +fake quote parsing; +term:listop Match; ignore nounphrase; ws tweaks following r20147. | 23:48 | |
diff: dev.pugscode.org/changeset/20148 | |||
lambdabot | Title: Changeset 20148 - Pugs - Trac | 23:49 | |
mncharity | prove -e ./elf_a ../../../t/01-sanity/01-tap.t | 23:52 | |
pugs_svnbot | r20149 | putter++ | [elf_a] "say 3" and "say 'e'" work. t/01-sanity/01-tap.t passes. There's also an unfinished attempt at if(). | ||
diff: dev.pugscode.org/changeset/20149 | |||
lambdabot | Title: Changeset 20149 - Pugs - Trac | ||
mncharity | a first test pass. :) all the rest fail of course. | ||
0.3 sec runtime. | 23:55 |