|
weekly Perl 6 status meetings with phase transitions: Tue 19:00 UTC | IR clogs at irclog.perlgeek.de/phasers/today Set by moderator on 14 June 2011. |
|||
|
01:33
[Coke] left
01:35
[Coke] joined
04:27
sorear_ joined,
sorear left
04:49
sorear_ is now known as sorear
14:01
colomon left
14:05
colomon joined
16:00
colomon left
|
|||
| pmichaud | My phasers report for 2011-06-28: | 16:03 | |
| (Items marked "nom +1" are places where nom is significantly improved over master) | |||
| What I did: | |||
| nom stuff: | |||
| * whatever currying | |||
| * list slicing, including autotrim semantics (nom +1) | |||
| * returns are now lexical (nom +1) | |||
| * fail() | |||
| * next/last/redo in map loops, lists are now 80% faster than master (nom +1) | |||
| * converted more pir:: to nqp:: | |||
| * try blocks | |||
| * dynamic variables | |||
| * list assignment | |||
| * magical Str incr/decr | |||
| * basic sequencing operator &infix:<...> | |||
| * inlined assignment | |||
| master stuff: | |||
| * draft release announcement (jdhore++) | |||
| nqp stuff: | 16:04 | ||
| * lexical return support | |||
| * eliminate astgrammar cruft from HLL::Compiler | |||
| * more nqp:: ops | |||
| parrot stuff: | |||
| * added "signature" attribute to PAST nodes | |||
| * patch to speed up RPA.splice by 95% | |||
| other stuff: | |||
| * booked travel for FOSSCON in Philadelphia | |||
| What I plan to do: | |||
| * more CORE functionality | |||
| * more spectests | |||
| * regexes in nom | |||
| * implement LoL | |||
| * Work on S07 redraft | |||
| EOR | |||
| oh, I'm also planning to work on metaops. | 16:07 | ||
|
16:08
colomon joined
16:11
colomon_ joined,
colomon left,
colomon_ is now known as colomon
|
|||
| jnthn | Over the last week... | 16:14 | |
| * .=, .^, .?, .+ and .* | |||
| * Attributive parameter binding | |||
| * eval | |||
| * BEGIN/CHECK/INIT/END first cut implementations | |||
| * Mu.isa, Mu.does | |||
| * Basic support for "is export" | |||
| * Got us to a working Test.pm | |||
| * Natively typed lexicals | |||
| * More work on roles, so that we can use them in the setting | |||
| * Dispatch by sigil | |||
| * Fixed PAST::Block.arity, so if foo() -> $x { ... } works again | |||
| * our and my scoped methods | |||
| * our scoped variables, various package-y bits | |||
| * my ($a, $b) style declarations | |||
| * Made Stash a Hash | |||
| * Literal values in signatures | 16:15 | ||
| * |@foo, |%bar | |||
| * Fix GLOBAL lookups, first cut of PROCESS | |||
| * Many introspection things now work, like .^methods | |||
| * Assorted CORE.setting additions | |||
| * Many little bug fixes | |||
| In the coming week... | |||
| * Will be in Beijing, so a bit distracted by travel and sightseeing | |||
| * Give talks at BJPW | |||
| * Fix magical vars ($_, $/, $!) | |||
| * new, BUILD, etc | |||
| * More stuff from nommap | |||
| EOR | |||
| Will miss #phasers due to being on a plane. | |||
| moritz | pmichaud++ | 16:16 | |
| jnthn++ | |||
| what I did: | 16:17 | ||
| * added some more builtins to nom | 16:18 | ||
| * added back basic file IO | |||
| * reviewed Failure.pm, found a few (IMHO) small bugs | |||
| * turned up and reported some other failures | |||
| * added more passing spectests | |||
| tweaked pir:: tests | 16:19 | ||
| PLANS: | |||
| turn X:: things into roles | |||
| implement backtrace | |||
| teach die() and fail() about X:: classes | |||
| EOR | 16:22 | ||
| EOP | |||
| colomon | Did: | 16:32 | |
| * blog post justrakudoit.wordpress.com/2011/06/23/euler-5/ | |||
| * learned it's actually a trivial one-liner in Rakudo (sorear++) | |||
| * say [lcm] 2..20 | |||
| * seriously, that's so short it's barely a one-liner! | |||
| * infix:<**> for Niecza | |||
| * fixed bug in Rakudo turned up by that | |||
| * had dinner with a bunch of Parrot guys | |||
| * promoted Perl 6 to several people I just met | |||
| * worked on my talk for tomorrow | |||
| Plan on: | |||
| * Parrot BOF tonight | |||
| * giving numerics talk tomorrow | |||
| * maybe a lightning talk on sequences if I can get it written and there's still space | |||
| * finally getting some nom hacking in | |||
| EOR | |||
| pmichaud | colomon++ | 16:43 | |
| moritz | colomon++ | 16:49 | |
|
17:03
ashleydev joined
|
|||
| sorear | Did: | 17:06 | |
| * released Niecza v7 | |||
| * fixed adverbs on prefix:<|>, a silly heredoc despacing bug, and made the REPL even more robust to errors (thou++ for finding these three failing cases) | 17:08 | ||
| * fixed $_ use in the REPL, but the implementation is far uglier than I'd like | 17:09 | ||
| * implemented binding to elements | |||
| * changed variables to default to my Mu $x = Any, including aggregate elements but not parameters | |||
| * made postcircumfix:<[ ]> and <{ }> the canonical definitions for $obj[2] and $obj<a> semantics | 17:10 | ||
| * constant $?FOO is my-scoped, even if constants in general are our | 17:11 | ||
| * Simplified handling of C# primitives, you now only need to define them in two places | |||
| * Improved regex **; handles spaces, blocks on RHS | |||
| * finished implementing jnthnian stash handling | 17:12 | ||
| * generally acted excessively grumpy to a lot of people on IRC; Sorry. | |||
| Plan: | 17:13 | ||
| * Spectests this week | |||
| * Then raid TODO | |||
| EOR | |||
|
17:14
masak joined
17:19
colomon left
17:22
colomon joined
17:44
colomon left
|
|||
| sorear | the spike in github follow rates that normally appears immediately after a release has failed. I guess this means I've reached awareness saturation among p6a subscribers, and I need to move elsewhere | 17:45 | |
|
17:48
colomon joined
|
|||
| TimToady | maybe you've got a bunch of people downloading continuously who used to be occasional | 18:02 | |
|
18:17
colomon left
18:20
colomon joined
18:21
mberends joined
|
|||
| mberends | reportlet: | 18:27 | |
| * enjoyed putting nom's new Test.pm ability to work, ramped up the number of testable files | 18:28 | ||
| * heavy storms in NL tonight, may be affected by blackouts | |||
| .eor | 18:29 | ||
| masak | report-ish: went to France, gave 2+ε talks. dropped the ball with the daily blogging. about to get back up on the horse. want to help with nom, but tuits are scarce. EOR | 18:54 | |
| colomon | masak += 1+ε | 18:56 | |
| masak | :-3 | ||
| tadzik | ε-: | 18:57 | |
| masak | :-Š· | ||
| tadzik | oh, #phasers | 19:00 | |
| report: | |||
| done: passed an exam | |||
| will do: pass (hopefully) another exam, then focus on gsoc/drinking, traveling in random directions | 19:01 | ||
| =end report | |||
| sorear | o/ | ||
| mberends | \\o | 19:02 | |
| colomon | o/ | ||
| ...and then there was silence. :) | 19:05 | ||
| sorear | not good! | ||
| colomon | pmichaud just suggested freezing master's spectest so that we can start migrating the rakudo spectests to nom. | ||
| sorear | several people have suggested variations on perl6sharp/ironperl6 for Niecza's new name | ||
| colomon | (like we did with alpha and ng.) | 19:06 | |
| sorear | I'm wondering if it makes sense to have different names for Niecza-CLR and Niecza-Otherbackends | ||
| mberends | sorear: no, but ironperl6 sounds nice | ||
| pmichaud | I'm in favor of freezing master's spectest. | 19:07 | |
| anyone opposed? | |||
| mberends | +1. the developers have all moved on. | ||
| pmichaud | I'm also in favor of doing some file refactors and renames in specs, too :) | ||
| sorear | What do you mean by freezing? | 19:08 | |
| Yeah S02 is way too big :D | |||
| pmichaud | "freezing" == rakudo master always checks out a specific revision of roast. | ||
| if we're going to do significant file refactoring/renames, now seems like a prime opportunity to do it, with the two active implementations already starting on a fresh set of spectests. | 19:09 | ||
| mberends | let's rename rakudo/master to rakudo/beta in the near future | ||
| colomon | +1 | ||
| pmichaud | I'm just going to put it back to "ng", actually. | ||
| rather than start a new naming sequence. | |||
| colomon | +1/2 | 19:10 | |
| masak thinks either beta or ng is fine | |||
| pmichaud | I just don't see the point in saying "beta was the ng version, gamma is the nom version, etc...." | 19:11 | |
| easier to just put the versions back to their original branch name. | |||
| masak | aye. | ||
| pmichaud | if we want to tag them specifically, it could become old-alpha, old-ng, etc. | ||
| tadzik | then nom would be delta <Bourne's reference> | ||
| colomon | guess there's a conflict with alpha/beta testing concept, too. | ||
| masak | "alpha" was "alpha" for lack of another name for it. | ||
| sorear | it's always funny when "New" stuff is obsolete | ||
| pmichaud | yes, perhaps alpha should've been called "prime" :-) | ||
| or "zero" | 19:12 | ||
| masak | sorear: thought "ng" stood for "Next ..." :) | ||
| PerlJam | yes, rakudo is well past its prime. | ||
| sorear | yeah, Next, but still | ||
| masak | now it's "last" :) | ||
| well, "previous". | |||
| pmichaud | anyway, I don't want to rename rakudo/master until we have something that we're comfortable with replacing it with | ||
| i.e., it needs to be at the point where we say "the next release is from nom" | 19:13 | ||
| colomon | +1 | ||
| hoping that time is fairly soon. :) | |||
| pmichaud | (which I hope to be the likely outcome for July, but we're still too far to commit to that yet.) | ||
| PerlJam | sounds like it | ||
| mberends | I think there's too much to do for a July date, if we want the ecosystem projects to run on nom | 19:15 | |
| jnthn told me Zavolaj will need considerable re-work, which then affects MiniDBI | 19:16 | ||
| colomon | mberends: does MiniDBI run on current Rakudo? | ||
| colomon 's Zavolaj modules are all still broken, as far as he knows | 19:17 | ||
| mberends | colomon: partly, there are some test fails but other bits work | ||
| colomon | *Zavolaj-based | ||
| mberends | It has not been urgent enough to get the tuits, relative to nom work | 19:18 | |
| colomon | back in a moment | 19:19 | |
|
19:19
colomon left
|
|||
| sorear | 12:06 < mberends> sorear: no, but ironperl6 sounds nice | 19:19 | |
| mberends: what did you mean by this? | |||
| mberends | I like the suggested name | ||
| masak | me too. | 19:20 | |
| mberends | the no was about different names for different backends | 19:21 | |
|
19:21
colomon joined
|
|||
| sorear | mberends: then I wonder how I could use that name | 19:22 | |
| pmichaud | we can do a July compiler release from nom even if the Star release still uses master. | ||
| that's kind of the point of separating distribution and compiler releases :-) | |||
| we can also start a new distribution sequence using nom | 19:23 | ||
| masak | a non-Star one? | ||
| sorear | mberends: if it doesn't make sense to have different names, then I need to use the same name for all. Right? | ||
| pmichaud | if we feel it's important to get a distribution release going sooner than we can convert Star to use it, perhaps. | ||
| (yes, a non-Star one, potentially) | 19:24 | ||
| mberends | sorear: I think so, but far be it for me to impose such opinions on you | ||
| pmichaud: I think it's better to keep name-changing to a minimum for PR reasons | 19:26 | ||
| colomon likes Niecza as a name | |||
| pmichaud | mberends: yes, I agree to some extent. | ||
| I'm simply pointing out that we have more flexibility than might have been traditionally assumed. | 19:27 | ||
| mberends | Since nom will be getting most of the contributors' attention, all we can expect to go into the next Star (ng based) release is bugfixes and triage work. The Star after that will probably be nom-based and much more exciting. | 19:31 | |
| pmichaud | mberends: agreed. | 19:35 | |
| and we can schedule the following star release to be whenever we think nom is ready (not later than October, though) | |||
| tadzik | is there anything new in master for Star to be exciting? | 19:36 | |
| pmichaud | it's actually somewhat faster. | 19:37 | |
| (than the previous Star release) | |||
| tadzik | mhm | ||
| sorear | tadzik: vastly improved garbage collector since last quarter means it's actually possible to build it on my machine again | ||
| tadzik | oh, that's something, yes | ||
| pmichaud | there have been a few rakudo fixes, and a lot of parrot fixes. | 19:38 | |
| sorear | colomon: ISTR masak was having issues talking about it | ||
| tadzik | sorear: what kind of machine are you on? | ||
| sorear | tadzik: .375 GB RAM | ||
| colomon: I also STR you had a Plan for Sin | |||
| colomon | sorear: yes, just need to find the tuits for it. | ||
| also figure out how many of the weird cases need t be tackled now. | 19:41 | ||
| sorear | mind sharing? | 19:42 | |
| colomon | weird cases or plan? | 19:43 | |
| sorear | all | ||
| colomon | my plan was basically to come up with a standard template for a trig function in Niecza, and then use code generation to spit out the actual functions. | 19:44 | |
| because the framework for each function will be basically exactly the same. | |||
| well, maybe with variations for inverse functions. | |||
| weird cases: 1) trig bases | 19:45 | ||
| 2) very very large Ints, Rats, FatRats | |||
| 3) very precise FatRats | |||
| #3 seems pretty worthless to me. | |||
| #2 less so | |||
| #1 I might still be willing to skip for a first approximation | |||
| sorear | most trig libraries are documented as losing precision for large numbers | 19:46 | |
| usually they work by first reducing modulo "2pi", then applying a high-order approximation (polynomial, rational, sometimes CORDIC) | 19:47 | ||
| mberends | I've been studying the p5 bigint/bignum docs a bit, and I think leaving much of this to external libs is good for a core language. The important thing is to have good hooks in place. | 19:48 | |
| colomon | sorear: right | ||
| sorear | when the input is on the same order as the inverse error of the nearest long double to 2pi, the output will be completely wrong (absolutely) | ||
| colomon | sure, but at least in theory for non-num types we can reduce module 2pi ourselves | ||
| I'm just not sure if it's worth fiddling with. | 19:49 | ||
| sorear | trig bases are more of an issue | 19:50 | |
| TimToady has take a dislike to trig bases | 19:51 | ||
| *taken | |||
| sorear | I saw a lovely rant on the Internet once about the fact that in matlab(?), int(log10(1000)) = 2 | ||
| colomon | TimToady: agreed | ||
| sorear | apparently later versions of matlab special case log10 to return integers when the input is within epsilon of a power of 10 | ||
| which annoyed this guy even more, because now it's discontinuous | 19:52 | ||
| moritz | :-) | ||
| colomon | TimToady: were you okay with the idea we were bandying about of making trigbase a named parameter (rather than positional)? | ||
| TimToady | I don't like the extra parameter at all | ||
| sorear | it was some CAS starting with M | 19:53 | |
| TimToady | most languages get away with using unaries | ||
| and sin/cos are traditionally unaries | |||
| sorear | TimToady: what do you think of 'use trigbase'? | ||
| moritz | sorear: I'm pretty sure that Matlab is not a CAS, and Mathematica doesn't treat it wrongly :-) | ||
| TimToady | and I'm wondering about passing closures to .assuming. my &sin = &OUTER::sin.assuming(* * $DEGREES) | 19:54 | |
| to just remap args instead of removing them | |||
| well, I guess one could just write a function for that | |||
| moritz | I think radians are fine, and there's a good set of previous art for it | 19:55 | |
| TimToady | at the moment I'm in the mood to make trigbases go away entirely | ||
| pmichaud | +1 | ||
| sorear | +1 | ||
| TimToady | in that case, change it while I'm still in the mood :) | ||
| moritz | +1 | ||
| mberends | +1 | ||
| sorear | I | ||
| I'll go take an axe to the spec now | 19:56 | ||
| TimToady | ooh, thunder | ||
| moritz | sorear: good, then I don't have to :-) | ||
| TimToady | I think I'll run on battery for a while... | ||
| colomon feels like he has too much work invested in trigbases to make a fair call, but will go with the crowd. | |||
| TimToady: out my window it barely even looks cloudy! just to the far left... | 19:57 | ||
| TimToady | I'd rather find a way to remap the functions statically within a lexical scope | ||
| well, if colomon and I drop off, either we took a power hit, or we're locked in mortal combat with each other :) | |||
| sorear | TimToady: use trigbase is currently specced as setting $?TRIGBASE and defining new functions my &sin := &sin.assuming(..), etc | ||
| TimToady: does it make sense to keep "use trigbase" but get rid of $?TRIGBASE, and just have it generate arg remappers? | 19:58 | ||
| TimToady | probably | ||
| we could still even have $?TRIGBASE for use by user code, but do arg remappers | 19:59 | ||
| rather than inflicting an extra argument on the built-ins | |||
| sorear | so, have TRIGBASE set but not used by the core? | ||
| TimToady | that was my thought | ||
| thinking also about the definition of "natural unary" we were discussing the other day | 20:00 | ||
| colomon | woo-hoo! I didn't actually write anything about trigbase for my talk tomorrow, so I don't have anything to delete! | 20:01 | |
| sorear | should we keep the TrigBase enum? I think it might make more sense to have $?TRIGBASE be a simple numeric multiplier | ||
| sorear wonders what to do about to-radians and from-radians | |||
| masak | ooh, trigbases are going away? splendid! | 20:02 | |
| sorear needs a commit message rationale :) | |||
| moritz | "as decided by #phasers" | ||
| "overly complicated" | |||
| TimToady had a fit of sanity | |||
| moritz | hey, I sense a new sport: P6 specs commit messages bullsh!t bingo! | 20:03 | |
| sorear | I think I'll keep enum TrigBase, but with more sensible numeric values | ||
| tadzik | "girrafe's tongue is 12 inches long". You could slip some controversial decisions behind that | 20:04 | |
| masak | 12 inches?! | ||
| tadzik | or so. They clean their ears with them | 20:05 | |
| mberends | almost as long as a zebra's stripe | ||
| masak | my goodness. | ||
| tadzik | girrafes lick sugar off zebras... | ||
| masak | I think this #phasers just jumped the shark :) | ||
| sorear has to look up what a gradian is | 20:06 | ||
| mberends | ok, srsly | ||
| masak | sorear: there are 400 of them in a rotation. | ||
| mberends | sorear: 1. do you think Niecza's library interface can be Zavolaj-ish, and 2. do you plan to go beyond CLR libs to native libs too? | ||
| tadzik | oh, I lied | 20:07 | |
| A giraffe has a prehensile tongue that is about 18 to 20 inches long | |||
|
20:08
lichtkind joined
|
|||
| sorear | heh, I never knew centigrade was a unit of angle before | 20:08 | |
| in what countries is the gradian the default unit of laymen? | 20:09 | ||
| mberends thought only the USA ever used it | |||
| masak has never seen it mentioned outside of textbooks, Wikipedia, and the spec | 20:10 | ||
| colomon | "The unit originated in France as the grade, along with the metric system. " --Wikipedia | 20:11 | |
| mberends | p6l will never forgive us for this Occam Razoring | 20:12 | |
| TimToady | ah, they were probably metricizing 90° | ||
| colomon | TimToady: exactly. | ||
| TimToady | about the same time as they tried a 10-day week | ||
| mberends | Napoleonic, that figures | ||
| colomon | I hate to say it, but it kind of makes sense to me, actually. more sensible than many more popular elements of the metric system.... | 20:14 | |
| moritz | gradian: full circle = 400 gradians? | 20:15 | |
| mberends | colomon: please specify 2nd 'it': 10-day week or 400-grade circle? ;) | 20:16 | |
| colomon | 400-grade circle. | ||
| mberends | phew | ||
| colomon | it means right angles are 100-grades | ||
| TimToady still kinda likes the idea of PiRats | 20:17 | ||
| moritz | .oO( shouldn't we move Perl 6 from pi to tau? :-) |
||
| colomon is firmly opposed to tau | |||
| moritz | my proposal wasn't quite serious, let's not argue about pi/tau in here :-) | 20:18 | |
| colomon | +1 | ||
| moritz | though of course pi/tau = 1/2 :-) | ||
| masak | :P | 20:19 | |
| pmichaud | in the spirit of TMTOWDI, we should support both pi and tau. :) | ||
| *TMTOWTDI | |||
| sorear | How insane is it to allow enums with non-integral values? | ||
| TimToady is getting zigzags in his vision, and it's not lightning, so better wrap up soon | |||
| sorear thinks it's actually completely sane | 20:20 | ||
| masak | ĻMĻOWĻDI | ||
| mberends | :) | ||
| sorear: what is your use case? | |||
| TimToady | colomon doesn't want to tau the line | ||
| colomon | TimToady: I've had it up tau here with these puns. | 20:21 | |
| masak | λολ | ||
| pmichaud | tau: www.cnn.com/2011/TECH/innovation/06...index.html | 20:23 | |
| TimToady | å „å£å „ | ||
| masak | TimToady: renkouren? :) | 20:25 | |
| oh wait, that's ru. | |||
| sorear sees ninguchinin | 20:26 | ||
| mberends: see latest spec change | 20:27 | ||
| mberends sees | |||
| TimToady | sorear: not nin | ||
| nyuu | 20:28 | ||
| sorear | oh | 20:29 | |
| å „ and äŗŗ look practically the same in this font :/ | 20:30 | ||
| tadzik | the first tent has a flag, the second one doesn't | ||
| masak | oh you westerners, you're so cute trying to describe hanzi. | 20:31 | |
| tadzik | I feel more like an easterner, or centerner :) | ||
| TimToady | the first looks like "enter", and the second looks like "guy" :) | ||
| masak | sorear: I did the same mistake above... but not due to the font :/ | 20:32 | |
| moritz thought that Westernesse has long since sunk | |||
| sorear | with the two side by side, there is 1 pixel of difference | ||
| TimToady | maybe you need a bigger font size :) | ||
| masak | "...just a bit of difference..." | 20:33 | |
| everyone reading hanzy needs a bigger font size. | |||
| hanzi* | |||
| mberends | sorear: that use of 'enum' conflicts with my expectation of integer-enum too much, so I would want to call it something different, probably something closer to constants. | 20:36 | |
| also, enums should be able to auto-number in alignment with a preceding value | 20:38 | ||
| sorear | mberends: hmm. Do you think it would be a good idea to 1. switch back to a "plain" enum with the numeric constants embedded in to-radians 2. switch to a bank of constants with no enum structure? | 20:51 | |
| mberends | sorear: 2 looks better on the grounds of simplicity | 20:53 | |
| sorear | Anyone else have comments/objections? | 20:55 | |
| My type-sense tells me that constant Degrees = pi / 180; is a bit wrong | 20:56 | ||
| masak | I don't think we need much structure there at all. | ||
| people who care enough about trig are perfectly capable of defining their own constants, too. | 20:57 | ||
| let's focus on the bits of the design where there's an actual need. | |||
| colomon | hmmm... I disagree a bit with that | ||
| masak | fair enough. let's hear it. | ||
| colomon | people who care about trig are probably using radians anyway | ||
| masak | aye. | 20:58 | |
| agreed. | |||
| colomon | it's the more casual user who might want to use degrees | ||
| and have them readily accessible | |||
| was in Piers' talk this morning about making programming more accessible | 21:00 | ||
| masak | sub postfix:<degrees>($rad) { $rad / pi * 180 }; say sin(90\\ degrees) | ||
| colomon | so now I'm visualizing a junior high school girl trying to use Perl 6 to do her geometry homework, and getting quickly frustrated because of radians. | ||
| masak | I think postfix ops are great for units. | 21:01 | |
| colomon | rakudo: sub postfix:<degrees>($rad) { $rad / pi * 180 }; say sin(90degrees) | ||
| masak | ENOP6EVAL | 21:02 | |
| tadzik | hi hi | ||
| colomon | EPHASERS | ||
| that worked fine | |||
| masak | but with the wrong result :( | ||
| colomon | :( | ||
| masak | there, fixed it. | ||
| brain was on sideways. | 21:03 | ||
| colomon | only problem is how to work the inverse functions in that way.... | ||
| masak | degrees**-1 :P | 21:04 | |
| colomon | I guess I'd just as soon p6 doesn't worry about all that by default, though. Or mostly exposes it via to-radians & from-radians or something like that. | 21:05 | |
| masak | yes. | 21:06 | |
| sorear | have you made up your minds yet? what should be done? | 21:13 | |
| masak votes for axing trigbase types | 21:14 | ||
| mberends is not really present | 21:16 | ||
| pmichaud | I'm fine with eliminating trigbase types. if we discover we need them, we can figure out a better approach then. | 21:17 | |
|
21:25
colomon left
21:27
colomon joined
|
|||
| PerlJam | re trigbase, +1 to the axe | 21:43 | |
|
22:39
colomon left
22:44
colomon joined
22:48
masak left
23:05
cotto joined
23:43
mberends left
23:55
dukeleto joined
|
|||