[00:31] *** lizmat_ joined
[00:33] *** lizmat left
[01:55] *** librasteve_ left
[09:15] *** lizmat joined
[09:19] <lizmat> m: module Foo { say $?MODULE.^name }   # habere-et-disper     also see $?CLASS for classes and $?PACKAGE for packages

[09:19] <camelia> rakudo-moar 123df613f: OUTPUT: «Foo␤»

[09:31] <disbot1> <timemelon> I guess if the pointy end points to the shorter list to be looped over, then »×« makes sense for a version that pads with Nil rather than looping, since neither pointy end points to an arg

[09:32] <disbot1> <timemelon> I phrased that a bit badly, pointy end points to the list to be cycled

[10:55] *** lizmat left
[10:55] *** lizmat_ left
[10:55] *** lizmat joined
[12:57] <disbot1> <jubilatious1_98524> It's a common problem in Data Science, you have two datasets and need to throw them in a 2D data structure (i.e. csv table). But one is longer than another and you can't zero-fill (because zero has measurement meaning).

[13:05] <disbot1> <jubilatious1_98524> I'd say the opposite. If »×« is intersection and «×» is union, then the »×« looks "narrow" while the «×» looks "wide". The wide one should pad. But I probably got that backwards!!!!

[15:36] *** Eric22 joined
[15:38] *** Eric22 left
[16:53] *** dakkar left
[20:03] *** librasteve_ joined
[20:12] <disbot1> <librasteve> I vote with »×« looks "narrow" while the «×» looks "wide".

[22:42] *** librasteve_ left
[23:00] *** sjn left
[23:01] *** sjn joined