[00:15] *** sena_kun joined [00:16] *** Altai-man left [01:04] *** Kaiepi left [01:05] *** Kaiepi joined [02:46] *** vrurg_ left [02:51] *** vrurg joined [03:14] *** Altai-man joined [03:16] *** vrurg left [03:17] *** sena_kun left [03:17] *** vrurg joined [04:08] *** Kaiepi left [04:09] *** Kaiepi joined [04:13] *** Kaiepi left [04:13] *** Kaiepi joined [04:59] *** leont joined [05:15] *** sena_kun joined [05:17] *** Altai-man left [05:35] *** lucasb left [07:14] *** Altai-man joined [07:16] *** sena_kun left [08:03] *** oddp joined [08:24] Files=1334, Tests=113514, 236 wallclock secs (30.28 usr 8.71 sys + 3263.88 cusr 319.33 csys = 3622.20 CPU) [08:24] I hope this is a fluke, but it looks like we've lost quite a bit of performance again :-( [08:29] Let's see csv bench. [08:51] Altai-man: that's a different benchmark from running tests [08:52] feels more we lost a few msecs at each startup [08:52] *** oddp left [08:54] Indeed. [09:11] Files=1334, Tests=113514, 87 wallclock secs [09:11] Numbers between runs differ a lot here, so cannot confirm. :( [09:13] 87 secs o.O [09:15] *** sena_kun joined [09:17] *** Altai-man left [09:18] *** Prince213 joined [09:34] *** patrickb joined [09:39] *** Prince213 left [10:04] *** Prince213 joined [10:07] <[Tux]> Rakudo version 2020.07-63-ga84952fb1 - MoarVM version 2020.07-16-g03d3e43fa [10:07] <[Tux]> csv-test-xs-20 0.389 - 0.396 [10:07] <[Tux]> csv-ip5xs 0.812 - 0.829 [10:07] <[Tux]> test-t --race 0.836 - 0.858 [10:07] <[Tux]> test-t 1.858 - 1.989 [10:07] <[Tux]> test 7.583 - 8.014 [10:07] <[Tux]> csv-ip5xs-20 8.363 - 8.373 [10:07] <[Tux]> test-t-20 --race 9.024 - 9.845 [10:07] <[Tux]> csv-parser 26.260 - 28.075 [10:07] <[Tux]> test-t-20 31.331 - 32.162 [10:17] *** JJMerelo joined [10:17] Hey [10:17] 2020-08-10T22:51:11Z #raku-dev JJMerelo I'm working on it. Almost done! [10:17] Heh [10:59] *** patrickb left [11:14] *** Altai-man joined [11:17] *** sena_kun left [11:18] *** JJMerelo left [12:19] *** patrickb joined [13:15] *** sena_kun joined [13:17] *** Altai-man left [13:17] *** Prince213 left [13:24] *** Kaiepi left [13:26] *** Kaiepi joined [13:51] *** Kaiepi left [13:56] *** Prince213 joined [14:25] <[Coke]> jjmerelo: I owe you an article, planning to finish it after I get out of $dayjob today [14:25] [Coke], I'll pass your message to JJMerelo [14:25] <[Coke]> ... oh, that looked like it just happened, didn't realize it was 4 hours ago. :) [14:25] <[Coke]> oops. :) [14:25] <[Coke]> tellable6++ [14:33] the scoping rfc advent thing reminded me - could we add a "no strict" variant of -e for one liner terseness? [14:33] maybe -E? [14:40] make it truly a language for funky one-liners? :) [15:14] *** Altai-man joined [15:16] *** sena_kun left [15:43] jdv79 this has been discussed in the past, and decided against [15:48] i don't remember but ok [15:49] $_ is defined and assignable [15:51] *** Prince213 left [15:51] *** Prince213 joined [16:38] *** brrt joined [16:44] *** TreyHarris left [16:45] *** TreyHarris joined [17:15] *** sena_kun joined [17:17] *** Altai-man left [17:57] *** brrt left [18:44] *** Prince213 left [18:46] *** Prince213 joined [18:53] *** tobs left [18:54] *** tobs joined [19:14] *** Altai-man joined [19:16] *** sena_kun left [19:25] *** brrt joined [19:27] lizmat: i guess that's good nuf as long as one remembers. when i'm in one liner mode i tend to think in Perl. [19:53] *** Kaiepi joined [20:08] *** rypervenche left [20:11] *** rypervenche joined [20:35] *** brrt left [21:15] *** sena_kun joined [21:17] *** Altai-man left [22:40] *** Kaiepi left [23:48] *** leont left