[00:49] *** rakkable left
[00:50] *** rakkable joined
[06:31] <ab5tract> Yeah that does feel like a bug

[10:22] <lizmat> fwiw there are plenty of bugs in old printf implementation

[10:44] *** librasteve_ left
[10:49] <timo> of course

[10:50] <timo> I'm not blaming you or anything :)

[11:08] *** librasteve_ joined
[11:15] <disbot2> <librasteve> weekly: https://github.com/Raku/doc/issues/3807

[11:15] <notable6> librasteve, Noted! (weekly)

[11:16] <disbot2> <librasteve> ^^ gonna shout out form help to document coercions

[11:19] <lizmat> timo: none taken...  still too bad we can't roll out the new implementation, is what I'm basically saying

[13:07] <Geth> ¦ rakudo/main: 2fe33db32b | (Elizabeth Mattijsen)++ | src/core.c/Setty.rakumod

[13:07] <Geth> ¦ rakudo/main: Fix Set(Hash).new(foo) for coercive type parameterizations

[13:07] <Geth> ¦ rakudo/main: 

[13:07] <Geth> ¦ rakudo/main: This was missed with ab6efcab1a90d74c1

[13:07] <Geth> ¦ rakudo/main: review: https://github.com/rakudo/rakudo/commit/2fe33db32b

[22:44] *** librasteve_ left