[00:01] <apogee_ntv> antononcube: Same.

[00:11] <SmokeMachine> I'm still not very comfortable with that... :(

[00:20] <apogee_ntv> I am but only because I write very long specs and then review the code against the spec after.

[00:21] <apogee_ntv> I start with a spec, break it down into tickets each with a plan with the LLM, then assign tickets and review them against the plans, then review unstaged vs the spec and make sure the tests cover it.

[00:21] <apogee_ntv> Each plan has a definition of done, the spec has a definition of done.

[00:24] <apogee_ntv> Original spec is all written by me but can be revised through the exploration (often I find what I write is not ambiguous to me but is ambiguous to the LLM).

[00:25] <apogee_ntv> Its not the fastest way to develop with AI but I think it's a way that balances speed of delivery with understanding of what's getting built.

[01:05] *** MasterDuke joined
[01:52] *** hulk joined
[01:53] *** kylese left
[01:54] <disbot> <anagogogo> it's a reasonable way to do things tbh

[01:55] <disbot> <anagogogo> you wouldnt expect much of the AI output to be if you had virtually no more input

[01:57] *** MasterDuke left
[02:15] *** hulk left
[02:15] *** kylese joined
[02:46] *** vasko4535586165 joined
[02:48] *** vasko453558616 left
[02:48] *** vasko4535586165 is now known as vasko453558616

[03:43] *** vasko4535586169 joined
[03:46] *** vasko453558616 left
[03:48] *** vasko45355861691 joined
[03:49] *** vasko4535586169 left
[03:49] *** vasko45355861691 is now known as vasko4535586169

[03:52] *** vasko45355861691 joined
[03:54] *** vasko4535586169 left
[03:54] *** vasko45355861691 is now known as vasko4535586169