00:00
lizmat joined
01:48
ilbot3 joined
04:24
lizmat joined
06:08
lizmat joined
06:19
Zoffix joined
06:49
domidumont joined
06:54
domidumont joined
07:19
brrt joined
07:34
zakharyas joined
07:46
lizmat joined
07:52
lizmat joined
08:10
geekosaur joined
08:11
geekosaur joined
08:19
geekosaur joined
08:25
geekosaur joined
09:04
geekosaur joined
09:08
geekosaur joined
09:43
AlexDaniel joined
10:00
stmuk joined
10:16
geekosaur joined
10:27
zakharyas joined
10:49
colomon joined
11:32
brrt joined,
praisethemoon joined
12:09
stmuk_ joined
12:14
geekosaur joined
12:53
brrt joined
12:57
geekosaur joined
13:28
robertle joined
15:06
brrt joined
|
|||
brrt | good * #moarvm | 15:07 | |
i've implemented hole-finding and it's doing all sorts of weird things | 15:08 | ||
which valgrind tells me is because i'm writing beyond my buffer | 15:10 | ||
actually, ASAN, wasn't using valgrind | |||
timotimo | that's good to know, though | 15:21 | |
imagine we had found this out after a year of production use | |||
brrt | heh, my code is much to brittle to work with a buffer overflow ???? | 15:27 | |
timotimo | so it doesn't crash, it just gives strange results, yeah? | ||
brrt | it does crash in fact | 15:33 | |
but i've resolved the issue, i was using the wrong iterator value to index the list | 15:34 | ||
timotimo | ah | 15:42 | |
Geth | MoarVM/even-moar-jit: ce585eea23 | (Bart Wiegmans)++ | src/jit/linear_scan.c Minor cleanliness improvement handle_requirements can be called process_tile, which is slightly more accurate, and doesn't need to modify the cursor, because we can just ignore any requirements. |
15:46 | |
MoarVM/even-moar-jit: ed212e35d0 | (Bart Wiegmans)++ | 2 files Find live range holes Per Wimmer (2010), find 'holes' in live ranges (i.e. ranges within the live range in which the value is not defined). Strategy is to iterate backwards over all basic blocks and instructions. If a value is used, that means it must be live in the code preceeding it (otherwise the program is wrong). If a value is defined, that means it must be ... (15 more lines) |
|||
brrt | hehe, i'm to noisy even for geth | 15:47 | |
anyway, that fixes that, yay | |||
timotimo | i find that acceptable | ||
15:48
ilmari[m] joined
|
|||
brrt | minor design issue | 15:49 | |
do I generalize the binary heap code in linear_scan for the management of live range holes | 15:51 | ||
we can do that easy | |||
or, do i use the existing list structure destructively, i.e. do i merge the holes into a sorted array of live range holes. | |||
(i need it to be able to answer 'gee, is this structure in a hole right now) | 15:52 | ||
or, do i not do that at all | |||
and simply iterate over the list of holes per live range whenever i want to find out if it's currently in a hole | 15:53 | ||
timotimo | i don't know what's at stake here | 15:57 | |
brrt | performance, obviously | ||
and complexity | |||
and bugginess | |||
but i'm decommuting | |||
16:14
domidumont joined
16:32
Ven joined
17:13
tbrowder joined
17:41
Ven joined
18:01
lizmat joined
18:22
robertle joined
|
|||
Geth | MoarVM: MasterDuke17++ created pull request #592: Add at_pos support for VMHash |
18:23 | |
18:41
Ven joined
|
|||
MasterDuke_ | google offers $ rewards for integrating with their free fuzzing tool opensource.googleblog.com/2017/05/...r-and.html | 19:56 | |
nine | .tell brrt "First make it work, then make it fast" can be an iterative game with even the new JIT that's there to be faster first having to work. | 20:14 | |
yoleaux | nine: I'll pass your message to brrt. | ||
lizmat | where could I find more info on what "telemeh" means / does ? | 21:09 | |
21:12
brrt joined
|
|||
timotimo | oh | 21:16 | |
i'm the only source on that | |||
lizmat: any particular question? | |||
lizmat | is there a writeup about it somewhere ? | ||
timotimo | not really, no | ||
it basically just can spit out little status messages with tiny bits of extra data at a very high speed | 21:17 | ||
and with high accuracy | |||
because instead of asking a clock of some kind, it just reads the "number of cycles elapsed since some point near the beginning of the process" register out of the CPU | |||
that's, sadly, why it's got problems on architectures besides x86 | |||
and also, it's not in older compilers | |||
lizmat | ok, I'll digest | 21:18 | |
timotimo | it's also thread-safe, much like the other profiler absolutely isn't :) | ||
well, the other one is thread-safe in recording its stuff | |||
but we don't have a safe way to get the data out at a certain point, because the other threads just keep changing the data while we're trying to collect ... or something :D | 21:19 | ||
you can try looking at the telemeh log generated by any multithreaded thing | |||
the idea is to eventually have a nice GUI-ish frontend that could let you analyze the log at a higher level | |||
it's inspired by a product called "telemetry" by RAD Game Tools | 21:20 | ||
lizmat | thanks! | 21:25 | |
and another Perl 6 Weekly hits the Net: p6weekly.wordpress.com/2017/05/08/...batross_i/ | 21:55 | ||
timotimo | oh, if i had known you'd put it up without much editing i would have formulated things better %) | 21:56 | |
lizmat | timotimo: I did a *bit* of editing :-) | 21:57 | |
timotimo | yeah | 21:59 | |
i'm not sure we should say the other profiler "absolutely" isn't | 22:00 | ||
it just fails pretty hard at the moment, but conceptually it can be made threadsafe with a bit of work | |||
jnthn | In theory it doesn't need that much work...it just needs the right work :) | 22:01 | |
(And a lot of care, 'cus the mechanism we could bust if we get it wrong is GC sync-up) | |||
GC sync stuff *is* going to get a re-work in the not too distance future, however, as it's also quite inefficient | 22:02 | ||
timotimo | nice to hear. i wasn't very aware of trouble in that area | ||
jnthn | Well, it was always a factor, but previously the pricey FSA dominated | ||
timotimo | oh yes, and how :) | 22:03 | |
jnthn | Now that's out of the way, this is the next biggest easily-observable overhead. | ||
lizmat | timotimo: rephrased it a bit | ||
timotimo | last time i looked, the FSA exploded during full-cleanup, i should look again tomorrow or so | ||
lizmat gets some sleep | |||
timotimo | have a good rest, lizmat! | 22:04 | |
and thanks for the weekly :) | |||
jnthn | ooh, midnight...I probably should too :) | ||
'night all | |||
22:33
lizmat_ joined
23:39
SmokeMachine joined
|