pugscode.org/ | nopaste: sial.org/pbot/perl6 | ?eval [~] <m oo se> | We do Haskell, too | > reverse . show $ foldl1 (*) [1..4] | irclog: irc.pugscode.org/ Set by diakopter on 11 July 2007. |
|||
00:04
jisom_ left
00:07
jisom joined
00:10
diotalevi joined
|
|||
diotalevi | So is forward chaining in a logic program sort of the same thing as propagators adding new information in a constraint solving program? | 00:11 | |
00:13
Aankh|Clone joined
00:21
justatheory left
00:30
Aankhen`` left,
Aankhen`` joined
00:32
Aankh|Clone left
00:33
wilx left
00:36
elmex left
00:39
fglock left
01:07
Jmax joined
|
|||
avar | kp6 broke: syntax error at lib5/KindaPerl6/Runtime/Perl5/MOP.pm line 307, near ") | 01:21 | |
$::Class->new('Str') | |||
my $meta_Str = $::Str->{_dispatch}( $::Str, 'HOW' ); | |||
that's line 30[67] | |||
needs ; on 306 | |||
also, prove5.9.5 --perl ./run_kp6_perl5.pl -Ilib5 -r t could be used (pretty much) instead of run_tests.pl | 01:26 | ||
01:29
devogon left
01:41
penk left
01:49
Aankhen`` left
02:05
jisom left
02:06
jisom joined
02:10
rindolf joined
02:36
weinig joined
02:38
weinig left
02:39
weinig joined
02:53
|Jedai| joined
02:57
bonesss left
03:01
thorat left
03:10
jedai left
03:22
amnesiac joined
03:36
buetow left,
buetow joined
|
|||
pugs_svnbot | r17116 | Darren_Duncan++ | ext/Muldis-DB/ : updated Grammar.pod concerning the Int|Blob base specifier | 03:47 | |
diff: dev.pugscode.org/changeset/17116 | |||
diotalevi | In languages with continuations, is it common to package a continuation with an exception to make a "work unit" re-doable? Consider the case of soft-failure in the face of network connections. | 04:03 | |
04:37
Aankhen`` joined
05:10
kanru left
05:12
integral joined
05:14
[particle] joined
05:28
dduncan left
05:39
[particle1 left
05:55
dduncan joined
06:10
pasteling left
06:26
rho joined
06:31
pmurias joined
06:39
devogon joined
06:40
rho left
06:41
drrho joined
|
|||
pugs_svnbot | r17117 | pmurias++ | kp6: fixed error reported by avar++ | 06:41 | |
diff: dev.pugscode.org/changeset/17117 | |||
06:53
wilx joined
06:58
xinming left
06:59
xinming joined
07:16
thoughtpolice joined
07:18
thoughtpolice left
07:19
thoughtpolice joined
|
|||
pugs_svnbot | r17118 | pmurias++ | kp6: cleaned up Class.new() | 07:24 | |
diff: dev.pugscode.org/changeset/17118 | |||
07:34
Aankh|Clone joined
|
|||
meppl | good morning | 07:44 | |
thoughtpolice | morning :) | 07:45 | |
07:51
Aankhen`` left
|
|||
meppl | good morning thoughtpolice | 07:53 | |
08:03
elmex joined
08:07
iblechbot joined
08:09
dduncan left
08:11
rfordinal joined
08:12
daxim joined
|
|||
pmurias | good morning | 08:15 | |
meppl | good morning pmurias | 08:22 | |
08:26
daxim_ left,
weinig left
|
|||
pugs_svnbot | r17119 | pmurias++ | kp6: | 08:26 | |
r17119 | pmurias++ | metaclasses return the metaobject instead of installing & returning the prototype object | |||
r17119 | pmurias++ | + a simple oo test | |||
diff: dev.pugscode.org/changeset/17119 | |||
08:54
Aankhen`` joined
09:08
iblechbot left
09:11
Aankh|Clone left
09:15
rindolf left
09:16
rindolf joined
09:20
amnesiac left
09:23
xinming left
09:25
Aankh|Clone joined
09:31
goloo joined
09:43
Aankhen`` left
09:47
Aankh|Clone is now known as Aankhen``
09:54
penk joined
10:08
Aankhen`` left
10:30
goloo left
10:32
iblechbot joined
10:43
penk left
10:45
Blwood joined
10:49
frankg joined,
hcchien left
|
|||
frankg | was wondering if perl6 would allow you to use yaml to create complex data structures? | 10:49 | |
11:02
frankg left
11:05
lvh joined
|
|||
lvh | hi | 11:05 | |
11:07
Blwood_ joined
|
|||
pmurias | lvh: hi | 11:09 | |
windsurfing& | |||
lvh | no | 11:10 | |
wifi surfing | |||
rindolf | Hi lvh | ||
lvh | i love airports | ||
11:10
lvh is now known as lvh|airport,
Blwood_ left
11:11
Blwood_ joined
11:17
lvh|airport left
11:20
kanru joined
11:21
rfordinal left
11:23
Blwood left
11:26
pmurias left,
zamolxes joined
11:38
lisppaste3 left
11:44
lisppaste3 joined
12:14
funktio joined
12:15
funktio left
12:45
jisom left,
offby1 joined
12:56
offby1 is now known as foobot,
foobot is now known as offby1
12:57
[particle1 joined
13:14
[particle] left
13:23
on_ joined
14:07
aindilis` left
14:10
xinming joined
14:29
agentzh joined
|
|||
agentzh | Hi, i see a lot of warnings while compiling pugs on feather: | 14:30 | |
"warning: "PACKAGE_VERSION" redefined" | |||
"In file included from /usr/lib/ghc-6.6.1/include/HsUnix.h:12," | |||
szbalint | same here | 14:33 | |
14:38
xinming_ joined
14:41
agentzh left
14:44
xinming left
15:02
rintaro left
15:22
franck___ joined
15:27
franck____ joined,
franck___ left,
xinming_ is now known as xinming
16:04
chris2 joined
16:07
Blwood_ left
|
|||
thoughtpolice | @ask [particle] do you know if parrot builds on solaris 10? | 16:10 | |
lambdabot | Consider it noted. | ||
[particle1 | thoughtpolice: yes | 16:11 | |
16:11
[particle1 is now known as [particle]
|
|||
thoughtpolice | [particle]: cool. | 16:12 | |
i have a box sitting around and i've been bored the past few days so I figure i'll do something with it. | |||
[particle] | it runs sun lint there, too (make sunlint or make lint iirc) | ||
lambdabot | [particle]: You have 1 new message. '/msg lambdabot @messages' to read it. | ||
thoughtpolice | [particle]: it has no internet but i could just pull the smoke.html and send it from say this box right? | ||
[particle] | thoughtpolice++ # you can usually find andy on irc.perl.org#parrot to help if you need | 16:13 | |
yep | |||
thoughtpolice | [particle]: what's the util in the source tree for that | ||
tools/util/smokeserv-client.pl ? | |||
[particle] | tools/utils/smokeserv-client.pl iirc | ||
you can verify by examining the 'smoke' target in the makefile | |||
thoughtpolice | yeah. i'll find a usb stick lying around (hell, i could use my psp :>) and get the source there and the smoke's back | 16:14 | |
[particle] | hurrah for sneakernet! | 16:15 | |
thoughtpolice | i can't test svn though, only releases (no internet,) if I get connections for it soon it'll be a small fileserver but i could smoke the latest repo :) | ||
i'll try to do that sometime now that i think of it. :) | 16:16 | ||
16:16
kanru left
16:17
masak joined
16:21
bonesss joined
16:23
DarkWolf84 left
16:28
justatheory joined
16:33
pjcj_ joined
16:35
justatheory left
16:41
joao joined
16:53
drrho left,
Azure-BOT joined
17:20
Limbic_Region joined
17:28
franck___ joined
|
|||
TimToady | @tell pmurias I'd just use something within the current syntax like "class Foo is HOW(Bar)" | 17:37 | |
lambdabot | Consider it noted. | ||
17:37
franck____ left
|
|||
TimToady | @tell pmurias though for any extensive use of a new metaclass I'd just replace "class" with a different keyword. You can view the "role" declaration that way, for instance. | 17:39 | |
lambdabot | Consider it noted. | ||
17:40
realnamexyz joined
17:41
amnesiac joined
|
|||
TimToady | @tell pmurias though now that I think on it, it's probably "is HOW(new Bar)" since .HOW is pointing to an instance of the metaclass. | 17:42 | |
lambdabot | Consider it noted. | ||
17:45
franck____ joined
17:54
franck___ left
17:56
Psyche^ joined
18:01
Patterner left,
Psyche^ is now known as Patterner
18:26
weinig joined
18:30
chris2 left
18:35
jisom joined
18:39
lambdabot left
18:42
riffraff joined
|
|||
riffraff | hi | 18:42 | |
rindolf | Hi riffraff | ||
riffraff | so pugs now compiles only with ghc 6.6.1 ? | 18:43 | |
18:45
realnamexyz left
|
|||
thoughtpolice | riffraff: it shouldn't, it compiled on ghc 6.6 for a while on this box | 18:46 | |
although i haven't built it recently on linux | |||
18:47
jisom left
|
|||
riffraff | I have ghc 6.6 on ubuntu and it complaing it is not 6.6.1 :) | 18:48 | |
18:48
offby1 left
|
|||
riffraff | I was just wondering why this, for me it's ok to find a new ghc or not to build pugs :) | 18:48 | |
18:52
cognominal_ left
18:53
cognominal_ joined
|
|||
_moritz_ | re | 18:54 | |
18:55
franck____ left
18:56
Limbic_Region left
18:57
amnesiac left
19:09
pmurias joined
|
|||
pmurias | _moritz_: hi | 19:09 | |
_moritz_ | hi pmurias ;) | ||
19:11
Aankhen`` joined
|
|||
_moritz_ | I'm back after an offline weekend ;) | 19:13 | |
masak | _moritz_: wb | ||
_moritz_ | but starting from tomorrow I have $work to do, so nearly no time for hacking ;( | ||
spinclad | riffraff: audreyt recently upgraded the requirement to 6.6.1 | 19:15 | |
pmurias will be away on camp for the next 12 days | 19:17 | ||
spinclad | on debian etch we've either upgraded to testing's ghc or backported; the backport may get submitted to backports.org... | 19:18 | |
_moritz_ | though you can't install ghc's binaries from lenny without upgrading, because it wants a new glibc or something | 19:19 | |
pmurias | i'll only do c++ for that period :( | 19:22 | |
spinclad | upgrading glibc at least, right. i've done that and not seen any instability, though my usage pattern is limited. | ||
Patterner | to 2.6? | ||
_moritz_ | I was too scared, I admit ;) | ||
Patterner | 2.6 works for me | 19:23 | |
spinclad | and glibc brought in incompatible kernel headers, which worries me some. | ||
(expect i should worry more, if i built my own kernels as i should) | 19:24 | ||
19:26
amnesiac joined
|
|||
spinclad | yes, to 2.6-2 | 19:29 | |
19:29
jisom joined
|
|||
Patterner | 0.6? | 19:30 | |
spinclad | ? | ||
Patterner | 2.6-2 = 0.6 | 19:31 | |
spinclad | ?eval 2.6-2 | ||
evalbot_r17041 | 3/5 | ||
_moritz_ | ?eval '2.6-2' eq '0.6' | ||
evalbot_r17041 | Bool::False | 19:32 | |
spinclad | ?eval '2.6-2' eq '3.0-0.4' | 19:33 | |
evalbot_r17041 | Bool::False | ||
spinclad | sorry, 3/5 is as close as i can get | ||
20:06
amnesiac left
20:16
pmurias left
|
|||
jisom | ?eval '2.6-2' eq eval '3/5' | 20:27 | |
evalbot_r17041 | Bool::False | ||
20:34
justatheory joined
20:46
iblechbot left
21:01
bonesss left
|
|||
diakopter is at pdx. riding some train. | 21:02 | ||
21:11
[particle1 joined
21:14
rindolf left
21:19
[particle] left
21:28
Blwood joined
21:33
joao left
21:37
jisom left
21:42
on_ left
21:43
Aankh|Clone joined
21:53
demq joined
22:00
Aankhen`` left
22:05
dmq left
|
|||
meppl | good night | 22:06 | |
22:17
justatheory left
|
|||
masak | 'night | 22:17 | |
& # sleep | |||
22:17
masak left
22:20
mako132_ joined
22:23
mako132_ left
22:27
mako132_ joined
22:35
buetow left
22:36
riffraff left
22:56
[particle] joined
22:58
[particle1 left
|
|||
cognominal_ | I can't grasp the difference between a mutable type and an imutable one (2 differents categories of types defined in S02) | 22:59 | |
23:14
[particle1 joined
|
|||
Gothmog_ | It's just what the name suggests: it's mutable or not. | 23:17 | |
23:30
[particle] left
23:41
daxim_ joined,
aindilis joined
|
|||
TimToady | cognominal_: immutable types are just values, like numbers. You can't assign to them. | 23:51 | |
mutable types are like variables or containers that can change their value | |||
So you can have a value like a set--in set theory every possible collection is a different set | 23:52 | ||
if you have a set variable, it changes which set it holds every time you modify it. | |||
23:52
daxim left
23:57
bonesss joined
|