The topic for #perl6 is: pugscode.org/ planetsix.perl.org/ | nopaste: sial.org/pbot/perl6 | pugs: [~] <m oo se> (or rakudo:, kp6:, elf: etc.) (or perl6: for all) | irclog: irc.pugscode.org/ Set by TimToady on 25 November 2008. |
|||
rakudo_svn | r33784 | tene++ | [rakudo]: Fix the ordering of multiple CATCH blocks in a block. | 00:00 | |
00:05
mncharity joined
00:11
araujo joined
|
|||
mncharity | moritz_: re "Mitchell Charity updated the Elf homepage and continued his work on bootrapping Elf on Common Lisp.", well, not quite. Wiki updated, yes. But the CL backend is inactive until either there's an additional developer, or the front-end gets bootstrapped (ie, elf runs STD.pm) and various other things happen. | 00:12 | |
00:13
broquaint left,
broquaint joined
00:17
vixey left
|
|||
mncharity | re "It's beginning to look a lot like Christmas..." blog entry, sigh. very long sigh. | 00:18 | |
Tene | why? | 00:20 | |
mncharity | Part of the difficulty of attracting developers to p6 is n years of throwing away any fragment of credibility in progress and status reporting. | ||
00:23
ChrisDavaz left
|
|||
jnthn | mncharity: What makes it not credible? | 00:24 | |
mncharity | Perhaps Boston.pm isn't representative, but saying p6 status reports are given zero credibility would I think be an entirely uncontroversial observation. | ||
jnthn | It acknowledges the progress that is being made, while still saying that "we're still a good distance from an true Perl 6 release". | ||
Moreover, it clearly states *what* progress has been made. | 00:25 | ||
I think anyone claiming "we'll certainly ahve a release in year X" can be dismissed as uncredible at this point, sure. | 00:26 | ||
But this report doesn't do anything like that. | |||
mncharity | jnthn: "It's beginning to look a lot like Christmas..." | ||
It's the title I find problematic, rather than the contents. | |||
jnthn | If the title is taken in isolation from the contents, I guess I can see room for misunderstanding. | 00:28 | |
mncharity | Current state doesn't at all resemble Christmas. It most resembles what pugs was doing three years ago. Great progress, yay. But very very far from a release. Or a release candidate. Or anything remotely associated with a release. We're still in development toy mode. | 00:29 | |
Pugs three years ago didn't resemble Christmas. Neither does parrot today. I didn't mean to flame. But... given parrot/p6 history, we really need to be bending over backwards to give people high-integrity descriptions of where we're at. If we care about folks believing us at all. | 00:32 | ||
00:38
broquaint left,
broquaint joined
00:42
elmex left
00:43
eternaleye joined
00:45
DemoFreak left
00:54
apeiron left
00:59
apeiron joined
|
|||
meppl | good night | 01:00 | |
01:02
eternaleye left
01:03
meppl left
01:21
felipe left
01:26
LimbicRegion joined
|
|||
mncharity | parrot: ("bac" ~~ /a/).perl | 01:39 | |
rakudo: ("bac" ~~ /a/).perl | |||
p6eval | rakudo 33784: OUTPUT[Method 'perl' not found for invocant of class 'PGE;Match'ā¤current instr.: '_block11' pc 40 (EVAL_13:19)ā¤] | ||
mncharity | rakudo: ("bac" ~~ /(a)/)[0] | 01:40 | |
p6eval | rakudo 33784: RESULT[Method 'perl' not found for invocant of class 'PGE;Match'ā¤current instr.: '_block11' pc 29 (EVAL_13:16)ā¤] | ||
mncharity | rakudo: ("bac" ~~ /(a)/).WHAT | 01:41 | |
p6eval | rakudo 33784: OUTPUT[Null PMC access in get_integer()ā¤current instr.: 'parrot;PGE;Match;get_bool' pc 504 (compilers/pge/PGE/Match.pir:328)ā¤] | ||
mncharity | rakudo: ("bac" ~~ /(a)/).[0] | ||
p6eval | rakudo 33784: RESULT[Method 'perl' not found for invocant of class 'PGE;Match'ā¤current instr.: '_block11' pc 29 (EVAL_15:16)ā¤] | ||
mncharity | ("bac" ~~ /(a)/).[0].Str | ||
rakudo: ("bac" ~~ /(a)/).[0].Str | |||
p6eval | rakudo 33784: OUTPUT[Method 'Str' not found for invocant of class 'PGE;Match'ā¤current instr.: '_block11' pc 58 (EVAL_15:22)ā¤] | ||
mncharity | rakudo: ("bac" ~~ /(a)/).[0] ~ "" | ||
p6eval | rakudo 33784: RESULT["a"] | ||
mncharity | rakudo: ("bac" ~~ /(a)/).{0}~ "" | 01:42 | |
p6eval | rakudo 33784: OUTPUT[Use of uninitialized valueā¤] | ||
01:44
Limbic_Region left,
LimbicRegion is now known as Limbic_Region
|
|||
mncharity | rakudo: ("bac" ~~ /<ident>/).{'ident'}~ "" | 01:50 | |
p6eval | rakudo 33784: RESULT["bac"] | ||
01:50
eternaleye joined
01:56
dukeleto joined
|
|||
rakudo_svn | r33785 | tene++ | [rakudo]: Create a protoobject for Exception | 02:10 | |
02:15
pasteling left
02:17
pasteling joined
02:29
pasteling left
02:30
pasteling joined
02:39
mncharity left
02:42
pasteling left
02:43
pasteling joined
03:11
Psyche^ joined
03:22
Patterner left,
Psyche^ is now known as Patterner
|
|||
rakudo_svn | r33789 | tene++ | [rakudo] | 03:40 | |
r33789 | tene++ | * More fixups for the Exception class | |||
r33789 | tene++ | * Add a :multi(Exception) for the 'die' op | |||
03:41
Minthe joined
04:05
notbenh joined
|
|||
rakudo_svn | r33790 | chromatic++ | [Rakudo] Fixed a typo in an exception message. | 04:20 | |
04:26
rhr_ joined
04:31
Limbic_Region left
04:39
rhr left
|
|||
pugs_svn | r24254 | leto++ | Unfudged passing CATCH test for Rakudo | 04:43 | |
dukeleto | w00t | ||
Minthe | Excuse me, but does pugs-svn run fine? | 04:44 | |
pmichaud | dukeleto++ | 04:45 | |
Minthe | I built r19955 with GHC 6.6.1 and it worked fine, but when I tried to build r22??? using GHC 6.8.2 it failed to start. | ||
Is the issue fixed? | |||
04:55
dukeleto left
04:59
araujo left
|
|||
rakudo_svn | r33791 | chromatic++ | [Rakudo] PDX.pm added a basic implementation of warn to Rakudo. This will need | 05:00 | |
r33791 | chromatic++ | revision when HLLCompiler and/or Rakudo supports a top-level exception handler. | |||
05:11
notbenh left
05:17
Minthe left
05:29
azawawi joined
|
|||
azawawi | ping | 05:38 | |
lambdabot | azawawi: You have 1 new message. '/msg lambdabot @messages' to read it. | ||
azawawi | @tell moritz_ will move it to misc asap.... i was wondering where to place it. | 05:39 | |
lambdabot | Consider it noted. | ||
05:49
ozy` joined
|
|||
pugs_svn | r24255 | azawawi++ | [Perl6::Highlight] moved from src/perl6/lib/ to misc/, moritz_++ | 05:55 | |
r24256 | azawawi++ | [Perl6::Highlight] Removing unneeded files committed by mistake. | 05:59 | ||
06:09
notbenh joined
06:11
ashizawa joined
06:19
ozy` left
06:21
notbenh left
07:03
adc_penner joined
07:12
mberends joined
07:15
DemoFreak joined
07:18
sri_kraih joined
07:57
iblechbot joined
08:12
justatheory joined
08:13
magnarjg joined
08:19
aartist left
08:27
araujo joined
08:34
riffraff joined
08:44
azawawi left
08:45
stephens left
08:54
dukeleto joined,
justatheory left
09:05
dr_df0 joined
09:29
felipe joined
09:32
adc_penner left
09:37
alexn_org joined
09:41
azawawi joined
09:49
riffraff left
10:16
kisu joined
10:28
elmex joined
10:43
ruoso joined
10:59
meppl joined
11:14
masak joined
|
|||
masak has backlooged a bit | 11:35 | ||
I agree with mncharity's sentiment. | |||
azawawi | which is? ;-) | 11:36 | |
hi masak | |||
masak | azawawi: hi | ||
azawawi: irclog.perlgeek.de/perl6/2008-12-11 | |||
it's difficult to walk the line between pride/happiness over progress and creating too high expectations outside of the community. | 11:37 | ||
add to that the fact that Perl 6 has been... a bit of a wait so far. | |||
azawawi | btw, which is the blog entry '...beginning to look a lot like Christmas' ? | ||
masak | azawawi: I'll get it for you. | ||
use.perl.org/~pmichaud/journal/38058 | 11:38 | ||
11:38
xinming_ joined
|
|||
azawawi is reading it... | 11:38 | ||
thx | |||
11:38
xinming left
|
|||
masak | I think that the phrase is not difficult to understand in context, but the dangerous thing might be that outsiders don't have that context. | 11:39 | |
(btw, I've been guilty of exactly the same sin, saying "Christmas is really close, you can feel it" in a filmed lightning talk) | 11:40 | ||
11:40
xinming_ is now known as xinming,
magnarjg left
|
|||
masak | but mncharity is right, we're really just at the beginning of a fairly long process. | 11:41 | |
azawawi | oh well, baby steps ;-) | ||
masak | it's not the baby steps that are the problem. | ||
it's keeping the external expectations at an appropriate level. | |||
azawawi | that's why i said baby steps... ;-) | 11:42 | |
release often... | |||
masak | azawawi: aye. I wish people were more aware of that. | ||
it's very hard to take the word "vapourware" in one's mouth when one is aware of the monthly releases. | 11:43 | ||
azawawi | im working on Perl6::Highlight cpan module atm | ||
masak | azawawi++ | ||
azawawi | i was also reading ovid's use.perl.org/~Ovid/journal/38010 in the morning | 11:44 | |
masak hadn't seen that yet | 11:45 | ||
ruoso later & | 11:47 | ||
11:47
ruoso left
|
|||
masak | food & | 11:49 | |
11:49
masak left
11:53
dr_df0 left
12:05
vixey joined
|
|||
pugs_svn | r24257 | azawawi++ | [Perl6::Highlight] Added missing jquery 1.2.6 to package | 12:07 | |
r24257 | azawawi++ | [Perl6::Highlight] Moved STD.pm required files into lib/Perl6 | |||
r24257 | azawawi++ | [Perl6::Highlight] Updated Perl6::Highlight structure and pod docs | |||
r24257 | azawawi++ | [Perl6::Highlight] Added initial methods and constructor (not implemented yet) | |||
r24257 | azawawi++ | [Perl6::Highlight] Updated cpan module dependencies in Makefile.PL | |||
r24258 | azawawi++ | [Perl6::Highlight] SVN-ignored generated files | 12:13 | ||
12:18
masak joined
|
|||
pugs_svn | r24259 | azawawi++ | [Perl6::Highlight] Moved STD.pm required p5 files to lib/ | 12:25 | |
masak | perl6: +(a => 2) | 12:37 | |
p6eval | pugs: RESULT[2] | ||
..elf 24259: RESULT[2ā¤] | |||
..rakudo 33797: OUTPUT[get_number() not implemented in class 'Perl6Pair'ā¤current instr.: 'prefix:+' pc 16648 (src/builtins/op.pir:111)ā¤] | |||
masak | is the aboce specced? | ||
s/c/v/ | |||
12:38
Lorn joined
|
|||
masak | perl6: +(a => 42) | 12:39 | |
p6eval | pugs: RESULT[2] | ||
..elf 24259: RESULT[2ā¤] | |||
..rakudo 33797: OUTPUT[get_number() not implemented in class 'Perl6Pair'ā¤current instr.: 'prefix:+' pc 16648 (src/builtins/op.pir:111)ā¤] | |||
masak | seems Pugs and Elf just numify to the number of items in a pair (2). | 12:40 | |
one could imagine numifying to the value instead, for example. | 12:41 | ||
masak asks p6l | 12:45 | ||
jnthn | masak: I can't recall reading anything on that. | 12:46 | |
masak neither | |||
jnthn: needs tests eventually too, I guess. | |||
jnthn | Yes, once there's a spec. | ||
masak | but I'll start with p6l. | ||
jnthn | :-) | ||
masak just realized that he could theoretically add something to the spec at this very moment | 12:50 | ||
hm, with great power comes great responsibility. | 12:51 | ||
I could introduce COMEFROM into the Perl 6 spec! :> that'd be eclectic. | |||
masak cackles evilly | 12:52 | ||
jnthn | I could use svn revert for the first time shortly afterwards. :-P | ||
12:52
iblechbot left
|
|||
jnthn | masak: Do it as a module. ;-) | 12:52 | |
use IntercalsInsaneFeatures; | |||
masak | jnthn: aye. :) | ||
masak is really studying Chinese Literature today -- just easily distracted | 12:53 | ||
jnthn | svn.pugscode.org/pugs/docs/Perl6/Spec/ - this is where the Perl 6 spec lives now, right? | ||
masak | aye | 12:54 | |
jnthn | Has the proposed use of the other numbers been put somewhere in the Pugs repository? | ||
masak knows not | |||
jnthn doesn't see it | 12:55 | ||
masak | in some sense, it's kind of appropriate that Pair numifies to 2 :) | ||
it's almost a bit funny. | |||
I'm also thinking that it might sometimes be useful and "expected" | 12:56 | ||
but I cannot think of an actual piece of code that exemplifies this. | |||
jnthn | If you see a pair as a kinda tuple and a tuple as a kinda list... :-) | 12:58 | |
masak | mm | ||
but does that mean that you need a 2 to fall out of it sometimes? | |||
jnthn | Well, that line of thinking is perhaps more a consistency than a DWIM argument. :-) | 12:59 | |
masak | it is. | ||
is it surprising if (switch => False) numifies to 2? | 13:00 | ||
people won't be surprised by [False, False, False] numifying to 3. | 13:01 | ||
jnthn | I'm not sure what the obvious answer is. | 13:02 | |
masak | if 2 is the consistency answer, is there an obvious DWIM answer? | 13:03 | |
masak is leaning towards the pair value | |||
perl6: say [min] (1,2,3) | 13:13 | ||
p6eval | elf 24259: OUTPUT[Parse error in: /tmp/PwbigUqbiyā¤panic at line 1 column 0 (pos 0): Can't understand next input--giving upā¤WHERE: say [min] (1,2,3)ā¤WHERE:/\<-- HEREā¤ STD_red/prelude.rb:99:in `panic'ā¤ STD_red/std.rb:76:in `scan_unitstopper'ā¤ STD_red/std.rb:224:in `comp_unit'ā¤ | ||
..STD_red/std.rb:210... | |||
..pugs: OUTPUT[*** ā¤ Unexpected "("ā¤ expecting operator, ":" or ","ā¤ at /tmp/d2tK1YmCol line 1, column 11ā¤] | |||
..rakudo 33797: OUTPUT[Statement not terminated properly at line 1, near "(1,2,3)"ā¤ā¤current instr.: 'parrot;PGE;Util;die' pc 129 (runtime/parrot/library/PGE/Util.pir:83)ā¤] | |||
masak | did I misunderstand the use of &min? | 13:23 | |
pmichaud | min isn't implemented in rakudo yet, apparently. | 13:26 | |
I probably shouldn't have used it in my post, then. | |||
masak | sounds like low-hanging fruit. | ||
pmichaud | it is, somewhat. | 13:27 | |
the problem is getting the default min value in place | |||
so that [min] () works | |||
because we don't have +Inf yet | |||
masak | nod | ||
pmichaud | for now, though, let's go ahead and use zero | 13:28 | |
masak | as long as there are tests for +Inf, that's fine I guess | ||
pmichaud | right. | ||
here's my comment for those who didn't like the title of my "looking like Christmas" post | 13:29 | ||
Your point is well-taken. On the other hand, my experience has been that even the "well reasoned" posts are invariably met with cries of "Perl 6 will always be vaporware" and "Parrot is a waste of time" and the like. To preserve my own sanity (and -Ofun), I've decided to not worry too much about preaching to that choir. (more) | 13:31 | ||
For now, I'm going with the theory that "working code" is really the only way to handle any naysayers, and let expectations fall out of that. If we don't have working code, then the naysayers are right. If we have working code but the naysayers want to focus on the years that we didn't, that's not useful or important to me. | 13:34 | ||
masak | pmichaud++ | 13:35 | |
at one point, the #perl6 topic linked to an image with a text along the lines of 'The best way to make a paradigm shift happen is to have so much fun that other people simply cannot spare to ignore you.' I liked that. | |||
13:37
renormalist joined
|
|||
masak | I agree that there are probably unchangeable naysayers out there. a more interesting question is how to make converts of people who haven't heard of Perl 6 yet. | 13:39 | |
pmichaud | so, when something happens that I think is worth blogging about (and I think there will continue to be a lot of this), I'm going to give my best account of it and let things go from there. The fact that there were a lot of broken claims in the past really shouldn't stop us from touting our successes in the present. | 13:40 | |
13:40
Caelum left
|
|||
pmichaud | masak: I think it'll start to happen naturally, as people (re)discover Perl's expressiveness and how easy it is to do things in this new language. | 13:41 | |
moritz_ | jnthn: the proposed numbers of the specs can be seen on perlcabal.org/syn/ | ||
lambdabot | moritz_: You have 1 new message. '/msg lambdabot @messages' to read it. | ||
pmichaud | _especially_ the grammar and regex stuff. | ||
masak | pmichaud: yes, I think so too. I'm glad I'm an early adopter in this case -- that's what I want to get through in most of my blog posts. | 13:42 | |
moritz_ has received an email of acceptance for his talk "Perl 6 Rulez" (German Perl Workshop 2009), which will use only examples that work right now (or then, march 2009) in rakudo | |||
pmichaud | and yes, it's those blog posts of "here's what I'm able to do with Perl" (both *5* and *6*) that will start to spark interest and enthusiasm about Perl again. | 13:43 | |
azawawi | moritz_++ | ||
masak | moritz_: nice title. :) | ||
pmichaud | (phone) | ||
I just submitted my abstract for a similar talk at Frozen Perl | |||
azawawi | moritz_: maybe now you can use --snippet-html mode in STD_syntax_highlight | ||
13:43
ashizawa left
|
|||
moritz_ | azawawi: I will, probably :-) | 13:44 | |
I'll develop a basic grammar for XML, and introduce the regex features on the way | |||
pmichaud | moritz++ | 13:45 | |
masak | nice. | ||
pmichaud | my talk is going to be a introduction to Perl 6 with working code examples | ||
masak wonders if it would be possible to write a SAX parser with {*} actions | 13:46 | ||
pugs_svn | r24260 | azawawi++ | [Perl6::Highlight] more fixes and tests nothing fancy... | ||
moritz_ | it would be very nice to have parametric regexes working by then (ie regexes that take arguments), but it's definitively not a requirement | 13:47 | |
azawawi | moritz_: and maybe highlighted regexps ;-) | ||
moritz_ wonders if he should start giving Perl 6 answers on perlmonks.org | 13:48 | ||
masak | moritz_: sure, why not? | ||
moritz_ | masak: it's hard to get IO think right atm, because it's mostly underspecced | 13:49 | |
masak | true. I've felt some of that lately, developing that board game. | ||
TSa thinks a pair should numify to the numification of its value. | 13:51 | ||
sometimes I think I think so too. :) | |||
moritz_ | that can easily be achieved with ~+$pair, of course (and so pretty...) :-) | 13:52 | |
uhm, ~+$pair.value | |||
masak | why both ~ and + ? | ||
what does that acheive? | 13:53 | ||
moritz_ | ~ is the stringification | ||
masak | I know. | ||
moritz_ | if you want to force it, that is | ||
if you have string context anyway, you can omit iit | |||
pmichaud | my initial impression is that +Pair should do its value also | 13:54 | |
masak | but why would you want to stringify after numifying? I don't get it. | ||
moritz_ | which is probably what you want | ||
masak | moritz_: the question here is what $pair numifies to by itself. | ||
moritz_ | I don't see a good reason not to numify to its value | 13:55 | |
masak | moritz_: well, one good reason might be that a Pair works like a list of its key and value in some contexts. and such a list numifies to 2. | 13:56 | |
moritz_ | so you can do %occurences.pairs.sort: &infix:<< <=> >>; | ||
masak | moritz_: again, not relevant. | ||
pmichaud | or even sort %hash | ||
moritz_ | pmichaud: no, that uses cmp | ||
pmichaud | oh, yes. | ||
moritz_ | pmichaud: and cmp first decides on the key, then on the value | ||
masak | moritz_: oh, wait. it is. sorry. | ||
pmichaud | so, what's the quick-and-easy way to sort on hash values? | 13:57 | |
I saw the post on use.perl and thought "that seems a bit long" | |||
moritz_ | pmichaud: I think we should allow arity-1 subs that automagically do a schwartzian transform | 13:58 | |
masak | what's wrong with %hash.sort? seems to me cmp is a good default. | ||
moritz_ | pmichaud: so that you can simply say %hash.sort: { .value } | ||
masak: it is, but not if you want to sort by value | |||
pmichaud | %hash.sort sorts by key and then value | ||
masak | moritz_: ooh! I like that. | ||
moritz_ | or %hash.pairs.sort: { .value } | ||
masak | pmichaud: sounds good to me. | 13:59 | |
moritz_: what's the difference? | |||
moritz_ | masak: it has been proposed by TheDamian back in the days, but it's not in S29, unless you put it there :-) | ||
masak makes a little note | |||
moritz_ | masak: probably none, but I'm not sure what a hash in list context does | ||
pmichaud | hash in list context is a list of Pairs | 14:00 | |
moritz_ | ok, so the .pairs is superfluous | ||
moritz_ has to go now and hold his third tutorial today | |||
pmichaud | we could do arity-1 subs using (1) a different methodname from sort, or (2) an adverb on sort | 14:01 | |
masak | I have a blog post in my queue about all the things that need to be done with S29. | ||
will write it when $SCHOOL stops bugging me so much. | |||
pmichaud | (IO underspecced): One way to improve the S16 situation would be to write code that is the way you'd like it to work and document that | ||
part of the reason why S16 is underspecced is that the design team was hoping it would fall out from use cases | 14:02 | ||
and a big part of the reason why it's in the pugs repo is so that people can adjust the spec to use cases | |||
so, rather than ask "what does the spec say", our real question is "what _should_ it say", and the implementors/early adopters have some latitude to negotiate that and explore the design space for a while | 14:03 | ||
masak | to varying degrees that is true of all S?? specs, I guess. | 14:04 | |
pmichaud | taking that as a starting point, Rakudo's philosophy with respect to S16 will be that as long as S16 is underspecced, we won't limit ourselves to doing "what is actually listed there". | ||
and yes, that's true of the S?? specs in general, although obviously the "more complete" specs have less room to wiggle. | |||
also, there comes a point where we really design to the test suite more than the synopses | 14:05 | ||
masak | aye. | ||
pmichaud | so if the test suite has a certain feature in it, then we implement to that even if the synopsis is silent on the subject (and we write a ticket asking that the synopsis be updated) | ||
the same will be true not only of S16, but also S19 (command line) and S24 (testing) | 14:06 | ||
and others. | |||
moritz_: I totally agree with the schwartzian transform approach, now that I think about it. | 14:08 | ||
masak | on the first sign of tuits, I'll add it to S29. | 14:09 | |
pmichaud | the problem with %hash.sort { foo(%hash{$^a}) op foo(%hash{$^b}) } is that we end up computing foo() for each comparison, even though it's invariant. | ||
masak | maybe there should be a multi version of sort taking only a binary operator, which also does a schwartzian transform | 14:10 | |
s/version/variant/ | |||
pmichaud | maybe, but typically it's not the operator (or its arity) that we're interested in | ||
14:11
iblechbot joined
|
|||
pmichaud | even in %hash.sort { %hash{$^a} cmp %hash{$^b} } we aren't passing the cmp operator to 'sort' | 14:11 | |
masak | right. | ||
pmichaud | i.e., the "comparison" that sort sees is still an arity-1 sub. | ||
oh, I guess it's arity 2. | 14:12 | ||
but it's not infix:<cmp> | |||
masak | true. | ||
pmichaud | so perhaps keying based on arity is sufficient. | ||
anyway, something like %hash.sort { foo($_) } would mean that we could cache the value of foo($_) for each element prior to doing the sort, instead of (re)computing it at each comparison step. | 14:13 | ||
it also becomes really useful for things like | 14:14 | ||
@list_of_dogs.sort { .breed } | |||
lambdabot | Unknown command, try @list | ||
masak | lambdabot: ssh! | ||
pmichaud | which would sort the list based on the breed of each dog. | ||
masak | I like it. | ||
pmichaud | actually, it almost calls for *two* adverbs to sort | 14:15 | |
one of them is the comparison function to use (default infix:<cmp>) | |||
the other is the value ot use (default: $_) | |||
masak | how would the latter work? can adverbs refer to variables? | 14:16 | |
pmichaud | @list_of_dogs.sort :by(&infix:<eq>) :value{ .breed } | ||
or something like that. | 14:17 | ||
masak | oh, a closure. | ||
I see. | |||
pmichaud | right, it's still a closure, but it's invoked on each element of the sort prior to doing the sort | ||
and then _those_ are the values used in the comparison | |||
masak | it does read well. 'sort ... by ... value'. | ||
pmichaud | but what we're sorting is still the invocant | ||
anyway, this is a place where I suspect we need TimToady to tweak the dwimminess knob | 14:18 | ||
masak | maybe s/:by/:using/, though. | ||
pmichaud | yes, I thought of :using as well. | 14:19 | |
masak | :by is for ranges :) | ||
pmichaud | the arity-1 thing initially feels like a nice level of dwimminess too. | ||
I really like %hash.sort { .value } | |||
masak | indeed. | ||
pmichaud | %hash.sort { .key } | ||
@dogs.sort { .name } | 14:20 | ||
@dogs.sort { .age } | |||
masak | \o/ | ||
Perl 6 rocks. | |||
pmichaud | ...if we can get that into the spec, yes. Although I'm sure S29 is up for that sort of modification. Maybe we can implement it in Rakudo. | ||
masak | I've written it down, and I will get to S29 early next week, if no-one else gets there first. | 14:21 | |
pmichaud | excellent. | 14:22 | |
I'm reviewing most of the list functions anyway, so I might see if I can sneak that into .sort | |||
masak | also, I plan to blog about my new favourite Perl 6 pattern: putting blocks in lexical &-variables and then using them as built-ins without the &. | 14:23 | |
pmichaud | isn't that just my sub foo { ... } ? | ||
masak | no, I can't use sub for my purposes, because I have a `return` in my block. | 14:24 | |
pmichaud | ahhhhhh | ||
clever. | |||
masak | it's half evil, half very useful :) | ||
pmichaud | definitely blog that. | ||
masak will | |||
just going to finish this Chinese course first. | 14:25 | ||
pmichaud | anyway, I need to get to today's meetings | 14:27 | |
14:29
ozy` joined
|
|||
rakudo_svn | r33800 | pmichaud++ | [rakudo]: spectest-progress.csv update: 235 files, 4916 passing tests | 14:30 | |
pmichaud | 84 to go. | ||
masak | so, sometime this weekend, probably. | ||
pmichaud | yes. | 14:32 | |
I'd really like to have 5k before tuesday's release. | |||
I'll be reviewing the suite today/tomorrow looking for ripe candidates. | |||
I'm thinking I'll fix complex issues -- that'll give us a bunch of tests (back) | |||
masak | (reclaiming functionality)++ | 14:33 | |
PerlJam | ruby has a routine called sort_by that does a ST automagically. | ||
pmichaud | and we can always write *new* tests :-) | ||
masak | pmichaud: åå :) | 14:34 | |
14:35
jhorwitz joined
|
|||
pmichaud | 14:37 <nopaste> "pmichaud" at 12.146.222.130 pasted "spectest progress, by synopsis" (17 lines) at nopaste.snit.ch/14900 | 14:37 | |
masak | wow, S09 really is under-tested. | 14:38 | |
considering what it contains. | |||
pmichaud | I don't know that we have any active implementations doing much of S09 | ||
14:50
masak left
|
|||
moritz_ | we don't | 15:07 | |
15:14
SamB left
15:17
Caelum joined
|
|||
pugs_svn | r24261 | azawawi++ | [Perl6::Highlight] merged of STD_syntax_highlight and this module | 15:19 | |
r24261 | azawawi++ | [Perl6::Highlight] Added a sample test script | |||
azawawi | moritz_: ping | 15:22 | |
moritz_ | p o n g | 15:23 | |
azawawi | moritz_: im facing a problem when moving STD inside Perl6::Highlight module | ||
pasteling | "azawawi" at 212.38.154.37 pasted "stacktrace (perl -d foo.pl)" (10 lines, 863B) at sial.org/pbot/33623 | 15:24 | |
azawawi | any ideas? | 15:25 | |
moritz_ | azawawi: you have an undef somewhere | ||
azawawi | ;-) | ||
moritz_ | azawawi: where you think you have a an object instead | 15:26 | |
jnthn | S09 - we've not much implementation progress as of yet. | 15:32 | |
moritz_ | it's one of those things you don't really need to bootstrap a compiler, write the prelude in Perl 6 etc. | 15:33 | |
jnthn | It's also full of vaguely obscure stuff. | ||
Cool, useful stuff. | |||
Typed arrays will land in a couple of months, I expect. | 15:34 | ||
moritz_ | I think Perl 6 itself is cool, vaguely obscure and not very cleanly specced :-) | ||
15:37
alester left
|
|||
jnthn looks at /syn/ | 15:37 | ||
14 Roles and Parametric Types (Deprecated, use implementation types) | |||
Roles and parametric types are deprecated? :-| | |||
.oO( What was 14 in the camel? ) |
15:38 | ||
moritz_ | jnthn: no, not deprecated, probably just the previous draft or something | ||
jnthn | Ah, tied variables. | ||
OK, I think the plan was to re-claim 14 for describing parametric types. | |||
Since I'm going to be doing a load of work on those, I wondered if it might be helpful if I was to take on the task of moving the bits out of other synopses that belong in such an S14 to that. | 15:39 | ||
moritz_ | jnthn: so the "deprecated" notice doesn't apply to the old one, but to the new one | 15:40 | |
15:40
alester joined
|
|||
jnthn is confused | 15:41 | ||
moritz_ | erm, the other way round | ||
jnthn | spreadsheets.google.com/ccc?key=p8p...v7Fsq9u4eA is what I have been looking at | ||
moritz_ | sorry | ||
jnthn | 14Generics? Roles and Parametric Types | ||
The person I probably need to ask is TimToady | 15:42 | ||
pugs_svn | r24262 | moritz++ | [docs] remove deprecated deprecation notice in syn_index.html | 15:43 | |
moritz_ | jnthn: re synopsis numbers, that spreadsheets lists chromatic as the owner of S24 (testing), but he didn't respond when I said I'd take a stab at that (during last #parrotsketch) | 15:50 | |
jnthn stares at the bit of SPAM he just got, wondering what on earth language it's in | 15:54 | ||
It's Slavic of some kind. But it's got characters from both latin and cyrillic alphabets in. | 15:55 | ||
jnthn didn't know of a language that did that | |||
ozy` | jnthn: there are a bunch. I think Yugoslavian does that but I'm probably wrong | 15:57 | |
jnthn | Oh, really? | 15:58 | |
Interesting. | |||
jnthn knows less about the South Slavic languages. | |||
15:59
exodist_ joined
|
|||
jnthn | I'm working hard on learning a West Slavic one and know a little bit of an East Slavic one. | 15:59 | |
15:59
exodist_ left
|
|||
ozy` | I think two Slavic langs would be my lifetime limit... if even that | 16:00 | |
jnthn | Well, I can happily do bits of several, but as for seriously learning them one is quite enough for me right now. Lifetime limit...well, we'll see. :-) | 16:01 | |
ozy` | they're hella hard to pronounce | ||
damn palatals | 16:02 | ||
jnthn | Yes. | ||
But I guess once you get the technique in one of them it helps with others. | 16:03 | ||
16:06
kanru left
|
|||
[particle] | Rakudo Spec Test Coverage percentage chart: | 16:09 | |
spreadsheets.google.com/pub?key=p_p...tput=image | |||
16:10
kanru joined
16:24
justatheory joined,
Exodist left
16:25
stephens joined,
Exodist joined
16:26
Exodist left
|
|||
pugs_svn | r24263 | azawawi++ | [Perl6::Highlight] first working ->snippet_html() sample | 16:32 | |
r24263 | azawawi++ | [Perl6::Highlight] Fixed STD.pm with a workaround. | |||
r24263 | azawawi++ | [Perl6::Highlight] You need to put 'use STD;' before using this module. | |||
azawawi | moritz_: $::PARSER was undef when you 'use STD' in Perl6::Highlight | 16:33 | |
pugs_svn | r24264 | azawawi++ | [Perl6::Highlight] Implemented simple_html method | 16:43 | |
r24265 | azawawi++ | [Perl::Highlight] Implemented semi-working full_html() | 16:47 | ||
r24266 | azawawi++ | [Perl6::Highlight] old STD_syntax_higlight now works with the new STD.pm lib path | 16:58 | ||
r24266 | azawawi++ | [Perl6::Highlight] ansi() and yaml() are now implemented and parsing is done in new() | |||
azawawi | @tell TimToady STD.pm does not behave as expected when it is used in another package (e.g. Perl6::Highlight); $::PARSER become undef; You need to manually use it before using packages that use it. | 17:00 | |
lambdabot | Consider it noted. | ||
17:02
rff joined
|
|||
rff | hi | 17:02 | |
vixey | oh so with this you can turn perl 6 code into colorized HTML? | ||
hi rff | |||
azawawi | vixey: yeah | 17:03 | |
vixey | cool! I've got to try it out | ||
azawawi | feather.perl6.nl/~azawawi/html/inte...ngs.t.html | ||
but Perl6::Highlight is still 0.01 and not yet released on CPAN | 17:04 | ||
vixey | wow that syntax tree view is good | ||
azawawi | you can meanwhile try src/perl6/STD_syntax_highlight | ||
that's the --full-html mode | 17:05 | ||
jnthn | Wow. That rocks. | 17:07 | |
17:08
rff is now known as riffraff
|
|||
azawawi | Perl6::Highlight will have two output renderers: STD.pm and Text::VimColor (perl6.vim) | 17:09 | |
@tell moritz_ can u plz install on feather 1 Text::VimColor; i need it in Perl6::Highlight | 17:11 | ||
lambdabot | Consider it noted. | ||
17:14
hercynium joined
|
|||
pugs_svn | r24267 | azawawi++ | [Perl6::Highlight] More TODOs | 17:19 | |
17:23
alexn_org left
|
|||
azawawi | dinner & | 17:25 | |
17:25
azawawi left
17:46
renormalist left
|
|||
moritz_ | @tell azawawi installed | 17:53 | |
lambdabot | Consider it noted. | ||
17:57
REPLeffect left
17:58
REPLeffect joined
18:00
adc_penner joined
18:11
araujo left,
sri_kraih left
18:25
azawawi joined
|
|||
azawawi | ping | 18:25 | |
lambdabot | azawawi: You have 1 new message. '/msg lambdabot @messages' to read it. | ||
azawawi | moritz_: thx | 18:26 | |
moritz_ | azawawi: when I'm in the channel you don't have to @tell me stuff through lambdabot, I backlog when I'm highlighted | ||
lambdabot | moritz_: You have 2 new messages. '/msg lambdabot @messages' to read them. | ||
moritz_ | @mossages | 18:27 | |
lambdabot | azawawi said 12h 47m 17s ago: will move it to misc asap.... i was wondering where to place it. | ||
azawawi said 1h 16m ago: can u plz install on feather 1 Text::VimColor; i need it in Perl6::Highlight | |||
18:34
schmalbe joined
18:37
alech_ joined
18:38
pmurias joined
18:40
tewk_ joined
18:51
alech left
18:53
tewk left
18:57
mberends left
19:00
adc_penner2 joined
19:02
adc_penner left
|
|||
Tene | jhorwitz: can you commit some spectests for .assuming? | 19:13 | |
19:13
adc_penner2 left
|
|||
moritz_ | Tene: there are such tests in pugs/t/blocks/currying.t | 19:14 | |
Tene looks | |||
19:14
araujo joined
|
|||
jhorwitz | Tene: what moritz_ said. :) | 19:14 | |
moritz_ | I don't know how up-to-date they are | 19:15 | |
19:15
adc_penner joined
19:22
adc_penner left
19:26
adc_penner joined
|
|||
pugs_svn | r24268 | moritz++ | [t/spec] move currying tests to t/spec | 19:34 | |
19:37
adc_penner2 joined
|
|||
rakudo_svn | r33804 | tene++ | [rakudo]: Add .assuming on Code objects for currying. | 19:40 | |
19:40
adc_penner left
19:41
aindilis left
19:42
adc_penner joined
|
|||
pugs_svn | r24269 | moritz++ | [t/TASKS] we need tests for warn() and various exception things | 19:42 | |
19:44
pbuetow joined,
adc_penner2 left
|
|||
pugs_svn | r24270 | moritz++ | [t/spec] initial tests for currying with named params only | 19:46 | |
19:47
adc_penner2 joined
|
|||
moritz_ | perl6: sub foo {1;}; sub foo {1;}; say 'alive' | 19:53 | |
p6eval | elf 24270: OUTPUT[Subroutine foo redefined at (eval 121) line 4.ā¤aliveā¤] | ||
..pugs, rakudo 33804: OUTPUT[aliveā¤] | |||
moritz_ | perl6: only sub foo {1;}; sub foo {1;}; say 'alive' | ||
p6eval | rakudo 33804: OUTPUT[aliveā¤] | ||
..pugs: OUTPUT[*** ā¤ Unexpected "foo"ā¤ expecting "=", subroutine parameters, trait or blockā¤ at /tmp/Kvt2pDDKgm line 1, column 10ā¤] | |||
..elf 24270: OUTPUT[Unknown rule: plurality_declarator:onlyā¤It needs to be added to ast_handlers.ā¤ at ./elf_f line 1918ā¤] | |||
jnthn | moritz_: Both of those should be errors. | 19:54 | |
moritz_ | elf++ # telling us exactly what should be done | ||
jnthn: I think so too | |||
pugs_svn | r24271 | moritz++ | [t/spec] tests that sub foo {1;}; sub foo {1;}; dies | 20:00 | |
20:01
adc_penner left
|
|||
pugs_svn | r24272 | moritz++ | [t/spec] fix fuding for multiple.t | 20:01 | |
azawawi | moritz_: fuding? ;-) | 20:02 | |
moritz_ | azawawi: see t/spec/README | 20:03 | |
azawawi: it's a way to skip tests, or mark them as todo | |||
azawawi | moritz_: i think you mean fudging right? | 20:04 | |
20:04
Lorn left
|
|||
moritz_ | azawawi: yes ;-) | 20:05 | |
azawawi | Text::VimColor failed me so far :-( | 20:06 | |
the thing is we need to 'setf perl6|source perl6.vim' and vim_options do not do that. | |||
20:09
riffraff left
|
|||
moritz_ | azawawi: it worked pretty well for me | 20:10 | |
moritz_ shouldn't commit when can't even type properly | 20:11 | ||
azawawi | moritz_: yeah but if you dont have perl6.vim pre-installed, then it wont work. | ||
moritz_ | azawawi: but why do you need it anyway? you write a different hilighter... | 20:13 | |
azawawi | moritz_: for fun ;-) | ||
moritz_: i wanted to compare perl6.vim and STD highlighter so they can evolve better... | 20:14 | ||
20:15
pmurias left
|
|||
moritz_ | azawawi: if it's just for comparison, I think you can be bothered to copy or symlink perl6.vim to ~/.vim/syntax/ | 20:17 | |
azawawi | hmmm nice idea; sym-links | ||
i guess working mostly on win32 does affect one's way of thinking | 20:18 | ||
moritz_ | aye | 20:19 | |
azawawi | i got an email from cpan ppl telling me why not Syntax::Highlight::Perl6 ;-) | ||
moritz_ | I've never been good with names :( | 20:20 | |
azawawi | but Perl6::Highlight sounds more cool ;-) | 20:21 | |
pugs_svn | r24273 | tene++ | Fix variable declaration in new currying test. | ||
avar | Call it Perl6::Christopher::Walken | 20:23 | |
Hinrik | that's a bit /too/ cool | 20:26 | |
alester | I spent three and a half years with this zip operator up my ass.... | 20:32 | |
20:32
eternaleye left
20:33
eternaleye joined
20:41
schmalbe left
20:43
azawawi left
20:51
justatheory left
20:55
jfroebe joined
|
|||
pugs_svn | r24274 | moritz++ | [t/spec] unfudge lists.t for rakudo | 20:57 | |
20:58
ozy` left
20:59
azawawi joined
|
|||
rakudo_svn | r33808 | moritz++ | [rakudo] add a test file for list assignment to spectest.data | 21:00 | |
Hinrik | azawawi: why not just use the filetype option instead of vim_options? | ||
pugs_svn | r24275 | moritz++ | [t/spec] unfudge another test | 21:02 | |
21:09
bacek joined
21:14
dr_df0 joined
|
|||
pugs_svn | r24276 | moritz++ | [t] move some parsing tests to spec/ | 21:16 | |
azawawi | Hinrik: i tried Text::VimColor and it is working correctly as advertised, but in a vanilla vim installation, perl6.vim will not be in ~/.vim/syntax. I guess i could make it part of the module installation procedure. | ||
rakudo_svn | r33809 | moritz++ | [rakudo] two more files for spectest.data: array slicing, and IO | 21:20 | |
Hinrik | azawawi: or you could have the module install perl6.vim to something like /usr/share/.../perl6.vim and then do vimoptions => '-s /usr/share/.../perl6.vim' | ||
vim_options even | |||
azawawi | that's what i tried but vim_options is used first and seems to be overridden afterwards... | 21:21 | |
Hinrik | oh | 21:22 | |
what if you do it with syntax_mark_file? syntax_mark_file($file, vim_options => ['-s /usr...']) | 21:24 | ||
21:24
sri_kraih joined
|
|||
azawawi | havent tried all the options but will certainly retry later | 21:24 | |
pugs_svn | r24277 | azawawi++ | [Perl6::Highlight] Renamed to Syntax::Highlight::Perl6 per PAUSE admin suggestion | 21:25 | |
21:26
kisu left
|
|||
pugs_svn | r24278 | moritz++ | [t] move a hash test to spec/ | 21:29 | |
rakudo_svn | r33811 | moritz++ | [rakudo] add a test for predictive parsing to spectest.t | 21:30 | |
21:30
sri_kraih left
|
|||
jnthn | Predictive parsing? | 21:33 | |
moritz_ | jnthn: knowing whether to expect an operator or a term | ||
jnthn | Aha, ok. :-) | 21:34 | |
moritz_ | jnthn: in this case to know if '<' is a less-than or left angle quote | ||
now we're at 4962 passing tests | |||
jnthn likes the "add more tests" approach ;-) | 21:35 | ||
pugs_svn | r24279 | azawawi++ | [Syntax::Highlight::Perl6] more namespace renaming | 21:37 | |
moritz_ | jnthn: I had exhausted that approach ~2 months ago. Now so much more works, it's time to start over ;-) | ||
pugs_svn | r24280 | azawawi++ | [Syntax::Highlight::Perl6] one missed, sorry | 21:39 | |
rakudo_svn | r33812 | moritz++ | [rakudo] tests for passing hashes to subs | 21:40 | |
21:42
bacek left
22:03
hercynium left
|
|||
azawawi | how much time does it take search.cpan.org to index a module? | 22:09 | |
moritz_ | azawawi: usually less than two hours | 22:10 | |
azawawi | cool then im going to sleep ;-) i submitted it 10 mins ago | ||
good night * | 22:11 | ||
moritz_ | good night azawawi | ||
22:11
azawawi left
22:13
dr_df0 left
22:18
jfroebe left
|
|||
pugs_svn | r24281 | moritz++ | [t/spec] update some skip reasons in lists.t (and finer graded fudging) | 22:18 | |
r24282 | moritz++ | [t/spec] fudging updates to assign.t | 22:24 | ||
22:26
adc_penner joined
|
|||
moritz_ | rakudo: my ($x, @y) = <a b c d e>; say @y.perl | 22:27 | |
p6eval | rakudo 33813: OUTPUT["b"ā¤] | ||
22:27
FurnaceBoy joined
|
|||
pugs_svn | r24283 | tene++ | [S04-statements/given.t]: Unfudge two tests and update comments on several others | 22:28 | |
22:29
eternaleye left
|
|||
pugs_svn | r24284 | moritz++ | [t/spec] fix two tests in assign.t, and improve fudging | 22:31 | |
r24285 | moritz++ | [t/spec] all these is(!defined($stuff), ...) instances need to be ok(). | 22:35 | ||
22:42
adc_penner2 left
23:05
billy- joined
|
|||
billy- | so basic question; if i want to play with perl6 now, i need to use pugs? | 23:08 | |
Hinrik | pugs or rakudo | 23:09 | |
moritz_ | billy-: you can try pugs or rakudo. Pugs is more feature complete, but rakudo is actively developed | ||
billy- | ok, i wasnt aware of rakudo. ill take a look, thanks | ||
moritz_ | it's Perl 6 on Parrot | 23:10 | |
23:11
adc_penner left
|
|||
billy- | im sick of python and remembered perl. though i wont hold my breath i guess | 23:11 | |
Hinrik | Perl 5 is still good :) | 23:13 | |
[particle] | rakudo: <python is cooler than perl>.[<4 1..3 0>].say | 23:14 | |
p6eval | rakudo 33813: OUTPUT[perlispythonā¤] | ||
[particle] | urk | ||
rakudo: <python is cooler than perl>.[<4 1 2 3 0>].say | |||
p6eval | rakudo 33813: OUTPUT[perliscoolerthanpythonā¤] | ||
[particle] | rakudo: <python is cooler than perl>.[<4 1 2 3 0>].join(' ').say | ||
p6eval | rakudo 33813: OUTPUT[perl is cooler than pythonā¤] | ||
billy- | yeah i know, but i was looking forward to the object.method syntax | 23:15 | |
[particle] | rakudo has a fairly complete object model | ||
better than pugs | |||
23:16
pbuetow left
|
|||
Tene | moritz_: is pugs really more feature complete? How does it do on the spectests? | 23:18 | |
moritz_ | Tene: uhm, before I mercyless broken them, pugs passed around 15k tests | 23:19 | |
Tene: I don't know what the current count is | |||
Tene | kk | ||
Let's see what I can do to help rakudo, then. | 23:20 | ||
23:21
Leon_ joined
23:24
[particle] left
|
|||
Leon_ | Anyone here not AFK? | 23:24 | |
23:24
[particle] joined
|
|||
[particle] | pugs has a better parser, rakudo a better runtime imo | 23:25 | |
Hinrik | [particle]: is that rakudo's fault or parrot's? | 23:27 | |
the parser, that is | |||
moritz_ | more of rakudo's, I'd say | ||
[particle] | rakudo's parser models STD.pm more closely than pugs, but PGE needs some refactoring for longest-token matching to work properly | 23:28 | |
pugs has ltm problems, too, but not as many. the parser is very custom, though. it needs to be redone | 23:29 | ||
after parrot's parser engine (pge) is refactored for ltm and extended for protoregexes, rakudo will be able to use STD.pm directly | 23:30 | ||
patrick is funded to do that work in the next few months | |||
jnthn | Does Pugs parse Perl 6 using Perl 6 regex? | ||
[particle] | no, it uses haskell | ||
moritz_ | jnthn: no, it uses a haskell parsing lib | ||
(parsec) | |||
Leon_ | particle: I have a question and I suspect you can answer it | 23:32 | |
[particle] | ask away! | ||
Leon_ | in Perl 6 Design Minutes for 29 October 2008 Allison mentions: "looks like we won't use roles at all for IO". Why not? | 23:33 | |
[particle] | don't need them (yet) | ||
parrot's design specifies not only classes, but roles, at the base level. | 23:34 | ||
that is, it allows pmcs (parrot's abstract data type aka class) to be composed of pmrs (roles) | 23:35 | ||
we haven't implemented the infrastructure to support roles written in C yet | |||
Leon_ | Ah | 23:36 | |
[particle] | you can write them in PIR and mix them in | ||
but, at the C level, no roles yet. we'll get them in by our 2.0 release for sure, which is jan 2010 | |||
by which time we'll also have async io | |||
Leon_ | That's a long time from now | ||
[particle] | (not that the two are coupled) | ||
pugs_svn | r24286 | moritz++ | [t/spec] unfudge assign.t a bit. We have a bunch of passing TODO tests that I | 23:37 | |
r24286 | moritz++ | plan to unfudge tomorrow | |||
[particle] | Leon_: why do you want roles for io? | ||
moritz_ heads off to bed | |||
Leon_ | I was kind of thinking about S16, and it really struck me that using roles would make much more sense than the current fat interface approach | ||
[particle] | use cases are always helpful | 23:38 | |
Leon_ | Essentially, close() is the only operation that is shared by all kinds of handles | ||
All other operations are invalid on a significant number of cases | |||
[particle] | true | ||
Leon_ | Read versus write is one example | ||
Trying to seek on a pipe or socket another | 23:39 | ||
jnthn | What Perl 6 does for IO doesn't need Parrot's underlying model to match it all that closely. | ||
Perl 6's IO interface can be done in terms of roles just fine. Parrot doesn't need such an IO-layer under the hood. | |||
moritz_ | Leon_: there are roles in parrot and rakudo right now, not just on the C level, so you that shouldn't be a blocker | ||
Leon_ | OK, that's what I needed to know | ||
[particle] | right, it's not a blocker, except perhaps for performance | 23:40 | |
jnthn | particle: How so? | 23:42 | |
[particle] | jnthn: if you need to write vtable functions in pir to mix in with an io class | 23:43 | |
i expect there will be impedence mismatches between the parrot and rakudo io implementations | 23:44 | ||
jnthn | IO is generally not CPU-bound, I don't think there'd be enough difference here to make it noticably slowly...not to mention that Rakudo IO will not map Parrot's FileHandle directly but just hold onto one as an attribute under the hood anyway. | ||
[particle] | you might be right about that | 23:45 | |
jnthn | (will probably not map, I should say...) | ||
(it could do, but it feels unlikely to me ATM) | |||
Leon_ thinks he'll post his ideas on perl6-language | 23:46 | ||
[particle] | Leon_++ | 23:48 |