|
This channel is intended for people just starting with the Raku Programming Language (raku.org). Logs are available at irclogs.raku.org/raku-beginner/live.html Set by lizmat on 8 June 2022. |
|||
|
00:52
razetime joined
02:35
jgaz left
02:40
jgaz joined,
teatwo left,
teatwo joined
04:06
razetime left
05:13
razetime joined
05:40
siavash joined
05:42
razetime left
05:43
razetime joined
05:55
siavash left
05:57
siavash joined
06:24
siavash left
06:26
siavash joined
06:54
siavash left
07:53
dakkar joined
08:26
razetime left
08:54
razetime joined
09:03
siavash joined,
siavash2 joined,
siavash2 left
09:06
siavash left
09:07
siavash joined
11:27
razetime left
|
|||
| knorrfg | Hey, me again 😄 I'm currently experimenting with rakus pkgs. I'd like to be able to store all dependencies for a script together with a script. I've used zef's -to argument to store the installed dependencies to a directory "zeftest" that lies next to a test script. And if I run the test-script like this: RAKULIB="inst#/tmp/zeftest" raku foo.raku it works. But I'd like to put that information into the | 11:31 | |
| script. I've tried: %*ENV<RAKULIB> = "inst#" ~ $*PROGRAM.dirname ~ "/zeftest"; which unsurprisingly didn't work, and i tried use lib $*PROGRAM.dirname ~ "/zeftest"; but that didn't work either. Is it possible? | |||
|
12:01
siavash left
|
|||
| lizmat | knorrfg why so difficult? why not make a distribution with said script in the "bin" dir and all the dependencies in the META6.json? | 12:02 | |
| afk& | |||
|
12:15
tea3po joined
12:17
teatime joined
12:19
teatwo left
12:20
tea3po left
|
|||
| knorrfg | I'm not aware of any of that. I'll read up what that means ^^ I simply want a repo that contains raku script to only have rakudo as dependency, even if I use packages, the easier the better | 12:27 | |
| nemokosch | Yes, this sounds like a very commonsensical approach to modularity, one that works without any fanfares in a lot of languages from JS and Python to Java and Ada | 12:38 | |
|
13:16
teatwo joined
13:20
teatime left
14:31
teatwo left,
teatwo joined
16:36
dakkar left
16:40
deoac joined
|
|||
| deoac | m: my regex foo { <?after W> X | X <?before Y> } | 16:43 | |
| camelia | ( no output ) | ||
| deoac | m: 'WXa' ~~ /<foo>/ | ||
| camelia | No such method 'foo' for invocant of type 'Match' in block <unit> at <tmp> line 1 |
||
| deoac | m: my regex foo { <?after W> X | X <?before Y> }; 'WXa' ~~ /<foo>/ ; 'aXY' ~~ /<foo>/; 'aXa' ~~ /<foo>/ | 16:44 | |
| camelia | ( no output ) | ||
| deoac | m: my regex foo { <?after W> X | X <?before Y> }; say so 'WXa' ~~ /<foo>/ ; say so 'aXY' ~~ /<foo>/; say so 'aXa' ~~ /<foo>/ | 16:45 | |
| camelia | True True False |
||
| deoac | good, that one worked. | ||
| Is there a more idiomatic way of matching an 'X' that is either *before* a 'Y' or *after* a 'W' ? | 16:46 | ||
| Within a grammar, what is the difference between 'token foo {...}' and 'my token foo {...}' ? | 20:17 | ||
| snonux | i guess one (the one with "my") is lexically scoped (i don't know, really) | 21:21 | |
|
22:21
tea3po joined
22:24
teatwo left
22:59
deoac left
23:03
teatwo joined
23:07
tea3po left
23:25
gfldex_ joined
23:26
hexology- joined
23:28
lizmat_ joined
23:32
lizmat left,
hexology left,
gfldex left
|
|||