|
02:55
shareable6 joined,
[Coke]_ joined
03:00
shareable6__ left,
tellable6 left,
notable6 left,
quotable6 left,
coverable6 left,
greppable6 left,
evalable6 left,
bisectable6 left,
[Coke] left,
nebuchad` left,
ilogger2 left
03:21
tellable6 joined,
coverable6 joined,
notable6 joined,
bisectable6 joined,
quotable6 joined,
evalable6 joined
03:24
greppable6 joined,
ilogger2 joined
03:39
zostay_ joined
03:41
SmokeMachine_ joined
03:44
zostay left,
zostay_ is now known as zostay
03:48
greenfork_ joined
03:53
eof left,
SmokeMachine left,
greenfork left,
rypervenche left,
JRaspass left,
greenfork_ is now known as greenfork,
SmokeMachine_ is now known as SmokeMachine
03:54
rypervenche joined
03:55
eof joined
03:58
JRaspass joined
04:03
[Coke]_ is now known as [Coke]
04:08
eof left,
summerisle joined
08:46
sena_kun joined
|
|||
| lizmat | bisectable6: old=2024.04 dd Failure.new | 08:53 | |
| bisectable6 | lizmat, Bisecting by output (old=2024.04 new=f521883) because on both starting points the exit code is 0 | ||
| lizmat, bisect log: gist.github.com/f401c830019989eb67...2e6bc51866 | |||
| lizmat, (2024-05-16) github.com/rakudo/rakudo/commit/e1...295123298f | |||
| ab5tract | well that's an unexpected side effect :/ | 09:38 | |
| lizmat | yeah, looking at it now | ||
| all those pesky little passages :-( | 10:05 | ||
|
10:54
finanalyst joined
|
|||
| lizmat | ab5tract: seems your last MAIN fixes also have some fallout | 11:00 | |
| WARNING: unhandled Failure detected in DESTROY. If you meant to ignore it, you can mark it as handled by calling .Bool, .so, .not, or .defined methods. The Failure was: | |||
| No such symbol 'foo' | |||
| basically, any argument given generates this :( | 11:01 | ||
| ab5tract | It shouldn’t? I wrapped the accesses in try | ||
| Will take a look when I get back to the computer | |||
| lizmat | not sure what's going on here, but it's pretty annoying :-) | ||
| and left me on a wild goose chase as to how my dd changes where responsible for it :-( | 11:02 | ||
| ab5tract | Ahh, shit. Sorry to hear that | 11:03 | |
| Weird that none of the main-specific tests were failing. Anyway , I will fix it this afternoon | 11:04 | ||
| Geth | rakudo/main: 0a0435d7f8 | (Elizabeth Mattijsen)++ | 2 files Make dd handle Failures better And generally make for a more pleasant experience by e.g. removing 'Mu' from type information, and "Backtrace.new) from Failure showing |
||
| lizmat | m: dd try Failure.new | 11:06 | |
| camelia | Nil | ||
| Geth | rakudo/main: 5fbda71d7e | (Elizabeth Mattijsen)++ | src/core.c/Main.rakumod Fix warning on each CLI argument ::(a) was *not* protected with a try And some code synthetics |
11:22 | |
| nqp/main: 597f46f019 | (Elizabeth Mattijsen)++ | tools/templates/MOAR_REVISION Bump MoarVM to get MasterDuke17++ bigint ops error fixes |
11:23 | ||
| lizmat | ab5tract: fixed the warning | 11:25 | |
| noticed that the new mod nqp ops are not mentioned in github.com/Raku/nqp/blob/main/docs...down#const yet | |||
| ab5tract | Ahh, thanks! | ||
| lizmat | could you add them? | ||
| ab5tract | Sure thing. | 11:26 | |
| nine: Is M#1803 up to snuff? | 11:29 | ||
| linkable6 | M#1803 [open]: github.com/MoarVM/MoarVM/pull/1803 Provide some mechanisms for introspecting file mode | ||
| lizmat | ab5tract: it is for me, but I didn't want to mix it with MasterDuke's PR because of blin bisectability | 11:30 | |
| nine is taking a look | 11:31 | ||
| Though I'm quite underpowered today. A week at the construction site for a friend's new house left me a bit drained. If only I had studied something useful. I hear software developer would be a quite comfy job | 11:32 | ||
| lizmat | hehe :-) | ||
| ab5tract | :) | ||
| Geth | rakudo/main: 5d6a7dfcac | (Elizabeth Mattijsen)++ | tools/templates/NQP_REVISION Bump NQP to get MasterDuke17++ bigint ops error fixes |
11:33 | |
| nine | Left a review | 11:52 | |
| Geth | rakudo/lizmat-aretype: c49797f649 | (Elizabeth Mattijsen)++ | src/core.c/Any-iterable-methods.rakumod Introduce Any.are(type --> Bool:D) This would allow a shorter way to say: sub a(@a where .are ~~ Int) { } namely: ... (11 more lines) |
11:54 | |
| rakudo: lizmat++ created pull request #5571: Introduce Any.are(type --> Bool:D) |
|||
| ab5tract | nine: so that poor excuse for a pointer-y type check was only working because the ! operator was applying to the LHS, not the expression :) | 12:43 | |
| but it's been gone for a little while now. | |||
| Just pushed some resolutions to your reviews. We've only got a single mode flag and while it is still set via an rw parameter, I've removed that extra function and its call and now set it in the same function that does the regular flag setup. | 12:44 | ||
| MasterDuke17: thanks for the review on the MoarVM PR. Somehow I didn't get pinged about them in the GH app | 12:48 | ||
| tellable6 | ab5tract, I'll pass your message to MasterDuke | ||
| ab5tract | lizmat: I really like that change to `.are` | 12:55 | |
| but doesn't that where in the commit need a `*.are(Int)` or a `{ .are(Int) }` | 12:56 | ||
| Geth | nqp/main: 51dd8b9444 | ab5tract++ | docs/ops.markdown Document OPEN_MODE_* |
13:21 | |
|
16:57
vrurg left,
vrurg joined
|
|||
| ab5tract | nine: I _think_ third time is the charm :) | 17:17 | |
| lizmat | ab5tract: nope | 17:23 | |
| sub a(@a where .are(Int)) | 17:24 | ||
| is enough | |||
|
17:26
finanalyst left
|
|||
| ab5tract | ok, that's a) great, b) surprising | 17:26 | |
| lizmat | why? | 17:27 | |
| m: sub a(@a where .are ~~ Int) { dd @a ); a (1,2,3) | |||
| camelia | ===SORRY!=== Error while compiling <tmp> Missing block at <tmp>:1 ------> sub a(@a where .are ~~ Int) { dd @a ⏏); a (1,2,3) expecting any of: postfix statement end statement modifier s… |
||
| ab5tract | it's not are specific | ||
| lizmat | m: sub a(@a where .are ~~ Int) { dd @a }; a (1,2,3) | ||
| camelia | (1, 2, 3) | ||
| lizmat | that already works ? | ||
| m: sub a(@a where .are ~~ Int) { dd @a }; a (1,2,3,"foo") | |||
| camelia | Constraint type check failed in binding to parameter '@a'; expected anonymous constraint to be met but got List ((1, 2, 3, "foo")) in sub a at <tmp> line 1 in block <unit> at <tmp> line 1 |
||
| ab5tract | I didn't mean that its surprising that it works for .are | 17:28 | |
| I just meant I am surprised that the implicit topicalization doesn't require a block | |||
| lizmat | the condition is thunked afaik | ||
| ab5tract | indeed. I think its just a brain fart or something | 17:37 | |
| as I have done a few where-related things in RakuAST, I must have already come across this :) | 17:38 | ||
| lizmat | yeah you have :-) | ||
| but I know you can develop some tunnel vision when having worked on the same type of issue for a while | 17:39 | ||
| been there, done that :-) | |||
| ab5tract | :) | 17:43 | |
|
20:01
MasterDuke joined
20:02
finanalyst joined
21:47
finanalyst left
22:23
sena_kun left
|
|||