🦋 Welcome to the IRC channel of the core developers of the Raku Programming Language (raku.org #rakulang). This channel is logged for the purpose of history keeping about its development | evalbot usage: 'm: say 3;' or /msg camelia m: ... | log inspection situation still under development | For MoarVM see #moarvm Set by lizmat on 22 May 2021. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
00:07
reportable6 left
01:09
reportable6 joined
02:09
evalable6 left,
linkable6 left
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
japhb | With Digest updated to 0.5.0, my rebuild-all script gets a LOT farther now. Sadly it's still not making it to completion; Cro-TLS tests (soft) hang. | 02:35 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
03:11
evalable6 joined
04:24
evalable6 left
05:12
linkable6 joined
06:07
reportable6 left
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Geth | nqp: 58b846f0a3 | (Christian Bartolomäus)++ | 2 files [JVM] Implement coercion from uint to str |
06:09 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
nqp: 28b041d80b | (Christian Bartolomäus)++ | src/vm/jvm/QAST/Compiler.nqp [JVM] Use unbox_u for HLL unbox for $RT_UINT The op 'unbox_u' is available. Even if it's implementation is identical to 'unbox_i' for now, it seems to make sense to use the _u variant. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
nqp: b75f85a688 | (Christian Bartolomäus)++ | src/vm/jvm/QAST/Compiler.nqp [JVM] Use $RT_UINT for some '_u' core ops I didn't see a difference in the tests and it feels more correct to use $RT_UINT here. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
06:10
reportable6 joined
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Geth | nqp: usev6++ created pull request #763: [JVM] Handle unsignedness for CStruct, CPPStruct, |
06:22 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
06:27
evalable6 joined
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Geth | rakudo: moon-chilled++ created pull request #4763: Fix typo |
08:41 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
08:47
linkable6 left,
evalable6 left
08:48
evalable6 joined,
linkable6 joined
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
lizmat | Files=1351, Tests=117097, 290 wallclock secs (34.88 usr 10.00 sys + 3996.96 cusr 336.85 csys = 4378.69 CPU) | 09:30 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|Tux| |
|
10:10 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
10:57
evalable6 left,
linkable6 left
11:00
evalable6 joined
11:22
AAD8E0 joined
11:24
AAD8E0 joined
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Geth | rakudo: 34c938c588 | moon-chilled++ (committed using GitHub Web editor) | src/core.c/Exception.pm6 Fix typo in error message; 'none' is singular (#4763) |
11:50 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
lizmat | notable6: weekly | 11:55 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
notable6 | lizmat, 3 notes: gist.github.com/44dd07ae945d2c1695...6aa40ed46a | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
12:07
reportable6 left
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
lizmat | notable6: weekly reset | 12:12 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
notable6 | lizmat, Moved existing notes to “weekly_2022-02-07T12:12:36Z” | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
[Coke] | moon-child: that read better to me before the change. wonder if this is a US vs. UK thing | 12:36 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
[Coke] finds www.writersdigest.com/write-better...-or-plural to back him up; signatures is plural, so the none should be treated as plural. (my 2c) | 12:43 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
lizmat | fwiw, this change also felt weird to me | 12:54 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
12:58
linkable6 joined
13:09
reportable6 joined
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
nine | None of these versions is clearly correct. | 13:27 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
It is indeed a very subtle issue. "None" can be singular and plural. A nicely done explanation is: www.merriam-webster.com/video/is-n...-or-plural Though even after watching that it's a 50/50 case for me. | 13:31 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
It may boil down to whether it's any of the individuals matter or if the sentence is about the collectiveness of signatures, i.e. do we want to convey "we didn't find that one signature that matches" or "sorry, these signatures all fail to match" | 13:32 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
13:46
kjp left
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
lizmat | and yet another Rakudo Weekly News hits the Net: rakudoweekly.blog/2022/02/07/2022-06-basicly/ | 13:55 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
13:55
|Tux| left
13:59
discord-raku-bot left,
discord-raku-bot joined
14:02
|Tux| joined
14:09
Altai-man joined
14:14
linkable6 left,
evalable6 left,
linkable6 joined,
evalable6 joined
14:59
kjp joined
15:22
sena_kun_ joined
15:26
Altai-man left
15:30
Merfont left
15:31
Merfont joined
15:59
discord-raku-bot left
16:00
discord-raku-bot joined
16:29
japhb left
16:31
japhb joined
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
[Coke] | yah, we could rephrase the error to avoid the issue. | 17:05 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
nine | LOL looks like the majority of last week's updated Raku modules was on account of my uint fixing PRs :D | 17:23 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
jdv | looks like there might be more - just posted the latest blin | 17:32 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
17:54
kjp left,
kjp joined
18:07
reportable6 left
18:26
sena_kun_ left
19:46
CIAvash left,
AlexDaniel left
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Geth | nqp: 6e39618a22 | (Christian Bartolomäus)++ | 6 files [JVM] Handle unsignedness for CStruct, CPPStruct, ... and CUnion. (At least for uint8, uint16, and uint32). I mostly copied this from NativeCallOps.java. |
19:56 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
nine | jdv: I cannot reproduce that PDF::Class failure | 20:18 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
20:29
CIAvash joined,
AlexDaniel joined
21:10
reportable6 joined
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
moon-child | '"we couldn't find one signature that matches" vs "these signatures all fail to match"' good point | 21:10 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
though note that due to negation, 'not any' corresponds to the former, and 'not one' to the latter :) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
nine | As I said, after reading multiple explanations I'm still square in the middle between singular and plural in this case :) | 21:23 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
21:35
CIAvash left,
AlexDaniel left
21:37
AlexDaniel joined
21:53
CIAvash joined
21:56
timo left
|