00:01
vrurg joined
00:06
vrurg left
00:16
gfldex left
00:28
sena_kun left
00:32
vrurg joined
01:03
HarmtH_ left
01:12
HarmtH joined
01:13
HarmtH left
01:22
frost-lab joined
01:32
HarmtH joined,
gfldex joined
02:40
kvw_5_ joined
02:43
kvw_5 left
04:25
squashable6 left
04:28
squashable6 joined
04:47
epony left
04:50
epony joined
05:07
squashable6 left
05:08
squashable6 joined
05:23
epony left
05:46
MasterDuke left
05:52
epony joined
06:30
softmoth left
07:04
frost-lab left
07:22
nine left
07:24
frost-lab joined
07:29
nine joined
07:33
epony left
07:35
frost-lab48 joined
07:38
sena_kun joined,
frost-lab left
08:11
epony joined
08:19
domidumont joined
09:20
nebuchadnezzar left
09:21
Altai-man_ joined,
sena_kun left
09:27
nebuchadnezzar joined
10:08
lizmat left
10:22
lizmat joined
|
|||
lizmat misses the sounds of commits merging :-( | 10:59 | ||
11:20
frost-lab48 left
11:32
frost-lab joined
12:20
HarmtH left
13:23
HarmtH joined
14:00
Kaiepi left
14:01
Kaeipi joined,
Kaeipi left
14:02
Kaeipi joined
15:00
HarmtH left
15:01
domidumont left
15:02
HarmtH joined,
codesect` joined
15:03
HarmtH left
15:04
codesections left,
HarmtH joined
|
|||
Kaeipi | i have a performance problem with my solution for problem-solving #111 | 15:08 | |
i have a vague idea of how to fix it, but i'm not sure how to go about things backend-wise | |||
the gist is, when performing a dns resolution, the backend boxes every single address received from the A and AAAA dns queries made; before, no addresses were being boxed | 15:09 | ||
how might i box the addresses lazily? | |||
maybe async dns would be faster... | 15:19 | ||
[Coke] reads jmerelo's SoD proposal and has one takeaway question: YAS has a dba for The Raku Foundation?? | 15:23 | ||
15:46
softmoth joined
16:00
JJAtria[m] left
|
|||
Kaeipi | the boxing doesn't seem to be what's slowing things down... hm | 16:02 | |
16:07
Kaeipi left,
Kaeipi joined
16:09
Kaeipi left,
Kaeipi joined
16:36
jmerelo joined
|
|||
jmerelo | Finishing up the Season of docs proposal perl-foundation-outreach.github.io...posal-2021 | 16:37 | |
Unless you find something big missing, this is going to be it | |||
[Coke] | jmerelo: is there an announcement somewhere about "The Raku Foundation" ? | 16:38 | |
codesect` | [Coke]: that's actually still in progress. Here's the Problem Solving PR about it: github.com/Raku/problem-solving/pull/267 | 16:40 | |
[Coke] | Looks like there is a rakufoundation.org website but it's got a sketchy cert and takes you to a login screen | ||
codesect` | there was some back-and-forth in a related issue before that | 16:41 | |
[Coke] | codesect`: jmerelo's proposal makes it sound much strong than "in progress" | ||
*stronger | |||
16:42
Merfont joined
|
|||
codesect` | well, it is expected to be very soon. We've asked YAS (last Friday) to create the DBA, and they indicated that it shouldn't be a problem and that they'd get back to us once it was officially approved | 16:43 | |
it doesn't yet have a website, but will soon – but it'll be at raku.foundation rather than on a .org domain | 16:44 | ||
codesect` logs out briefly to get his correct nick | 16:45 | ||
16:45
codesect` left
16:46
Kaeipi left
16:47
unclechu left
|
|||
jmerelo | [Coke]: it's been approved already by the Perl Foundation, as far as I know. | 16:50 | |
raku.foundation is already opeative, but pointing at raku.org | 16:51 | ||
[Coke]: so the timing might not be exactly right, but it will happen before the proposal is approved (or rejected) | 16:52 | ||
[Coke]: anyway, if you think that's a problem, just let me know. Also, I've applied, as you have seen, for two volunteer stipends. I would really appreciate if you could help with this, should it be approved. | 16:53 | ||
17:02
unclechu joined
17:25
Merfont left,
Merfont joined
17:28
Kaeipi joined,
Merfont left
17:57
frost-lab left
|
|||
nwc10 | dev.azure.com/Rakudo/rakudo/_build...ff75bff664 lets me drill down to "An unexpected error has occurred within this region of the page." "Error: The operation is insecure." | 18:32 | |
18:50
Kaeipi left,
Kaeipi joined
19:13
vrurg left
19:16
vrurg joined
19:20
jmerelo left
19:38
Kaeipi left,
Kaiepi joined
21:10
Kaiepi left
21:11
Altai-man_ left,
Kaeipi joined
|
|||
[Coke] | .tell jmerelo - hadn't heard anything about TRF, so was just curious, I trust you on the timing. I cannot guarantee I have any time to support the project, sorry | 21:17 | |
tellable6 | [Coke], I'll pass your message to jmerelo | ||
21:26
MasterDuke joined
|
|||
[Coke] | where is the match logic for 'a' ~~ /'a'/ ? src/core.c/Match.pm6? | 21:44 | |
MasterDuke | [Coke]: at what level? i think all the actual regex *implementation* is in nqp | 21:45 | |
[Coke] | ok | 21:46 | |
21:48
Kaeipi left
21:50
Kaiepi joined
|
|||
[Coke] | m: say "fiddle" ~~ /:ignorecase fidd/ | 21:50 | |
camelia | 「fid」 | ||
[Coke] | Looking at that, the code in NQP does a .fc on the string, but with no regard to the fact that .chars might change. Wonder how hard it would be to track all the cursor information that we have to adjust at that point and update it. If we have to pass it around, that'll be unfun. | 21:51 | |
22:33
dogbert17 joined,
dogbert12 left
22:37
Xliff joined
|
|||
Xliff | \o | 22:38 | |
tellable6 | 2021-03-22T13:45:17Z #raku <vrurg> Xliff having an issue for that would be better. | ||
Xliff | Given "sub a ($a, $b, $c) { ... }; a(1, 42, 'Blub')" is there a way to get the arguments a was called with, without the use of the parameters themselves? | 22:39 | |
23:00
b2gills left
23:02
dogbert11 joined
23:06
dogbert17 left
|
|||
[Coke] | m: sub a ($a, $b, $c) { dd DYNAMIC:: }; a(1, 42, 'Blub') | 23:19 | |
camelia | PseudoStash.new(("\$!" => Nil,"\$*DISPATCHER" => Mu,"\$/" => Nil,"\$_" => Any,"\$a" => 1,"\$b" => 42,"\$c" => "Blub","\$¢" => Nil)) | ||
[Coke] | that's not quite what you're looking for. | 23:20 | |
23:25
b2gills joined
|