00:47
Xliff joined
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Xliff | . | 00:47 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
00:57
Kaeipi joined,
Kaiepi left
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
releasable6 | Next release in ≈1 day and ≈15 hours. 1 blocker. Please log your changes in the ChangeLog: github.com/rakudo/rakudo/wiki/ChangeLog-Draft | 03:00 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Geth | rakudo: vrurg++ created pull request #3977: Fix a problem with multi submethods been treated as method |
03:03 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
roast: vrurg++ created pull request #691: Add and fix tests for multi-dispatching methods |
03:06 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
03:23
Xliff left
03:26
Xliff joined
04:32
committable6 left,
unicodable6 left,
statisfiable6 left,
releasable6 left,
quotable6 left,
sourceable6 left,
coverable6 left,
linkable6 left,
evalable6 left,
tellable6 left,
squashable6 left,
shareable6 left,
nativecallable6 left,
bisectable6 left,
notable6 left,
bloatable6 left,
benchable6 left,
greppable6 left
04:33
sourceable6 joined,
committable6 joined,
shareable6 joined,
bloatable6 joined,
tellable6 joined
04:34
releasable6 joined,
unicodable6 joined,
squashable6 joined,
notable6 joined,
linkable6 joined,
bisectable6 joined
04:35
statisfiable6 joined,
coverable6 joined,
nativecallable6 joined,
evalable6 joined,
benchable6 joined,
greppable6 joined,
quotable6 joined
04:52
MasterDuke left
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Xliff | timotimo lizmat vrurg jnthn: repl.it/@Xliff/RoleAttributeWeirdness | 05:42 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
timotimo: I think this golfs what I've been having a problem with. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Note the duplicated attributes. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
06:41
patrickb joined
06:59
sena_kun joined
07:03
samcv left
07:34
frost-lab joined
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Kaeipi | releasable6, status | 07:49 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
releasable6 | Kaeipi, Next release in ≈1 day and ≈11 hours. 1 blocker. 17 out of 83 commits logged | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Kaeipi, Details: gist.github.com/0dbe51fa3338b224d0...72634b143c | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
lizmat | m: class A { has $!a }; class B is A { has $!a }; .say for B.^attributes.map( { .package.^name ~ "::" ~ .name } ) # Xliff | 09:42 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
camelia | B::$!a A::$!a |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
lizmat | seems a normal consequence of the way you've set up things? | 09:43 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
this is also why in an nqp::getattr you *must* specify the class to which an attribute in an object belongs | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
10:24
AlexDaniel` left,
unclechu left
10:31
AlexDaniel` joined
10:42
unclechu joined
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Geth | rakudo: 240bc9eb13 | (Elizabeth Mattijsen)++ | 2 files Make .grep/.first on native arrays about 3.5x as fast - searching for Str:D on a native str array - searching for Int:D on a native int array - searching for Num:D on a native num array |
12:16 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
patrickb | Is it possible to create numbered lists in the docs at the moment? | 12:42 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
I'm still pondering on the lengthy explanation in docs.raku.org/routine/bless saying one shouldn't usually create a custom `new`. | 13:12 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Both examples given work fine when stripping out the complexity given as reason for not writing custom `new`s. | 13:13 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
These are my simplified examples: docs.raku.org/routine/bless | 13:15 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
vrurg | .tell Xliff it's not a bug. You have two instances of attribute per class and this is how roles work. A method on parent class can't have access to attributes of a child class anyway. | 13:16 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
tellable6 | vrurg, I'll pass your message to Xliff | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
patrickb | Can anyone enlighten me what's wrong with those? | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
I'm inclinded to remove those examples should there actually be no point to them. (Have they been added at a point in the past where Rakudo was not as capable enough for the more obvious ways?) | 13:23 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
13:27
Merfont joined
13:28
Kaeipi left
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
patrickb | Now looking at the blame of the file. Seems there was some discussion about this in the past in github.com/Raku/doc/issues/2077 | 13:29 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
13:29
patrickb left
13:30
patrickb joined,
frost-lab left
14:02
MitarashiDango[m joined
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Geth | roast: f0e096c092 | (Elizabeth Mattijsen)++ | 3 files Add tests for native array .grep/.first |
14:03 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
rakudo: cf2394772c | (Elizabeth Mattijsen)++ | 2 files Fix errors in :k, :kv, :p handling Spotted *after* writing tests for these cases. :-( |
14:05 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Xliff | vrurg: Hi. Thanks for the response. | 14:06 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
tellable6 | 2020-10-23T13:16:01Z #raku-dev <vrurg> Xliff it's not a bug. You have two instances of attribute per class and this is how roles work. A method on parent class can't have access to attributes of a child class anyway. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Xliff | So why does the example not set $!origin properly? | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
timotimo | i would assume you're setting one $!origin and checking the other | 14:10 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
didn't look close enough yet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
MitarashiDango[m | Hello, I want to add a flag to IO::Path's symlink method (something like :literal or :exact), so that a symlink can be created without calling .absolute on the intended link. Would there be any issue with adding that in? | 14:14 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
lizmat | MitarashiDango[m why is calling .absolute a problem? what is the use case? | 14:16 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
timotimo | to create a relative symlink probably | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
MitarashiDango[m | ^ Yup, if I create one in a directory, and the directory moves, that symlink breaks because its not relative | 14:17 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
lizmat | ok, so it's a shortcoming of the current implementation | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ugexe | :literal is one less character than .absolute | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
tellable6 | 2020-10-15T23:22:17Z #raku <tbrowder> ugexe how long should it take before zef finds just-upgraded modules on cpan? | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2020-10-15T23:23:07Z #raku <tbrowder> ugexe and modules.raku.org already shows the upgraded module | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2020-10-16T00:28:19Z #raku <gfldex> ugexe p6bot has stopped updating the ecosystem files about 14 hours ago | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
vrurg | Xliff: because you set $!origin on Base, not $!origin on A. | 14:18 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Xliff: and when you invoke Origin method you invoke the one which is installed into A. | 14:20 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
14:33
patrickb left
14:40
sena_kun left
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
[Tux] | With teams and Opera killed: | 14:44 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Xliff | vrurg: OK, this breaks with my understanding of how Object Oriented programming works. | 14:57 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
For one thing, there is only ever supposed to be One Attribute With A Given Name | 14:58 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
How can I accomplish that with the given example? | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
vrurg | Xliff: no if you do understand the model of role Raku embraced. Roles are flattened down into the consuming class. Inheritance keeps classes separate entities. | 14:59 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
In your example setOrigin must be defined in the role the attribute defined in. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Xliff | OK. So let's move that and see if I can reproduce the error. | 15:00 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
vrurg | Xliff: basically, you break the rule of attribute handling to be done where the attribute belongs. | 15:01 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Xliff | OK | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
OK. If I do that, it's working. | 15:02 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
So I think, for my purposes, I will need a way to reference the Base version of an attribute. | 15:03 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
And I really shouldn't even need to think about that when working with Objects and Roles. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
However, thanks fort the explanation. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
A.new(origin => 42, origin-attribute2 => Any, origin => 99, origin-attribute2 => Any) | 15:07 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
So... how to distinguish $!origin? | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
vrurg | Xliff: when you deal with ! twigil – you have to think of these things. But if you reference an autogen accessor – everything will work as expected. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Xliff | OK, but in this case, I always want to deal with the $!origin found in Base. | 15:08 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
How would that be expressed? | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
vrurg | No way to distinguish externally without low-level magic. | 15:09 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The only good solution is to split up the roles. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Xliff | Not even something like $!self::Base::origin? | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
vrurg | No because A doesn't have access to privates of Base. | 15:10 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Again, consider better encapsulation approach. Instead, you're trying to break it. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Xliff | So in this situation, I should remove "does Origin" from Inherits from Origin? | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
vrurg | Likely so. Besides, 'InheritsFrom' is generally bad name as roles do not inherit. :) | 15:11 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Xliff | Yeah. That seems to do the trick. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
However, what happens when the intent from InheritsFromOrigin is needed/ | 15:12 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
As in, I need InheritsFromOrigin to access a method from Origin? | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Do I just expect the composing class to do the right role and regerence that method anyway? | 15:13 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
vrurg | First of all, it looks like your mistake here is that you consider roles in terms of inheritance. But, in fact, they're consumed. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
As to accessing a method – make the other role require a method it needs. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
This way you'd guarantee compile-time check of the method existance. Then it's up to the consuming class to provide the method no matter which means are used for this. | 15:14 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Xliff | OK. I think I see how this is intended to work. | 15:16 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
I still think that composing two attributes of the same name in a single object inheritance chain is a Bad Idea and also LTA | 15:17 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
vrurg | Xliff: no. Do you care about internal structure of a 3rd-party class when you inherit from it? Do you care if they have $!state if you define same attribute in your class? | 15:18 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Geth | rakudo: Kaiepi++ created pull request #3978: Add a Mu ACCEPTS candidate for Mu:D |
15:19 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
vrurg | And roles are symbiotic to the class consuming them. The only thing they don't share are submethods. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Xliff | vrurg: I have no problem of the internal state of a third party object, but I should be able to note if I happen to name an attribute the same as someoen elses! | 15:20 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Preserving internal state here is irrelevant. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
15:20
Merfont is now known as Kaiepi
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Xliff | If there is an attribute naming convention, it is more fair to throw an error and let the consuming class handle the conflict. | 15:20 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
vrurg | Xliff: a private one you have no access to? Remember, attributes are not part of the published API, only accessors are. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Xliff | Masking the error and then leaving the consuming class in a broken state doesn't make sense! | 15:21 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
vrurg: I don't see the utility to allow for attribute collision in an inheritance chain. | 15:22 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
It just leads to confusion. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Geth | roast: Kaiepi++ created pull request #692: Add tests for Mu smartmatching |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Xliff | Whether you have access to it programatically or not. | 15:23 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
If you are browsing the source code, you have expectations. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
if you see an attribute named one way, you expect that attribute to be the same across the entire codebase. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
If you are saying you want that expectation to change, then that's fine. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
But it is not me that's fighting DECADES of OOP. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
It's you. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
If this is the expectation, then maybe a warning? | 15:24 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
vrurg | Xliff: I have to ran, don't have time. But your mistake is in mixing up accessors and private attributes. | 15:25 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Xliff | Acually, my mistake is not understanding how "does" works. | 15:28 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
I thought if we had a role R that "does A" then the it would be the equivalent of "class A does R does A" on the composing class | 15:29 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
What you are describing is not that at all. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
At any rate, thanks for the discussion. I will now have to see how to rework everything. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
vrurg | Xliff: I was delayed, so last note: it do 'does+does' eventually. But it only applies directly to the class consuming R. The one which inherits has it's own separate namespace. So, think of A injecting into the consuming class. And what's injected belongs only to the consuming class. Publics are available through MRO, but privates remain privates. | 15:33 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
15:36
travis-ci joined
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
travis-ci | Rakudo build failed. Elizabeth Mattijsen 'Fix errors in :k, :kv, :p handling | 15:36 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
travis-ci.org/rakudo/rakudo/builds/738317107 github.com/rakudo/rakudo/compare/2...2394772c72 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
15:36
travis-ci left
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Xliff | OK. So the fix seems to be to move the equivalent of "does Base" from the role to the consuming objects. | 15:38 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
I was hoping to save that step, but no matter. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
dogbert17 | I see some native array related spectest fails. Am I seeing WIP? | 16:26 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
16:50
zostay_ joined,
ugexe left
16:55
Xliff left
16:57
zostay left,
zostay_ is now known as zostay
17:18
patrickb joined
17:26
ugexe joined
17:30
domidumont joined
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
patrickb | Numbered lists in docs aren't possible, right? Is there any workaround? | 17:39 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Geth | rakudo: mid1221213++ created pull request #3979: Fix ecaf334 that partly caused #3966 |
18:15 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
linkable6 | RAKUDO#3966 [open]: github.com/rakudo/rakudo/issues/3966 [BLOCKER][blin][regression] Blin 2020.10, round 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Geth | rakudo: f3ffb702cc | (Alexandre Jousset)++ | lib/NativeCall.rakumod Fix ecaf334 that partly caused #3966 The test of installation of Compress::Bzip2 failed after ecaf334. There was a change from isconcrete to isconcrete_nd in excess. |
18:27 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
rakudo: cb023b2120 | (Elizabeth Mattijsen)++ (committed using GitHub Web editor) | lib/NativeCall.rakumod Merge pull request #3979 from mid1221213/fix-ecaf334 Fix ecaf334 that partly caused #3966 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
linkable6 | RAKUDO#3966 [open]: github.com/rakudo/rakudo/issues/3966 [BLOCKER][blin][regression] Blin 2020.10, round 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
tbrowder | hi, raku ppl, i would like to propose a community project to help increase interest among young ppl. | 18:59 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
vrurg | patrickb: ping? | 19:00 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
patrickb | vrurg: pong | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
vrurg | patrickb: have you tried build jvm backend on a linux recently? NQP fails on linux mint for me. | 19:02 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
tbrowder | my idea is to have something like small scholarship awards, sponsored overall by the perl foundation, and claimed by individual sponsors. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
vrurg | patrickb: "Missing or wrong version of dependency 'gen/jvm/stage2/NQPCORE.setting'" | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Geth | rakudo: mienaikage++ created pull request #3980: Add flag for creating symlinks without absolute path |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
tbrowder | the scholarships would be for somthing like a smaller scale version of the google summer of code. | 19:03 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
19:03
Xliff joined
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
patrickb | vrurg: I didn't. (Actually I'm not sure whether I ever managed to build JVM locally. I mostly tested via CI so far...) | 19:04 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
vrurg: Does the NQP build fails or Rakudo? | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
tbrowder | we could do something like beef up the module most wanted list... | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
vrurg | NQP. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
patrickb | Do you know whether its | 19:05 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
tbrowder | oops, wrong channel | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
patrickb | missing or stale? | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
vrurg | patrickb: it's definitely not missing. I can't be stale because it's a fresh build. | 19:06 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Xliff | vrurg: Another aside to the role thing. It makes code maintenance harder, because I can't place the Base object behind a proxy role. | 19:08 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
patrickb | Hm. My experience with this failure is that it always ended up being right about the version mismatch. Is there a previous installation in some other folder maybe? | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Xliff | Any consuming objects now have to "does Base does SoemthingElseUsingBase" | 19:09 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
It makes maintenance harder. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
vrurg | patrickb: not for JVM. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Xliff: I think you have a design issue. If the problematic attribute should be a sole property of Base then make it so! Move everything related to it either into Base or into a separate role. | 19:12 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
patrickb | Hm. I'll see if I manage to build a JVM locally. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
I'm away for a bit... | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Xliff | vrurg: I'm using GLib's design. | 19:13 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Trying to make Role serve the place of Interface, which it closely maps. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
vrurg | patrickb: there is no big deal about it usually. Just install openjdk and that's all you need. | 19:14 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Xliff: why you say "does Base does SomethingElse"? "is Base"? And what's SomethingElse? | 19:17 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Xliff | vrurg: Ideally though Base should be an object, not a role. So that might be the problem, right there. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
vrurg | Xliff: based on your example, Base is a class. Thus, "is Base". Otherwise I'm lost in what you're trying to achieve. Your code snippet now looks about right to me. | 19:21 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Xliff | vrurg: Yes. Base needs to become an object. It's always been a role and I haven't had time to make it an object. that's been on the software map for a long time. Just never had the chance to fix the implementation | 19:22 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Geth | rakudo: c37ffe71bd | (Elizabeth Mattijsen)++ | 2 files Make .unique/.repeated/.squish on native arrays faster - .unique between 1.6x and 7.6x as fast - .repeated between 2.0x and 2.5x as fast - .squish between 1.8x and 6.8x as fast Also add a dedicated native array .Seq method. |
19:35 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
roast: 5d93b6803c | (Elizabeth Mattijsen)++ | 3 files Add tests for native array .unique/repeated/squish |
19:36 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
19:47
samcv joined
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
lizmat suddenly realizes that "my @a = ^100; say @a.Seq[99]" *will* actually copy the @a array into a cache, whereas it could well just access the array underlying the Seq | 19:48 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
19:59
finsternis left
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
lizmat invites thoughts about github.com/rakudo/rakudo/pull/3980 | 20:05 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
20:05
nwc10 joined
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
nwc10 | fatal: Not a git repository: '/home/nick/Perl/rakudo/t/spec/.git' | 20:05 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
That means my checkout is a little bit old? | 20:06 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
lizmat | does it have a config in it ? | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
nwc10 | :-) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
lizmat | eh.. the git repo would be "/home/nick/Perl/rakudo/t/spec", no ? | 20:07 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
nwc10 | seems that I didn't build Rakudo on that machine. nqp says | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
This is nqp version 2015.03-125-g53d43e8 built on MoarVM version 2015.03-148-g8bb5da8 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
lizmat | ah, wow | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
nwc10 | anyway, woohoo, it has valgrind | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ho, it's not as crazy as I thought | 20:08 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
it doesn't actually have a spectest checkout | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
it's not simply that it dates from 2105 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
20:10
finsternis joined
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
nwc10 | oh pants. its Fedora. no IPC::Cmd | 20:12 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
vrurg wonder when was it the last time anybody needed JVM backend? | 20:20 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
*wonders | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Xliff | Windows users want raku to target .exe | 20:21 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Until that happens, JVM backend is the closest they can get since they can target JAR | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
vrurg | Does it build on Windows? | 20:24 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Xliff | It used to. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
It used to build under Cygwin, but I couldn't get it to work, last night. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
I know Star is on Windows. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Would be interested to know how they build rakudo so I can do so, myself. | 20:25 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
vrurg | I always had problems building JVM on Win and never on Mac. Now it turns out JVM is broken altogether. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
20:35
Geth left
20:36
Geth joined
20:37
dogbert17 left,
dogbert17 joined
20:38
raku-bridge left
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
nwc10 | fixed that. next problem - branch `nom` is just a little out of date | 20:43 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
patrickb | vrurg: I managed to reproduce the problem locally. | 20:56 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
vrurg | patrickb: I'm trying to locate the guilty commit. 2020.02.1 release is the last working one. 2020.05 is broken. | 20:57 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
And I probably found the last working commit right now... Just waiting for build to finish to make sure. | 20:58 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
patrickb: b0ddeda683a1b90399f92d9845f1499c3ea68f2f still compiles. The likely suspect is 3d69dc107b73d9127235297219c21418148a85e0. | 21:01 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
patrickb | Maybe the `#.NOTPARALLEL`? | 21:04 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
vrurg | patrickb: It worked well and it should work. | 21:05 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
But I'm testing it now. | 21:07 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
patrickb | :-) me too | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
vrurg | And it seemingly works. Heh... :( | 21:09 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
patrickb | That means, that some dependency is not stated correctly. Right? | 21:10 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
I think it should compile NQPCORE.setting before nqpmo. (The original error being nqpmo failing with being unable to find NQPCORE.setting, which at that point actually wasn't compiled (NQPCORE.setting.jar didn't exist).) | 21:12 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
vrurg | patrickb: I'm trying it. | 21:16 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
patrickb | I need to reboot. Back in a bit. | 21:17 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
vrurg | Oops, CORE_SETTING depend on nqp_mo | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
21:17
patrickb left
21:26
patrickb joined
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
patrickb | vrurg: Can't we deduce a working build order when looking at a `.NOTPARALLEL` build? | 21:46 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
vrurg | patrickb: possibly. But I go other way around. JASTNodes currently fails and when it does there is no .jar for NQPCORE. And JASTNodes doesn't actually depend on NQPCORE. | 21:48 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
But somehow when I add dependency in the template it is not propagated into Makefile. I likely to forget something... | 21:50 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
vrurg was editing in a directory different from the one where he was compiling. This evil directory name shortening in CLI prompt... | 21:56 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
patrickb: ok, that was it. A missing dependency on NQPCORE. | 22:01 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Geth | nqp: 688019c375 | (Vadim Belman)++ | tools/templates/Makefile-backend-common.in Add a missing dependency Fixes parallel build. |
22:03 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
patrickb | yay! | 22:11 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
releasable6 | Next release in ≈19 hours. 1 blocker. Please log your changes in the ChangeLog: github.com/rakudo/rakudo/wiki/ChangeLog-Draft | 23:00 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Geth | rakudo: 219978e12e | (Elizabeth Mattijsen)++ | src/core.c/core_epilogue.pm6 Fix JVM build The JVM doesn't know about Uni yet, spotted by vrurg++ |
23:04 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
vrurg | lizmat: didn't expect you to be awake and tried to find a better solution to the problem. | 23:06 |