|
🦋 Welcome to the IRC channel of the core developers of the Raku Programming Language (raku.org #rakulang). This channel is logged for the purpose of history keeping about its development | evalbot usage: 'm: say 3;' or /msg camelia m: ... | log inspection situation still under development | For MoarVM see #moarvm Set by lizmat on 22 May 2021. |
|||
|
00:02
reportable6 left
00:08
evalable6 joined
00:46
linkable6 joined
02:33
Xliff left
04:06
reportable6 joined
05:31
releasable6 left,
bloatable6 left,
linkable6 left,
notable6 left,
greppable6 left,
coverable6 left,
nativecallable6 left,
benchable6 left,
squashable6 left,
reportable6 left,
tellable6 left,
committable6 left,
unicodable6 left,
sourceable6 left,
bisectable6 left,
quotable6 left,
shareable6 left,
statisfiable6 left,
evalable6 left,
reportable6 joined,
quotable6 joined
05:32
coverable6 joined,
statisfiable6 joined
05:33
greppable6 joined,
nativecallable6 joined,
shareable6 joined,
sourceable6 joined,
committable6 joined,
notable6 joined,
bloatable6 joined,
unicodable6 joined
05:34
bisectable6 joined,
evalable6 joined
06:02
reportable6 left
06:05
reportable6 joined
06:32
squashable6 joined
06:33
releasable6 joined
|
|||
| gfldex | m: for 1 { last 42; } | 06:41 | |
| camelia | 5===SORRY!5=== Error while compiling <tmp> Calling last(Int) will never work with any of these multi signatures: ( --> Nil) (Label:D \x --> Nil) at <tmp>:1 ------> 3for 1 { 7⏏5last 42; } |
||
| gfldex | is this LTA? | ||
| moon-child | m: do for 1 { last 42; } | 06:42 | |
| camelia | 5===SORRY!5=== Error while compiling <tmp> Calling last(Int) will never work with any of these multi signatures: ( --> Nil) (Label:D \x --> Nil) at <tmp>:1 ------> 3do for 1 { 7⏏5last 42; } |
||
| gfldex | It's a v6.e feature. Could be quite confusing for a beginner. | 06:43 | |
| (This may be a big question.) | |||
|
07:31
linkable6 joined
07:34
tellable6 joined,
benchable6 joined
07:49
discord-raku-bot left
07:50
discord-raku-bot joined,
discord-raku-bot left,
discord-raku-bot joined
|
|||
| nine | People ought to get used to declaring the language version early on. | 08:27 | |
|
09:53
frost joined,
frost left
09:54
frost joined
|
|||
| gfldex | nine: exactly my point. We could tell them to do so in a proper error message. | 10:17 | |
| nine | Can we? | 10:20 | |
| gfldex | We still have a few features in v6.c left that throw NYI. Instead we could throw X::ImpelemtendIn.new('v6.e') . | 10:22 | |
| [Coke] | My brain think that sounds like too much magic, but it is only 6am or so here. | 10:23 | |
| so no cogent arguments just yet. | |||
| also, I apparently need to update my rakudo, because that gives the same error in 6.e here. | |||
| nine | gfldex: that requires adding a multi candidate that would throw. This multi candidate would then show up in introspection as well. Question is: is this better? | 10:40 | |
| MasterDuke | add `is implementation-detail`? | 11:59 | |
|
12:02
reportable6 left
12:41
frost left
12:59
frost joined,
frost left
13:04
reportable6 joined
13:08
notna joined
13:16
Xliff joined
13:59
notna left
14:54
lizmat_ joined,
lizmat_ left,
lizmat_ joined
14:58
lizmat left,
lizmat_ left,
lizmat joined
14:59
squashable6 left
16:07
squashable6 joined
16:16
smarton left,
djinni` left
16:17
smarton joined
16:19
djinni` joined
16:20
smarton left,
smarton joined
16:23
smarton left
18:02
reportable6 left
18:38
Xliff left
19:03
reportable6 joined
20:03
evalable6 left,
linkable6 left
20:04
evalable6 joined
20:06
linkable6 joined
|
|||
| gfldex | nine: I think it could be done without a multi candidate. All we want is a better error message and the one we got right now is a SORRY. | 20:07 | |
| nine | how? | 20:08 | |
| gfldex | We could special case the error message itself in 6.c and 6.d but not 6.e. | 20:10 | |
|
23:16
evalable6 left,
linkable6 left
23:18
evalable6 joined
|
|||