|
Documentation Channel for #raku | This channel is logged | Roadmap: github.com/raku/doc/wiki Set by [Coke] on 23 May 2022. |
|||
|
00:39
NemokoschKiwi joined
|
|||
| NemokoschKiwi | oh I missed quite a lot | 00:39 | |
| github.com/Raku/doc/issues/4160 - this has already been mentioned | 00:41 | ||
| I'm defo biased here because I feel the "decont pseudo-operator" hurt me rather than helped me with my understanding... BUT | 00:42 | ||
| I see a problem with this thinking pattern of "I wish I have seen this easier --> the docs need to be adapted" | 00:43 | ||
| not saying this is a desperately serious problem but probably it's good to be on one page with this | 00:48 | ||
| if there is one and only one documentation, it inevitably won't be equally convenient for everyone. Perhaps it would be good to have some declared non-technical goal | 00:50 | ||
| ehh... sounds like something to be added to the discussions :D | 00:56 | ||
|
00:58
NemokoschKiwi left
07:44
sena_kun joined
|
|||
| [Coke] | "one and only one" as opposed to one for 6.c, one for 6.d? Yes. I think we need to start with one (among other reasons, the amount of effort it would take to do even a second version), and once we have the *data* to support showing one vs. the other, we can consider the technical effort of generating different versions of the docs. | 14:08 | |
| because there isn't just raku versions, but also rakudo releases, and backend issues, and bugs.. | 14:09 | ||
| and we have each of those noted in various places in the docs. | |||
| when we have a per-verison change in something like a tutorial, that's a much better argument to have a separate version. | 14:10 | ||
|
16:42
Kaiepi left
17:01
Kaiepi joined
|
|||
| coleman | Who owns the raku.org domain? | 17:33 | |
| The Foundation? | 17:34 | ||
| Or a friendly community member? | |||
|
17:45
lizmat left
17:47
lizmat joined
18:22
sena_kun left
18:23
sena_kun joined
20:26
sena_kun left
20:27
sena_kun joined
|
|||
| [Coke] | dunno, sorry, ask in raku? | 21:52 | |
|
22:36
Nemokosch joined
|
|||
| Nemokosch | Ah no, I meant something even more banal | 22:37 | |
| it's not "one for you, one for me" | |||
| diversity that comes from Raku versions or even Rakudo versions, that's a legitimate challenge | 22:43 | ||
| but regarding the goal, well... that's the thing exactly. There should be one goal. Not less, not more. | |||
| [Coke] | if someone wants to setup a competing site, i'd ask them to just try to infiltrate our org instead. | 22:44 | |
| Nemokosch | Honestly, I don't think that would happen, simply because it's really a horrendous amount of work... | 22:47 | |
| I brought it up because of that decont issue where we had pretty much oppositional views with Rob (perhaps Steve as well) regarding the direction of the change itself | 22:48 | ||
|
23:33
sena_kun left
|
|||