|
Documentation Channel for #raku | This channel is logged | Roadmap: github.com/raku/doc/wiki Set by [Coke] on 23 May 2022. |
|||
|
02:58
rf left
|
|||
| Geth | doc/main: 1d11030921 | (Elizabeth Mattijsen)++ | doc/Type/DateTime.rakudoc Document DateTime.posix(:real) |
13:01 | |
| doc/main: b3e0c1d99f | (Elizabeth Mattijsen)++ | 2 files Document Exception|Cool.Failure coercer |
13:07 | ||
|
13:21
rf joined
|
|||
| [Coke] | \o/ | 14:08 | |
| Geth | doc/main: 92686de1bd | (Elizabeth Mattijsen)++ | 2 files Document ThreadPoolScheduler.new(:max_threads) a bit better And the associated RAKUDO_MAX_THREADS environment variable. |
14:45 | |
| doc/main: 438708cd09 | cfa++ | doc/Type/DateTime.rakudoc Fix signature typo |
15:02 | ||
| doc/main: bd8282ece8 | cfa++ | doc/Type/ThreadPoolScheduler.rakudoc Add code preamble |
15:11 | ||
| doc/main: 8fd5f52b1a | (Elizabeth Mattijsen)++ | doc/Type/ThreadPoolScheduler.rakudoc Change pseudocode into actual code Now not needing the preamble |
15:14 | ||
| doc: cfa++ created pull request #4259: Amend documented signatures for `Failure` methods |
15:18 | ||
| doc/main: ec0bc09b51 | cfa++ (committed using GitHub Web editor) | 2 files Amend documented signatures for Failure methods (#4259) |
15:23 | ||
| doc/main: 57206323e1 | (Elizabeth Mattijsen)++ | doc/Type/IO/Path.rakudoc Document IO::Path.dir-with-entries |
15:32 | ||
| lizmat | meh, looks like the REPL is not a lemma | 15:42 | |
| Geth | doc/main: ef66f20a7b | (Elizabeth Mattijsen)++ | doc/Programs/03-environment-variables.rakudoc Document support for INSIDE_EMACS environment variable |
15:47 | |
| doc/main: 52c2ea05e7 | (Elizabeth Mattijsen)++ | doc/Type/List.rakudoc Document roundrobin( ..., :slip) |
16:31 | ||
| doc/main: 08b4ee46c5 | (Elizabeth Mattijsen)++ | doc/Type/Cool.rakudoc DOcument Cool.Order |
16:35 | ||
| doc/main: 33a6b17f1f | (Elizabeth Mattijsen)++ | doc/Language/variables.rakudoc Bring version statement more in line with others |
16:41 | ||
| doc/main: 9d53594e5f | (Elizabeth Mattijsen)++ | doc/Programs/03-environment-variables.rakudoc Document RAKUDO_OPT for now |
17:02 | ||
| doc/main: 3db8263a4e | cfa++ | doc/Type/List.rakudoc Normalise link (remove ".html") |
17:10 | ||
| lizmat | oops, copy pasto cfa++ | 17:18 | |
| interesting: there is no documentation about IterationBuffer, nor is there any test in roast (other then checking the existence of the classe) | 18:37 | ||
| so: does that mean it's an implementation detail or not? | 18:38 | ||
| note that the class is *not* marked as an implementation-detail | |||
| I'm leaning towards documenting and testing in roast | 18:39 | ||
| Geth | doc/main: 1e8ea8a48a | (Elizabeth Mattijsen)++ | doc/Programs/03-environment-variables.rakudoc Document RAKUDO_PRECOMPILATION_PROGRESS |
18:55 | |
| doc/main: a327de2e7d | (Elizabeth Mattijsen)++ | doc/Type/DateTime.rakudoc Mark availability of DateTime.Numeric |
18:57 | ||
| doc/main: 03a7c1dd7a | (Elizabeth Mattijsen)++ | doc/Type/IO/Path.rakudoc Document IO::Path.add(<bar baz>) |
19:02 | ||
| [Coke] | doing both is great. If we have items that are unspecc'd at some point we probably want to say it's not specced so people don;'t rely on it. hardline: don't document unspecced items: friendly: doc but warn. | 19:05 | |
| so many commits to review, thank you! | 19:06 | ||
| lizmat | yw :-) | 19:07 | |
| [Coke] | once I do a review pass we'll push to prod by tomorrow, lots of updates here. | 19:08 | |
| Geth | ¦ doc: coke self-assigned xt test for missing C in C<> (and let's use a allow-list for doc text) github.com/Raku/doc/issues/2306 | 19:10 | |
| doc/main: e2eb0f28c5 | (Will Coleda)++ (committed using GitHub Web editor) | 20 files Add test for <> (missing formatcode) (#4257) * Add test for <> (missing formatcode) * Fixup some missing C<> in pod. |
19:12 | ||
| doc/main: 9f10710a53 | (Elizabeth Mattijsen)++ | doc/Language/control.rakudoc Document next/last with a value in 6.e |
19:20 | ||
| doc/main: 63ca40c6b0 | (Elizabeth Mattijsen)++ | doc/Type/List.rakudoc Document .pick(**) |
19:28 | ||
| [Coke] | lizmat: github.com/Raku/doc/commit/9f10710...f510a00dcf says you can use last in a map but then shows an example with next. | 20:04 | |
| ... ah, that's a simple typo, there's a section below with next. no worries. | |||
| .... I did it here: section below with *last*. :) | 20:09 | ||
| /win 11 | 20:25 | ||
| lizmat: the pick(**) - compilation test is failing on that method and I can't find it in the source- is it really Callable? | 20:26 | ||
| I think it is. | 20:32 | ||
| Geth | doc/main: 094c08a618 | (Will Coleda)++ | doc/Programs/03-environment-variables.rakudoc typo,specify lang |
20:38 | |
| doc/main: 7904706d86 | (Will Coleda)++ | doc/Type/List.rakudoc fix signature. |
|||
| doc/main: dfb3dd27d2 | (Will Coleda)++ | xt/pws/words.pws new word |
|||
|
20:49
NemokoschKiwi joined
20:52
NemokoschKiwi left
|
|||
| Geth | doc/main: 7258d52c0c | (Will Coleda)++ | 3 files Remove old util Use xt/check-signatures.rakutest instead. Closes #4223 |
20:54 | |
| ¦ doc: coke unassigned from codesections Issue util/list-missing-methods failure github.com/Raku/doc/issues/4223 | 20:55 | ||
| ¦ doc: coke self-assigned Check for indexing marks that try to index the page they're in github.com/Raku/doc/issues/4057 | |||