🦋 Welcome to Raku! raku.org/ | evalbot usage: 'p6: say 3;' or /msg camelia p6: ... | irclog: colabti.org/irclogger/irclogger_log/raku Set by ChanServ on 14 October 2019. |
|||
00:03
sena_kun joined
00:04
Altai-man_ left
00:19
lainon joined
00:26
AlexDaniel left
00:57
lainon left
01:03
oneeggeach joined,
oneeggeach left
01:06
rir joined
01:14
rir left
01:18
Merfont left
01:20
holyghost left
01:27
oddp left
01:50
aleksb joined,
aleksb left
01:51
aleksb joined
01:59
molaf left
02:01
Altai-man_ joined
02:04
sena_kun left
02:11
molaf joined
02:17
Xliff left
02:20
PavelB joined
02:22
rbt left
02:23
rbt joined
02:24
Cabanossi left
02:26
Cabanossi joined
|
|||
codesections | earlier, lizmat said that sending a file to the raku REPL would support multiline blocks better if the editor saved the text as a temp file (instead of essentially pasting it in). That made sense, and I've seen similar approaches in other languages/REPLs. However, unless I'm missing something, it looks like the temporary-file approach won't work either, because the REPL can't currently load a file | 02:42 | |
into the global namespace (only import Modules). Is that correct? | |||
(Of course, that's a great design decision for the language as a whole, even if it makes setting up a REPL-driven workflow quite a bit more difficult) | 02:43 | ||
(I'm basing my conclusion that the REPL can't load a non-module file on stackoverflow.com/questions/501199...epl-usage, combined with my inability to get it to do so. But that answer is a couple years old, and I'd love to learn that it's out of date now) | 02:48 | ||
03:15
holyghost joined
03:35
stoned75 left
03:37
stoned75 joined
03:46
dolmen joined
|
|||
rjbs | Hey, I just found a crazy bug with rakudobrew and it seems so weird, but maybe (a) nobody uses rakudobrew anymore or (b) I am just an idiot. | 03:53 | |
03:53
notandinus left
|
|||
rjbs | If I initialize rakudobrew in my zshrc *after* plenv, then rakudobrew seems to put the path to the current perl shim into my PATH, which breaks using "plenv shell" subsequently. | 03:54 | |
If I put initialize rakudobrew *first*, it's fine. ??? | |||
03:54
zacts joined,
team\andinus joined
|
|||
rjbs | Bleh, I see. rakubrew now, which wants me to do a curl pipe. | 03:55 | |
03:56
team\andinus is now known as notandinus
03:59
Merfont joined
04:02
sena_kun joined
04:04
Altai-man_ left
|
|||
aleksb | hi, if I want to create local modifications to a zef package (e.g. to fix a bug) for use in my own projects, what is the easiest way? | 04:27 | |
04:30
PavelB left
|
|||
samebchase- | aleksb: You can clone the repository, make modifications and do a zef install from inside that repository, and it will install it for you locally. | 04:35 | |
Let me find the exact syntax | |||
aleksb: I think you can cd to the repository and do a plain `zef install`. | 04:37 | ||
aleksb: Sorry it is `zef install .` Notice the dot | 04:38 | ||
aleksb: I got it from github.com/MARTIMM/mongo-perl6-dri...-630363249 | 04:40 | ||
aleksb | I had to do `zef install . --force-install` to override the official version (which was already installed) but it works | 04:46 | |
thank you! | |||
05:16
xinming_ left,
xinming_ joined
05:17
hungrydonkey left,
hungrydonkey joined
05:26
dolmen left
05:31
OpenZen left
05:35
holyghost left
05:36
softmoth left
05:46
brtastic joined
05:48
dev joined
|
|||
dev | hi | 05:49 | |
05:49
dev left
05:52
bocaneri joined
06:01
Altai-man_ joined
06:04
stoned75 left,
sena_kun left
06:06
wamba joined
06:07
rindolf joined
06:15
stoned75 joined
06:19
molaf left
06:26
MasterDuke joined
06:33
go|dfish joined
06:43
dolmen joined
06:48
aleksb left
06:50
ensamvarg3 joined
07:09
holyghost joined
|
|||
holyghost | A nice project for someone, make allegro library raku bindings (allegro.cc liballeg.org) | 07:12 | |
It's a giftware licensed game library | 07:14 | ||
written in C, there's also a iphone system for it | 07:18 | ||
I might write an extension for it, an adaptive systems library for game AI and statistics | 07:23 | ||
e.g. for RTS games | 07:24 | ||
07:29
ab5tract joined
|
|||
ab5tract | m: sub infix:</>(&f, *@a) is tighter(&infix:<+>) { reduce &f, @a }; say &[~] / <w e x> | 07:29 | |
camelia | wex | ||
ab5tract | m: sub infix:</>(&f, *@a) is tighter(&infix:<+>) { reduce &f, @a }; say &infix:<+> / 5, 6, 7 | 07:30 | |
camelia | 567 | ||
ab5tract | m: sub infix:</>(&f, *@a) is tighter(&infix:<+>) { reduce &f, @a }; dd &[~] / <w e x> | ||
camelia | "wex" | ||
ab5tract | m: sub infix:</>(&f, *@a) is tighter(&infix:<+>) { reduce &f, @a }; dd &infix:<+> / 5, 6, 7 | ||
camelia | 5 6 7 |
||
ab5tract | what am I doing wrong? :( | ||
07:31
dolmen left,
hungrydonkey left
|
|||
ab5tract | m: dd reduce &infix:<+>, 5, 6, 7 | 07:32 | |
camelia | 18 | ||
07:44
abraxxa left,
abraxxa joined
07:46
holyghost left
07:51
dolmen joined
07:58
skids left
08:02
sena_kun joined
08:04
Altai-man_ left
08:10
pecastro joined
08:14
sarna joined
08:29
xinming_ left
08:30
xinming_ joined
|
|||
ab5tract | lizmat: any ideas? ^ | 08:56 | |
09:07
oddp joined
09:08
finanalyst joined
|
|||
moritz | there's already an infix /; I don't think you can redefine the precedence of an existing operator | 09:08 | |
also, for your code to work you'de have to give it a looser prec than infix:<,> | 09:09 | ||
09:09
molaf joined
|
|||
ab5tract | moritz local definitions override core | 09:10 | |
moritz | m: sub infix:<RED>(&f, @*a) is looser(&infix<,>) { reduce &f, @a }; say &infix:<+> RED 10, 11, 12 | ||
camelia | 5===SORRY!5=== Error while compiling <tmp> Undeclared routine: infix used at line 1. Did you mean 'indir', 'index'? |
||
moritz | m: sub infix:<RED>(&f, @*a) is looser(&infix<,>) { reduce &f, @a }; say &[+] RED 10, 11, 12 | ||
camelia | 5===SORRY!5=== Error while compiling <tmp> Undeclared routine: infix used at line 1. Did you mean 'index', 'indir'? |
||
ab5tract | m: sub infix:<+>($a, $b) { say "computer says no" }; "x" + "y" | ||
camelia | computer says no | ||
moritz | ab5tract: I know, but that example doesn't redefine the *precedence* of an existing op | 09:11 | |
m: sub infix:<RED>(&f, @*a) is looser(&infix:<,>) { reduce &f, @a }; say &[+] RED 10, 11, 12 | |||
camelia | 5===SORRY!5=== Error while compiling <tmp> Variable '@a' is not declared at <tmp>:1 ------> 3@*a) is looser(&infix:<,>) { reduce &f, 7⏏5@a }; say &[+] RED 10, 11, 12 |
||
ab5tract | why would the new definition not also have its precedence applied | ||
moritz | m: sub infix:<RED>(&f, *@a) is looser(&infix:<,>) { reduce &f, @a }; say &[+] RED 10, 11, 12 | ||
camelia | 33 | ||
ab5tract | anwyay i think you maybe missed that the first example using ` | ||
`~` works as expected | 09:12 | ||
but using infix + does not | |||
moritz | ab5tract: because that would need to remove an existing operator from a language you're deriving | ||
but the example above with a new symbol works | |||
m: sub infix:<RED>(&f, *@a) is looser(&infix:<,>) { reduce &f, @a }; say &[+] RED 10, 11, 12 | |||
camelia | 33 | ||
moritz | m: sub infix:<RED>(&f, *@a) is looser(&infix:<,>) { reduce &f, @a }; say &[~] RED 10, 11, 12 | 09:13 | |
camelia | 101112 | ||
09:14
hungrydonkey joined
|
|||
ab5tract | m: > sub infix:<+>(Str $a, Str $b) { say "no ints allowed" }; say 5 + 5 | 09:14 | |
camelia | 5===SORRY!5=== Error while compiling <tmp> Preceding context expects a term, but found infix > instead. at <tmp>:1 ------> 3>7⏏5 sub infix:<+>(Str $a, Str $b) { say "no |
||
ab5tract | I don't see how preceddence can really matter here because local definitions override any core | 09:15 | |
moritz | that's what I've been trying to explain | ||
there are two parts to an infix:<something> definition | |||
1) if the symbol doesn't exist already, add it to the parser | 09:16 | ||
2) install it in the lexical pad, call it | |||
if you override an existing operator, only 2) happens | |||
but you need 1) to change the precedence of an operator | 09:17 | ||
ab5tract | I'm still not convinced | ||
moritz | then show me an example where a local override changed the precedence of an existing operator | 09:18 | |
ab5tract | Behavior of my redefinition of `infix:</>` according to different precedence changes behavior | ||
it doesn't do the *right* thing | 09:19 | ||
but it doesn't do *no* thing | |||
moritz | m: sub infix:<+>($a, $b) is tighter(&infix:<~>) { "[$a + $b]" }; say 3 ~ 4 + 5 | ||
camelia | 3[4 + 5] | ||
ab5tract | m: sub infix:</>(&f, *@a) is looser(&infix:<,>) { reduce &f, @a }; dd &infix:<+> / 5, 6, 7 | 09:20 | |
camelia | 5 6 7 |
||
moritz | m: sub infix:<+>($a, $b) is looser(&infix:<~>) { "[$a + $b]" }; say 3 ~ 4 + 5 | ||
camelia | 3[4 + 5] | ||
ab5tract | ok I see it now | ||
sorry for the confusion | |||
moritz | happens, it can be a confusing topic :D | 09:21 | |
ab5tract | that's also a bit disappointing and unexpected relative to the general behavior of local redefinitions :( | ||
moritz | also, I consider it a bug that rakudo doesn't even give an error message regarding ignoring the precedence specfication | ||
ab5tract | LTA for certain | ||
moritz | (one could also argue that it's a bug that you cannot redefine the precedence, but I wouldn't even know how to approach fixing it) | 09:22 | |
09:24
hungrydonkey left,
hungrydonkey joined
|
|||
ab5tract | I'm busy otherwise I would be tempted to do a deep dive into CORE-settings to understand the hows and whys of it | 09:25 | |
:) | |||
09:27
hungrydonkey left
09:28
hungryd39 joined
09:29
holyghost joined
09:32
hungryd39 left
|
|||
ab5tract | moritz: would it perhaps be possible to have a special form of braid that has a more aggressive override strategy, leaving in place all CORE definitions that have not been overridden but otherwise always adding it to the parser regardless of any existing definitions? | 09:34 | |
moritz | ab5tract: I don't know the current parser deep enough to answer that | 09:35 | |
ab5tract | erm, sorry, that came out a bit confusing. "adding it" <-- "it" meaning any definition gets both steps 1 & 2 | ||
moritz: me either.. Lucky for us, it sounds like in a little while here we will have a new and improved parser to learn. | 09:36 | ||
Laziness wins again! :) | |||
09:40
wamba left
|
|||
jnthn | The grammar changes very little, however. | 09:40 | |
ab5tract | moritz thanks for your help. I've updated this here with this new knowlede: www.reddit.com/r/rakulang/comments...r/fws8u3s/ | 09:41 | |
09:42
molaf left,
pmurias97 joined,
pmurias97 left
|
|||
ab5tract | jnthn: can you elaborate? the grammar of CORE-settings? the grammar of setting up a cascading braid like I described above? the grammar of the braid grammars? | 09:43 | |
help me I'm drowning! | |||
jnthn | I guess you're referring to the RakuAST changes, and I mean that the parser itself will parse in the same way, it's what we build from it that will changes. | 09:44 | |
So don't expect much parsing wise to get magically fixed :) | |||
Some semantic things probably will :) | 09:45 | ||
ab5tract | Oh, I meant that it sounds like the way slangs / braids are defined relative to the parser will likely look radically different after RakuAST | 09:49 | |
keep in mind I have zero clue how you crazy core devs manage any of that at the moment! | |||
moritz | only the part that translates the parse tree into an AST will look different | ||
the parser itself won't | |||
09:50
MasterDuke left
|
|||
ab5tract | "the part that translates" == there are more than one, no? isn't each braid going to do this differently? | 09:51 | |
moritz | no, they just look up the symbols in different scopes | 09:52 | |
but the code is the same | |||
ab5tract | jnthn I guess for practical purposes, I guess I am most curious about an answer to my question: would it enable -- or change the implementation of -- addition of a mechanism to specify that you want to completely override global definitions including precedence in your local scope. | 09:53 | |
that seems like something that braids do naturally but braiding is not something we get to do ourselves outside of the ill-defined slang, correct? | |||
09:56
kensanata joined
|
|||
jnthn | ab5tract: I think that issue is orthogonal. | 09:59 | |
09:59
lichtkind joined
|
|||
jnthn | Clearly the semantics today of ignoring the requested precedence are LTA, though. | 10:00 | |
Maybe we should allow changing precedence or an existing operator, but only if you declare a `proto` (and so hide all existing candidates, that assumed a different precedence) | |||
10:01
Altai-man_ joined
|
|||
ab5tract | yeah, this is the only kind of thing I had in mind | 10:04 | |
some simple signal to say "please install in the parser in place of whatever may already be there" | |||
10:04
sena_kun left
|
|||
ab5tract | could be handy too if user space ever grows too wild with new conflicting operator definitions? | 10:04 | |
assuming that it is the case that the first definition to the parser gets the precedence for user defined operators well | 10:06 | ||
10:08
JJMerelo joined
|
|||
ab5tract | *as well | 10:11 | |
10:14
holyghost left
10:16
wamba joined,
yuplushi joined
10:17
Black_Ribbon left
10:30
ab5tract left
10:40
ab5tract joined
10:41
dolmen left
10:50
MasterDuke joined
11:01
JJMerelo left
11:06
JJMerelo joined
|
|||
JJMerelo | I was kicked off... | 11:07 | |
Altai-man_ go ahead, please. You have my email, right? | |||
Altai-man_ | JJMerelo, hm, not really. :( Can you PM it to me, please? | 11:09 | |
11:09
Manifest0 left
11:17
sarna left
11:18
dolmen joined
11:20
sarna joined,
holyghost joined
11:21
ab5tract left
11:22
jvverde_ joined
11:54
holyghost left
12:02
sena_kun joined
12:04
Altai-man_ left
|
|||
lizmat | breaking news on CNN: hand-sanitizer and fireworks don't mix :-) | 12:05 | |
jnthn | .oO( But it'd make a great "will it blend" episode... ) |
12:10 | |
lizmat | :-) | 12:11 | |
jnthn | The hand sanitizer at my local microbrewery smells like something tasty to drink. I don't plan to try, but... | ||
El_Che | jnthn: git push first | 12:12 | |
12:31
hungrydonkey joined
12:33
cgfbee joined
12:37
wamba left
12:45
hungrydonkey left,
hungrydonkey joined
12:50
hungrydonkey left
12:58
hungrydonkey joined
13:12
Manifest0 joined
13:18
hungrydonkey left
13:19
hungrydonkey joined
13:25
JJMerelo left
13:32
hungryd4 joined,
hungrydonkey left
13:35
dolmen left
13:36
Manifest0 left
13:40
hungryd4 left
13:41
hungrydonkey joined,
Manifest0 joined
13:43
hungrydonkey left,
hungrydonkey joined,
grumble joined
13:49
wamba joined
13:50
hungrydonkey left,
hungrydonkey joined
14:01
dolmen joined
14:02
Altai-man_ joined
14:04
holyghost joined,
sena_kun left
14:20
lichtkind left
14:21
vike1 left
14:27
sarna left
14:30
lichtkind joined,
vike joined
14:37
lichtkind left,
holyghost left
14:39
lichtkind joined,
wamba left
14:40
lichtkind left
14:42
lichtkind joined
|
|||
jjatria | Is there a search URL that can be used with the Raku docs, as in to use with DuckDuckGo bangs (duckduckgo.com/newbang) or browser custom search thingies? | 14:43 | |
DuckDuckGo has `!perl` which uses the perldoc site | |||
14:44
lichtkind left
|
|||
Altai-man_ | jjatria, duckduckgo.com/newbang <- ? :) | 14:45 | |
14:45
lichtkind joined
14:46
brtastic left
|
|||
jjatria | Yeah, my message had that same URL. But that form wants a search URL | 14:46 | |
Does the Raku docs site have one that can be used for that sort of thing? | |||
Altai-man_ | ooh, I see what you mean. I don't think there is one. | 14:47 | |
jjatria | It would be neat to be able to search with `!raku` | ||
Altai-man_ | Because website is static and there are all kinds of problems with search caused by that. | ||
14:50
lichtkind left
|
|||
codesections | Would it be against the spirit of duckduckgo bangs to have it redirect to duckduckgo.com/?q=site%3Adocs.raku.org ? (i.e., just a site search of the docs website) | 14:57 | |
that's what happens if you search for a term on the website that doesn't match an existing page | |||
(well, a google site search, but still) | |||
14:58
OpenZen joined
15:04
zacts left
15:07
kensanata left
15:09
hungrydonkey left
|
|||
jjatria | codesections: Ha! I guess it's worth a try. Bangs an always be updated later, if we ever get a proper search URL | 15:11 | |
15:12
hungrydonkey joined
|
|||
codesections | er, rather duckduckgo.com/?q=site%3Adocs.raku.org+ | 15:17 | |
15:25
marcusr left,
bdju left
15:26
bdju joined
15:28
marcusr joined
15:36
kensanata joined
15:41
hungryd56 joined
15:43
hungrydonkey left
15:49
hungryd56 left
15:50
hungrydonkey joined
15:52
hungryd5 joined
|
|||
jjatria | Welp, submitted. Let's see what happens | 15:55 | |
15:55
hungrydonkey left
15:58
Black_Ribbon joined
16:02
hungryd5 left
16:03
sena_kun joined
16:05
Altai-man_ left
16:12
xinming_ left
16:14
xinming_ joined
16:27
brtastic joined
16:49
wamba joined
16:51
stoned75 left
16:52
stoned75 joined
16:55
AlexDaniel joined,
AlexDaniel left,
AlexDaniel joined
17:05
cpan-raku left
17:06
cpan-raku joined,
cpan-raku left,
cpan-raku joined
17:14
dolmen left
17:35
ensamvarg3 left
17:40
rindolf left
17:48
brtastic left,
yuplushi left
17:50
rindolf joined
17:55
erdic joined,
telex joined
17:58
rindolf left
18:02
Altai-man_ joined
18:03
rindolf joined
18:04
sena_kun left
18:06
Xliff joined
|
|||
codesections | I'm attempting to get a Raku debugger set up, and could use a bit of help interpreting the error message I'm getting: | 18:06 | |
$ zef install --/test App::MoarVM::Debug | |||
===> Searching for: App::MoarVM::Debug | |||
===> Searching for missing dependencies: MoarVM::Remote | |||
===> Searching for missing dependencies: Data::MessagePack | |||
===> Fetching [FAIL]: Data::MessagePack:ver<0.1.2> from [email@hidden.address] | |||
ck.git | |||
Aborting due to fetch failure: Data::MessagePack:ver<0.1.2> (use --force-fetch to override) | |||
(this is after following the directions in the README at github.com/edumentab/p6-app-moarvm-debug ) | 18:07 | ||
18:08
satori__ left
|
|||
lizmat | timotimo ^^ | 18:09 | |
Xliff | codesections: You may want to alert the maintainer for ata::MessagePack | ||
*Data | |||
codesections: In the meantime, you can install from git by hand. | 18:10 | ||
codesections | (As an aside, am I correct that App::MoarVM::Debug is the debugger I should be installing as a new user? I started from the docs page (docs.raku.org/programs/01-debugging), which referred me to github.com/jnthn/rakudo-debugger, but that page indicates (I think) that it's been deprecated in favor of MoarVM::Remote) | ||
Xliff | git clone [email@hidden.address] cd Perl6-Data-MessagePack; zef install . | 18:11 | |
codesections: Actually, you may want to look into Comma. commaide.com/ | |||
codesections | Xliff, thanks. What is the error I'd be alerting the Data::MessagePack maintainer to? Is it a version mismatch? | 18:12 | |
Xliff | Paste exactly what you get from zef | 18:13 | |
codesections | The text I pasted was the full msg | 18:14 | |
18:14
vrurg_ joined,
reach_satori joined
|
|||
Xliff | Then paste everything from the "Fetching [FAIL]". If you wait a second, I might be able to get you a better message. | 18:14 | |
Ah. It's not a URL | 18:15 | ||
He may be better served to use the following for source-url in META6.json: github.com/pierre-vigier/Perl6-Dat...gePack.git | 18:16 | ||
codesections | re: Comma – does it offer a standalone debugger or just a full IDE/editor? If it's the latter, is it worth switching? I'm pretty happy with my Emacs setup and feel some reluctance to switch to a non-FOSS editor. But I'd be willing to do so for compelling enough benefits | 18:18 | |
18:19
softmoth joined
|
|||
Altai-man_ | codesections, full IDE/editor, no separation. But means for debugging are open, so you can look at something like github.com/edumentab/p6-app-moarvm-debug and integrate it into whatever or write your own frontend. | 18:20 | |
I think emacs folks would be truly thankful. :) | 18:21 | ||
re fetching failure above: just clone it an zef install . | 18:22 | ||
codesections | > so you can look at something like github.com/edumentab/p6-app-moarvm-debug | ||
right, that's what I started with (and the README I was following) :) | 18:23 | ||
18:23
sjm_uk left
|
|||
Altai-man_ is bad for not backlogging | 18:23 | ||
codesections | ha :) | 18:25 | |
> re fetching failure above: just clone it an `zef install .` | |||
18:25
sjm_uk joined
|
|||
codesections | yeah, that seems like the right solution. I'd like to understand the error msg, though | 18:26 | |
and insight into what it means/what the fetching error was based on this msg: | 18:27 | ||
$ zef install --/test App::MoarVM::Debug | |||
===> Searching for: App::MoarVM::Debug | |||
===> Searching for missing dependencies: MoarVM::Remote | |||
===> Searching for missing dependencies: Data::MessagePack | |||
===> Fetching [FAIL]: Data::MessagePack:ver<0.1.2> from [email@hidden.address] | |||
ck.git | |||
Aborting due to fetch failure: Data::MessagePack:ver<0.1.2> (use --force-fetch to override) | |||
(rerunning the install command with --debug is noisier but doesn't seem more helpful. If anyone would like to see that msg, I'm happy to post it but otherwise I'll hold off to avoid spamming the channel) | 18:30 | ||
(er, more than I already am, anyway) | 18:31 | ||
18:34
reach_satori left
18:35
rbt left,
rbt joined
18:41
reach_satori joined,
hungrydonkey joined,
Guest311 joined
|
|||
codesections | Oh, I see. The url in the META6.json file incorrectly uses `git@github.com:` instead of `github.com`. Looks like Altai-man_ has had a PR out fixing that error since September, github.com/pierre-vigier/Perl6-Dat...ck/pull/17 | 18:46 | |
18:53
wamba left
18:54
lichtkind joined
18:58
wamba joined
19:03
go|dfish left
19:14
hungrydonkey left
19:17
go|dfish joined
|
|||
timotimo | i'm not sure why fetching messagepack would afil like that? | 19:30 | |
if you're able to fetch lots of things from github | 19:31 | ||
codesections | I think I figured out what the issue could be. If I `git clone` from the github.com/$URL address, I clone the repo. If I `git clone` from the [email@hidden.address] address, I'm *prompted to unlock my SSH key* and clone the repo | 19:34 | |
I'm guessing that zef can't handle that case? | |||
timotimo | d'oh | 19:35 | |
maybe | |||
Xliff | Auto-convert the [email@hidden.address] instances into https: ?? | 19:38 | |
vrurg_ | Xliff: unless I oversee a hidden problem I like the idea. | 19:43 | |
[email@hidden.address] is a huge pain in the ... | |||
19:44
vrurg_ is now known as vrurg
19:46
cpan-raku left,
cpan-raku joined,
cpan-raku left,
cpan-raku joined
|
|||
codesections | do y'all think it's worth opening an issue on the zef repo over this? I'm happy to do so, if that'd be helpful | 19:50 | |
19:57
xinming_ left,
xinming_ joined
20:00
finanalyst left
20:02
sena_kun joined
20:05
Altai-man_ left
20:09
webb joined,
webb left
20:12
aborazmeh joined,
aborazmeh left,
aborazmeh joined,
OpenZen left,
OpenZen joined
20:14
softmoth left,
softmoth joined
|
|||
timotimo | hm, does the thing come from the meta json file or from the ecosystem meta list? | 20:17 | |
probably the former | 20:18 | ||
an issue could be for tracking "what distros still have the wrong kind of url" in the ecosystem and/or an issue in zef for looking for a flag or env var you can pass to git to prevent a password unlock request or so | 20:19 | ||
20:19
cpage joined
|
|||
codesections | The issue opened against Data::MessagePack (and the PR) suggested it came from Data::MessagePack's META6.json file (which did, indeed, have a git@ url) | 20:19 | |
20:26
kensanata left
|
|||
cpan-raku | New module released to CPAN! DBIish::Pool (1.0.1) by 03RBT | 20:39 | |
20:41
kensanata joined
20:44
hungrydonkey joined
20:55
wamba left
21:02
hungrydonkey left
|
|||
Xliff | vrurg: I may just look into submitting a PR for zef. | 21:08 | |
21:16
leont_ left
21:23
molaf joined
21:38
finanalyst joined
22:02
Altai-man_ joined
22:04
softmoth left,
sena_kun left
22:07
MilkmanDan left
22:09
MilkmanDan joined
22:12
xinming_ left
22:13
xinming_ joined
22:29
finanalyst left
22:30
aborazmeh left
|
|||
codesections | Update on the source-url issue discussed earlier: the zef issue I opened has been closed with the following comment: | 22:31 | |
It’s not up to zef to enforce ecosystem policy like what source-url is allowed. For all I know users have configured their own fetcher that actually uses that uri format. There is no blessed format, and any format can be made to work then rough configuration and code. And because there are many possible fetchers how could it possibly report “set your ssh key” when that plug-in cannot know a | |||
later plug-in might actually understand that uri? Admittedly it’s possible but it’s a lot of work to fix a problem that stems from elsewhere. | |||
It’s not up to zef to tell the user about errors the author made (wrong source-url) — that is for authoring tools or ecosystem prechecks. Zef will never tell you e.g. “hey your META6.json is wrong“ because it isn’t an authoring tool. | |||
22:31
samebchase joined
|
|||
codesections | (source: github.com/ugexe/zef/issues/359) | 22:31 | |
Xliff | Hrm | 22:33 | |
codesections | So, I guess the solution that leaves is updating docs.raku.org/language/modules to clearly state that distribution authors should use https URLs for the `source-url` field | 22:34 | |
Xliff | codesections: Added a comment to your bug. | ||
22:41
rindolf left
22:48
kensanata left
22:49
lichtkind left
23:19
sftp left
23:22
sftp joined
23:28
pecastro left
23:41
hungrydonkey joined
23:50
Cabanossi left
23:57
Cabanossi joined
|