🦋 Welcome to Raku! raku.org/ | evalbot usage: 'p6: say 3;' or /msg camelia p6: ... | irclog: colabti.org/irclogger/irclogger_log/raku Set by ChanServ on 14 October 2019. |
|||
00:01
wamba left
|
|||
codesections | m: say <1 2 3>[0 .. *]; say <1 2 3>[0 .. *-0] | 00:04 | |
camelia | (1 2 3) (1 2 3 Nil) |
||
codesections | moon-child: ^^^^^ | ||
moon-child | a ha! | 00:05 | |
so it's just * being magic, as usual | 00:06 | ||
00:11
wingfold joined,
wingfold left
00:12
wingfold joined
00:21
aindilis joined
00:32
b2gills left
00:36
dogbert11 joined
00:39
dogbert17 left
00:41
dogbert11 left,
dogbert11 joined
00:42
dogbert11 left
00:43
dogbert11 joined
00:44
dogbert11 left
00:45
dogbert11 joined
00:47
Doc_Holliwood left
00:48
mowotter left
00:51
dogbert17 joined
00:52
_jrjsmrtn joined
00:53
Black_Ribbon joined
00:54
dogbert11 left,
__jrjsmrtn__ left
00:59
wingfold left,
wingfold joined
01:00
wingfold_ joined,
wingfold left
01:01
wingfold joined,
wingfold_ left
01:06
wingfold left,
wingfold joined
01:11
wingfold left,
dogbert17 left,
brtastic left
01:14
b2gills joined
01:18
monkey__ joined
|
|||
japhb | moon-child: a bare * is just a Whatever. You get a WhateverCode when you apply certain operators to it. | 01:21 | |
01:23
wingfold joined
01:25
blaboeir left
01:28
wingfold left
01:29
sxmx left
01:32
monkey__ left
01:36
londoed left
01:37
londoed joined
01:41
wingfold joined
01:49
wingfold left
01:51
dogbert17 joined
01:52
sxmx joined
|
|||
sxmx | anyone have an issue where raku repl doesn't show the prompt and just hangs after showing "Built on Moar..." | 02:09 | |
02:09
wingfold joined
|
|||
sxmx | I am on openbsd 6.9 | 02:09 | |
02:11
wingfold_ joined,
wingfold left
02:12
sena_kun left,
wingfold_ left,
wingfold joined
02:13
kvw_5 joined
02:16
kvw_5_ left
02:17
wingfold left
02:18
Xliff left
02:27
sena_kun joined
02:32
sxmx left
02:34
sxmx joined
|
|||
moon-child | sxmx: it takes a long time to start up if not in cache; how long did you wait? | 02:35 | |
02:42
wingfold joined
02:43
g0nk left
02:50
wingfold left
03:11
berber44 joined,
wingfold joined
|
|||
sxmx | a minute or two, I'll give it another shot moon-child | 03:13 | |
you were right moon-child , I was just impatient | 03:16 | ||
moon-child | I mean in fairness, a minute or two is a pretty long time for a repl to take to start up | 03:17 | |
I think it's caching the bootfiles | |||
(so, should be faster in the future, until the next upgrade) | 03:18 | ||
sxmx | This is on a VPS, and it wasn't literally a minute, more like 20 seconds | 03:23 | |
03:30
DarthGandalf left
03:41
DarthGandalf joined
03:53
kaiwulf left
04:01
maggotbrain left
04:03
wingfold left
04:16
wingfold joined
04:23
wamba joined
04:26
Altai-man_ joined
04:28
sena_kun left
04:29
monkey__ joined
04:32
monkey__ left
04:42
ex_nihilo joined
04:49
defaultxr left
05:00
defaultxr joined
05:03
wingfold left
05:15
wingfold joined
05:21
parabolize left
05:26
samebchase-5 is now known as samebchase-
05:38
berber44 left
05:53
Doc_Holliwood joined
06:02
wingfold left
06:15
brtastic joined,
wingfold joined
06:28
brtastic left
06:33
squashable6 left
06:35
squashable6 joined,
wamba left
06:41
wamba joined
06:45
aluaces joined
06:46
frost-lab joined
07:04
wingfold left
07:06
abraxxa left,
abraxxa joined
07:12
wingfold joined
07:18
ufobat joined
07:37
Sgeo left
07:51
Doc_Holliwood left
07:55
guifa2 joined
07:57
wingfold_ joined,
wingfold left
08:02
wingfold_ left,
rindolf joined
08:05
domidumont joined
08:22
wingfold joined
08:29
wingfold_ joined,
wingfold left
08:31
frost-lab left
08:33
wingfold_ left
08:35
frost-lab joined
08:38
aborazmeh joined
08:40
aluaces left,
aluaces joined,
wingfold joined
08:42
ufobat_ joined,
ufobat left
08:43
guifa2 left,
guifa2 joined
08:59
Kaiepi left
09:02
jmerelo joined
09:05
frost-lab left
09:10
pecastro joined
09:23
Altai-man_ left
09:25
sena_kun joined
09:26
wingfold left
09:30
PimDaniel joined
09:31
PimDaniel left
09:32
PimDaniel joined
09:35
frost-lab joined
09:40
wingfold joined
09:46
frost-lab88 joined
09:49
Black_Ribbon left
09:50
frost-lab left
10:00
Heijki joined
10:01
Heijki left
10:02
frost-lab88 left
10:14
wingfold left,
guifa2 left,
wingfold joined
10:29
aborazmeh left
10:30
Matze37 joined,
guifa2 joined
|
|||
Matze37 | Hello. I get stuck and like to ask for a hint. I have list of word in a file. I would like to map this list to a hash mit a key '1'. I am trying to do this in an one-liner, but i dont dig it.. | 10:33 | |
i was trying something like my %str = map(@arr.list, '1'); | |||
the array holds the list | |||
10:36
clickmesh joined
10:37
clickmesh left
10:38
aluaces left
10:40
frost-lab joined
10:44
wamba left
10:48
Doc_Holliwood joined
10:49
aindilis left,
aindilis joined
|
|||
guifa2 | Matze37: what you're doing is just creating a 1 for each item in the list, and that assigns a long sequence of 1s to %str | 10:50 | |
tellable6 | 2021-03-18T20:53:08Z #raku <summerisle> guifa2 that did it. no clue why that didn't occur to me. this week has been cursed. | ||
10:51
wamba joined
|
|||
guifa2 | m: say map( <a b c d>, 1 ) | 10:51 | |
camelia | Cannot resolve caller map(List:D, Int:D); none of these signatures match: (&code, +values) in block <unit> at <tmp> line 1 |
||
guifa2 | actually, ha, I guess it doesn't work at all that way | ||
anyways | |||
lizmat | Matze37: feels to me you're creating a Set | 10:52 | |
guifa2 | What you'll want is to do the map on the array. | ||
lizmat | my %str is Set = @arr | ||
guifa2 | ^^ yeah, set (or maybe ultimately a bag, if there's going to be coutning) | ||
If you're just needing a true/false (for the word existing or not), you'll want to use a set as lizmat says. | 10:53 | ||
To actually map on the array, you'll want to use a slightly different syntax. | |||
my @arr = <a b c>; my %str = @arr.map( * => '1' ); say %str | 10:54 | ||
evalable6 | {a => 1, b => 1, c => 1} | ||
Matze37 | mhm | 10:58 | |
10:59
Kaiepi joined
|
|||
Matze37 | looks like that my file is something crappy | 11:00 | |
this daid, something like that should work i guess: y %s = slurp('strings.csv').map(* => 'a'); | 11:01 | ||
*my | |||
my @arr = slurp('list.txt'); gives me [one | 11:04 | ||
two | |||
] | |||
lizmat | Matze37: if you have CSV files, you should probably be using Text::CSV ? | 11:05 | |
Matze37 | i just named it so..its just a one-word list | ||
11:07
aluaces joined
|
|||
Matze37 | ok..its my slurp line..this is working well: for "list.txt".IO.lines -> $l { @arr.push: $l; } | 11:07 | |
11:09
benkolera left
|
|||
Matze37 | so the question is, how to slurp a list into @arr? | 11:09 | |
11:31
guifa2 left
|
|||
lizmat | weekly: www.edument.se/en/blog/post/comma-in-2020 | 11:31 | |
notable6 | lizmat, Noted! (weekly) | ||
CIAvash | Matze37: `my @arr = 'list.txt'.IO.lines;` or `my %set is Set = 'list.txt'.IO.lines;`? | 11:32 | |
11:39
guifa2 joined
|
|||
guifa2 | lol, "While my code style choices are obviously the correct ones, in a magnanimous moment I decided that Comma should cater better to those who feel otherwise" | 11:41 | |
12:14
frost-lab left
12:17
frost-lab joined
|
|||
xinming_ | SmokeMachine: How do we pass rhs side sql value to filter? | 12:18 | |
Something like, Model.^all.grep({ .creation_time >= "(now() - Interval '1d')" }) | |||
12:29
xinming_ left,
xinming_ joined
12:42
frost-lab left
12:43
Doc_Holliwood left
12:49
frost-lab joined
12:56
DiffieHellman left
13:03
DiffieHellman joined
13:23
domidumont left
13:27
samcv_ joined
13:29
xinming joined,
lucs_ joined
13:31
andinus joined
13:33
xinming_ left,
wamba left,
b2gills left,
spacebat2 left,
samcv left,
lucs left
|
|||
Matze37 | Well done - thank you guifa2, CIAvash! | 13:34 | |
13:40
spacebat2 joined
13:41
wamba joined,
b2gills joined
13:42
ensamvarg left
|
|||
Matze37 | my %s = 'list.txt'.IO.lines.map(* => '1');Â .. beautiful :) | 13:43 | |
moritz | or even my %s = 'list.txt'.IO.lines X=> 1; | 13:44 | |
13:47
jmerelo left
13:51
Doc_Holliwood joined
13:55
brtastic joined
13:59
aindilis left
14:05
Sgeo joined
14:06
frost-lab left
14:18
abraxxa left
|
|||
codesections | this seems like a common practice for user-implemented custom value types (or, if not, like it should be): | 14:18 | |
m: class C { has Str $.stuff; method WHICH { ValueObjAt.new("C|{use nqp; nqp::sha1($.stuff)}")}}; say C.new(:stuff<bar>).WHICH | |||
camelia | C|62CDB7020FF920E5AA642C3D4066950DD1F01F4D | ||
codesections | is there any particular reason why we don't expose nqp::sha1 in Raku? | 14:19 | |
ugexe | why would we? | 14:20 | |
codesections | to encourage the idiom above. | 14:21 | |
ugexe | i'm not sure use of sha1 is something to encourage | 14:22 | |
vrurg | codesections: why not $.stuff.WHICH? | ||
ugexe | and the use of sha1 internally is an implementation detail that users shouldnt try to be interfacing with | ||
moritz | rakudo happens to implement some packaging stuff with certain cryptographic hashes | ||
but if it changes that to something else, it likely won't keep a sha1 implementation around | 14:23 | ||
so exposing sha1 as a public API "just because" seems wrong | |||
codesections | moritz: ? If I'm reading the source correctly, sha1 is where WHICH comes from for all non-trivial value types in Rakudo | 14:24 | |
that doesn't have anything to do with packaging | 14:25 | ||
ugexe | its still an implementation detail | ||
14:25
Doc_Holliwood left
|
|||
codesections | vrurg: $.stuff.WHICH returns the stringified $stuff. Which is fine for simple things, but not great for larger ones (as Raku seems to agree, based on the code) | 14:27 | |
m: Bag.new(1).WHICH | |||
camelia | ( no output ) | ||
codesections | m: say Bag.new(1).WHICH | ||
camelia | Bag|A7ECAB1324EE10383A958D58A3120EBBEC860F8E | ||
codesections | ugexe: it's an implementation detail that _users_ need to implement for their types if they want them to act like built-in onse | 14:29 | |
ugexe | it doesn't have to be sha1 | ||
vrurg | So it seems that exposing objectid generation API would be beneficial, not sha1 in particular. | 14:30 | |
moritz | agreed! | ||
ugexe | and when/if the core decides to move off sha1 we would have to keep it around because we already encouraged users to do it that way | ||
codesections | vrurg++ that's a much better idea | ||
14:38
lucs_ is now known as lucs
14:47
brtastic left
14:50
Matze37 left
14:52
CodeR32 joined
|
|||
CodeR32 | Hello | 14:53 | |
codesections | o/ | 14:56 | |
14:56
CodeR32 left
14:57
imcsk8 left
14:58
muffindrake joined,
imcsk8 joined
15:03
parabolize joined
15:04
Doc_Holliwood joined,
brtastic joined
|
|||
jjatria | Hm, I seem to be unable to install JSON::Fast:ver<0.15> at the moment | 15:06 | |
zef doesn't seem to find any candidates for that, even though it worked before. I can install 0.14, though | |||
15:09
berber44 joined
15:28
Kaiepi left
15:34
Kaiepi joined
15:39
Kaiepi left
15:42
Kaiepi joined
|
|||
ugexe | m: say (CompUnit::Repository::Distribution but role :: { method Str { "mystring" } }).id; # totally up to spec! | 15:43 | |
camelia | 9CE3EA4D6FAC2165933B3971E6D5A13753C7D878 | ||
16:04
Doc_Holliwood left
16:07
cetjs2 left
16:16
samcv_ is now known as samcv,
samcv left,
samcv joined
16:28
samcv left
16:31
ex_nihilo left
16:32
daimon is now known as daemon
16:33
brtastic left
16:43
guifa2 left
16:50
londoed is now known as parsec
|
|||
tonyo_ | m: grammar G { rule TOP { ^ . $ }; }; role A { method TOP($/) { say $/ ~~ m/'a'/; }; }; G.parse("b", :actions(A)); | 16:50 | |
camelia | Cannot assign to a readonly variable or a value in method TOP at <tmp> line 1 in regex TOP at <tmp> line 1 in block <unit> at <tmp> line 1 |
||
16:50
parsec is now known as londoed
|
|||
summerisle | is there a way to figure out at what point in a corpus of text a grammar stops matching? | 16:53 | |
16:57
mahafyi joined
|
|||
tonyo_ | there's grammar::tracer | 16:57 | |
you can see the steps the grammar goes through and when it stops matching | |||
17:30
samcv joined
17:37
aborazmeh joined
17:45
muffindrake left,
muffindrake joined
18:00
wingfold_ joined,
wingfold left
18:39
ufobat_ left
|
|||
raydiak | m: grammar G { rule TOP { ^ . $ }; }; role A { method TOP($m) { say $m ~~ m/'a'/; }; }; G.parse("b", :actions(A)); | 18:45 | |
camelia | False | ||
raydiak | m: "b" ~~ m/^.$/; say $/ ~~ m/"a"/ | 18:53 | |
camelia | True | ||
raydiak | m: "a" ~~ m/^.$/; say $/ ~~ m/"a"/ | ||
camelia | ï½¢aï½£ | ||
raydiak | m: "b" ~~ m/^.$/; say $/.clone ~~ m/"a"/ | 18:56 | |
camelia | False | ||
19:00
berber44 left
19:11
dataangel joined
19:30
aborazmeh left
19:44
Doc_Holliwood joined
19:50
xinming left
19:52
xinming joined
20:04
guifa2 joined
20:11
epony left,
epony joined
20:28
xinming left
20:35
PimDaniel left
20:37
mowcat joined
20:46
aindilis joined
20:48
guifa2 left,
rindolf left
20:52
wamba left
21:53
Black_Ribbon joined
|
|||
summerisle | so i have an action method that uses make to attach a payload to a match. i'd like to be able to inspect that payload in a later action method, but it appears to be unset | 21:59 | |
and i can verify they execute in the desired order | |||
tonyo_ | how are you trying to access the made later? | 22:06 | |
i have a toml 1.0.0 compliant grammar/action that i'm testing now, i can put somewhere if an example would help. | |||
summerisle | could be my mistake on my part. this week has been a trip. | 22:10 | |
seeing the expected behavior in other atcion methods | |||
22:10
Sgeo_ joined,
UukGoblin joined
|
|||
tonyo_ | an example might help me (or others) help ya | 22:12 | |
22:12
HobGoblin left,
vike left,
jjatria_ joined,
a6502_ joined,
[Coke]_ joined,
jjatria left,
a6502 left,
[Coke]_ left,
[Coke]_ joined
22:13
Sgeo left,
jjatria_ is now known as jjatria,
vike joined,
[Coke] left
22:18
vike left
22:28
vike joined
22:33
vike left
22:34
muffindrake left,
muffindrake joined
22:45
vike joined
|
|||
vrurg | Anyone to remind me if regexes have something to express <-[ $char ]> without string interpolation in <{ }>? | 22:47 | |
*in -> with | |||
summerisle | ok, more grammar stuff, is there a way when specifying a <token-name> within the body of another token to specify that any corresponding action method not be run? | 23:01 | |
or would i just want to create a copy of token-name without a corresponding action method | 23:02 | ||
23:05
vike left
|
|||
MasterDuke | vrurg: istr some discussion about that a little while ago, but i don't think there was a conclusion other than what you just said | 23:09 | |
23:12
monkey__ joined
23:27
vike joined
|
|||
vrurg | MasterDuke: thanks! I also remember the discussion existed, but otherwise nothing about it. | 23:34 | |
summerisle: I don't think so. An action method is invoked unconditionally. | |||
summerisle | yeah, i ended realising i had a bad design in that area anyways so i'm reworking it | 23:35 | |
MasterDuke | vrurg: github.com/Raku/problem-solving/issues/97 | 23:36 | |
23:38
monkey__ left
|
|||
vrurg | MasterDuke: thanks! | 23:40 | |
MasterDuke | np | 23:42 | |
23:57
mowcat left
|