🦋 Welcome to the former MAIN() IRC channel of the Raku Programming Language (raku.org). This channel has moved to Libera (irc.libera.chat #raku) Set by lizmat on 23 May 2021. |
|||
00:02
reportable6 left
00:03
reportable6 left
00:05
Doc_Holliwood left
01:04
reportable6 joined
02:04
linkable6 left,
evalable6 left
02:05
linkable6 joined
02:06
evalable6 joined
02:31
stoned75 left
02:33
stoned75 joined
02:52
Doc_Holliwood joined
03:01
zacts joined
03:30
justsomeguy joined
03:35
zacts left
03:43
Doc_Holliwood left
03:44
Doc_Holliwood joined
04:44
linkable6 left,
evalable6 left
04:47
linkable6 joined
05:02
justsomeguy left
05:22
ddeimeke left,
ddeimeke joined
05:30
gordonfish- joined
05:32
gordonfish left
|
|||
moon-child | m: say +'⑤' | 05:42 | |
camelia | Cannot convert string to number: base-10 number must begin with valid digits or '.' in '3⏏5⑤' (indicated by ⏏) in block <unit> at <tmp> line 1 |
||
moon-child | m: say ⑤ | ||
camelia | 5 | ||
moon-child | why? | ||
05:46
evalable6 joined
|
|||
moon-child | notably, it's not just unicode, because | 06:00 | |
m: say +'৫' | |||
camelia | 5 | ||
06:04
reportable6 left
06:06
reportable6 joined
06:28
ufobat joined
06:46
ufobat left
07:23
Sgeo left
|
|||
mykhal | m: say '5৫⑤'.comb.map(*.uniprops.join) | 07:26 | |
camelia | (Nd Nd No) | ||
mykhal | moon-child: .. no digit, bot other, according to Unicode headquarters | ||
or maybe other number, i apologize :) | 07:27 | ||
non-decimal, for some reason | 07:30 | ||
07:32
gugod left
07:33
gugod joined
|
|||
mykhal | strange definition, strange behavior | 07:39 | |
m: say '5৫⑤'.comb.map({(for <Numeric_Type Numeric_Value> -> $n {$_.uniprop($n)}).join(", ")}).join("; ") | 07:48 | ||
camelia | Decimal, 5; Decimal, 5; Digit, 5 | ||
07:59
ufobat joined
|
|||
mykhal | i think all are digits, i hope Unicode is not going to add all decimal numbers | 08:38 | |
m: say '⑬'.uniprop('Numeric_Type') # 13 circled | 08:40 | ||
camelia | Numeric | ||
08:59
linkable6 left,
evalable6 left
09:01
evalable6 joined
09:03
tejr left,
tejr joined
09:31
xinming joined
09:32
patrickb joined
09:50
MoC joined
09:54
zacts joined
10:00
linkable6 joined
10:10
abraxxa left
10:25
zacts left
10:30
sena_kun joined
11:22
sono left
11:33
Doc_Holliwood left
11:47
Doc_Holliwood joined
11:58
Frozenset joined
|
|||
Frozenset | hello, how may i get a handle to a method to, say, inspect its signature? | 12:00 | |
I mean: | |||
m: &abs.signature | |||
camelia | ( no output ) | ||
Frozenset | &A-Class.method.signauture | 12:01 | |
m: say &abs.signature; | 12:02 | ||
camelia | ($, *%) | ||
Frozenset | Okay with functions but what about methods? | ||
12:02
reportable6 left
|
|||
MasterDuke | m: .say for Int.^methods>>.signature | 12:03 | |
camelia | (Int: |) (Int: *%_) (Int: *%_) (Int:D: *%_ --> Int:D) (Int:D: *%_ --> Num:D) (Int:D: $?, *%_ --> Rat:D) (Int:D: $?, *%_ --> FatRat:D) (Int:D: *%_ --> Int:D) (Int: *%_ --> Num:D) (Int:D: *%_ --> Num:D) (Int: |) (Int:D: +@mods, *%_… |
||
Frozenset | how to for a specific method? | ||
(thx btw) | |||
MasterDuke | m: .signature.say for Int.^can("abs") | 12:04 | |
camelia | (Int:D: *%_ --> Int:D) (Cool: *%_) |
||
12:05
reportable6 joined
|
|||
MasterDuke | m: say Int.^find_method("abs").signature | 12:05 | |
camelia | (Int:D: *%_ --> Int:D) | ||
MasterDuke | the docs explain the difference between can and find_method | 12:06 | |
Frozenset | oh thanks very much | ||
[Coke] | me yesterday: "why doesn't this code work". me today: ".package" is not the same as "package." | 12:20 | |
12:45
Doc_Holliwood left
12:46
Doc_Holliwood joined
13:22
[Coke]_ joined
13:24
goblin joined,
Gruber joined,
raydiak_ joined
13:25
masak_ joined,
sjn_ joined,
a3r0 joined
13:26
eseyman_ joined
13:30
Scotteh_ joined
13:34
[Coke] left,
Grrrr left,
a3r0_ left
13:39
tadzik joined
13:40
Doc_Holliwood left
|
|||
codesections | huh, I've always used .^lookup instead of .^find_method. | 13:44 | |
MasterDuke | right, forgot about that one | 13:47 | |
codesections | is there any difference between those two? | 13:48 | |
m: say Int.^find_method('abs') === Int.^lookup('abs') | |||
camelia | True | ||
codesections | m: say Int.^find_method('not-here'), Int.^lookup('not-here') | 13:50 | |
camelia | (Mu)(Mu) | ||
codesections | m: say Int.^find_method('roll'), Mixy.^lookup('roll') | 13:54 | |
camelia | Method+{is-nodal}.new(Mu) | ||
codesections | m: say Mixy.^find_method('roll'), Mixy.^lookup('roll') | ||
camelia | The 'ForeignCode' class is a Rakudo-specific implementation detail and has no serviceable parts inside(Mu) | ||
codesections | m: say Mixy.^find_method('of'), Mixy.^lookup('of') | 13:55 | |
camelia | The 'ForeignCode' class is a Rakudo-specific implementation detail and has no serviceable parts insideof | ||
13:56
zacts joined
|
|||
codesections | different behavior for Rolls, I guess? | 13:56 | |
s/Rolls/Roles/ | |||
14:12
tadzik left,
tadzik joined
14:31
zacts left
14:33
Sgeo joined
14:54
zacts joined
15:22
Doc_Holliwood joined
15:24
sjn_ is now known as sjn
15:27
zacts left
|
|||
mykhal | hi again. services like camelia and evalable6 are handy. can some of them test a code snippet in multiple notable rakudo versions backwards and report result differences and failures ? | 15:34 | |
MasterDuke | committable6: releases say $*PERL.compiler.version | 15:37 | |
committable6 | MasterDuke, gist.github.com/19d6d6dd4a4040ef67...dbeda4c9a5 | ||
MasterDuke | github.com/Raku/whateverable/wiki | 15:38 | |
15:43
stoned75_ joined
|
|||
mykhal | MasterDuke: very nice, it was unexpected | 15:46 | |
15:47
stoned75 left
|
|||
MasterDuke | yeah, they're awesome tools | 15:47 | |
mykhal | committable6: releases say {(1..$^x).grep($^x %% *)}(10) | 15:50 | |
committable6 | mykhal, ¦releases (56 commits): «(1 2 5 10)» | ||
15:51
ufobat left
|
|||
mykhal | c: say Uni(0x300) eqv Uni(0x340) | 15:52 | |
committable6 | mykhal, Seems like you forgot to specify a revision (will use “v6.c” instead of “say”) | ||
mykhal | c: releases say Uni(0x300) eqv Uni(0x340) | ||
committable6 | mykhal, gist.github.com/8926b89dbdb9f982ac...9df344c358 | 15:53 | |
mykhal, gist.github.com/3fb1b37dcc24c353fb...49583c7231 | |||
16:22
gordonfish- is now known as gordonfish
|
|||
mykhal | c: releases my @a = ^5; my @b := @a[5, 100, 0]; @b[2] = 0 but "zero"; say @a | 16:36 | |
committable6 | mykhal, ¦releases (56 commits): «[zero 1 2 3 4]» | ||
16:55
melezhik joined
|
|||
Xliff | It looks like line numbers have stopped being included in the error reporting for a few types of syntax errors. | 17:01 | |
Consider: gist.github.com/Xliff/09d508ed9ce8...a7a61bc564 | 17:02 | ||
17:17
Xliff left
17:52
sena_kun left
18:02
reportable6 left
18:05
reportable6 joined
|
|||
AlexDaniel | Altai-man: dat 2021.06 release… I guess the issue is known? | 18:12 | |
18:29
[Coke]_ is now known as [Coke]
18:35
melezhik left
19:19
Juerd is now known as Juerd[m]
19:29
Juerd[m] is now known as Juerd
|
|||
Altai-man | AlexDaniel, the one with line numbers or? | 20:03 | |
20:29
linkable6 left,
evalable6 left
20:31
linkable6 joined
|
|||
codesections | wait, really: | 21:03 | |
m: say Mu(42) | |||
camelia | 42 | ||
codesections | Oh, is that being parsed as a coercion? | 21:04 | |
m: say Int.^lookup('nope')(5) | |||
camelia | 5 | ||
codesections | m: say Int.^lookup('abs')(-5); say Int.^lookup('abbs')(-5) | 21:06 | |
camelia | 5 -5 |
||
codesections | that's pretty odd – and I'm not sure if it's a feature or not | 21:07 | |
21:14
sono joined
|
|||
AlexDaniel | Altai-man: the one with the release number that is incorrect :) | 21:19 | |
Altai-man: gist.github.com/Whateverable/19d6d...dbeda4c9a5 | |||
2021.06 should say 2021.06, not 2021.05-something | |||
doesn't matter anymore I guess | 21:20 | ||
it happened before too | |||
Altai-man | AlexDaniel, I fail to see how that could happen. I mean, there is github.com/rakudo/rakudo/pull/4417...83a86fc4dd <- and github shows it's included under the 2016.06 tag? | 21:25 | |
anyway, I think I'll retire in two relesaes | 21:26 | ||
*releases | |||
AlexDaniel | oooooooh interesting | ||
cuz I also fail to see how it can happen! | |||
c: 2021.06 say $*PERL.compiler.version | 21:27 | ||
committable6 | AlexDaniel, ¦2021.06: «v2021.05.43.g.4887.a.169.b» | ||
AlexDaniel | c: 4887a169b4 say $*PERL.compiler.version | 21:28 | |
committable6 | AlexDaniel, ¦4887a16: «v2021.05.43.g.4887.a.169.b» | ||
AlexDaniel | that's the right commit sha, but whyyy | ||
21:29
MoC left
|
|||
AlexDaniel | c: cd01706216d6 say $*PERL.compiler.version | 21:31 | |
committable6 | AlexDaniel, ¦cd01706: «v2021.06.1.gcd.0170621» | ||
21:32
Frozenset left
|
|||
AlexDaniel | Altai-man: great work! Well deserved retirement 🤗 | 21:32 | |
Altai-man: some successor volunteered already? | |||
Altai-man | AlexDaniel, not really, but I also did not "announce" it properly yet, just told it here and there a couple of times in "well, maybe sometime in the future" sorta way, so the people are not worried yet. :) | 21:33 | |
AlexDaniel | Altai-man: if you stay for 3 releases then you'll break the record 😀 | 21:34 | |
Altai-man | AlexDaniel, well, that's my plan. :P | ||
AlexDaniel | Altai-man: yes, but 3, not 2, if I'm not mistaken | 21:35 | |
or 4 if we count point releases as cheating 🤔 | 21:36 | ||
Altai-man | AlexDaniel, dunno, maybe I'm wrong as well. I counted it as 2, doesn't matter much. I mean, after first 10 one or two more start to look alike. | ||
AlexDaniel | not making your life easier am I | ||
Altai-man | AlexDaniel, well, I counted both point for you and me included. | ||
AlexDaniel | Altai-man: dunno, some releases are special! Based on the list, 2020.08 looked like one 😛 | 21:37 | |
Altai-man: but you did great! Thank you for your work! | 21:38 | ||
Altai-man | AlexDaniel, noooo, I don't want to remember this one, what an utter failure, heh. | ||
.oO ( just blame the man who distracted me a lot that day ) | |||
AlexDaniel, I cannot express enough gratitude to YOU though, I mean I am just starting the scripts once in a while and you did made all that tooling, that's very helpful. | 21:39 | ||
21:39
patrickb left
|
|||
AlexDaniel | if I didn't do it, you would've had one made by Zoffix. It was a big step too, mine was just an iteration on that | 21:40 | |
there was Toaster instead of Blin and a bot instead of the sakefile, both did the job alright | 21:41 | ||
Altai-man | fair enough | 21:42 | |
22:19
gabiruh_ is now known as gabiruh,
Typewriter joined
22:23
Typewriter left
|
|||
[Coke] | (releases) I'm glad you (and others) have gotten to point where it's mostly routine. Thank you! | 22:24 | |
(you all) | |||
vasko | Hi, anybody able to point me in the right direction to convert a list into a hash? In perl5 I would do `▶ perl -M'Data::Dump qw(dump)' -e 'my %sq = map { $_ => $_ ** 2 } (0..4); dump \%sq;' | 22:32 | |
{ "0" => 0, "1" => 1, "2" => 4, "3" => 9, "4" => 16 }` | |||
In raku I'm failing with: `> (0..3).map( * => * ** 2); | 22:33 | ||
(0 => 1 2 => 9)` | |||
moon-child | so you want the array indices to be the keys of the hash? | 22:34 | |
oh, no, ignore me | |||
so something like (* => * ** 2) is actually a function of _two_ parameters | 22:35 | ||
so you would need something like {$_ => $_ ** 2} | |||
m: say (0..4).map({$_ => $_ ** 2}).hash | 22:36 | ||
camelia | {0 => 0, 1 => 1, 2 => 4, 3 => 9, 4 => 16} | ||
vasko | Ah thanks, I was missing the `.hash` cheers :) | ||
moon-child | well, you don't actually need the .hash depending on what you do with it | 22:37 | |
m: my %x = (0 .. 4).map({$_ => $_ ** 2}); say %x | |||
camelia | {0 => 0, 1 => 1, 2 => 4, 3 => 9, 4 => 16} | ||
vasko | Oh I see, I really need to reread the manpages and understand the `Whatever` closures over normal subs/functions I'm used too. | 22:38 | |
22:45
Xliff joined
|
|||
Xliff | Is there an easy way to check the wordsize of a string encoding? | 22:46 | |
22:48
casaca joined
|
|||
Xliff | Hmmmm.... | 22:58 | |
m: "Hello".encode('ASCII').of.^name.say # ? | |||
camelia | uint8 | ||
Xliff | \o/ | ||
23:10
kybr left
23:12
kybr joined
23:16
casaca left
23:18
casaca joined
23:26
casaca left
23:27
casaca joined
|
|||
mykhal | m: sub circumfix:<\ />($a) { "\$a/" }; say \o/ | 23:28 | |
camelia | 5===SORRY!5=== Error while compiling <tmp> Missing required term after infix at <tmp>:1 ------> 3 circumfix:<\ />($a) { "\$a/" }; say \o/7⏏5<EOL> expecting any of: prefix term |
||
23:30
evalable6 joined
23:31
casaca left
23:32
Xliff left
|