|
Parrot 2.0.0 "Inevitable" released! | parrot.org | Priorities: deprecated core PMCs, ops -> dynops, GC tuning and implementation | Roadmap: icanhaz.com/parrotroadmap | Latest modified TT's: icanhaz.com/parrotbugs Set by moderator on 2 February 2010. |
|||
|
00:02
s1n joined,
s1n left
00:03
ash_ joined
|
|||
| plobsing | who should I talk to about parrot's opengl bindings? | 00:13 | |
| darbelo | japhb, IIRC | ||
| plobsing | seen japhb? | ||
| purl | japhb was last seen on #parrot 3 days, 1 hours, 16 minutes and 14 seconds ago, saying: darbelo, used by the Perl 5 embedding somehow (Blizkost)? Though I would have assumed that would be handled by the Blizkost config/make [Feb 5 22:57:16 2010] | ||
| dukeleto | plobsing: what do you want to know? | 00:25 | |
| plobsing | whether the signatures generated by config/gen/opengl.pm vary or are constant. | 00:26 | |
| because I want to move to a static call_list and src/nci.c | |||
| darbelo | plobsing: IIRC those are generated based on local headers. | 00:27 | |
| They can vary from place to place. | 00:28 | ||
| plobsing | yes, that's what I thought, but then there's a list of signatures in the file | ||
| so I'm not sure | |||
| maybe I should shift around my planned actions and make opengl a testbed for my dynamic nci thunk libraries idea | 00:33 | ||
|
00:36
hicx174 joined
|
|||
| bacek_at_work | o hai | 00:40 | |
| Whiteknight | hai | ||
| bacek_at_work | Whiteknight, you are bloody pervert! Why did you create such PMC??? | ||
| :) | |||
| cotto_w0rk | bacek_at_work, it's not even done yet. | 00:41 | |
| clock? | |||
| purl | cotto_w0rk: LAX: Mon 4:41pm PST / CHI: Mon 6:41pm CST / NYC: Mon 7:41pm EST / LON: Tue 12:41am GMT / BER: Tue 1:41am CET / IND: Tue 6:11am IST / TOK: Tue 9:41am JST / SYD: Tue 11:41am EST / | ||
|
00:46
abqar joined
01:05
abqar_ joined
01:26
eternaleye joined
|
|||
| Whiteknight | bacek_at_work: it's a debugging and analysis tool | 01:33 | |
|
01:38
mikehh joined
01:40
solarion joined
|
|||
| bacek_at_work | Whiteknight, like pathoanatomist's tools? | 01:46 | |
| Whiteknight | never heard of them | ||
| bacek_at_work | Did you see "True Lies" movie? | 01:47 | |
| Austin | What pmc is this? | 01:48 | |
| bacek_at_work | github.com/Whiteknight/parrot-hacke...mchack.pmc | 01:51 | |
| Whiteknight | Austin: I'm trying to conjure pure evil | 01:52 | |
| Austin | And doing a fine job, I'm sure. | ||
| cotto | good evening | 01:54 | |
| purl | Ah, evening. The tumultuous mind tarries and contemplates, reveling in the silence afforded by the diurnal proletariat. Good evening, indeed. | ||
|
02:23
hicx174 joined
|
|||
| japhb | plobsing: the OpenGL config step tries to wrap as many library functions as it can (basically, what current Parrot NCI can handle). It keeps track of all the unique signatures it came across while parsing the GL* headers, and adds them to the call_list. On any given platform, with any given release of the headers, it will appear unchanging. But upgrade your GL headers, or go to another platform, and the list will be different. | 02:35 | |
| And, as I said, it will currently be incomplete because there are a number of signatures that current Parrot NCI just can't handle. | |||
| cotto | NotFound, c++ build should be happy now. | 02:40 | |
| (well, g++) | |||
| dalek | rrot: r43788 | cotto++ | trunk (2 files): [ops2c] fix the C++ build and use enums instead of chars |
02:42 | |
| Austin | Hey, is there going to be a PVMW @ YAPC this year? (If not, will there be a PVMW not @ YAPC?) | ||
| Austin | I think in the future we should schedule the PVMW with the super bowl, but in some other city. There's gotta be a discount for that. | 02:44 | |
| cotto | I axed about that earlier and didn't get a good answer. It'd be a good #ps question. | ||
| Austin | I'll ask the list | 02:45 | |
|
02:50
kid51 joined
|
|||
| dalek | rrot: r43789 | coke++ | branches/rm_cflags: Remove CFLAGS script. |
02:59 | |
| cotto | Austin, particle can check/verify that your CLA has arrived. Coke and chromatic can give you your secret decoder ring. | 03:02 | |
| s/and/or | |||
| Austin | Coke already acknowledged getting the .pdf. He said something about a parrotsketch meeting being required. (Tho I have no idea why.) | 03:03 | |
|
03:03
leto joined
|
|||
| cotto | Ok. iirc you have to be proposed and seconded by at least two committers. | 03:04 | |
| Coke | t/pmc/packfile.t is failing in trunk. | 03:07 | |
| Austin | Nobody uses that anyway. | ||
| Here's a little bit of joy: I'm passing a list of parameters to a function (actually, lines in an array). I'd like to commingle the parameters with logic, selecting which lines to pass. How to do that in P6? | 03:10 | ||
| dalek | TT #1393 closed by jkeenan++: src/gc/api.c: Intermittent test failures at line 245 since r43211 | 03:11 | |
| eternaleye | (backlogging) Coke: Fluxx on Parrot would be epic, especially if it was networked multiplayer. Although, since cards mutate the rules, it might be tough adding expansions like Zombie Fluxx without changing core code. | 03:13 | |
| cotto | Coke, what platform are you on? | ||
| Austin | Whiteknight has developed a PMC that should support that. | 03:14 | |
| cotto | make test is fine on my box | ||
| dalek | rrot: r43790 | coke++ | branches/rm_cflags (4 files): Remove cc_flags.pl Build is now straight $(CC) - no intermediate perl script. Windows users should see a speedup (if it builds). Build just got a lot more verbose. (half from warnings, half from actually showing the build line.) |
03:15 | |
| Coke | cotto: in general, linux. | 03:21 | |
| why? | |||
| eternaleye: yes, presumably you'd have to code against any potential rules changer. | 03:24 | ||
| cotto | Coke, I'm not seeing any test failures in trunk. | ||
| Coke | cotto: this is on timtowtdi | 03:25 | |
| eternaleye | Austin: Can you do up some pseudocode? I'm not sure I understand what you want to do | ||
| Austin | I got nothing for ya. You mentioned changing core code, and Whiteknight has a PMC that exposes far more of the core than is really safe. | 03:26 | |
| eternaleye | Austin: I meant your commingling params and logic thing | ||
| Coke | anyone here on windows? | ||
| eternaleye | And I meant core game logic of a Fluxx game on parrot | 03:27 | |
| Austin | oh. Sorry. Yeah, I'll nopaste something. | ||
| Coke | something non-strawberry preferred, but I'll take that (wondering about rm_cflags branch) | ||
| nopaste | "Austin" at 68.37.46.53 pasted "commingling parameters and logic" (8 lines) at nopaste.snit.ch/19520 | 03:28 | |
| cotto | For Fluxx you'd probably end up implementing a VM for which the cards would contain various bits of code to modify gameplay. | 03:29 | |
| Austin | The point being that I only want to emit the debug code if $debug is on | ||
| cotto | For 1000 Blank White Cards, good luck. ;) | ||
|
03:35
janus joined
|
|||
| treed | Someone should play a version of nomic where the object is to print the text "$name wins" or something | 03:37 | |
| everyone takes turns making commits that have to be approved by the other players. | |||
| or that makes it crash or something | 03:38 | ||
| maybe that would make coders better at knowing what makes crashes happen | |||
| eternaleye | Austin: ( $debug ?? "\\t" ~ "say \\"Fetching attribute: '$attr'\\"" !! Nil ) | 03:42 | |
| Austin | Hmm. What's Nil? | ||
| purl | somebody said Nil was generally completely equivalent to '() | ||
| Austin | Thanks purl. But I don't know what that means. | ||
| eternaleye | Undef in item context, empty list in list context | ||
| kid51 is not getting any failure in trunk on t/pmc/packfile.t: Linux/i386, r43790 | 03:43 | ||
| Austin | So in a parameter list, it simply goes away? | ||
| eternaleye | Hm, might not | ||
| Maybe if you did Array.new( |( ( ...yourargs... ).grep: !*.notdef ) ) - that should work as long as you have no intended undefs in the args | 03:45 | ||
| Somewhat hacky, though | 03:46 | ||
| The reason for the convolution is that I'm not sure if Nil would be in item context (and thus an undef value) or list context (and thus fall away) | |||
| kid51 holds his breath waiting to see if this smolder report will be reported back properly | 03:47 | ||
| eternaleye | Because it'd be Array.new( 'foo', 'bar', ( $debug ?? 'baz' !! Nil ), 'quux' ), and that comma after the ??!! bit might be enought to make an entry in the array | 03:48 | |
| TimToady_: ^^^ Thoughts? | 03:49 | ||
| kid51 | rm_cflags branch: make test: PASS on Linux/i386 | ||
| eternaleye | Austin: What you really seem to be in need of is a macro, but those are NYI | 03:50 | |
| Austin | :$ | ||
| kid51 | Well, it took about 3 minutes, but both of those smolders were reported properly. | 03:51 | |
| rm_cflags branch: smolder.plusthree.com/app/projects/...ails/32113 | |||
| Austin | Maybe just making the 3ary test a flattening list? *( $debug ?? 'baz' !! Nil) | ||
| kid51 | as expected, output of 'make' in rm_cflags branch is ~3.5 times more verbose than in trunk | 03:52 | |
| dalek | rrot: r43791 | jkeenan++ | trunk/lib/Parrot/Ops2c/Utils.pm: [codingstd] Eliminate trailing whitespace. |
04:04 | |
| rrot: r43792 | jkeenan++ | branches/rm_cflags/lib/Parrot/Ops2c/Utils.pm: [codingstd] Eliminate trailing whitespace. |
|||
| Austin | Is there a way in parrot-nqp to specify a value for Parrot's "-L" flag? | 04:11 | |
| (The obvious, parrot-nqp -Llibrary foo.nqp, doesn't work.) | 04:12 | ||
|
04:12
kurahaupo1 joined
|
|||
| Austin | Howdy, kura. | 04:12 | |
| Tene | Austin: no, there is not. | 04:16 | |
| plobsing | Austin: I think you can poke it through the parrotinterpreter pmc | ||
| Tene | Right, but there are no recognized arguments to parrot-nqp that do that. | 04:17 | |
| Austin | I feel a ticket coming on... | ||
| plobsing | Tene: is this because HLLs can't see PIR constants? | 04:18 | |
| Tene | plobsing: No, that's not related at all. | ||
| Austin | plobsing: we're talking about command line arguments | ||
| plobsing | oh, I thought you wanted to change the library path | 04:19 | |
| Austin | I do. | ||
| Tene | he wants to change it by providing command-lie arguments to the 'parrot-nqp' binary. | ||
| Austin | But I was asking about a way to do it via the CLI to parrot-nqp | ||
| parrot-nqp -Llibrary foo.nqp | |||
| CLASSPATH=$HOME/parrot/classes parrot-nqp foo.nqp | 04:20 | ||
| or something | |||
| purl | i heard something was really wrong out there :) | ||
| eternaleye | CLASSPATH would be a less-than-awesome name for that variable | 04:22 | |
| Austin | And that's a less-than-awesome way to implement searching, too. | 04:23 | |
| eternaleye | Unless you _like_ breaking Java horribly | ||
| Austin | The Cranberries. | ||
| purl | the cranberries are native to the New World, I think. Can you even grow cranberries in the UK? | ||
| dalek | TT #1429 created by Austin_Hastings++: Add -L support to parrot-nqp | 04:34 | |
|
04:44
mikehh joined
|
|||
| kurahaupo1 | Austin: howdy. | 04:45 | |
| kurahaupo1 has hands in guts of disassembled computer, hoping to add more RAM. | |||
|
05:13
petdance joined
05:48
mikehh_ joined
|
|||
| Austin | w00t. Kakapo = bad-ass. | 05:49 | |
|
05:56
mikehh_ joined
|
|||
| dalek | rrot: r43793 | coke++ | branches/rm_cflags/config/gen/makefiles (2 files): restore 2 of the CFLAGS directives in the makefile itself. |
05:59 | |
|
06:02
kurahaupo joined
|
|||
| dalek | rrot: r43794 | coke++ | branches/rm_cflags/config/gen/makefiles/CFLAGS.in: This file generates no warnings as is. don't need this anymore. |
06:15 | |
| cotto | svn-- | 06:25 | |
| because reverting to an old revision and updating again shouldn't require manual intervention | |||
|
06:27
jan joined
|
|||
| dalek | rrot: r43795 | coke++ | branches/rm_cflags/config/gen/makefiles/root.in: re-order and fix these makefile deps (unbreak build) |
06:31 | |
| Austin | What kind of error is a call to an abstract method? | 06:36 | |
| cotto | "don't do that" | 06:38 | |
| purl | "don't do that" is, like, a perfectly valid workaround :) | ||
| Austin | Illegal Operation? | 06:39 | |
| That's where I'm at now. | |||
| cotto | I guess that'd work. | 06:40 | |
| Austin | class Exception::AbstractMethodCalled\tis Exception::IllegalOperation; | ||
| dalek | rrot: r43796 | coke++ | branches/rm_cflags/config/gen/makefiles/CFLAGS.in: These files are warnings-clean in the default build. |
06:49 | |
| Austin | Mmmm...the severity and type are both integer values. | 06:50 | |
| That's the kind of excellent documentation we expect from Parrot docs. | |||
| cotto | We'll get you a commit bit tomorrow. After that you can fix it yourself. ;) | 06:54 | |
| Austin | snicker | ||
| Is there a cool tool for checking config settings from the command line? | 06:55 | ||
| cotto | ./parrot_config | 06:56 | |
| Is that what you were thinking of? | 06:58 | ||
| Austin | Yes, exactly. Cotto++ | ||
| Sadly, exception info is not configured. | |||
| Is there a way to generate an isotone integer given a PMC? | 07:00 | ||
| The exception types appear to be just an enum. | |||
| Any new exceptions won't have types unless there is some kind of registry. | |||
| cotto | That's a weakness of the current system. | 07:02 | |
| Austin | Ahh! I'm turning into Max Headroom... | ||
| make test-test-testcase | |||
| dalek | rrot: r43797 | petdance++ | trunk/src/call/args.c: consting and localizing local vars |
07:05 | |
| Austin | Ahh, my old nemesis: C3 linearization. | 07:08 | |
| Of course it's an ambiguous hierarchy - it's a straight line. | |||
| How's pbc_merge, cotto? | 07:09 | ||
| cotto | Your patch and my fix seem to have made it usable. | 07:11 | |
| Austin | Woo-hoo. What did you fix? | ||
| cotto | I just copy/pasted the extra case to another switch in the same function. | ||
| Austin | Oh. | 07:12 | |
| I thought you were doing a rewrite or something. | |||
| (the way you were talking the other day, I expected a commit entry with "rm pbc_merge.c" in it...) | |||
| cotto | I was going to until I saw that you figured out an easier way to make it work. | 07:13 | |
| Austin | laugh | ||
| What's next on your plate? | |||
| cotto | ops_pct | ||
| Austin | What's that? | ||
| purl | that is the case, but I don't know | ||
| cotto | the pct-based ops compiler to replace ops2c | 07:14 | |
| Austin | Ahh. | 07:15 | |
| I don't suppose you'd like to figure out why C3 doesn't work? | 07:16 | ||
| cotto | I figure I can at least get the upgrade tax paid before I get distracted by the next shiny thing, | ||
| Austin | Laugh! | ||
|
07:18
uniejo joined
|
|||
| cotto | and the award for lamest placement of an exclamation mark in an error message goes to... | 07:19 | |
| "Class Compiler already registered!" | |||
| Austin sings, "I'm the root of all that's evil - yeah - but you can call me 'cookie.'" | 07:20 | ||
| NotFound | cotto++ Build fine and pass tests. | 07:21 | |
| cotto | and now we use advanced techniques like "enums" instead of casting to/from char | 07:22 | |
| Austin | You know, I just saw a History Channel show on "1980's tech" | 07:23 | |
| They didn't mention enums, though. | |||
| NotFound feeling old | |||
|
07:38
eternaleye joined
|
|||
| Austin | Okay, I think I just visually found a bug. | 07:39 | |
| cotto | where | 07:44 | |
| Austin | Nopaste coming | ||
| nopaste | "Austin" at 68.37.46.53 pasted "Register allocation bug, or just a TRACE problem?" (32 lines) at nopaste.snit.ch/19521 | 07:45 | |
| Austin | Or perhaps not. | ||
| nopaste | "cotto" at 96.26.227.153 pasted "HLLCompiler is making me confused" (15 lines) at nopaste.snit.ch/19522 | 07:48 | |
| Austin | Interestingly, cotto, the Parrot_oo_register_type function, which throws that message, is checking a parameter called _namespace to see if the class already exists. | 07:56 | |
| cotto | It smells like a bug in the HLLCompiler code. | 07:58 | |
| cotto wishes pmichaud were here to confirm/deny | |||
| Austin | deny | ||
| Pmichaud's code contains no bugs that can be found by humans. | 07:59 | ||
| It says so on the label. | |||
| cotto | sleep | 08:04 | |
| Austin | FWIW, the autogenerated stuff doesn't just use HLLCompiler | ||
| It loads PCT.pbc or some such. | 08:05 | ||
| But yeah, there's a bug down there someplace. | |||
| I tried adding a .namespace with a sub in it, but it still breaks. | |||
|
08:08
iblechbot joined
08:18
fperrad joined
|
|||
| Austin | Aww, crap. | 08:27 | |
| The problem with finding bugs is writing the steps to reproduce. | |||
| dalek | TT #1430 created by Austin_Hastings++: Change trace offset numbers to hex format | 08:29 | |
|
08:47
bacek joined
08:49
barney joined
|
|||
| Austin | Hey, bacek: does pbc_dump work right when dumping the constants table (specifically, keys)? | 09:05 | |
|
09:05
jhelwig_ joined
|
|||
| bacek | Austin, yes afaik | 09:05 | |
| Austin | ticket coming | 09:06 | |
| bacek | patches welcome! | ||
| purl | patches welcome is always true | ||
| Austin | tt#1431 | 09:07 | |
| dalek | TT #1431 created by Austin_Hastings++: Register assigned to .local string variable is mis-remembered | 09:19 | |
|
09:33
eternaleye joined
09:54
mikehh joined
09:58
lucian joined
|
|||
| mikehh | All tests PASS (pre/post-config, make corevm/make coretest, smoke (#32117), fulltest) at r43797 - Ubuntu 9.10 amd64 (gcc with --optimize) | 10:28 | |
| bacek | mikehh, merge coming | ||
| mikehh | it tested ok for me | 10:29 | |
| the part1 goody | 10:30 | ||
| bacek | exactly :) | ||
| r43798 | |||
| bacek offer cheap karma for removing gc_encapsulate_part1 branch from svn | 10:31 | ||
| mikehh | ok | 10:34 | |
| dalek | rrot: r43798 | bacek++ | trunk (10 files): Merge branch gc_encapsulate_part1 back to trunk. |
10:39 | |
| rrot: r43799 | bacek++ | branches/gc_encapsulate_part2: Second part of GC encapsulation |
|||
|
10:48
eternaleye_ joined
10:53
mikehh joined
|
|||
| dalek | rrot: r43800 | mikehh++ | branches/gc_encapsulate_part1: branch merged so remove it |
10:55 | |
| rrot: r43801 | bacek++ | branches/gc_encapsulate_part2/src/gc (2 files): Move pool intialization into gc_ms.c from api.c |
|||
| rrot: r43802 | bacek++ | branches/gc_encapsulate_part2/src/gc (3 files): Encapsulate allocate_pmc_header |
|||
| rrot: r43803 | bacek++ | branches/gc_encapsulate_part2/src/gc (3 files): Encapsulate free_pmc_header |
|||
| rrot: r43804 | bacek++ | branches/gc_encapsulate_part2/src/gc (3 files): Encapsulate allocate/free string headers |
|||
| mikehh | All tests PASS (pre/post-config, make corevm/make coretest, smoke (#32118), fulltest) at r43804 - Ubuntu 9.10 amd64 (g++ with --optimize) | 11:05 | |
|
11:11
schmalbe joined
11:34
kid51 joined
|
|||
| kid51 | rm_cflags branch: PASS at r43804: smolder.plusthree.com/app/projects/...ails/32120 | 11:50 | |
| Austin | Hey, kid51 - looks like you'll be getting some real snow this time. | 12:01 | |
|
12:21
cognominal joined
12:24
bluescreen joined
12:30
ruoso joined
|
|||
| dalek | rrot: r43805 | bacek++ | branches/gc_encapsulate_part2/src/gc (3 files): Encapsulate allocation/deallocation of attributes and fixed size storage |
12:33 | |
| rrot: r43806 | bacek++ | branches/gc_encapsulate_part2/src/gc/gc_ms.c: Rename gc_ms_finalize to gc_ms_finalize_memory_pools |
|||
|
12:48
plobsing joined
|
|||
| dalek | rrot: r43807 | bacek++ | branches/gc_encapsulate_part2 (5 files): Move pools destruction functions in alloc_resources.c |
12:50 | |
| rrot: r43808 | bacek++ | branches/gc_encapsulate_part2/src (3 files): Encapsulate GC finalization little bit more. Properly implement MS GC |
|||
| purl | i think finalize is not enough | ||
|
12:57
bluescreen joined
13:03
kvorg joined
|
|||
| kid51 | Austin: I grew up in Rochester and went to college in Buffalo. By my standards: New York City *never* gets real snow. | 13:04 | |
| dalek | rrot: r43809 | bacek++ | branches/gc_encapsulate_part2/src/gc (3 files): Encapsulate allocating of buffer and string storage |
13:06 | |
| rrot: r43810 | bacek++ | branches/gc_encapsulate_part2/src/gc (3 files): Factor out merge_memory_pools function to decouple merging of Interp |
|||
| kid51 to $job | 13:16 | ||
|
13:24
whiteknight joined
|
|||
| whiteknight | good morning #parrot | 13:27 | |
|
13:36
payload joined
|
|||
| bacek | aloha whiteknight | 13:39 | |
| whiteknight | did gc_encapsulate_part1 merge? | ||
| bacek | whiteknight, yes | 13:40 | |
| loooong time ago | |||
| dalek | rrot: r43811 | bacek++ | branches/gc_encapsulate_part2 (6 files): Encapsulate destruction of child interpreter |
13:55 | |
| rrot: r43812 | bacek++ | branches/gc_encapsulate_part2 (5 files): Encapsulate allocate/free bufferlike headers |
|||
| rrot: r43813 | bacek++ | branches/gc_encapsulate_part2/src/gc (3 files): Encapsulate block/unblock/test mark and sweep. Implement total_unblock in terms of is_blocked/unblock |
|||
|
14:00
Essobi joined
|
|||
| whiteknight | I can't keep track | 14:08 | |
| bacek | whiteknight, of what? | 14:09 | |
| whiteknight | of branches merging | 14:10 | |
| Coke | bacek: (long time ago) you mean yesterday? | ||
| whiteknight | that is a long time, in bacek-time | ||
| bacek | Coke, yes. At least in my timezone. | 14:11 | |
| Coke will hopefully have rm_cflags in by the weekend. | |||
| (if not tomorrow.) | |||
| uh, do we have any platform on which using backwhacks in the makefile is required? | 14:15 | ||
| sorry, backslashes. (as part of file paths) | 14:16 | ||
| I ask again, do we have anyone building on windows that is NOT using strawberry or cygwin? | 14:18 | ||
| bacek | Coke, TapTinder? | 14:20 | |
| Coke | TapTinder? | ||
| purl | TapTinder is software development tool - taptinder.org . For Parrot project running on tt.perl6.cz/ and reporting build failures to #parrot channel as ttbot. | ||
| Coke | bacek: I see no way there to say "show me the windows" | 14:21 | |
| bacek declaring victory | |||
| Coke, tt.ro.vutbr.cz/file/cmdout/191037.txt | |||
| this is "client 5" | 14:22 | ||
| bacek@icering:~/src/parrot$ ack -c 'interp->mem' src/ -r|grep -v ':0' | |||
| src/gc/gc_ms.c:63 | |||
| ooookey | |||
| Coke | ... ok. I can't see having to drill down into the report to say "what client are you", and also: ... that's strawberry perl. | ||
| bacek | There is no references to interp->mem_pools left in sources apart from gc_ms.c! | ||
| mj41, ping | 14:23 | ||
| Coke | bacek: try ack -clQ 'interp->mem' src | ||
| mj41 | bacek, pong | ||
| bacek | mj41, Coke want some strange windows build :) | ||
| Coke, thanks for ack. Same results :) | 14:24 | ||
| Coke | yes, but I saved you a pipe! | ||
| mj41 | have strawberry perl and cygwin machines online | ||
| bacek smoking pipe saved by Coke | 14:25 | ||
| Coke | Right. I'm looking for the "real" windows build. | ||
| (using the MS compilers) | |||
| rm_cflags branch fails on strawberry now because the makefile is all foo\\bar instead of foo/bar | 14:26 | ||
| (that is only tangentially related to my desire to have someone using MS compiler to test.) | |||
| dalek | rrot: r43814 | bacek++ | branches/gc_encapsulate_part2/src/gc (3 files): Add get_gc_info introspection function. |
14:28 | |
| rrot: r43815 | bacek++ | branches/gc_encapsulate_part2/src/gc (2 files): Move calculation of active/total buffers into gc_ms.c |
|||
| rrot: r43816 | bacek++ | branches/gc_encapsulate_part2/src/gc (3 files): Encapsulate mark_special. It's wrong way because we have to move whole mark_FOO_alive into gc_ms. But it's good enough for now |
|||
| rrot: r43817 | bacek++ | branches/gc_encapsulate_part2/src/gc (3 files): Encapsulate pmc_needs_early_collection |
|||
| mj41 | we have copy of cygwin wm machine somewhere | 14:33 | |
| Coke | ... cygwin is also not the MS compiler. | ||
| (I have cygwin here too if I need it.) | |||
| mj41 | I can make MS from this one | 14:34 | |
| Do you want to test trunk or any branch? | 14:35 | ||
| whiteknight | Anybody around here knowledgable about packfiles? | 14:39 | |
| Coke | only that that test is failing. =-) | ||
| whiteknight | I'm trying to figure out what the status of the packfile PMCs is, and what is preventing them from being used in Parrot to manage bytecode? | ||
| Coke | mj41: I'm going to need MS feedback on the rm_cflags branch (though it's not 100% yet) | 14:40 | |
| bacek | whiteknight, nothing | ||
| Coke | having that to compare to trunk would be nice. | ||
| whiteknight | bacek: so all that is required is to create a branch and make the switch-over? | ||
| bacek | whiteknight, yes (almost) | ||
| whiteknight | ...almost? | ||
| bacek | whiteknight, currently Packfile PMCs are wrapper around PackFile_foo functions | 14:42 | |
| They weren't build for "on-line" usage in runtime. | 14:43 | ||
| Main purpose was able to unpack/create/pack PBCs | |||
| check examples/pir/make_hello_pbc.pir if you want | |||
| whiteknight | so what is the design? Are we going to use those PMCs internally to work with packfiles or not? | 14:44 | |
| bacek | we can | 14:45 | |
| But it will require some adjustments | |||
| whiteknight | lots of possibilities, but any firm decisions? | ||
| bacek | And VTABLEs are way too narrow... | ||
| whiteknight | Adjustments are fine. The whole subsystem needs refactors and fixes | ||
| bacek | Yeah... Do you mean cleanup with fire? | 14:46 | |
| Coke | can we rip out the #if 0 code in src/runcore/main? | ||
| whiteknight | Coke: let me look | ||
| bacek: yes, cleanup with fire | |||
| and encapsulating things into PMCs is a good first start | 14:47 | ||
| Coke | whiteknight: if not, no matter, I can shove more in the if 0 black hole in the branch. | ||
| bacek | whiteknight, than I want to highly recommend again to change PBCs to be truly "portable". And have single format, not zillion of combinations. | 14:48 | |
| whiteknight | Coke: Probably need to leave it for now. CG and CGP cores are slightly fragile and I don't want to remove code we might rely on later | ||
| Coke | bacek: but the unachieved theoretical runtime efficiency! =-) | ||
| bacek | Coke, Yay! :) | ||
| Coke | whiteknight: technically the code is already removed, but ok. I'll keep branch changes minimal. | ||
| (that's a good plan regardless) | 14:49 | ||
| whiteknight | bacek: yes, I agree with that. I'm looking for good GSoC project ideas | ||
| Coke: I mostly want to keep the ideas around, in case we need to make use of them again | |||
| Alternatively, delete the code but make a ticket referencing the commit | |||
|
14:50
lucian joined
|
|||
| whiteknight | a portable bytecode format would be awesome. Properly encapsulating bytecode into PMCs would be awesome too | 14:51 | |
| brb | 14:52 | ||
|
14:56
whiteknight joined
14:58
iblechbot joined
|
|||
| Coke | rant: having a warning disabled by default and enabling only on certain files is backwards. | 14:58 | |
| whiteknight | which warning? | ||
| Coke | unused. | ||
| whiteknight | and why would it be disabled by default? | ||
| Coke | whiteknight: ... I can't speak to why. | 14:59 | |
| whiteknight | enable it everywhere | ||
| Coke | whiteknight: ... did you see my rant? =-) | ||
| whiteknight | I'm enabling! | ||
|
14:59
cognominal joined
|
|||
| Coke | rm_cflags will enable it by default then shut it off for the files where it is hard to fix. | 15:00 | |
| (and fix it for the rest of the files, since mostly it's just deleting old crap.) | |||
| whiteknight | "hard to fix" is a challenge, not something to just ignore | ||
| Coke | whiteknight: you're welcome to challenge yourself, sure. | ||
| whiteknight | enable the warning by default, we'll clean it before the next release | 15:01 | |
| Coke | I'm going to enable it by default and then disable it on those files that `need` it. easy enough to re-enable it for the file you wish to try to clean. (the hard ones are the generated ops files) | 15:02 | |
| particle | pay attention to the buildbot output | ||
| Coke | Parrot_compile_string has an unused variable, 'pf'. except it looks like it is not supposed to be unused. anyone? | 15:05 | |
| whiteknight | ah, generated code files might be good candidates to turn that warning off then | 15:06 | |
| but all "real" code files should have it | |||
| NotFound | whiteknight: I started a test of dumping pbc using pacfile pmc but not finished it. Extending that tests for reading and writing will be a good way to make sure the PMC are able to do al the work. But in order to do some realistic writing test we need some way to assemble parrot opcodes from HLL. | 15:08 | |
| whiteknight | in other news, some of our code generators should get a lot smarter | ||
| NotFound: so something like an op or pmc that can compile a single op to a string of bytecode? | 15:09 | ||
| NotFound | whiteknight: I'd like better something that takes an op name and the number and type of parameters and return the opcode number. Even better, other that takes just the name and return an array of variants. | 15:13 | |
| whiteknight | NotFound: so an OpLib PMC that provides PIR-level access to the op list? | ||
| including lookup and compilation? | 15:14 | ||
| NotFound | whiteknight: PMC, interpreter method, keyed access.... anything. | ||
| whiteknight | actually a series of ops might be better, less call overhead and more flexibility | ||
| I will prototype some ops like that for testing | |||
| NotFound | I don't care about speed, at least for the first attempts. | 15:15 | |
| whiteknight | ok | ||
| Coke | ... Andy++ | 15:16 | |
| Andy | for? | ||
| purl | for is *only* foreach, because c-style for is "loop" | ||
| Andy | Or do you mean Armstrong? | ||
| Coke | (just found and removed several useless string creations that were in loops in parrot argument processing.) | ||
| Andy | haha, awesome! | ||
| Coke | (which would have been found if this (*&@#$# arg was enabled by default, which it soon will be.) | 15:17 | |
| whiteknight | an OpLib PMC with a get_integer_keyed_string (for specific op variant lookup) and get_pmc_keyed_string (returns a hash of all variants, signature -> opnumber) would work | ||
| dalek | rrot: r43818 | coke++ | branches/rm_cflags/config/auto/warnings.pm: CFLAGS enables this for some files, but it's off by default. necessary, disable it where we have to. |
||
| NotFound | whiteknight: I think so. At least will be enough for proof of concept tests. | 15:19 | |
| whiteknight | ok | 15:20 | |
| NotFound | Oh, and for the reading part, getting the name and signature from the opcode number will also be useful. | 15:21 | |
|
15:24
bubaflub joined,
Psyche^ joined
|
|||
| whiteknight | so an Opcode PMC type also might be interesting, that contains lots of info about one op | 15:26 | |
| NotFound | Yeah | 15:27 | |
| whiteknight | an OpLib PMC that provides access to the entire library and returns Opcode PMCs on keyed lookups | 15:29 | |
| NotFound | whiteknight: sounds great | 15:30 | |
| whiteknight | and Opcode.get_string_keyed() could return the compiled bytecode of that statement | ||
| NotFound | May be helpful, at least for non-jump ops. | 15:32 | |
| whiteknight | yeah, the jump ops get more tricky | ||
| dalek | rrot: r43819 | coke++ | branches/rm_cflags/src (9 files): Eliminate some unused variables and static functions. - might be worth a benchmark on trunk. |
15:33 | |
| rrot: r43820 | whiteknight++ | branches/op_pmcs: branch to prototype some new PMCs for working with ops |
15:50 | ||
| moritz | public service announcement: the timtowtdi.org server is going to be unavailable to us starting from next week (Coke, japhb, kj have accounts there) | 15:56 | |
| whiteknight | what is that server? | ||
| moritz | (oh, forgot leto) | 15:57 | |
| whiteknight: leto did some benchmarking on it, Coke some smoke testing, some others did some web hosting | |||
| whiteknight | ok | ||
|
16:00
bubaflub joined
16:01
theory joined,
NotFound joined
16:09
payload joined
16:14
whiteknight joined
|
|||
| Austin_away | Why, oh why, does C3 not work? | 16:15 | |
| whiteknight | it does work, if you ignore all the bugs and the fact that it doesnt work | 16:16 | |
| Austin | Yeah. Aside from that. | 16:17 | |
| What? You have two classes with a common ancestor? And you want to make one a parent of the other? No, that's ambiguous. Sorry. | 16:19 | ||
| Coke | moritz: it's going away permanently? | 16:20 | |
| moritz | Coke: probably | 16:21 | |
| Coke | thank you for the heads up. | ||
| whiteknight | Austin: is that an issue with the C3 algorithm, or just our implementation of it? | 16:24 | |
| Austin | It seems like a safe bet that it's an implementation issue. See tt#1426 | 16:25 | |
| whiteknight | ok | 16:32 | |
| mj41 | Coke I setup machine with MS VC++ 2008, nmake on rm_cflags ok, now running nmake test | 16:42 | |
| Coke Result: PASS | 16:47 | ||
|
16:49
hercynium joined
16:54
whiteknight joined
16:57
Themeruta joined
17:06
mikehh joined
|
|||
| mj41 | TapTinder machine 13 (WinXP, Visual Studio 2008 Express Editions, ActivePerl) added. | 17:11 | |
| Coke | mj41: huh. freaks me out that strawberry is failing but VC++ works. | 17:14 | |
| danke. | |||
| Coke shuts off the lights on timtowtdi | 17:20 | ||
| (at least in my room) | 17:21 | ||
|
17:23
whiteknight joined
|
|||
| dalek | rrot: r43821 | coke++ | branches/rm_cflags/src (2 files): Remove more unused code. |
17:28 | |
|
17:42
plobsing joined
|
|||
| dalek | rrot: r43822 | whiteknight++ | branches/op_pmcs/src/pmc (3 files): Add initial prototypes of three new PMCs with some quick TODO notes |
17:44 | |
|
17:48
mikehh_ joined
|
|||
| whiteknight | I really want to clean up the src/pmc.c file | 18:06 | |
| Renaming functions from e.g pmc_new() to Parrot_pmc_new(), etc | 18:07 | ||
| Coke | Should this function (pcf_v_(PARROT_INTERP, PMC *self) | 18:11 | |
| actually be generated, or is that an undef leaking through? | |||
| (src/nci.c) | |||
|
18:13
kurahaupo joined
18:17
mj41 joined
18:21
payload joined,
plobsing joined
18:26
Psyche^ joined
18:31
cotto_w0rk joined
18:32
Psyche^ joined
18:43
PacoLinux joined
|
|||
| dalek | rrot: r43823 | plobsing++ | trunk/tools/build/nativecall.pir: use a global variable instead of threading a parameter through all calls in the program just for one use-site |
18:51 | |
|
18:55
ruoso joined
18:56
allison joined
|
|||
| Coke | allison: hio | 19:03 | |
| allison: did you see the src/call/ change in branch? I wonder if that was a time sink. | |||
| allison | hi | 19:04 | |
| Coke | (branches/rm_cflags) | ||
| allison | didn't see it yet, will take a look | ||
| Coke | r43819 | 19:05 | |
| Coke wonders why ICC is adding warnings to the build. | 19:07 | ||
| allison | looks good, clearing out some variables we don't need (especially avoiding creating constant strings we don't need) | ||
| dalek | rrot: r43824 | plobsing++ | trunk/tools/build/nativecall.pir: add some command line options to nativecall.pir (currently mostly unimplemented) |
19:08 | |
| Coke | allison: and those were in loops. whee. | ||
| allison | excellent | ||
| Coke | this'll get merged back in a few days. | ||
| cotto_work | allison, is trac.parrot.org/parrot/ticket/866 on your list of things to eventually address? whiteknight had some feedback. | 19:09 | |
| NotFound | I have my Basic interpreter running in the Nokia N900 :) Parrot coming soon, I hope. | ||
| whiteknight | Sorry about the length of the comments. | 19:10 | |
| allison | cotto: his arguments are sound, I'm okay with eliminating pow | ||
| cotto_work | ok. Do you feel the same way about bignum? | 19:11 | |
| allison | cotto: it basically comes down to "how common will it be to override the behavior?" and with pow it's uncommon | ||
| cotto: it could be argued that any PMC that wants to return a bignum should return it as a PMC anyway | 19:12 | ||
| cotto_work | agreed | 19:13 | |
| (I'm for taking out both bignum and pow, fwiw) | |||
| allison | cotto: so set_pmc, get_pmc, are sufficient | ||
| (I'm reading back over the history of the conversation) | |||
| cotto: okay, I'll reverse the earlier comment, we can nuke both pow and bignum | 19:16 | ||
| cotto_work | Glad to hear it. | ||
| allison | cotto: but, that's an important point about "where to draw the line" | 19:17 | |
| cotto_work | Thanks for looking at the ticket. | ||
| allison | cotto: if we remove pow, are there other common math ops we should also remove from the vtable? | ||
| whiteknight | I'm a little bit of a VTABLE minimalist, but I won't push the conversation any further than the obviously under-used ones | 19:18 | |
| allison | the discussion might become more relevant with lorito | ||
| whiteknight | ...despite my obvious dislike of having both a complete set of math ops and i_* math ops which are almost always identical | ||
| allison | (with a minimalist op set, the monolithic vtable set is less useful) | ||
| whiteknight: and all the variants for all the different types | 19:19 | ||
| whiteknight | I like the idea of fast vtable-based access to certain operations, but I can distinctly tell there was a "the more, the merrier" attitude earlier in Parrot's history and the ramifications of that were not thought out ahead of time | 19:20 | |
| of course, I wasn't present for most of Parrot's history, so I really can't say what the attitudes towards these kinds of things used to be | 19:23 | ||
| allison | without benchmarks, we really can't say for sure whether vtable-based access is all that much of a speed advantage | 19:25 | |
| whiteknight | over, for instance METHOD calls, we have to assume they are | 19:26 | |
| allison | yes, there was definitely an early philosophy of "the more the merrier" | ||
| yes, faster than method calls | |||
| though, the old method calls were a simple function pointer invoke, so not actually much slower | |||
| whiteknight | what are the other alternatives, direct ATTR access? | 19:27 | |
| allison | it depends on the situation | ||
| when it's not actually custom behaviour, and external op can be equally good | |||
| like, math behavior that really should be consistent | |||
| you run into some complexity with deciding if the behavior should be int-like or float-like | 19:28 | ||
| whiteknight | but that could easily be decided with a flag | ||
| allison | (we don't really have a way of making that decision externally at the moment) | ||
| whiteknight | or a role | ||
| allison | or with an attribute of the PMC that the op checks | 19:29 | |
| whiteknight | although that's a bit of a shoehorn | ||
| VTABLE_get_math_mode() | |||
| allison | aye, and that's part of why so many of the math ops are vtable functions | ||
| it's a clean implementation of polymorphism | 19:30 | ||
| whiteknight | so in theory, if we had a way for a pmc to declare how it was handled in a scalar math operation, most of the vtable logic could be moved to consistent ops? | ||
| allison | yes, definitely | ||
| and most of the math ops could be moved to dynops too | 19:31 | ||
| whiteknight | you're making my mouth water | ||
| I'm a big proponent of a "lean and mean" parrot | |||
| but that's no secret | |||
| allison | It's the direction we're heading now | 19:32 | |
| it is a break from they earlier design philosophy, but a good one, I think | 19:33 | ||
| whiteknight | I strongly agree. Decreasing memory footprint, decreasing the number of thigns to be initialized at startup, removing components that are not frequently used, these are all good things | ||
| allison | speed has always been one of Parrot's goals, so in a sense we're just tackling a key goal from another angle | 19:37 | |
|
19:42
cognominal joined
|
|||
| Coke | chromatic has burst my bubble. ah well. | 19:51 | |
|
19:51
eternaleye joined
|
|||
| Coke makes the mistake of looking in config/auto/warnings | 20:02 | ||
|
20:07
lucian joined
20:08
kurahaupo joined,
mikehh joined
20:09
lucian joined
|
|||
| dalek | rrot: r43825 | chromatic++ | trunk/lib/Parrot/Harness/DefaultTests.pm: [lib] Made t/src/*.t run before other extended core tests, to make parallel starting it earlier allows further time overlapping. |
20:13 | |
|
20:23
joeri joined,
chromatic joined
|
|||
| GeJ | Good morning everyone | 20:26 | |
| whiteknight | good morning GeJ | ||
| how is life in paradise today? | |||
| GeJ | Heya whiteknight. | 20:27 | |
| purl | whiteknight is, like, mailto:wknight8111@gmail.com or the grand master funk or wknight8111.blogspot.com/ | ||
| chromatic | #ps in 4 | ||
| whiteknight almost forgot | 20:29 | ||
| dalek | rrot: r43826 | mikehh++ | trunk/tools/build/nativecall.pir: fix codetest failure - trailing whitespace |
20:30 | |
| whiteknight is reading through hundreds of lines of code at work, where the original author only used comments as a substitute for the delete key | |||
| no english-language explanations of things, but hundreds of lines of inexplicably commented-out code | 20:31 | ||
| GeJ | whiteknight: It's ok. Weather's fine. Job's okay. The only remaining problem is that days are only 24 hours long. I'm working on this, but I don't have any obvious solution yet. Still investigating. | 20:32 | |
| Tene | whiteknight: but what if he needed to get the deleted code back some time in the future?!?! | ||
| whiteknight | GeJ: How much snow do you have there? We have two feet of it on the ground, and another 1.5 feet coming tonight | ||
| GeJ | whiteknight: How's life treating you in... erm... your side of the globe? (I'd say east coast, but I'm not quite sure) | 20:33 | |
| whiteknight | Tene: I know! It's the ultimate version control system | ||
| GeJ | whiteknight: snow? You mean that white thing that people seem to enjoy 3 weeks every 4 years on the TV? Yeah, we've heard about it. It could be an urban legend though. | 20:34 | |
| whiteknight | lucky bastard | 20:35 | |
| GeJ | Don't know if that's been said here, but FreeBSD 7.3 will ship with a Parrot 2.0 and Rakudo 2010.01 | 20:36 | |
| Coke | huh. | 20:37 | |
| allison | GeJ: excellent | ||
| whiteknight | GeJ: Great | 20:38 | |
| GeJ | I have nothing to do about it. I just saw the two ports a couple of days ago. | 20:40 | |
|
20:40
cognominal joined,
kurahaupo joined
|
|||
| GeJ | The guilty one is Aliaksandr Zahatski. Don't know if he's idling around here. | 20:42 | |
|
20:44
hercynium joined
|
|||
| allison | Coke: technically the deprecation was for get_bigint and set_bigint, which don't exist | 20:45 | |
| Coke: is there a rule for deprecation typos? | 20:46 | ||
|
20:46
kurahaupo1 joined
|
|||
| dalek | rrot: r43827 | whiteknight++ | branches/vtable_massacre: creating branch to rip out deprecated vtables bitwise*, *pow*, and *bignum |
20:46 | |
| Coke | .. don't do that? | ||
| Coke | allison: it looks like DEPRECATED.pod mostly agrees with the most recent ruling, so I'll close my eyes. | 20:47 | |
| moderator | Parrot 2.0.0 "Inevitable" released! | parrot.org | Priorities: merge branches, remove deprecations | Roadmap: icanhaz.com/parrotroadmap | Latest modified TT's: icanhaz.com/parrotbugs | 20:47 | |
| chromatic | trac.parrot.org/parrot/wiki/GCSizeTuning -- implementation ideas for a GC tuning | 20:47 | |
| whiteknight | chromatic: looks nice. should run the GC more frequently but with smaller runs | 20:49 | |
| chromatic | Hopefully it runs the GC less frequently. | 20:50 | |
| dalek | tracwiki: v1 | chromatic++ | GCSizeTuning | 20:56 | |
| tracwiki: trac.parrot.org/parrot/wiki/GCSizeT...ction=diff | |||
| chromatic | whiteknight, what do you want to do with these deprecations? Want to break them up into individual pieces? | 20:58 | |
| Coke | if anyone wants to hack on rm_cflags, I can carveout some tasks. | 20:59 | |
| whiteknight | chromatic: however. I was planning to go all scorched earth, but if there are other people with their hands in the branch we probably need to be more polite | 21:00 | |
| chromatic | Goes faster with more hands. | ||
| bacek | Good morning | 21:03 | |
| purl | What's so good about it? | ||
| whiteknight | First step is probably to update the bitwise and pow ops to call get_int and get_float vtables. Then rip out the unused vtables, then fix all broken tests | ||
| mikehh | All tests PASS (pre/post-config, make corevm/make coretest, smoke (#32128), fulltest) at r43826 - Ubuntu 9.10 amd64 (gcc with --optimize) | 21:04 | |
| bacek | I've got small task for bored developer. | ||
| chromatic | whiteknight, if you make a small wiki page like we did for the CC revamp, we can coordinate there. | 21:05 | |
| bacek | Cut CLI param parsing out of IMCC and do it _before_ init of Interp. | ||
| whiteknight | okay. I'm getting in my car nowish, but I'll put together the page in 1hr when I get hom | ||
| bacek | It will be very helpful with run-time GC selection | 21:06 | |
| chromatic | Excellent. | ||
| Coke | bacek; also with pirc switch. | ||
| whiteknight | bacek: I've wanted that same thing for a while | 21:07 | |
|
21:13
payload joined,
plobsing joined
|
|||
| NotFound | cotto_work: ping | 21:13 | |
| cotto_work | NotFound, pong | 21:14 | |
| NotFound | cotto_work: can we close TT #1428? | 21:15 | |
| cotto_work | lemme look | ||
| definitely | 21:16 | ||
| NotFound | cotto_work: can you add some comment about the fix? | ||
| cotto_work | Sure. I'll take care of it. | ||
| NotFound | cotto_work++ | 21:17 | |
| chromatic | msg whiteknight trac.parrot.org/parrot/wiki/GCSweep...ementation | ||
| purl | Message for whiteknight stored. | ||
| chromatic | Also bacek: trac.parrot.org/parrot/wiki/GCSweep...ementation | ||
| There's the algorithm whiteknight and I have tossed around for a while. | |||
| mikehh | bacek: gc_encapsulate_part2 - make corevm/make coretest, make test PASS - some codetest failures (working on it) and make: ./pbc_merge: Command not found | 21:19 | |
| bacek | chromatic, it's exactly how previous Gen GC was implemented | 21:27 | |
| dalek | TT #1428 closed by cotto++: pbc_merge breaks c++ build | 21:28 | |
| chromatic | Is that good, bad, neutral, charm, or strange? | ||
| bacek | chromatic, it's more good than bad | ||
| chromatic | That's a positive sign. | 21:29 | |
| How much more GC encapsulation work do you have? Do you have more branches in mind? | |||
| bacek | chromatic, it's done | ||
| next branch - Boehm GC again | 21:30 | ||
| dalek | tracwiki: v1 | chromatic++ | GCSweepFreeImplementation | ||
| tracwiki: trac.parrot.org/parrot/wiki/GCSweep...ction=diff | |||
| chromatic | Okay, I'll wait for the merge and then work on this. | ||
| bacek | chromatic, ok. | 21:31 | |
|
21:32
mikehh joined
|
|||
| dalek | rrot: r43828 | mikehh++ | branches/gc_encapsulate_part2/src/gc/gc_ms.c: fix codetest failures - linelength and trailing spaces |
21:36 | |
| rrot: r43829 | mikehh++ | branches/gc_encapsulate_part2/src/gc/gc_ms.c: fix codetest failure - at least one space between C keyword and subsequent open parenthesis |
|||
| rrot: r43830 | mikehh++ | branches/gc_encapsulate_part2/src/gc/api.c: fix codetest failure - at least one space between C keyword and subsequent open parenthesis |
|||
|
21:44
mikehh joined
|
|||
| darbelo | purl: msg Austin You may redeem this purl-o-gram for an enchanted +1 Bit of Commiting. Contact Coke for more details. | 21:46 | |
| purl | Message for austin stored. | ||
| cotto_work | mikehh, the gc branch looks fine apart from some codingstd failures. I don't see any problem with pbc_merge. | 21:52 | |
|
21:52
mikehh_ joined
|
|||
| dalek | rrot: r43831 | mikehh++ | branches/gc_encapsulate_part2/src/gc/gc_private.h: fix codetest failure - at least one space between C keyword and subsequent open parenthesis |
21:53 | |
| cotto_work | mikehh, the gc branch looks fine apart from some codingstd failures (possibly the ones you just fixed). I don't see any problem with pbc_merge. | ||
| Coke | darbelo: he already has the commit bit, and he should be talking to whiteknight, not me. =-) | 22:01 | |
| </deniability> | 22:02 | ||
| darbelo | Coke: Oops. Sorry. | 22:03 | |
|
22:04
mikehh__ joined
|
|||
| darbelo | purl: msg Austin Oops, I meant Whiteknight, not Coke. Also, your bit is now active. Don't break the build. Increase the awesome. | 22:05 | |
| purl | Message for austin stored. | ||
|
22:08
mikehh joined
|
|||
| Coke | note: new commiters first commit email may be delayed by gremlins. be patient. | 22:08 | |
| darbelo | gremlins-- | 22:09 | |
| dalek | rrot: r43832 | mikehh++ | branches/gc_encapsulate_part2/src/gc/gc_ms.c: fix codetest failures - unused assert macros |
||
| mikehh | I am still getting a codetest failure for assert args in src/gc/gc_private.h that I fixed in r43832 for gc_ms.c but make headerizer does not work for me | 22:25 | |
| that's in gc_encapsulate_part2 branch | 22:27 | ||
| cotto_work | not quite fixed. There's an extra "Parrot_" in front of some of the assert_arg macros. | ||
| mikehh | cotto_work: I thought I fixed those | 22:33 | |
|
22:35
mikehh joined
|
|||
| cotto_work | mikehh, there are still some in src/gc/gc_ms.c | 22:36 | |
| mikehh | cotto_work: ok I see them | 22:39 | |
|
22:41
kiwichris joined
22:43
plobsing joined
|
|||
| tewk | MMD question, I defined is_equal in PMC A, but not in PMC B, ne A B works but ne B A throws a exception from DefaultPMC. do I have to re define is_equals in B too? | 22:45 | |
| chromatic | Sadly, I believe so | 22:46 | |
| We don't have a mechanism to identify commutative MMD. | |||
| For "commutative" read whichever mathematical word means "reflexive", perhaps. I'm in writer mode, not math mode. | |||
| tewk | uggh, code duplication | ||
| darbelo | Would making default try "the other way around" help any? | 22:47 | |
| Avoiding the obvious infinite recursion, clearly. | |||
| tewk | YES, As long as we all agree that is_equal is reflexive | 22:48 | |
| chromatic | Or we have some mechanism to mark some candidates as such. | ||
| tewk | sounds like pmc2c fun :) | 22:49 | |
| and MMD dispatch work too. | |||
|
22:51
cotto_work joined
|
|||
| NotFound | BTW, i think that PMCNULL is equal to PMCNULL | 22:55 | |
| darbelo | It shouldn't be? | ||
| cotto_work | You make a good argument. | ||
| NotFound | Should be, but current code doesn't think so. | 22:56 | |
| darbelo | Ouch. | 22:58 | |
| dalek | rrot: r43833 | plobsing++ | trunk/tools/build/nativecall.pir: implement head, thunks, loader, coda, and all targets as well as restrict the loader function to loading thunks and nothing else |
||
|
23:01
mikehh_ joined
|
|||
| darbelo | You know, having a VTABLE be always implemented in terms of other VTABLEs is a good sign you can delete safely. | 23:03 | |
| cotto_work | are you thinking of the i versions? | 23:04 | |
|
23:04
Whiteknight joined
|
|||
| darbelo | Nope, get_bignum(), I've just killed it. Running make test before commiting. | 23:04 | |
| cotto_work | darbelo++ | 23:05 | |
| I won't miss that one at all. | 23:06 | ||
| Make sure to take it out of src/vtable.tbl too. | |||
| darbelo | Yeah, did that. | ||
| Incoming! | 23:08 | ||
| purl | duck! | ||
| cotto_work | Urgh. _vtable on x64 is 1968B. | 23:09 | |
| Whiteknight | urg | ||
|
23:09
mikehh_ joined
|
|||
| chromatic | At least x64 has more registers. | 23:10 | |
| Whiteknight | chromatic++ #sweepless gc algorithm | 23:11 | |
| cotto_work | looks like some of the vcgc ideas got in there | 23:12 | |
| chromatic | I don't see any big holes in the idea. | ||
| Whiteknight | cotto_work: exactly | ||
| darbelo | I just looked it over and it sounds almost generational. | ||
| chromatic | It's not quite generational, but it requires very few changes. | 23:13 | |
| Whiteknight | generational uses a similar idea to reduce the mark set | ||
| this is the same idea on the sweep set | |||
| chromatic | We can keep the current precise system without having to track down every place we store a GCable to put guards around it. | ||
| darbelo | I like it. | ||
| Whiteknight | ours is hardly precise (*cough&src/gc/system.c*cough*) | ||
| darbelo pokes dalek with a stick. | 23:15 | ||
| dalek | rrot: r43834 | plobsing++ | branches/nativecall_pir_build: branch takes wrong approach to solving the problem |
||
| rrot: r43835 | darbelo++ | branches/vtable_massacre (9 files): Remove the get_bignum() VTABLE. |
|||
| chromatic | It's mostly precise; we don't use a lot of the C stack and we don't have to trace much of it. | ||
| darbelo | In the interst of full disclosure, r43835 should be tested by someone who has GMP installed. | 23:16 | |
| I can't test Integer->BigInt autopromotion on my box. | 23:17 | ||
| Whiteknight | I need to install GMP | 23:18 | |
| darbelo | I also disagree with Integer->BigInt autopromotion, but that's a mostly unrelated phenomenon. | ||
| Whiteknight | +1 | ||
| purl | 1 | ||
| Whiteknight | Parrot should make fewer assumptions about the behavior of HLLs | 23:19 | |
|
23:21
kurahaupo joined
23:28
eternaleye joined
|
|||
| Coke | (assumptions), well it has to work /some way/ in parrot. if there's a way that involves less work on our part that is overridable, go for it. | 23:35 | |
|
23:40
hercynium joined
23:44
kurahaupo joined
23:48
mikehh_ joined
23:50
mikehh joined
23:56
lucian joined
|
|||