|
Parrot 2.0.0 "Inevitable" released! | parrot.org | Priorities: merge tt_389_fix and one_make branches | Roadmap: icanhaz.com/parrotroadmap | Latest modified TT's: icanhaz.com/parrotbugs Set by moderator on 23 January 2010. |
|||
| dalek | rrot: r43591 | chromatic++ | trunk/src/pmc/orderedhash.pmc: [PMC] Fixed C errors and warnings reported by Andy Dougherty in TT #1417: don't |
00:00 | |
|
00:00
mj41_ joined
|
|||
| Coke | ooh, something that is difficult to localize. that'll entertain me tomorrow. -> zzzz | 00:13 | |
|
00:15
dduncan joined
00:27
dduncan left
00:31
tetragon joined
|
|||
| dalek | rrot: r43592 | chromatic++ | trunk/src/pmc/orderedhash.pmc: [PMC] Removed spurious trailing semicolon from OrderedHash (Andy Dougherty, |
00:49 | |
|
00:50
patspam joined
00:53
abqar joined
01:08
naypalm joined
01:09
cotto_w0rk joined
|
|||
| mikehh | I am getting a failure with testr - t/pmc/eval.t - Failed test: 12 with gcc builds (with or without --optimize) BUT NOT g++ builds - Ubuntu 9.10 amd64, since the merge (TT #1412?) | 01:20 | |
| sorry that should be TT1142 | 01:21 | ||
| TT #1142 | |||
| plobsing | mikehh: which merge? | 01:23 | |
|
01:24
cconstantine joined
|
|||
| mikehh | orderedhash_revamp | 01:25 | |
| kid51 | I did a "practice svn merge" of one_make into trunk. | 01:31 | |
| The merge itself was much easier than I thought; only a few easily resolvable conflicts. | 01:32 | ||
| But make test was pretty awful. | |||
|
01:33
LaVolta joined
|
|||
| cotto_w0rk | I'll have some time in a couple hours to give it a shot, but I recall that last time I tried a merge I had to get bacek to rescue me. | 01:33 | |
| nopaste | "kid51" at 71.255.53.28 pasted "'make test' after attempted merge of one_make branch into trunk" (280 lines) at nopaste.snit.ch/19368 | 01:34 | |
| kid51 | but surprisingly, I had a tremendous make fulltest after (what I presume was today's) orderedhash branch merge. | 01:35 | |
| cotto_w0rk | That's extravagantly broken. I'm not even sure how that's possible. | 01:36 | |
| You did reconfig, right? | |||
| kid51 | Since, in that paste, most of the failing files are failing in toto, I suspect path problems. | ||
| I merged into a fresh sandbox | |||
| plobsing | mikehh: I can't reproduce the error. can you run './parrot t/pmc/eval_12.pbc' and show the output? | 01:37 | |
| mikehh | I get the error with gcc builds on Ubuntu 9.10 amd64 but not with g++ builds | 01:39 | |
| kid51 | Trying something | ||
| mikehh | and only in testr | 01:40 | |
| plobsing | mikehh: I am on Arch Linux x86_64 and compile with gcc 4.4.2 . My results should be similar. | ||
| mikehh | it passes on all other cores, and make coretest, make test | ||
|
01:40
JimmyZ joined
|
|||
| kid51 | Getting better results. | 01:46 | |
| After the merge, config/gen/makefiles/root.in had 'running-make-test' in EXTRA_TEST_ARGS | |||
| That was eliminated in trunk in r43546 | 01:47 | ||
| Deleting that string from root.in and starting over from make realclean is leading to much better make test results. | |||
| PASS | |||
| Dare I merge ... or does Coke want to do the honors? | 01:48 | ||
|
01:52
particle joined
01:56
cognominal joined
|
|||
| kid51 | If we don't merge one_make now, then perhaps we should consider applying to that branch the same changes applied to trunk in r43546 (eliminating --running-make-test) | 01:59 | |
| cconstantine | how would I go about removing an item from a hash in nqp? | 02:01 | |
| or even better, just remove al items in the hash (or even the hash itself) | 02:03 | ||
| just %some_hash := NULL ? | 02:04 | ||
| Austin | cconstantine: yes | 02:08 | |
| But that eliminates the hash - you won't be able to store anything there afterwards. | |||
| cconstantine | Austin: awesome | 02:12 | |
| on both counts | |||
| Austin | How's reason? | ||
| You get your quote thing worked out? | 02:13 | ||
| cconstantine | yup | ||
| it's awesome | |||
| Austin | Sweet | ||
| cconstantine | I'm just doing some cleanup work now | ||
| Austin | So what's next? A text editor? | ||
| cconstantine | hmm, a lisp-aware text editor... I wonder if one already exists... | ||
| Austin | Doubtful. | 02:14 | |
| kid51 | lisp? | ||
| purl | rumour has it lisp is just for the firmware loader or xkcd.com/224/ | ||
| cconstantine | surely that's not emacs | ||
| Austin | No, man. Emacs is a text-aware operating system. | ||
| cconstantine | true true | 02:15 | |
| I still have some basic forms to get working. I'm aiming to get only the bare minimum of forms working then stay in in reason as much as possible for the rest of it's implementation | 02:17 | ||
| latests changes are up | 02:20 | ||
| in case you care | |||
| kid51 | Okay, so the only failure I'm getting in 'make fulltest' in the merge-candidate tree is the one we expect: perlcritic.t fails on tools/dev/checkdepend.pl. | ||
| cconstantine | is it fairly easy to load an external HLL file? | 02:24 | |
| that's probably a dumb question, and I don't really need to know how to do it now so... yeah | 02:28 | ||
|
02:29
somebody joined
02:35
TiMBuS joined
|
|||
| Coke | (I don't care if someone else merges one_make back to trunk) | 02:36 | |
| kid51 | Coke I'm ready to do that now --okay? | 02:38 | |
| Coke | sure. | ||
| kid51 | ... and I'll remove the branch then? | ||
| Coke | sure. | ||
| thanks. I hate dealing with merges. | |||
| -> offline. | 02:39 | ||
| GeJ | building post-merge | 02:43 | |
| dalek | rrot: r43593 | jkeenan++ | trunk (166 files): Merge one_make branch into trunk. |
02:44 | |
| rrot: r43594 | jkeenan++ | branches/one_make: Branch has been merged into trunk and is no longer needed at HEAD. |
|||
| purl | i already had it that way, dalek. | ||
| ttbot | Parrot trunk/ r43593 MSWin32-x86-multi-thread make error tt.ro.vutbr.cz/file/cmdout/185416.txt ( tt.ro.vutbr.cz//buildstatus/pr-Parrot/rp-trunk/ ) | ||
| GeJ | build OK, smoking it. | 02:45 | |
| r43594 smoke PASS on FreeBSD 7.2 amd64 | 02:51 | ||
| Coke++ | |||
| kid51++ | |||
| ttbot | Parrot trunk/ r43595 MSWin32-x86-multi-thread make error tt.ro.vutbr.cz/file/cmdout/185459.txt ( tt.ro.vutbr.cz//buildstatus/pr-Parrot/rp-trunk/ ) | 02:59 | |
| dalek | rrot: r43595 | jkeenan++ | trunk/tools/dev/checkdepend.pl: Convert an 'XXX' into ļæ½trac.parrot.org/parrot/ticket/1418 to quiet perlcritic. |
03:00 | |
| JimmyZ | E:\\parrot>make | 03:03 | |
| makefile:2802: warning: overriding commands for target `testg' | |||
| makefile:2798: warning: ignoring old commands for target `testg' | |||
| D:\\strawberry\\perl\\bin\\perl.exe tools\\build\\h2inc.pl include\\parrot\\enums.h lib\\ | |||
| Parrot\\Pmc2c\\PCCMETHOD_BITS.pm | |||
| invalid output file: 'lib\\Parrot\\Pmc2c\\PCCMETHOD_BITS.pm' for input 'include\\par | |||
| rot\\enums.h' at tools\\build\\h2inc.pl line 36. | 03:04 | ||
| make: *** [lib\\Parrot\\Pmc2c\\PCCMETHOD_BITS.pm] Error 255 | |||
| dalek | TT #1418 created by jkeenan++: tools/dev/checkdepend.pl: TODO; fine-tuning | ||
| cconstantine | how do I add attributes to a compiler? I've tried addattribute but it won't work (add_attribute() not implemented in class 'Reason::Compiler') | 03:09 | |
| oh, I have an instance of a class, not a class definition :( | 03:11 | ||
| GeJ | clock? | 03:12 | |
| purl | GeJ: LAX: Mon 7:12pm PST / CHI: Mon 9:12pm CST / NYC: Mon 10:12pm EST / LON: Tue 3:12am GMT / BER: Tue 4:12am CET / IND: Tue 8:42am IST / TOK: Tue 12:12pm JST / SYD: Tue 2:12pm EST / | ||
| dalek | TT #1214 closed by jkeenan++: config/inter/charset.pm generates incorrect makefile deps | 03:20 | |
| TT #1285 closed by jkeenan++: Some files generated by Configure.pl should be generated by Makefile | |||
| TT #382 closed by jkeenan++: Using := in Makefiles causes extra complexity | |||
| kid51 | Smolder is being recalcitrant again re feedback to submitter. | 03:21 | |
| I notice that when Smolder is being recalcitrant, it shows a box on the summary page that reads like this: | 03:23 | ||
| Platform \tUnknown \tArchitecture \tUnknown | |||
| ... until such time as the timeout runs its course. | |||
| Coke | what was with all prop changes on the merge? | 03:25 | |
| kid51 | That's the latest version of Subversion ... or at least the latest version I have on that box. | 03:26 | |
| svn --version svn, version 1.5.1 (r32289) compiled Aug 6 2009, 20:47:37 | 03:27 | ||
| dalek | tracwiki: v8 | jkeenan++ | BuildTaskList | ||
| tracwiki: trac.parrot.org/parrot/wiki/BuildTa...ction=diff | |||
| Coke | oh, was it the svn-merge props? | ||
| kid51 | I guess that's what they call it. | 03:28 | |
| All my merges lately have had that. | |||
| Nothing to worry about, AFAICT | |||
| Coke | k | 03:29 | |
| kid51++ | |||
| kid51 | Subversion is actually up to at least 1.6.3 (what I have on my ibook). | ||
| 1.5.1 is what came with Debian Lenny | 03:30 | ||
| kid51 must sleep | |||
| purl | $kid51->sleep(8 * 3600); | ||
|
03:52
cognominal joined
|
|||
| Coke | looks like svn:ignore didn't get copied over. | 03:53 | |
| ah, whoops. no, things that used be cleaned aren't any more. need to do a manually clenaup once. | |||
| dalek | tracwiki: v9 | coke++ | BuildTaskList | 04:00 | |
| tracwiki: trac.parrot.org/parrot/wiki/BuildTa...ction=diff | |||
| tracwiki: v10 | coke++ | BuildTaskList | 04:16 | ||
| tracwiki: trac.parrot.org/parrot/wiki/BuildTa...ction=diff | |||
|
05:08
abqar joined
06:03
eternaleye joined
06:05
brooksbp joined
06:49
cognominal joined
07:22
brooksbp_ joined
|
|||
| wagle | my round tuit arrived this evening, and i'm giving parrot a whirl | 07:24 | |
| in the docs, it says stuff like "run this: $ B<parrot news.pasm>" | 07:25 | ||
| what does that mean? is the docs b0rk? | |||
|
07:26
kgilmer joined
|
|||
| GeJ | if you see this in perldoc, then most probably. If you're reading raw pod, then discard the 'B<' and '>'. | 07:40 | |
|
07:52
khisanth_ joined
|
|||
| wagle | docs.parrot.org/parrot/latest/html/...d.pod.html | 07:56 | |
| for example | |||
|
08:02
iblechbot joined
|
|||
| GeJ | Hum, ok. | 08:02 | |
| Looks like some POD got in the HTML rendering. | 08:03 | ||
| just ignore 'B<' and '>' for now. | |||
| and the '$' is the command prompt, so you don't have to type it either. | 08:04 | ||
| just go with: parrot news.pasm | |||
|
08:10
particle1 joined
|
|||
| wagle | yeah.. i'm currently busy with figuring out first class functions.. dukeleto talked me into writing a scheme compiler | 08:21 | |
| pir is perl without the bells and whistles | 08:22 | ||
| cotto | technically, so is bf | 08:23 | |
| wagle | just found that amusing.. | 08:29 | |
| oh.. brainf*ck.. i never sat down and figured that out | 08:33 | ||
| cotto | It's probably better that way. | ||
| wagle | lol | ||
| cotto | You lol now but wait until you've tried it. | 08:36 | |
| wagle lol's now while he still knows how | |||
| here's the example i bookmarked: www.linusakesson.net/programming/brainfuck/ | 08:38 | ||
| ttbot | Parrot trunk/ r43596 MSWin32-x86-multi-thread make error tt.ro.vutbr.cz/file/cmdout/185541.txt ( tt.ro.vutbr.cz//buildstatus/pr-Parrot/rp-trunk/ ) | 08:53 | |
| dalek | rrot: r43596 | cotto++ | trunk/tools/dev/checkdepend.pl: [checkdepends] Trade one bug for another. Also, upgrade this from a braindead script to a script. |
08:56 | |
| ttbot | Parrot trunk/ r43597 MSWin32-x86-multi-thread make error tt.ro.vutbr.cz/file/cmdout/185576.txt ( tt.ro.vutbr.cz//buildstatus/pr-Parrot/rp-trunk/ ) | 09:05 | |
| cotto | I wonder if that's a case-sensitivity bug. | 09:07 | |
| Let's see if that helps. | 09:09 | ||
| msg cotto_w0rk Check if the win32 build is fixed at tt.ro.vutbr.cz//buildstatus/pr-Parrot/rp-trunk/ | 09:11 | ||
| purl | Message for cotto_w0rk stored. | ||
| cotto | I can delegate. | ||
| dalek | rrot: r43597 | fperrad++ | trunk/ext/nqp-rx/Rules.mak: [build] fix target 'installable' |
09:12 | |
| ttbot | Parrot trunk/ r43598 MSWin32-x86-multi-thread make error tt.ro.vutbr.cz/file/cmdout/185615.txt ( tt.ro.vutbr.cz//buildstatus/pr-Parrot/rp-trunk/ ) | ||
| rrot: r43598 | cotto++ | trunk/lib/Parrot/H2inc.pm: [h2inc] make h2inc less picky about capitalization, hopefully fixing the win32 build |
|||
| rrot: r43599 | cotto++ | trunk/tools/dev/checkdepend.pl: [checkdepends] minor readability improvements |
|||
| ttbot | Parrot trunk/ r43599 MSWin32-x86-multi-thread make error tt.ro.vutbr.cz/file/cmdout/185629.txt ( tt.ro.vutbr.cz//buildstatus/pr-Parrot/rp-trunk/ ) | 09:14 | |
| cotto | might be slashes then | 09:17 | |
|
09:22
JimmyZ joined
|
|||
| JimmyZ | nopaste | 09:22 | |
| nopaste? | |||
| purl | nopaste is at nopaste.snit.ch/ (ask TonyC for new channels) or paste.scsys.co.uk/ or App::Nopaste or tools/dev/nopaste.pl or at www.extpaste.com/ or paste.scsys.co.uk (for #catalyst, #dbix-class, #moose and others) or gist.github.com/ or paste or gtfo or tools/dev/nopaste.pl or trac.parrot.org/parrot/browser/tru...nopaste.pl | ||
| nopaste | "JimmyZ" at 61.144.177.86 pasted "parrot make error on Win32 with strawberry perl" (23 lines) at nopaste.snit.ch/19372 | 09:23 | |
| cotto | JimmyZ, can you test a patch? | 09:24 | |
| JimmyZ | yep | 09:25 | |
| nopaste | "cotto" at 96.26.227.153 pasted "win32 build fix" (22 lines) at nopaste.snit.ch/19373 | ||
| cotto | if the build doesn't immediately explode, it worked | 09:27 | |
| lmk | |||
| JimmyZ, is it working? | 09:31 | ||
| JimmyZ | the same error | 09:32 | |
| cotto | well crud | ||
| It's off to bed with me. I'll have a windows box to play with tomorrow. | 09:33 | ||
| JimmyZ | and there is a warning. | ||
| makefile:2802: warning: overriding commands for target `testg' | |||
| makefile:2798: warning: ignoring old commands for target `testg' | |||
| cotto: good night | |||
| cotto | night | ||
| mikehh | All tests PASS (pre/post-config, make corevm/make coretest, smoke (#31913), fulltest) at r43599 - Ubuntu 9.10 amd64 (g++ with --optimize) | 09:40 | |
| dalek | rrot: r43600 | fperrad++ | trunk/lib/Parrot/H2inc.pm: [H2inc] fix on Windows |
09:45 | |
|
09:54
JimmyZ joined
|
|||
| JimmyZ | fperrad++ | 09:55 | |
| nopaste | "JimmyZ" at 61.144.177.86 pasted "parrot make error on Win32 with strawberry perl again" (14 lines) at nopaste.snit.ch/19374 | ||
|
10:00
payload joined
10:09
TiMBuS joined
|
|||
| mikehh | fulltest - testr FAIL - t/pmc/eval.t - Failed test: 12 - see TT #1142 | 10:16 | |
| all othertests PASS (pre/post-config, make corevm/make coretest, smoke (#31915), fulltest) at r43600 - Ubuntu 9.10 amd64 (gcc with --optimize) | |||
|
10:20
payload joined
10:51
payload joined
11:46
cognominal joined
12:09
LaVolta joined
12:14
payload joined
12:16
bluescreen joined
12:30
cconstantine joined
13:43
payload joined
13:52
payload joined
|
|||
| Coke | fperrad++ | 14:23 | |
| make tests passes for me here on SB perl. | 14:32 | ||
| the testg duplicate rule is probably because we have a testg and a testG | 14:33 | ||
|
14:39
payload joined
|
|||
| Coke | ugh. we invoke perl to invoke CC every time? | 14:40 | |
| I wonder how much of our build time is devoted to perl startup. | |||
|
14:42
mj41_ joined
|
|||
| particle | much more on windows... | 14:43 | |
| Coke | I'll add that to the cleanup work. | ||
|
14:43
mj41__ joined
|
|||
| Coke | trac-- | 14:48 | |
| dalek | rrot: r43601 | coke++ | trunk/config/gen/makefiles/root.in: testG conflict with testg on windows, so use more characters. |
14:51 | |
| tracwiki: v11 | coke++ | BuildTaskList | 14:54 | ||
| tracwiki: trac.parrot.org/parrot/wiki/BuildTa...ction=diff | |||
| tracwiki: v12 | coke++ | BuildTaskList | |||
| tracwiki: trac.parrot.org/parrot/wiki/BuildTa...ction=diff | |||
|
14:56
mj41_ joined
|
|||
| Coke | cotto, was that you that made cd.pl show line numbers and makefile names? | 14:59 | |
| (whoever that was, thanks.) | 15:01 | ||
| msg cotto my plan for the build is to have every foo.pir get built into foo.pbc, even if it is later copied to buz/blarg/frob.pbc | 15:03 | ||
| purl | Message for cotto stored. | ||
| Coke | then we can key all the deps for going from pir->pbc properly. | 15:04 | |
| msg cotto we should also distinguish between load_bytecode deps (runtime) and include (compile time) | |||
| purl | Message for cotto stored. | ||
| dalek | rrot: r43602 | coke++ | trunk/tools/dev/cc_flags.pl: Remove unused option. |
15:08 | |
| tracwiki: v13 | coke++ | BuildTaskList | 15:11 | ||
| tracwiki: trac.parrot.org/parrot/wiki/BuildTa...ction=diff | |||
| tracwiki: v14 | coke++ | BuildTaskList | |||
| tracwiki: trac.parrot.org/parrot/wiki/BuildTa...ction=diff | |||
| tracwiki: v15 | coke++ | BuildTaskList | |||
| tracwiki: trac.parrot.org/parrot/wiki/BuildTa...ction=diff | |||
| NotFound | r43604 must fix the problem nopasted by JimmyZ. | 15:19 | |
| dalek | rrot: r43603 | coke++ | trunk/tools/dev/checkdepend.pl: Move these docs into the wiki and reference them from here. |
15:24 | |
| rrot: r43604 | NotFound++ | trunk/src/embed.c: remove unneeded Parrot_SubAttributes access from set_current_sub |
|||
| rrot: r43605 | coke++ | trunk/config/gen/makefiles/root.in: Fix 2 dependencies: one missing with the new build, one w/2 targets in 1 rule. |
|||
|
15:27
preflex joined
15:41
Psyche^ joined
15:46
bubaflub joined
|
|||
| cotto | Coke, yes I added that. | 15:47 | |
| Coke | cotto++ : thanks. | 15:49 | |
| cotto | I like the idea of making the pbc build more C-like. | 15:51 | |
| That'll make dependency checking easier. | |||
| and it'll mean I won't have to make checkdepends much smarter | 15:54 | ||
| Coke | that was my lan. | 15:57 | |
| *p | |||
|
15:57
cognominal joined,
whiteknight joined
|
|||
| Coke | anyone here using ncigen? | 15:57 | |
| it's not built as part of the normal build, it seems. | |||
| whiteknight | Might just be a good opportunity to switch to the PCT-based variant | 16:01 | |
| at least, I seem to remember that project was mostly ready to go | |||
|
16:09
brrant joined
16:33
payload joined
|
|||
| cotto_w0rk | good morning! | 16:43 | |
| whiteknight | good morning cotto | 16:44 | |
|
17:01
brooksbp joined
|
|||
| bubaflub | good afternoon, all. i've got a rather newbie question: i ran make install on 1.9.0 and now want to make sure that my development doesn't conflict with an older version. since there is no make uninstall, should i just nuke the directory and unlink some stuff in /usr/local/bin? | 17:27 | |
| darbelo | bubaflub: Torch the harddrive. It's the only way to be sure. | 17:28 | |
| bubaflub | darbelo: hahaha. | ||
|
17:29
theory joined
|
|||
| darbelo | If you're willing to settle for a lesser alternative, you can install to a --prefix and use that as a list of stuff to delete from /usr/local | 17:29 | |
| bubaflub | ah, i see that they are actual executables in /usr/local, not symlinks | 17:34 | |
| that should make things more interesting | |||
| cotto_w0rk | Does anyone recall what the official conclusion on switching Parrot to Git was? ISTR allison saying that it should be brought up at some point in the future, either post-2.0 or post 3.0. | 17:37 | |
| bubaflub | cotto_w0rk: if my memory serves me correctly, at one parrotsketch it was asked to be brought up post-2.0 | 17:42 | |
| cotto_w0rk | good enough | ||
| whiteknight | bubaflub: you'll want to unlink everything parrot*, libparrot*, and pbc* from /usr/local/bin, /usr/local/lib, /usr/local/src, /usr/local/inc | ||
| bubaflub | whiteknight++ | ||
| whiteknight | Here's my bash function to do it: | 17:43 | |
| function parrot-uninstall { | |||
| sudo rm -rfv /usr/local/bin/parrot* | |||
| sudo rm -rfv /usr/local/bin/pbc* | |||
| sudo rm -rfv /usr/local/lib/parrot* | |||
| sudo rm -rfv /usr/local/lib/libparrot* | |||
| sudo rm -rfv /usr/local/src/parrot* | 17:44 | ||
| sudo rm -rfv /usr/local/include/parrot* | |||
| } | |||
| overkill, but always works | |||
| cotto_w0rk | won't that miss include/pmc ? | 17:45 | |
| whiteknight | no, recursively deletes all files and folders | ||
| that's /usr/local/include/pmc, right? | |||
| cotto_w0rk | yes | ||
| whiteknight | hmm, I didn't know we installed files to that location | 17:46 | |
| whiteknight needs to update his macro | |||
| cotto_w0rk | It's a recent change. | ||
| bacek++'s doing iirc | |||
| whiteknight | ah, that magical coding robot | ||
| particle | parrotsketch is logged... | 17:48 | |
| cotto_w0rk | 2.0 or 3.0 is correct: irclog.perlgeek.de/parrotsketch/200...#i_1553903 | 17:52 | |
| Coke gives a "meh" for the switch to git. | 18:01 | ||
| we still haven't recovered from our last infrastructure transition. =-) | |||
| cotto_w0rk | you mean rt->trac? | 18:02 | |
| Coke | more generally, parrotcode.org -> parrot.org | ||
| but yes. | |||
| and rt->trac was a BEAR. | 18:03 | ||
| dukeleto: any progress on the website? | |||
| so, I like git better, and am happy for the switch, but have no interest in managing any of the work involved. | |||
| * or doing. | |||
| if a shiny new git shows up, whee. | |||
| cotto: ./parrot -E might help with 1418. | 18:08 | ||
| whiteknight | The switch to git will be much more painless than the switch to SVN | ||
| and if we were bright we could maintain a read-only SVN mirror | |||
| Coke | cotto: yup. it flattens heredocs... | 18:09 | |
| cotto_w0rk | nice | ||
| Coke | whiteknight: given that we now have not svn but svn+trac... | ||
| (that adds to the complexity, is all.) | |||
| cotto_w0rk | although it's pretty simple to deal with them if all I care about is ignoring them. | 18:10 | |
| Coke | fair enough. | ||
| whiteknight | too bad github doesn't offer a better issue tracker | ||
| cotto_w0rk | We'd definitely want to keep a ro svn mirror, even if only to avoid obsoleting all extant references to svn revisions. | ||
| Coke | whiteknight: we're not switching issue trackers. =-) | 18:11 | |
| we've done that once. we're not doing again. =-) | |||
| I don't care if the new one /fixes bugs/ | |||
| cotto_w0rk | +1 | ||
| purl | 1 | ||
| bubaflub | whiteknight: github.com/davglass/github-trac | 18:12 | |
| don't know how good it is, but there is a plugin started for using trac with github. even including redirecting the source view of trac to github | 18:13 | ||
| Coke | if folks are serious about git, a page to track what we'd need from an infrastructure standpoint to switch. (trac support. all old rXXXX links inside trac should still work., etc.) | 18:15 | |
| cotto_w0rk | Coke, doing so now | 18:17 | |
| Coke failed to complete that sentence; danke. | 18:18 | ||
| dalek | tracwiki: v1 | cotto++ | GitTransition | 18:28 | |
| tracwiki: trac.parrot.org/parrot/wiki/GitTran...ction=diff | |||
| cotto_w0rk | tracsmac | 18:29 | |
| Gah! What's with trac today? | 18:30 | ||
|
18:32
chromatic joined
|
|||
| cotto_w0rk | nm. browser issue | 18:32 | |
| bubaflub | cotto_w0rk: i think dukeleto should have some good feedback on the switch to git; i know he recently did an svn -> git transition at his work. he also taught me git. | 18:33 | |
| cotto_w0rk | Excellent. | ||
| I'll ask him to add to that page next time he's around. | |||
|
18:38
zibri joined
|
|||
| moderator | Parrot 2.0.0 "Inevitable" released! | parrot.org | Priorities: deprecated core PMCs and VTABLE entries | Roadmap: icanhaz.com/parrotroadmap | Latest modified TT's: icanhaz.com/parrotbugs | 18:42 | |
| wagle | so, do i want to write a compiler from scheme s-expr strings to .pir, or look into one of the other things? | 18:50 | |
| chromatic | wagle, if I were doing Pheme over again, I'd use NQP. | 18:51 | |
| wagle | hmm.. ok | ||
| chromatic | I don't know how easy or difficult NQP makes things, but expression evaluation order rewriting was annoying enough that I wouldn't want to do it myself. | ||
|
18:51
joeri joined
|
|||
| wagle | i am planning to do all sorts of wacky things with memory layout | 18:51 | |
| oh, expression evaluation is easy for me | 18:52 | ||
| Coke wonders if he'll ever get back to partcl-nqp | 18:53 | ||
| wagle | i have a trick: wagle-normal-form, which moggi's a-normal-form was later a lot like.. one person says its "just ssa!" | ||
| (invented-by-laziness at 3am) | 18:54 | ||
| treat temporaries and locals the same | |||
| so make each temporary a local | |||
| conversion is a lot like converting to continuation-passing-form | 18:55 | ||
| chromatic | Sure, now write that in PIR. | ||
| That part was the annoying one, at least for me. | 18:56 | ||
| wagle | write a compiler to write it in .pir for me.. 8) | ||
| chromatic | Presto, done! ext/nqp-rx | ||
| wagle tries to juggle 24 balls at onve | |||
| wagle tries to juggle 24 balls at once | |||
| sweet! | 18:57 | ||
| cotto_w0rk | dukeleto, can you look at trac.parrot.org/parrot/wiki/GitTransition ? Apparently you have some recent experience with svn->git migrations. | ||
| dukeleto | indeed I do | 18:59 | |
| cotto_w0rk throws another hat at dukeleto | |||
| dalek | tracwiki: v148 | dukeleto++ | WikiStart | 19:00 | |
| tracwiki: trac.parrot.org/parrot/wiki/WikiSta...ction=diff | |||
| dukeleto starts wearing hats on his feet | |||
| wagle | use toes.. | 19:01 | |
|
19:03
rblasch joined
19:05
plobsing joined
19:15
rblasch_ joined
|
|||
| dalek | tracwiki: v149 | cotto++ | WikiStart | 19:17 | |
| tracwiki: trac.parrot.org/parrot/wiki/WikiSta...ction=diff | |||
|
19:22
rblasch__ joined
19:32
iblechbot joined
|
|||
| Coke | oh, crap, did I miss PS? | 19:37 | |
| dukeleto | Coke: yep | 19:40 | |
| Coke: we gave you all the hardest TTs | |||
| wagle: how is your scheme interpreter? | |||
| wagle | dukeleto: going to try writing one in haskell to target .pir... until i hit one of the many walls i can see dimly in the fog | 19:44 | |
| Coke | dukeleto: I'll treat them with the same care and tenderness that all the tt's open are. =-) | ||
| wagle | i dont have the impression i can (easily) do what I really want, but at least I'll get the infrastructure for a front-end going | 19:46 | |
| dukeleto | wagle: so you are writing haskell that generates PIR? | 19:47 | |
| wagle | i have a lot of clever memory layout and intermediate language stuff i want to do, and targetting a simplified perl is a bit disconcerting.. but i'll get over that, i think | ||
| dukeleto: yeah, i think i can get that going in a day or so (without factoring in the 3x) | 19:48 | ||
| will start working on it in an hour or so | |||
| dalek | tracwiki: v2 | dukeleto++ | GitTransition | 19:50 | |
| tracwiki: trac.parrot.org/parrot/wiki/GitTran...ction=diff | |||
| wagle | eventually, i write it in itself, but hey | 19:54 | |
|
19:54
bluescreen joined
|
|||
| whiteknight | chromatic: ping | 19:59 | |
| davidfetter | anybody know the status of rakudo w/2.0? | 20:00 | |
| dalek | rrot: r43606 | mikehh++ | branches/remove_deprecated_vtable_entries: create a branch to remove deprecated VTABLE entries |
20:01 | |
| rrot: r43607 | mikehh++ | branches/moving_core_to_dynpmcs: create a branch to move core to dynpmcs |
|||
| chromatic | pong | 20:05 | |
| whiteknight | chromatic: in #ps today you mentioned TT #389 was "more complex than anyone thought". The ticket doesn't have any info from the last two months. Can you expand on the new-found difficulties? | ||
| cotto_w0rk | davidfetter, istr that ng worked with it after a fairly small amount of hacking. | ||
| PerlJam | davidfetter: I know that the ng branch seems to work fine with 2.0 and that the ng branch should become master this week and that there should be a release this week. | 20:06 | |
| chromatic | Built-in PMCs store associated methods in the NameSpace because I couldn't find a good place to put them otherwise. | ||
| My best idea right now is to store them in a PMCProxy. | 20:07 | ||
| dalek | tracwiki: v3 | dukeleto++ | GitTransition | ||
| tracwiki: trac.parrot.org/parrot/wiki/GitTran...ction=diff | |||
| davidfetter | cotto_w0rk, PerlJam ok. the rakudo thing appears to be blocking a fedora package | ||
| whiteknight | chromatic:so it's just a question of figuring out where to put the definitions if not in the Namespace? | 20:13 | |
| Coke | trac-- | ||
| whiteknight | to my knowledge PMCProxies are created lazily, right? | 20:14 | |
| chromatic | Right. | ||
| Coke | trac-- | ||
| whiteknight toots "this won't be a problem when everyting is written in Lorito" horn | |||
| chromatic | No kidding. | ||
| Because PMCProxy extends Class, it's easy enough to stuff them in there. | 20:15 | ||
| whiteknight | on parrot startup, we create NameSpace PMCs for each built-in type? | ||
| chromatic | I don't know that. | ||
| The vtable has a slot for that. | |||
| I assume it has to be that way to store the methods. | |||
| whiteknight | well the method PMCs are created on startup, and if they're going in the NameSpaces, the namespaces must be created early | 20:16 | |
| chromatic | Exactly. | ||
| whiteknight | What if every VTABLE had a Hash* with methodnames/Method PMCs? | 20:17 | |
| then we wouldn't need to create PMCProxies eagerly | |||
|
20:17
payload joined
|
|||
| whiteknight | but we could look them up in the hash and add them to the proxy when needed for inheritance | 20:18 | |
| chromatic | I'm not sure. | ||
| Essentially we have two method lookup schemes now. | |||
| One is for classes and one is for intrinsics. | |||
| Unification would be lovely. | 20:19 | ||
| Coke | will spock be there/ | ||
| whiteknight | where do Classes store them, right in an attribute of the class? | ||
| chromatic | Yes. | 20:20 | |
| whiteknight | hmmm | 20:21 | |
| quite the tricky problem | |||
| chromatic | It's not awful. I think the trick is to make Default delegate its find_method VTABLE to the appropriate PMCProxy's find_method. | 20:22 | |
| whiteknight | that's a reasonable solution. I have a personal irrational dislike of PMCProxy, but I won't let that get in the way | 20:23 | |
| chromatic | Otherwise we make everything extend Class, not default. | ||
| Point being, a doubly-rooted hierarchy is silly. | |||
| dalek | tracwiki: v4 | coke++ | GitTransition | ||
| tracwiki: trac.parrot.org/parrot/wiki/GitTran...ction=diff | |||
| tracwiki: v5 | coke++ | GitTransition | |||
| tracwiki: trac.parrot.org/parrot/wiki/GitTran...ction=diff | |||
| whiteknight | on a tangential note, is there any reason why Class and PMCProxy cannot be merged? | ||
| chromatic | PMCProxy->instantiate() I think. | 20:25 | |
| whiteknight | but that should be easy enough, switch whether the type is an intrinsic or not, and run one of the two implementations | 20:26 | |
| chromatic | Replace Polymorphism with Switch? | ||
|
20:28
Austin joined
|
|||
| whiteknight | When the Class PMC is created, we would have a flag that determines whether it's a built-in type or not. | 20:32 | |
| PMC2C would generate the affirmative flag. Anything else would be negative | |||
| then when we instantiate, we act based on the value of that flag | |||
| chromatic | What does that unification provide, besides the chance to get rid of polymorphism with runtime checks and switches? | 20:34 | |
| Here's my idea. | 20:48 | ||
| When we register methods in PMC initialization, create a PMCProxy, store it in the appropriate namespace, and then insert the methods there. | |||
| dalek | rrot: r43608 | chromatic++ | branches/tt389_fix/lib/Parrot/Pmc2c/PMCEmitter.pm: [lib] Extracted write_nci_methods() method from init_func() method in PMC |
20:50 | |
| NotFound | whiteknight: I think your post about pir doesn't take into account the pir role as target language for compilers that doesn't use PCT. | 20:51 | |
| BTW the anonymous that recommends Winxed is not me X-) | 20:52 | ||
| whiteknight | NotFound: no, I didn't forget about Winxed. But I think it should be easy for Winxed to output PASM instead of PIR | 20:53 | |
| chromatic: good idea, but increases startup time | |||
| NotFound: and if you can output PASM, you can call libparrot to do a direct translation to bytecode | |||
| the only thing that PASM is really missing there is the ability to auto-allocate registers, which you don't want to do yourself | 20:54 | ||
| NotFound | whiteknight: yes, but pir curentrly takes care of calling conventions details. Generating pasm means you need to change the code generator when calling conventions change, | ||
| chromatic | There's a tradeoff. We're trading a bit of startup time for correctness and unification of method lookup. | 20:55 | |
|
20:56
brooksbp joined
|
|||
| cotto_w0rk | Lazy PMC initialization could help alleviate some pain. | 20:56 | |
| whiteknight | chromatic: so find_method VTABLE gets the PMCProxy/Class from the namespace and then looks for the method there? | 20:58 | |
| chromatic | Definitely. | ||
| Yes. | |||
| whiteknight | wait, pmc has pmc->vtable->class with the current Class or PMCProxy, right? So we can keep the lookup with only one redirection | 20:59 | |
| cotto_w0rk | I'm seeing the charm of unification. | ||
| chromatic | It's a one-line delegation: VTABLE_find_method(interp, VTABLE_get_class(interp, SELF->vtable->_namespace), method); | ||
| Does PMCProxy go in vtable->class? | |||
| whiteknight | chromatic: I think it should. in a built-in PMC type, vtable->class wouldn't hold anything else anyway | 21:00 | |
| chromatic | Fine by me. | ||
| That lets us skip a lot of unnecessary ceremony anyway. | |||
| whiteknight | jam the class or the proxy in there, be consistent about it, and then we just do VTABLE_find_method(interp, SELF->vtable->class, method); | 21:01 | |
|
21:01
japhb joined
21:09
bacek joined
|
|||
| whiteknight | I would really like to see some good caching or memoization of looked-up methods though | 21:10 | |
| of course we may need to wait for a proper PIC implementation or something similar for that | |||
| chromatic | In theory we have caching. | ||
| We have two kinds of caching. | |||
| Both suck in various ways. | |||
| whiteknight | I'm not aware of any caching that is done for method lookups | 21:11 | |
| chromatic | find_method_direct_1() in src/oo.c. | 21:12 | |
| whiteknight | that doesn't do any caching | 21:14 | |
| oh wait, I was looking at the wrong method | |||
| bacek | morning, good morning | 21:15 | |
| whiteknight | hello bacek | ||
| bacek | aloha whiteknight | ||
| whiteknight | anyway, I'm heading home now. See you guys later | 21:16 | |
| chromatic | slacker | ||
|
21:19
payload1 joined
|
|||
| bacek | msg whiteknight Can you help me with gc_encapsulate branch? It compiles. Even runs. But dies on first GC cycle... | 21:21 | |
| purl | Message for whiteknight stored. | 21:22 | |
| bacek heading off for morning duties and $dayjob | |||
| cotto_w0rk | chromatic, moving #ps 3 hours later seemed like an acceptable option to most people. Are we going to try that? | 21:23 | |
| darbelo | +1 from me on that. | 21:25 | |
| I wouldn't have missed it today that way ;) | |||
| chromatic | We can try it. | 21:27 | |
|
21:33
bacek joined
|
|||
| NotFound | "The PL/Parrot team will be having IRC meetings in #plparrot on freenode" Are you going to post logs somewhere? | 21:35 | |
| Coke | 3 hours puts it at what time? | 21:39 | |
| ps? | 21:40 | ||
| purl | rumour has it ps is postscript or process status or see "parrotsketch" or non-vector?! or annoying | ||
| Coke | parrotsketch? | ||
| purl | hmmm... parrotsketch is a status meeting for parrot core committers held every Tuesday at 18:30 UTC in #parrotsketch | ||
| chromatic | 21:30 UTC then. | ||
| NotFound | 22:30 Spain winter time. Good for me. | 21:42 | |
| Coke | that puts it at 4:30 or 5:30 eastern depending on the season? | ||
| darbelo | UTC == GMT ? | ||
| Coke | darbelo: minus DST. | ||
| UTC? | |||
| purl | hmmm... UTC is date -u or "Coordinated Universal Time" | ||
| NotFound | darbelo: for all practical purposes, yes. | 21:43 | |
| Coke | er, wait. minus some fractions of a second. | ||
| darbelo | Looks good to me. | ||
| NotFound | GMT is astronomical based, UTC is based on atomic clocks. | ||
| Coke | if we move to that, I'll miss it about half the year due to being in a car. | 21:44 | |
| chromatic | That's a long commute. | ||
| Coke | funny. | 21:45 | |
| I don't see '3 hours' in the email thread. | |||
| chromatic | Go ahead and laugh. I'm a funny guy. | ||
| Coke | just "couple" | ||
| ... tell everyone goodbye. | |||
|
21:46
cghene joined
|
|||
| darbelo | couple == 2 ? Such old-fashioned thinking... | 21:49 | |
| NotFound | How many are a 'bunch'? | 21:51 | |
| Coke | bunch depends on the item being bunched. | 21:59 | |
|
22:04
joeri left
|
|||
| dukeleto | anybody know stuff about openembedded? | 22:11 | |
| dalek | rrot: r43609 | plobsing++ | trunk (2 files): fix return (possibly smaller) native types from NCI and add test for returning |
22:12 | |
| darbelo | dukeleto: www.openembedded.org has some pointers. | 22:13 | |
| dukeleto | darbelo: yes, I am reading up | ||
| it looks like I am going to get some hardware from buglabs.net to port Parrot to it | 22:14 | ||
| and they use an openembedded buildchain | |||
| darbelo | Oh. Shiny. | ||
| dukeleto | shiny shiny! I am excited | 22:15 | |
| Infinoid | oh, cool. so you're gonna write an openembedded build script for parrot? | 22:17 | |
| darbelo | 'recipe' IIRC. | ||
| Configure.pl is bound to need surgery for that. | 22:18 | ||
|
22:20
brooksbp joined
|
|||
| NotFound | I'd like a port to the Nintendo DS | 22:22 | |
| darbelo | I started thinking about that when the RTEMS people first shouwed up. The path of least resistance for cross-compilation should be to add a --use-this-hinst-file= option to Configure and the build an *extensive* hists file that overrides all of the data we pull from perl. | 22:32 | |
| dukeleto | PL/Parrot sketch is happenin on #plparrot on irc.freenode.net NOW | 22:38 | |
| dalek | rrot: r43610 | plobsing++ | trunk (2 files): remove "xv"-style NCI signature fixup code (see TT1410) |
22:44 | |
| parrot: 3aa1b83 | darbelo++ | CREDITS: Add myself to CREDITS. |
22:45 | ||
| parrot: c322ad5 | darbelo++ | PLATFORMS: Add a PLATFORMS file. |
|||
|
22:46
brooksbp joined
|
|||
| dukeleto | Infinoid: yes, that is the plan | 22:47 | |
| so do we need an embedded Parrot working group or something? | 22:48 | ||
| PerlJam imagines opening a machine and finding bunches of tiny parrots inside. | 22:49 | ||
| dalek | parrot: 9209f47 | (Joshua Tolley)++ | PLATFORMS: Add platform report |
22:51 | |
| cotto_w0rk | Ideally they'd be Loritos. | ||
| chromatic | A wunch of loritos? | 22:52 | |
|
22:54
Whiteknight joined
|
|||
| NotFound | A bunch of couples, so they can reproduce. | 22:57 | |
| cotto_w0rk | and a bunch of bananas so they don't go hungry | ||
| NotFound | Good point | ||
| dalek | nxed: r370 | julian.notfound++ | trunk/winxedst0.cpp: rename PredefFunction to PredefFunctionFixargs and move some functionality to in stage 0 the same way as in stage 1 |
23:00 | |
|
23:07
eternaleye joined
23:12
patspam joined
23:16
plobsing joined
23:20
lichtkind joined
|
|||
| Whiteknight | NotFound: I don't know enough about Winxed, a default systems language for Parrot would need to be relatively low-level | 23:27 | |
| NotFound | No one but me knows enough about Winxed ;) | ||
| Whiteknight DEMANDS more documentation and examples | 23:28 | ||
| NotFound | Is enough low level to be able to compile himself without any runtime. | ||
| Whiteknight | I would need to see more examples | 23:29 | |
| purl msg bacek: sure, I'll check out a copy and look at it tonight | |||
| purl | Message for bacek stored. | ||
| NotFound | I recall now that I have an hexadcimal dump in examples in my laptop and forgot to commit it. | 23:30 | |
| plobsing | after I remove something deprecated, do I remove the deprecation notice? | 23:31 | |
| dalek | rrot: r43611 | plobsing++ | trunk/tools/build/nativecall.pl: simplify empty nci signature fixup a bit |
23:33 | |
| Whiteknight | plobsing: yes, unless you want to double-secret deprecate it | ||
| dalek | nxed: r371 | julian.notfound++ | trunk/examples/hexdump.winxed: hexadecimal dump example program |
23:34 | |
| plobsing | Whiteknight: double-secret deprecation? | 23:35 | |
|
23:35
brooksbp_ joined
|
|||
| lichtkind | the reason for parrot 2.0 is really just a nother year not a new API ? | 23:36 | |
| darbelo | Kind of. | ||
|
23:36
brooksb__ joined
|
|||
| darbelo | 2.0 is a supported release, it's API (unless noted in DEPRECATED.pod) will stay stable until the next supported release. | 23:37 | |
|
23:40
hudnix joined
23:45
bacek joined
|
|||
| dalek | nxed: r372 | julian.notfound++ | trunk/ (2 files): implement PredefFunctionVarargs in stage 0 and reimplement print and say predefs |
23:48 | |
| purl | using it is asking for troubles, it will cause more work than doing right from the beginning | ||
|
23:49
jsut joined
|
|||
| dalek | rrot: r43612 | plobsing++ | trunk (2 files): update documentation wrt status of "xv"-style signatures |
23:49 | |
|
23:50
sri joined
|
|||
| lichtkind | darbelo: thanks | 23:54 | |
| darbelo | Incidentally, we've just changed from a 6-month deprecation cycle to a 3-month one. So you could say our API has become more potentily volatile now. | 23:56 | |
|
23:56
hercynium joined
|
|||
| cotto_w0rk | Or you could say that we'll converge on awesomeness more quickly. | 23:57 | |
| darbelo | That's the intent, at least. | 23:58 | |
| lichtkind | why after 8 years develope,ment still API changes ? | 23:59 | |