pugscode.org/ | nopaste: sial.org/pbot/perl6 | pugs: [~] <m oo se> (or rakudo:, kp6:, smop: etc.) || We do Haskell, too | > reverse . show $ foldl1 (*) [1..4] | irclog: irc.pugscode.org/
Set by TimToady on 25 January 2008.
meppl good morning 03:08
mncharity yay for STD.pm refactoring :) 04:06
TimToady: "(1)" expect_infix has a context var $op, which doesn't seem to be used anywhere else. there's a lexical $op in reduce. "typo" or unfinished refactoring? 04:21
(2) $<O> looks like it gets copied up to dottyop, but then not up to the dotty:sym's. 04:25
mncharity back "tomorrow". good night all & 04:29
pugs_svnbot r20360 | lwall++ | [STD] couple tweaks suggested by putter++ 05:44
diff: dev.pugscode.org/changeset/20360
pugs_svnbot r20361 | lwall++ | [STD] first whack at semantically correct LTM backoff 08:23
diff: dev.pugscode.org/changeset/20361
r20362 | lwall++ | [Cursor5] backoff could terminate on skipped lengths 08:44
r20362 | lwall++ | forgot to actually test against the fixed length tokens
diff: dev.pugscode.org/changeset/20362
mncharity TimToady: (1) where does methodop get its $<O> from? it doesn't seem to be --> Methodcall anywhere? 15:44
mncharity (2) prefix_circumfix_meta_operator:reduce still has a %thisop is context<rw>; which doesn't seem to be used elsewhere. 15:54
mncharity (3) unlike the other $<O>'s, it looks like lex1 is using it as some kind of context var? is this intentional, and if so, is there anywhere else where this is done? 16:17
also, that should probably be a s/or/and/ panic. 16:19
s/context var/let() context var/ 16:32
mncharity continues to sync STD_red with STD.pm... 17:19
bbl &
pugs_svnbot r20363 | lwall++ | [gimme5] optimize leading whitespace out of alternatives so ltm works in rules 19:00
r20363 | lwall++ | various bug fixes
diff: dev.pugscode.org/changeset/20363
meppl good night 21:55
Adam- Hi 22:58
Adam3 hi 23:04
could anyone help me reversing molebox packing?
Eevee what is perl 6 intended to do with "a" - "b"? cast with warning a la perl 5 and return 0, or refuse a la ruby/python? 23:22
spinclad thinks refusing would be good. it's listed as 'numeric subtraction', and does rely on multi-dispatch; i don't see that this answers your question, though. 23:56