|
irclog.perlgeek.de/perl6book/today | source: github.com/perl6/book/ Set by moderator on 11 November 2009. |
|||
|
00:26
dalek joined
00:30
dalek joined
|
|||
| dalek | ok: af7253e | chromatic++ | src/classes-and-objects.pod: Edited classes and objects chapter: * some formatting cleanup * added a few suggestions for further improvement |
01:58 | |
| jnthn | chromatic++ # thanks, I plan to work on that chapter more in the next couple of days :-) | 02:00 | |
| chromatic: I see: | |||
| X<encapsulation> | |||
| X<classes; encapsulation> | 02:01 | ||
| Are those for index entries, or something else? And what's the significance of putting both in? | |||
| chromatic | They're index entries. | 02:02 | |
| jnthn | OK. | 02:03 | |
| The ; is so we get an entry like | |||
| classes | |||
| encapsulation | |||
| attributes | |||
| etc? | |||
| chromatic | X<classes; encapsulation> adds an encapsulation entry under the classes entry. | ||
| Hierarchical index. | |||
| jnthn | Nice. | ||
| Thanks. | |||
| I've taken note of the =begin programlisting syntax and will use that from now on too. | 02:04 | ||
| masak | chromatic: good changes all-in-all. chromatic++ | 02:05 | |
| jnthn | masak: huh? You're in my timezone and still concious too! :-) | 02:06 | |
| masak | jnthn: yes. an even number of us must be up too late. :P | ||
| jnthn | Even in Latvia. :-) | ||
| jnthn is looking forward to The Trip. | |||
| masak too | |||
| jnthn | Will be fun checking in for all(3,4) nights. ;-) | 02:07 | |
| masak | :) | ||
| masak pictures a junction of waiters on the fourth day, one yelling 'get out' and the other saying 'good morning, sir' | |||
| jnthn | We simultaneously have and don't have bacon. | 02:08 | |
| Gee, I hope that quantum entanglement collapses in a tasty way. | 02:09 | ||
| chromatic | Most everything looks fine; most of my changes were noting where the order of explanation is missing something and otherwise polishing prose. | ||
| masak | it'll be simultaneously tasty and unsatisfactory. | ||
| jnthn | chromatic: One of the =for author comments confused me, but that's probably because it's 3am. I'll get back to you if concious me still finds it confusing. :-) | 02:10 | |
| dalek | ok: 424541e | masak++ | src/classes-and-objects.pod: [OO] added back a lost full stop |
||
| masak | jnthn: so, who do you think first makes it to #perl6 tomorrow? :P | 02:11 | |
| jnthn | masak: I'm really not sure. | 02:12 | |
| masak: I know that I had to look up "insomnia" in my Slovak dictionary today to explain why I slept all morning to my Slovak teacher... | |||
| masak | :/ | ||
| what's the word? | |||
| jnthn | nespavost | 02:13 | |
| masak | beautiful. | ||
| jnthn | Which is wonderuflly logical. | ||
| masak | spac = sleep? | ||
| jnthn | infinitiv is spat | 02:14 | |
| masak | ah. | ||
| jnthn | Soft t on the end. | ||
| All Slovak infinitives end in soft t. | |||
| masak | convenient. | ||
| jnthn | Yeah. I like that. | ||
| ne is just like "not" or whatever. | |||
| masak | nodnod. | ||
| jnthn | Nespal som = "I didn't sleep" or some such. | ||
| masak | 'som'? | 02:15 | |
| jnthn | som = I am | ||
| masak | o.O | ||
| jnthn | (more) | ||
| When you do past tense for anything other than third person, you insert the appropriate present tense conjugation of "to be" | |||
| masak | that's... insane. | 02:16 | |
| jnthn | Well | ||
| The thing is that when you conjugate the verb itself for the past tense, you lose information. | |||
| masak | yes, I see that. | 02:17 | |
| but Russian manages well without 'am' in that sentence. | |||
| jnthn | In Russian, it's disambiguated 'cus you don't drop pronouns much when using the past tense. | ||
| masak | ah. | ||
| ok, now I see it. | |||
| jnthn | In Slovak we always drop them, unless you really need emphasis. | ||
| masak | the 'to be' verb stands in for the pronoun. | 02:18 | |
| except in third person, where it's implicit. | |||
| jnthn | the other annoyance is... | ||
| Bol som v Rusku # I was in Russian | 02:19 | ||
| erm, Russia | |||
| but | |||
| masak | lovely language, Slovak. | ||
| jnthn | Ked som bol v Rusku, cital som knihy. | ||
| # When I was in Russian, I read books. | |||
| masak | sure. | ||
| jnthn | Note the "som" moved. | ||
| masak | oh. | ||
| jnthn | Ked = "when" | 02:20 | |
| masak | nod. | ||
| we have the same in Swedish! | |||
| jnthn | There's a bunch of things in Slovak that slot into "second position" | ||
| masak | I didn't even reflect on it as something strange. :) | ||
| jnthn | In a tree-ish sense of second position. | ||
| masak | nod. | ||
| yiddish too. | |||
| jnthn | Yeah, it tripped me up quite a bit when I was first doing past tense. | ||
| But I highly doubted it was unusual. | |||
| Where does Swedish do it? | 02:21 | ||
| masak | hold on, let me try it first. | ||
| Ked som cital knihy, nespal som. | |||
| did I get that right? | |||
| # When I was reading books, I didn't sleep. | 02:22 | ||
| jnthn | Yes | 02:23 | |
| There's a couple of exceptions (a = and, ale = but, alebo = or, never cause the re-ordering) | 02:24 | ||
| Pil som vela piva, ale nebol som opity # for example | 02:25 | ||
| (I drunk lots of beer, but I wasn't drunk.) | |||
| masak | We have three types of word order in Swedish. (1) normal phrases 'jag Ƥter inte' (2) questions and subordinate phrases 'Ƥter jag inte' (3) phrases with an adverbial in them 'jag inte Ƥter'. | ||
| jnthn: that makes sense, those aren't the same type of word as 'Ked' | 02:26 | ||
| jnthn | Right. | ||
| masak | your phrase falls under case (3) above. | ||
| jnthn | Just good to note for completeness. :-) | ||
| jag = I? | |||
| masak | yes. | ||
| jnthn | You'll have to translate the other two words for me, sorry. | ||
| masak | 'a' and 'ale' don't change it because they're not in 'first place' in the phrase. | 02:27 | |
| Ƥter = eat | |||
| jnthn | Yeah, they're kinda not even in the phrase, in a sense. | ||
| masak | inte = not | ||
| jnthn: they're conjunctions and disjunctions; the glue between phrases. | |||
| jnthn | Right. | ||
| I guess (1) just comes yout as "I didn't eat", the second could be more "Didn't I eat?" and the third? | 02:28 | ||
| masak | I could have written 'jag Ƥter inte' as 'NP VP Adv'. | ||
| jnthn | OK. Change of meaning, or some subtle implication? | 02:29 | |
| masak | jnthn: the third: 'yesterday, I didn't eat' | ||
| jnthn: no, the three word orders are simply to be used in three disjunct sets of circumstances in a sentence. | |||
| a _very_ easy shibboleth for non-natives. | |||
| jnthn | Yeah | 02:30 | |
| I actually probably will soon start making some kinda effort to learn Swedish. | |||
| masak | it was only a matter of time :) | ||
| jnthn | Well, it's not unlikely I'll end up living there for a while. | ||
| masak | \\o/ | ||
| jnthn | A lot of my non-Perl 6 work comes from Sweden. | 02:31 | |
| masak | same here :) | ||
| jnthn | Well, given the about of masak-bugs I close, a lot of my Perl 6 work does too :-P | ||
| masak | :P | ||
| jnthn | But the latest possibility is that I do some stuff that needs me to come over to Sweden physically to do it...and if I have to do that regularly, well... | 02:32 | |
| ...I'm not a huge fan of flights anyway, and it's hardly great environmentally. | |||
| masak | loljnthninsweden! | ||
| jnthn | Plus Sweden is a really nice country. | ||
| masak | it is? oh, good. | ||
| jnthn | Oh, I've always enjoyed my visits. | 02:33 | |
| I'd probably be in the south. | |||
| South-west-ish | |||
| Well, very south west I guess...Malmo area. | |||
| masak | that's South :) | 02:34 | |
| jnthn | Yeah :-) | ||
| I quite like that area. | 02:35 | ||
| It's in reach of Gothenburg too, which I really like. | |||
| I guess I'd miss central Europe too. | 02:36 | ||
| So...lots to weigh up. | |||
| It's the second most likely option after "stay in Slovakia" though. :-) | |||
| masak | the first being...? | ||
| jnthn | Well, the first being "stay in Slovakia" :-) | 02:37 | |
| masak | that's not an option after your stay in Slovakia. :) | ||
| it may be late, but you can't fool me. :P | 02:38 | ||
| jnthn | Gah. | ||
| Thing is, I didn't learn English at school. I was left to figure it out for myself. :-) | |||
| masak | I can tell. :) | 02:39 | |
| jnthn | :-P | ||
| masak | though this is more a case of 'logic' than 'English' :) | ||
| oh well, as long as we don't let you near any critical codebases, we should be OK. :P | |||
| jnthn | Oh, I might have studied some of that...somewhere... | ||
| Yeah...good plan. pmichaud realized that and got me working in a branch. | 02:40 | ||
| :-P | |||
| masak | jnthn: did you see the big discussion earlier tonight? | ||
| jnthn | Yeah. | ||
| I actually backlogged it all. | |||
| I wasn't avoiding participating. | 02:41 | ||
| I was rather distracted by another discussion elsewhere. | |||
| Which kinda needed me to really think lots and hard. | |||
| masak | I didn't think you were avoiding it. :) | ||
| jnthn | :-) | 02:42 | |
| I'm very happy to see it. | |||
| masak | (switching over to #perl6) | 02:43 | |
|
05:41
mubot joined
08:00
sasykes joined
09:46
hicx174 joined
13:12
masak joined
|
|||
| PerlJam | btw, that discussion yesterday about the relationship between Perl 5 and Perl 6 should probably make its way into the book somehow (as long as we're reframing things) | 14:17 | |
| moritz_ | PerlJam: yes, I think it should go into the preface | ||
| PerlJam: and since you wrote it, I know the perfect man for that job :-) | 14:18 | ||
| PerlJam | heh | ||
| moritz_ | thank you for volunteering :-) | ||
| PerlJam | okay, I'll write something up this weekend | ||
| masak | PerlJam++ | 14:54 | |
|
19:05
chromatic joined
21:14
masak joined
|
|||