svn switch --relocate svn.openfoundry.org/pugs svn.pugscode.org/pugs/ | run.pugscode.org | spec.pugscode.org | paste: sial.org/pbot/perl6 | pugs.blogs.com | dev.pugscode.org/ Set by putter on 11 February 2007. |
|||
00:15
bones`comer is now known as bonesss
00:16
mako132_ joined
00:17
REPLeffect joined
00:26
larsen_ joined
00:39
sunnavy joined
00:53
Caelum joined
01:04
rashakil joined
01:11
REPLeffect_ joined
01:23
woremacx joined
01:25
mako132_ joined
01:33
MegaRevolt joined,
MegaRevolt left
01:52
stevan_ joined
01:55
bsb joined
01:56
Aankh|Clone joined
02:04
mdiep_ joined
02:19
dmq joined
02:33
eric256 joined
|
|||
eric256 | hello | 02:33 | |
eric256 wonders if he is in the wrong time zone for everyone else ;) | 02:34 | ||
143 people an no one is around? /me whistles | 02:37 | ||
02:50
amnesiac joined,
sunnavy joined
|
|||
eric256 | been a while since i did anything on p6 or pugs...is there a seperate pugs chat room? | 02:51 | |
there hasn't been a smoke of pugs done since oct? | 02:56 | ||
allbery_b | most pugs stuff happens here. things are quiet because most stuff that goes on at this time of day involves putter, who isn't around, or audreyt who is in hospital. | 02:59 | |
couldn' tell you much else, sorry | 03:00 | ||
eric256 | thanks for telling me that much ;) | ||
eric256 goes to wathc hereos and studio 60...but i'm getting my feather account fired back up | |||
03:08
Aankh|Clone is now known as Aankhen``
|
|||
TimToady | eric256: there have been lots of smokes of pugs since oct. where are you looking? | 03:08 | |
you want to look at the repository entries, not the release entries | 03:10 | ||
no point in resmoking the release, it'd presumably just give the same answer every time. | |||
ingy | hi TimToady | 03:11 | |
we never met up in Mountainview | |||
but that's ok | |||
I was just sleeping in a crappy hotel there | 03:12 | ||
all the hacking was in Palo Alto | |||
TimToady | well, my schedule has been insane in any event | ||
and I almost can't even eat out anymore between food allergies and low-salt diet... | 03:13 | ||
ingy | :( | 03:14 | |
TimToady | but it beats hepatitis, I'm sure | 03:15 | |
ingy | it's really too bad you won't be going to .jp | ||
TimToady | speaking of high sodium diets... | ||
ingy | haha | ||
03:16
mako132_ joined
|
|||
ingy | is that why? | 03:16 | |
TimToady | no, prior commitment on east coast that week | ||
ingy | I could supply you with applesauce | ||
ok | |||
TimToady | well, I'm sure I could survive on just rice for a week, if it came to that. | 03:17 | |
ingy | any word on YAPC::Beijing? | ||
TimToady | dunno | ||
ingy | I heard rumors | 03:18 | |
TimToady: if you ever want to feel the true extent of your creation, try installing a minicpan | 03:19 | ||
merlyn | installing the whole thing? | 03:20 | |
that could take months. :) | |||
TimToady | hey, 10 years or so ago i was trying to compress CPAN onto a CD | ||
merlyn | or do you mean just downloading it | ||
ingy | I'm on hour 2, at DBIx-Wrap | ||
TimToady | (for O'Reilly) | ||
merlyn | the minicpan *just about* fits on a CD still | ||
TimToady | with everything precompiled? | 03:21 | |
merlyn | uh, no | ||
sources | |||
TimToady | these were binary rpms... | ||
merlyn | ahh | ||
current MINICPAN = 631M | |||
ingy | TimToady: 7 years ago I did something similar for ActiveState | 03:22 | |
merlyn | that's still a CD, I think | ||
TimToady | but the Perl Resource Kit for Unix was never a good seller | ||
ingy | but that was only 1200 mods | ||
heh | |||
allbery_b | that, and it had the problem that it was out of date before it was released, CPAN being what it is | ||
allbery_b has a perl resource kit, never even bothered with the modules :) | |||
ingy | CPAN is my test database | 03:23 | |
it's a good chunk of data | |||
03:29
GabrielVieira joined
|
|||
TimToady | dinner & | 03:30 | |
03:43
justatheory joined
|
|||
Coke yawns. | 03:47 | ||
03:52
GabrielVieira2 joined
04:07
hobbs joined
04:24
reZo_ joined
04:49
stevan__ joined
04:51
jdv79 joined
05:06
REPLeffect_ joined
05:10
GabrielVieira joined
|
|||
eric256 | if i want to patch documentation..do i do that in the //mirror/pugs? or somewhere else? S29 had some minor code issues i was hoping to help fix ;) | 05:13 | |
05:15
rfordinal joined
|
|||
allbery_b | I think the synopses are more resrcited; post your issues here, and TimToady or someone else with access will fix | 05:16 | |
*restricted | |||
eric256 | okay, in the definition of reduce, and reverse the brackets { } arn't balanced, reduce is missing one, and reverse has a ) instead of a } | 05:19 | |
shouldn't there at least be a readme in that folder then explaining not to mess with them? i found Functions.pod in /docs/Perl6/Spec | 05:20 | ||
hmm just found the same file as /pugs/docs/feather/syn_index.html | 05:26 | ||
hehe now i'm confused | |||
Ziggy6 | i i think the synopses are on another svn repo | 05:27 | |
eric256 | err scratch that. itw as the index, not the same doc. | ||
ahh.. | |||
05:30
Aankhen`` joined
|
|||
eric256 | maybe if i figure this out my first task can be making it more obvious for the next guy! ;) | 05:30 | |
05:33
REPLeffect joined
05:34
Aankhen`` joined
|
|||
eric256 | actualy affter looking around, i think that IS the right place to edit S29 well i can always apply my changes and if its wrong it can get undone..thats tbe beauty of svn right? | 05:35 | |
05:38
ofer0 joined
|
|||
TimToady | The proper place to edit S29 is in pugs/docs/Perl6/Spec/Functions.pod | 05:47 | |
only S1-6,9-13 are in the svn.perl.org repo | 05:48 | ||
I leave the others over in pugs so that they can be edited by people like you. :) | |||
eric256: see above | 05:49 | ||
eric256 | hehe thanks! apparently i lost my commiter bit somewhere in there. could someone set me up with [email@hidden.address] i got the announcment it was changing, but can't find the email with a link to change my password | 05:50 | |
thanks TimToady, i figured out the smoke thing after i said it | |||
mind if i add a message at the bottum of S29 explaining where to update it at? | 05:51 | ||
05:52
fengc joined
|
|||
TimToady | I'd put it at the top, myself... | 05:52 | |
commit bit sent | |||
eric256 | thanks | ||
TimToady | thank you | 05:53 | |
gaal | TimToady: is &sort clever about its input somehow? Or should examples in Snn say sort :numerically or something? | 05:56 | |
nothingmuch | morning gaal | 05:59 | |
eric256 | all i need to do is svk -ci right? no push or pull or anything? svk is a little new to me ;) | 06:00 | |
eric256 enjoys seeing his changes take effect ;) hopefully i can find a little time now and then to scour docs and help a bit | 06:02 | ||
TimToady | gaal: sort by default uses cmp which is smart about a given type. If the keys are of inconsistent types, then you'd have to be more explicit, or use the signature form to coerce things a bit. | 06:04 | |
(assuming the signature for allows for the coercions...) | |||
*form | |||
sort uses Ordering which is defined in Functions | 06:05 | ||
I'm sure it's still infested with a few bogons though. | |||
I wish the people who spend endless hours debating various sorting approaches in Perl 5 would spend a little time critiqueing the new design... | 06:06 | ||
06:07
avarab joined
|
|||
TimToady | I do think canonicalized is a horrid long word. | 06:08 | |
tene | I like it. | ||
TimToady | how 'bout "canned" for short. :) | 06:09 | |
or maybe c11d :) | 06:10 | ||
REPLeffect | Yeah, but then the guy at s11n.net would claim trademark or something. | ||
TimToady | he should be flattered that we borrowed a feature. :) | 06:11 | |
REPLeffect | hehe. | ||
Except that's a C++ library :-) | 06:12 | ||
TimToady | oh, we'll probably end up borrowing that too... | ||
REPLeffect | yeesh. He's out with cancer -- is everyone getting seriously ill lately? | ||
TimToady | we'll have to put some extra stuff in there so the Pava and P# peopel can chop it back out later. | 06:13 | |
s/el/le | |||
REPLeffect | Is that the British spelling of peopel? :-) | ||
06:13
avarab_ joined
|
|||
REPLeffect | no, wait, that would be peouple. | 06:14 | |
TimToady | well, I hope I got done with being seriously ill three years ago. | ||
REPLeffect | Was that the stomach trouble? | ||
TimToady | nod | ||
REPLeffect | So, what was the exact condition? | ||
(other than "miserable")? | 06:15 | ||
TimToady | called GIST "gastro-intestinal stromal tumor" | ||
06:15
Ziggy6 joined
|
|||
TimToady | fast growing, but tends not to metastasize, fortunately. | 06:15 | |
REPLeffect | So did they try to give you the old "irritable bowel" as a preliminary diagnosis? | ||
TimToady | by the time they took it out it was the size of a fist | ||
no, not when I was pouring blood out my lower end | 06:16 | ||
had two ulcers on the tumor | |||
REPLeffect | Well, yes, that tends to be an indicator of something worse :-) | ||
TimToady | had to have two units of blood just for that part | ||
REPLeffect | Youch. | 06:17 | |
I've just noticed, that a lot of times when they don't know what it is ... | |||
... and it is gastro-related "Oh, it's irritable bowel". | |||
TimToady | and I was off on Kauai at the time; we were at our timeshare there | ||
REPLeffect | Where's that? | 06:18 | |
TimToady | not how I wanted to spend an extra week in Hawaii | ||
REPLeffect | ah. | ||
Was your family with you? | |||
TimToady | it's the westernmost main island | ||
my wife. my in-laws had just flown out earlier that day | |||
and the oldest and most eroded | |||
but pretty | 06:19 | ||
REPLeffect | (nice save) :-) | ||
TimToady | got to look at it a lot from my hospital room | ||
REPLeffect | oh, I thought that you were joking about your wife. | ||
(ducks) | |||
TimToady | the doctor there didn't want to tell me I had a tumor and "ruin my vacation" | ||
REPLeffect | Um. Duh... | ||
TimToady | but said in no uncertain terms that I would see a GI specialist | 06:20 | |
when I got back home | |||
REPLeffect | By that time I'd say twas ruined. | ||
TimToady | I did, and he sent me to the surgeon | ||
REPLeffect | So how long was your recovery -- post surgery? | ||
TimToady | the surgeon did a CT scan, and before I was home from that, he and my wife arranged surgery for the next day | ||
they sent me home after about ten days, but I ended up right back in the hospital in a day | 06:21 | ||
apparently the new plumbing had scarred up | |||
REPLeffect | youch. | ||
TimToady | we waited another month and a half for it to open back up, but it never did. | ||
06:22
GabrielVieira2 joined
|
|||
TimToady | so eventually they went back in and replumbed it a different way. | 06:22 | |
REPLeffect | PVC or copper? ;-) | ||
TimToady | basically, I didn't eat or drink a thing for most of two months. | ||
everything came through tubes | |||
couldn't take pills | |||
it was either morphine or nothing | |||
gaal | rehi; thanks for the explanation, TimToady, smartcmp++. | 06:23 | |
eric256 | with the smart linking, i was linking t/operators/value_equivalenc.t and wondered if i could make it two large code blocks...will the smart linking catch that and link that whole bit..then smart links inside that could link to just those sub code blocks? | ||
TimToady | basically, I thought I was recovered two months after that | ||
REPLeffect | TimToady: Between the cornea transplant and that I'm sure you'd prefer ... | ||
TimToady | but in retrospect, I wasn't really back online for most of a year | ||
REPLeffect | ... to stay out from under the knife for a good long time. | ||
TimToady | yeah, now it's just hypertension, grrrr. | 06:24 | |
REPLeffect | As my Grandpa says "it's hell gettin' old, ain't it!" | ||
TimToady | beats the alternative, barely | ||
gaal | nothingmuch: remoose | ||
REPLeffect | Well, from what I understand, not in your case (bad for family, but not for you) | 06:25 | |
But noone wants to leave before their time. | |||
TimToady | eric256: no clue | ||
REPLeffect | s/noone/no one/ | ||
can't believe I did that -- one of my pet peeves. | 06:26 | ||
TimToady | Q: Why is it that we laugh at a birth and cry at a funeral? A: Because we are not the person involved. | ||
REPLeffect | hehe. | ||
06:27
LCamel joined
|
|||
TimToady | well, time to take my blood pressure again... | 06:27 | |
REPLeffect | enjoy :-) | ||
06:28
LCamel joined
|
|||
TimToady | 134 / 89, not too bad | 06:29 | |
just don't say anything exciting, and I should last a while yet. | |||
REPLeffect | anything .... exciting | 06:30 | |
I got nothin' | 06:31 | ||
should be safe. | |||
On a slightly perl-6-ish topic. I haven't seen anything, but are there plans for a macro mechanism in perl 6? | 06:33 | ||
I mean, like lisp macros, not C macros. | |||
allbery_b | yes, it's in one of the symopses | ||
*synopses | |||
REPLeffect | Seems it would be much more difficult to implement, perl having syntax and all (unlike lisp). | 06:34 | |
in my fairly uneducated estimation. | |||
allbery_b | they operate on ASTs | ||
(that is, the internal representation) | |||
REPLeffect | So, how does that translate to the perl 6 code? | 06:35 | |
(feel free to point to the synopsis, if you know which one) | |||
TimToady | see S06:2010 | ||
section "Macros" | |||
REPLeffect | OK. | ||
allbery_b | was just about to check S06, having just scanned S02 | 06:36 | |
REPLeffect | Funny, after asking the question, that sounds a bit familiar :-) | ||
allbery_b has not memorized the synopses... | |||
REPLeffect | perhaps old-timers has just set in. | ||
allbery_b | neh, just perl6 is rather lower on the stack than a number of other things | ||
06:37
jisom joined
|
|||
REPLeffect | Either that, or I've just slept since then :-) | 06:37 | |
allbery_b goes back to searching for a different kind of macro | 06:38 | ||
06:38
drupek12167 joined
|
|||
REPLeffect | TimToady: am I missing something? S06 has just one line about macros that I can see. | 06:41 | |
allbery_b | hrm, I saw a whole section about them, admittedly without much detail | ||
TimToady | about 2000 lines below that | ||
REPLeffect | Am I looking in the wrong place? (perl.org) | ||
06:42
jisom joined,
bsb left
|
|||
allbery_b | perlcabal.org/syn/ | 06:42 | |
lambdabot | Title: Official Perl 6 Documentation | ||
06:42
jisom joined
|
|||
REPLeffect | ah (gasp 2003!) no wonder. | 06:42 | |
allbery_b | S06 / Advanced subroutine features / Macros | ||
TimToady | dev.perl.org/perl6/doc/design/syn/S...tml#Macros | 06:43 | |
lambdabot | Title: Synopsis 6: Subroutines - perl6: | ||
REPLeffect | Much better. | ||
TimToady | don't look at the original date, look at the last modified date | 06:44 | |
REPLeffect | I was looking here: perl6.org/doc/design/syn/S06.html | 06:45 | |
lambdabot | Title: Synopsis 6 | ||
REPLeffect | Last Modified: 12 Apr 2003 | ||
just a tad out-of-date. | 06:46 | ||
TimToady | yes, that's very old | ||
REPLeffect | So, I'm assuming that none of that is actually implemented yet. Is that correct? | ||
Or is that an "unfair" statement? | 06:47 | ||
TimToady | ?eval macro prefix:<foo> { "say" }; foo "bar" | 06:48 | |
evalbot_r15255 | Error: No compatible subroutine found: "&foo" | ||
eric256 | i remember now how this can quickly suck up a ton of time! ;) later all and thanks for helping me get back in the groove ;) | ||
TimToady | ciao | ||
06:48
eric256 left
|
|||
TimToady | ?eval macro foo { "say" }; foo "bar" | 06:49 | |
evalbot_r15255 | OUTPUT[ā¤] Bool::True | ||
TimToady | seems not to be entirely functional yet... | ||
REPLeffect | But at least there is something there. | ||
TimToady | probably parses correctly but doesn't actually mutate the grammar appropriately yet | ||
the current pugs parser doesn't really do the syntactic categories thing yet. | 06:50 | ||
that's part of why I'm writing the Perl 6 grammar in Perl6 now. | |||
to see how all that works together | 06:51 | ||
REPLeffect | If you could just write Perl 6 in Perl 6, you'd be golden :-) | ||
(all of it, I mean) | |||
except for that little bootstrapping problem. | |||
TimToady | maybe someday we'll get there. for now I'd just be happy for the parser to be in Perl 6 | 06:52 | |
jisom | how are perl6 macros different from perl5 constant functions? | ||
allbery_b | self-bootstrapping is a solved problem :) start simple, each new revision parses a bit more | ||
TimToady | constants are just variables that are initialized at compile time, basically. | ||
they don't change the grammar | |||
you can use macros to define constants, but it's kind of overkill. | 06:53 | ||
REPLeffect | jisom: are you familiar with lisp-style macros? | ||
jisom | no, only c, and pir | ||
REPLeffect | totally different beast from C | ||
C macros are just text substitution, essentially. | 06:54 | ||
TimToady | 'course, the nice thing about Lisp is that the language *is* the AST... | ||
REPLeffect | hehe. | ||
jisom | I'd take forth over lisp any day, though | ||
REPLeffect | If you can just get used to the parens (someone will say it eventually, might as well be me) | ||
TimToady | I'm trying to think if there's anything else nice about Lisp... :) | ||
jisom | good with lists? | 06:55 | |
REPLeffect | actually, I would submit that the language being the AST is a pretty big win -- if you can get used to it. | 06:56 | |
TimToady | nah, uses all these strange lopsided . trees to represent what should be a simple structure. :) | ||
it's a big win for the compiler writer :/ | |||
REPLeffect | No doubt! | 06:57 | |
TimToady | it'd be an even bigger win for the compiler writer if we could just get the user used to writing I*86 assembly | ||
;), of course | 06:58 | ||
jisom | not portably, I use a ppc :) | ||
TimToady | then you'll just have a harder time getting used to it... | ||
jisom | yeah, or hack parrot and it's jit to use that for your programming | 06:59 | |
REPLeffect | TimToady: I'm curious. Have you ever written anything fairly large in lisp (I don't know if you've done much in it at all)? | ||
TimToady | not since grad school | ||
and I wouldn't really call it "large". | |||
REPLeffect | So, was that homework assignments then? | ||
TimToady | well, course project in natural language processing | 07:00 | |
REPLeffect | Don't get me wrong, I'm not trying to "convert" you, I'm fairly new to lisp myself. | ||
jisom | that many parenthesis aren't natural | ||
REPLeffect | I was just curious. | 07:01 | |
I am *not* new to perl. | |||
s/perl/Perl/ | |||
allbery_b | jisom: there's always the interlisp-style ] | 07:02 | |
REPLeffect | lisp programmers would argue that many paren-challenged versions of lisp have been tried and all failed. | ||
TimToady | also used (and hacked on) the mock-lisp in Gosling's emacs, but that's arguably not real lisp. | ||
REPLeffect | I have to admit. What I've seen of macros in lisp impresses me. | 07:03 | |
TimToady | um, *all* languages have been tried and all have failed. :) | ||
REPLeffect | I was waiting for it. | ||
TimToady | you give good straight lines | ||
allbery_b | lisp macros are powerful. they're also incredibly brain-twisty | ||
jisom | perl6 has failed already??? | ||
allbery_b | having the language and the AST be identical has its downside | 07:04 | |
TimToady | oh, certainly, we've planned for it in advance. | ||
REPLeffect | Which downside are you referring to? | ||
allbery_b | the brain-twisty | 07:05 | |
TimToady | arguably, planning to have failed is the *one* thing that Perl 6 has done better than any other language. | ||
REPLeffect | hehe. | ||
allbery_b | really easy to confuse the map and the territory when they're indistinguishable | ||
REPLeffect | Actually ... | ||
so far I see it as mainly a good thing. | 07:06 | ||
I've tried to to a fair bit with code generation. | |||
jisom | does perl 6 require alphanumeric characters? | ||
REPLeffect | And lisp is the first language that seems to make it a natural part of the language. | ||
allbery_b | for unicode definition of same, I believe | ||
TimToady | jisom: not sure what you're asking | 07:07 | |
REPLeffect | The verdict is still out in my case (as to whether I'll try to do much with it). | ||
jisom | with trickery, a perl 5 program doesn't need any alphanumeric characters, can perl 6 do the same? | ||
all line noise | 07:08 | ||
TimToady | it will be more difficult | ||
most of the punctuational variables are gone, for instance | |||
REPLeffect | !@#$@%$@%!!! | 07:09 | |
devbot6 | REPLeffect: Error: "@#$@%$@%!!!" is not a valid command. | ||
REPLeffect | (sorry) | ||
couldn't resist. | |||
TimToady | have you looked at Haskell yet? | ||
tene | ?eval !@#$@%$@%!!! | ||
evalbot_r15255 | Error: ā¤Unexpected "#$@%$@%!!!"ā¤expecting "@" or "::" | ||
jisom | only looked.....not understood | 07:10 | |
REPLeffect | It's on my list (if you're asking me) | ||
jisom | haven't done the homework | ||
TimToady | it's definitely more of a brain-pretzel than Lisp... | ||
REPLeffect | I kind of picked up that vibe. | 07:11 | |
allbery_b | if you avoid keywords you can write haskell programs without alphanumerics | ||
jisom | I remember one of audrey's blog posts, about some code that worked, but she didn't know how | ||
allbery_b | <*> is a perfectly good variable name | ||
jisom | "Gentlemen, that is surely true, it is absolutely paradoxical; we cannot understand it, and we don't know what it means. But we have proved it, and therefore we know it must be the truth." - Benjamin Peirce | ||
TimToady | well, $<*> is a perfectly good variable name... :) | 07:12 | |
REPLeffect | Is there a "straight" tie-fighter operator yet? |-o-| | 07:13 | |
07:13
Ziggy6 left
|
|||
TimToady | ?eval sub infix:<|-o-|> ($a,$b) { say "Use the $a, $b!" }; "Force" |-o-| "Luke" | 07:14 | |
evalbot_r15255 | OUTPUT[Use the Force, Luke!ā¤] Bool::True | ||
TimToady | that good enough? | 07:15 | |
REPLeffect | works for me :-) | ||
Still haven't figured out how Darth let that other stupid tie fighter run into him in the trench. | |||
geez -- chosen one -- didn't you forsee that? | |||
TimToady | well, you know, family squabbles get you hyperfocused... | 07:16 | |
REPLeffect | hehe. | ||
jisom | that one needs to go into a faq somewhere | ||
REPLeffect | Even when you don't know they are family. | ||
The tie fighter, or the darth vader reference? | |||
jisom | the little command | 07:17 | |
perl6-amusement | |||
REPLeffect | Your next book, TimToady. | ||
TimToady | will already be too fat... | ||
REPLeffect | Perl 6 3000 (ducks) | ||
TimToady | Pyrl | 07:18 | |
Puby | |||
Pcl | |||
Pisp | |||
REPLeffect | <shudder> | ||
TimToady | Paskell | ||
jisom | python? | ||
REPLeffect | oops. That's a little too close. | ||
TimToady | Portran? | ||
REPLeffect | Porth? | ||
Pimula? | 07:19 | ||
TimToady | PPL | ||
allbery_b | perthon, of course | ||
TimToady | and, of course, PL/I | ||
jisom | hmmm......a perl that uses postfix | ||
allbery_b | PerL/1? | ||
REPLeffect | Perlfix? | ||
jisom | perl forth.... | ||
REPLeffect | But please, no P++ | 07:20 | |
TimToady | ?eval sub postfix:<!> ($x) { [*] 1 .. $x } 10! | ||
evalbot_r15255 | 3628800 | ||
07:20
marmic joined
|
|||
REPLeffect | And no Pasic of any form :-) | 07:21 | |
(visual or not) | |||
jisom | makes me think of pir's "foo = print" | ||
TimToady | Pua | ||
07:21
Ziggy6 joined,
Ziggy6 left
|
|||
REPLeffect | Pogo? | 07:21 | |
I actually kinda like that one. | 07:22 | ||
If I do say so myself. | |||
TimToady | purtle graphics | ||
jisom | no one's going to mention p | ||
REPLeffect | Next book typeset in Patex. | ||
Or is that Perlatex? | 07:23 | ||
Heck, that may already exist. | |||
TimToady | Next nintendo box is the Pii | ||
REPLeffect | think of the children | ||
... in the public swimming pool | |||
As if Wii wasn't bad enough. | |||
TimToady | Darn, I forgot to Pivo that program... | 07:24 | |
REPLeffect | Actually, I think the next version is the "Uss" (pronounced "us") | ||
TimToady | all just goes to show that P is much more flexible than Py | 07:25 | |
REPLeffect | [cough] [sputter] [flying coffee] | ||
go away bad visuals!!!! | |||
TimToady | well, I think my blood pressure is down in the basement now. probably should head off to bed before I do any more damage to the ecology. | 07:26 | |
REPLeffect | That's because Py is not in liquid form. | ||
sleep well, TimToady ... | |||
TimToady | K | ||
REPLeffect | (I'd say dream of large women ... | 07:27 | |
... but there was already one incorrect reference to females in your life earlier) | |||
TimToady | except my wife is 4'10"... | ||
REPLeffect | so she probably wouldn't appreciate that. | ||
No matter how it was interpretted. | |||
TimToady | well, g'nite. | 07:28 | |
REPLeffect | I should get back to work also. | ||
good evening. | |||
07:28
REPLeffect left
07:29
GabrielVieira joined
07:43
leed joined
07:46
offby1 joined
|
|||
offby1 | is there a built-in way to "adjoin" an element to a list -- i.e., to "push" it if there isn't already an equivalent value? (I suspect not, but ...) | 07:46 | |
allbery_b | sounds more like you want a set than a list | 07:47 | |
offby1 | ya | 07:48 | |
trying that now. | |||
'nother question: at the pugs command line, can I find out what methods are defined for a particular variable? There seem to be all sorts of handy things whose documentation I've never run into. | |||
allbery_b | no introspection as yet, no :( | 07:49 | |
offby1 | ok, more specifically: if I've got a file handle, and read some lines from it, can I get it to tell me how many lines I've read? | ||
seems silly for me to have to keep track myself. | |||
I guess I want the perl6 equiv of $. | |||
allbery_b | hm, S16 hasn't evolved that far yet. guess it's a question for @Larry | 07:53 | |
avarab_ | offby1: in p5 people would generally say "use a hash" | 07:54 | |
the same probably applies in p6 | |||
07:54
avarab_ is now known as avar
|
|||
offby1 | avar: doin' that now :-) | 07:54 | |
allbery_b | well, except p5 didn't have a set type; p6 is supposed to | ||
(may not be implemented yet, of course) | 07:55 | ||
offby1 | aha | 07:56 | |
see, I didn't know that :-| | |||
jisom | isn't there a @array.contains($foo) type thing in perl 6? | 07:57 | |
offby1 | that'd be nifty | ||
let's see. | |||
allbery_b | @array ~~ $foo? | ||
lambdabot | Keelhaul the swabs! | ||
offby1 | well, pugs ain't got it | ||
allbery_b | whoops | ||
offby1 | nope | ||
~~ don't do it needer | |||
pity. | |||
allbery_b | ?eval <a b c> ~~ 'a' | ||
evalbot_r15255 | Bool::False | 07:58 | |
offby1 | is evalbot running pugs? | ||
allbery_b | hm, I think thatmade the synopsis a few weeks ago and pugs hasn't been updated to match yet | ||
offby1 | ah | ||
allbery_b | smartmatch gets overhauled every week or so :) | ||
jisom | then it'd just make it a push unless contains type thing | ||
offby1 | I have to trust that it's not just flattening the array into a string and then doing a regexp match against that ... :-) | ||
allbery_b | oh, duh | 08:00 | |
?eval any(<a b c>) eq 'a' | 08:01 | ||
evalbot_r15255 | (Bool::False | Bool::True) | ||
allbery_b | hm, right, got that bug still :) | ||
offby1 | hmm | ||
let's see if that bites me too | |||
allbery_b | ?eval my @foo = <a b c d e>; any(@foo) eq 'c' | 08:02 | |
offby1 | works though. | ||
evalbot_r15255 | (Bool::False | Bool::True) | ||
offby1 | allbery_b: thanks. | ||
at least, it works in an "if". | |||
which prompts me to say: "Everything I Do Gonna Be Funky (From Now On)" | 08:03 | ||
allbery_b | ?eval my @foo = <a b c d e>; if any(@foo) eq 'c' { "yea" } else { "nay" } | ||
evalbot_r15255 | "yea" | ||
jisom | ?eval my @foo = <a b c>; any (@foo) eq 'd'; | ||
evalbot_r15255 | (Bool::False) | ||
offby1 blows allbery_b a kiss | |||
allbery_b | ?eval my @foo = <a b c d e>; if any(@foo) eq 'f' { "yea" } else { "nay" } | ||
evalbot_r15255 | "nay" | ||
allbery_b | if provides the right context to avoid the autothread bug | ||
offby1 | I assume that's no worse than linear time in the size of @a? | ||
allbery_b | I don't know the implementation | 08:04 | |
offby1 | ah, hell; I'll code as if it were reasonably fast. | ||
allbery_b | no worse, potentially better if it autothreads | ||
offby1 | i.e., I will not prematurely optimize. | ||
08:04
iblechbot joined
08:05
devogon joined
|
|||
offby1 | what would "autothreads" mean? | 08:05 | |
allbery_b | junction operators like any() can automatically take advantage of multiple CPUs by doing multiple operations in parallel threads | ||
offby1 | kewl. | 08:06 | |
p6 is about 10 years ahead of any other language I know of. | 08:07 | ||
jisom | maybe look into erlang, it's designed for multiprocessing | 08:10 | |
single operator multithreading....sounds good considering how common multi core/multi cpu computers are becoming | 08:11 | ||
moritz | jisom: I'm sure erlang doesn't have rules... or at least not as powerfull as p6 ;) | ||
avar | offby1: how about lisp?:) | 08:23 | |
offby1 | I already do lisp ... p6 is kewler :-) | 08:24 | |
avar | mm, m-expressions;) | ||
08:24
svnbot6 joined
|
|||
moritz | 22:18 < TimToady> Perl 6 is just another dialect of Lisp | 08:24 | |
offby1 | perl and scheme are diametric opposites (I like both). Scheme says "Programming languages should be built, not by piling feature on top of feature, but by removing the weaknesses and restrictions that make additional features appear necessary". Perl takes the opposite approach. Both work! | 08:25 | |
moritz: what do perl 6 macros look like? | |||
moritz | offby1: I have no idea ;) | ||
allbery_b | one could argue that haskell does a better job of being scheme than scheme does; call/cc can be implemented as a library, not as a builtin :) | ||
offby1 | haskell ain't got macros, far's I know | 08:26 | |
allbery_b | (in fact, it is: Control.Monad.Cont) | ||
audreyt | offby1: template haskell is typesafe macro | ||
allbery_b | Template Haskell | ||
*blink* hello! | |||
audreyt | much better/hygenic than scheme's :) | ||
offby1 stands corrected | |||
audreyt | greetings | ||
moritz | offby1: I see the same with eiffel... I used to use that, and it's a very neat language ;) | ||
audreyt | so. limited time awake. but the most dangerous phase is behind me (where I was largely unconscious) | ||
moritz | audreyt++ | ||
allbery_b | yay! audreyt++ | 08:27 | |
offby1 | and furthering the common misapprehension that I am audreyt's evil twin, it's time for me to go to bed. Thanks for the hints, folks. | ||
allbery_b | also, some things you'd do with macros can be done with generics instead. Data.Generic aka SYB | ||
(hm, except that may use TH under the covers) | 08:28 | ||
allbery_b should go back to being eviltwin_b :) | 08:30 | ||
wolverian | audreyt, very glad to hear that. get well soon. | 08:42 | |
audreyt | well, I need to roll my 1d20 tomorrow | 08:45 | |
95% chance that it'll take but another week (or two) for this to be over | |||
5% chance that it'll get chronic | |||
the saving throw is to be checked ~14hr from now, so I better get some more sleep... | 08:46 | ||
moritz | we keep our fingers crossed | ||
audreyt | thanks :D | ||
at least it's just acute Hepatitis B and not fulminant failure... | 08:47 | ||
clkao | audreyt! | ||
audreyt | clkao: heya | 08:48 | |
clkao | å„ēčå | ||
audreyt | čč„äø儽äŗŗēęÆę„ę„ē | ||
čč„ęÆ儽äŗŗēęÆåÆ¬é »ē | |||
clkao: anyway... the doctor will decide if my immune system needs to get modded tomorrow | 08:49 | ||
if not, that means I get to stay conscious most of the time, and you're welcome to visit | |||
if I need to get modded... it may be more fun to watch plants grow than visit ;) | 08:50 | ||
clkao | best to you | ||
audreyt | danke | ||
clkao | i will be in taipei tomorrow | ||
audreyt | k. will keep you posted | 08:52 | |
keyboarding during IV requires too much aerobics... | 08:54 | ||
so bbl :) *wave* & | |||
clkao | SvIV | 08:55 | |
08:57
jamhed joined
09:07
pfarmer joined
09:09
REPLeffect_ joined
09:29
BooK joined
09:37
andara joined
09:44
buetow joined
09:53
Psyche^ joined
10:02
fengc_ joined
10:05
andara joined
10:09
Psyche^ is now known as Patterner
10:19
drrho joined
10:25
nipra joined,
drupek12167 joined,
sunnavy joined
10:29
ruoso joined,
kanru joined
10:47
VanilleBert joined
10:49
rfordinal joined
10:57
dalecooper joined
10:58
elmex joined
11:04
cmarcelo joined
11:10
dduncan left
11:12
b_jonas joined
11:21
reZo joined
11:27
andara left
11:30
andara joined
11:35
jamhed joined
11:48
IllvilJa joined
11:49
IllvilJa joined
12:08
chris2 joined
12:17
ludwig- joined
12:26
buetow joined
12:36
GabrielVieira2 joined
13:28
araujo joined
13:30
REPLeffect_ joined
13:37
pbuetow joined
|
|||
mj41 | hi, see www.ohloh.net/projects/4406 maybe somebody should add pugs too | 13:49 | |
lambdabot | Title: Parrot Metrics Report | ||
13:50
rindolf joined
|
|||
moritz | mj41: see www.ohloh.net/projects/3300 | 13:56 | |
lambdabot | Title: Pugs Metrics Report | ||
13:59
thepler joined
|
|||
wolverian | ohloh doesn't count haskell, I think, which makes it a bit useless for pugs. | 14:09 | |
14:14
ofer1 joined
14:19
vel joined
14:47
chris2 joined
|
|||
Coke | see also "PIR" for parrot. :| | 14:56 | |
cia is more helpful, I think. | |||
14:56
bonesss joined
15:04
iblechbot joined
15:15
rindolf joined
15:26
__Ace__ joined
15:30
pdcawley joined
15:37
GabrielVieira joined
15:38
VanilleBert joined
15:40
broquaint joined
15:55
iblechbot joined
16:22
justatheory joined
16:32
REPLeffect_ joined
16:39
silug joined
16:48
BooK joined
16:53
cjeris joined
17:16
bjoern_ joined
17:22
elmex joined
|
|||
pasteling | "bjoern_" at 84.57.242.159 pasted "Simplifying regular expressions" (48 lines, 1.4K) at sial.org/pbot/22962 | 17:26 | |
bjoern_ | Hi. In the paste above I give an algorithm to perform a certain simplification of regular expressions | 17:27 | |
My algorithm works as I want it to, except that it does not terminate if the expression uses inf repetition like in `a+` | |||
I so far failed to fix that problem. Suggestions most welcome. | 17:28 | ||
[particle] | you could leave nodes with repetition modifiers alone | 17:30 | |
(until you have a better solution) | |||
17:31
rashakil_ joined
|
|||
bjoern_ | I think that does not work. One of the operators I have is something similar to relaxng.org/spec-20011203.html#inte...ve-pattern | 17:32 | |
lambdabot | Title: RELAX NG Specification | ||
bjoern_ | In relax ng, <interleave>a* b c</interleave> would match e.g. `a b a c a a a`. I need to turn this into a choice of groups, if I keep the repetition where it is, the result would be incorrect | ||
[particle] | how would you "simplify" that expression? | 17:33 | |
bjoern_ | Well one option would be a*ba*ca* | a*ca*ba* | 17:35 | |
[particle] | would that expression match 'a'? or are b and c always required? | 17:36 | |
17:36
bernhard joined
|
|||
bjoern_ | the latter | 17:36 | |
I could handle the simple case of a repetition of one terminal simply by checking `if rest == p` and then generating `head+` | 17:37 | ||
baest | that should be possible to do with p6 rules. Name every group as a rule and have <a>* <b> <a>* <c> <a>*. Maybe this could be done simpler, but shouldn't that approach work? | ||
bjoern_ | Yes, I basically have a validation engine for arbitrary context-free grammars, I just want to, if the grammar describes a regular language, turn the grammar into a regular expression | 17:38 | |
In principle my question is totally non-perl6 related | |||
... but head+ does not work if more than one terminal is repeated, as in the (ab)+c example in the paste | 17:39 | ||
17:46
wilx` joined
17:48
eric256 joined
|
|||
svnbot6 | r15256 | eric256++ | Adding/fixing some smartlinks | 17:48 | |
eric256 | .... first looks like ti would be easy to implmement, but its not there yet.. would it be added in prelude or somewhere else? | 17:51 | |
moritz | ti? | 17:52 | |
17:55
sunnavy joined
|
|||
svnbot6 | r15257 | lwall++ | sigs and captures mostly | 17:55 | |
TimToady | eric256: prelude makes sense to me | 17:57 | |
eric256 | hehe now to learn how to use a Matcher object ;) | 17:58 | |
TimToady | in the long run we'd like to have almost everything in the prelude in a self-referential way, and then cut the circularity with a "circularity saw". | ||
that would make tiny embedded interpreters practical | |||
and fancier run times would just replace more of the prelude with built-in magic | 17:59 | ||
moritz | the build system is a bit weird... | 18:00 | |
TimToady | for now you could implement it with a return from inside a grep, I think. | 18:01 | |
eric256 | hehe wwow that was easy. for @list -> $val { return $val if $val ~~ $test}... probably even a niecer way to right that | ||
moritz | when I do `make' twice in a row, it still compiles stuff in the second run | ||
is that intended? | |||
TimToady | I think some of it is. | 18:02 | |
moritz | and on `make install` there are some compiliations as well | ||
18:02
xinming joined
|
|||
moritz | that is ugly, because if you run make as a user, and make install as root, your repository fills with uid=0 files ;( | 18:02 | |
TimToady | yeah | ||
Coke | wow, sounds like pugs build is not much better than parrots. | 18:03 | |
it's on our list of things to fix. =-) | |||
TimToady | same kind of make install problems, which is why most of us never do make install... | ||
moritz | I don't easer (dpkg-buildpackage is much more pretty once it works ;) | ||
s/easer/either/ ;) | 18:04 | ||
18:04
offby1 left
|
|||
TimToady | make install run as root should just depend on the existence of the executable, not it's up-to-dateness | 18:05 | |
s/it's/its/ grr | |||
but the basic underlying problem is that there are all sorts of subtle build dependencies that make is just too stupid to capture | 18:06 | ||
and the smarter your compiler and linker are, the more they fool make | |||
18:07
justatheory joined,
rashakil__ joined
|
|||
TimToady | make is sort of like vice grips. it's the wrong tool for every job, but it'll do every job. :) | 18:07 | |
moritz | so should we just du it in perl? *g* | 18:08 | |
s/du/do/ *grml* | |||
TimToady | well, the whole problem with make is that it has little clue what "do" and "it" mean. | 18:09 | |
all it really knows is file granularity and "touch" semantics | 18:10 | ||
eric256 | do i need to remake in order to see changes to Prelude? | ||
TimToady | pugs will reload the prelude every time if you don't remake the precompiled version | 18:11 | |
eric256 | i'm just using feathers pugs so i don't know where it is looking for its Prelude.pm can i convince it to look at my own Prelude? | 18:12 | |
TimToady | ENOCLUE | 18:13 | |
biab & | 18:14 | ||
eric256 beggins building pugs to final test his first method ;) | 18:16 | ||
moritz | btw is there something like "Design by Contract" for Perl6? | 18:20 | |
18:20
ludwig- joined
|
|||
TimToady | moritz: yes, grep S04 and S06 for PRE and POST | 18:23 | |
moritz | TimToady: cool, thanks | ||
eric256 | on 37 out of 106... well when i get back from lunch it should be done ;) /me goes to look at see if you can control where pugs looks for Prelude.pm | 18:24 | |
__Ace__ | hey, TimToady, what say you about creating a bigger project in C (instead of C++)? :) | ||
moritz | TimToady: sounds like a start... | 18:29 | |
18:30
weinig joined
|
|||
moritz | TimToady: not quite as sophisticated as in eiffel, but that's hard to beat ;) | 18:30 | |
18:34
ashleyb joined
|
|||
moritz | TimToady: how would a sub with PRE and POST look like? sub foo() PRE { true } { work} POST {true}? | 18:34 | |
18:38
ashelyb_ joined
|
|||
TimToady | moritz: block traits typically go inside the block their modifying | 18:45 | |
18:45
Lorn joined
|
|||
TimToady | it's possible DBC blocks could be an exception to that | 18:45 | |
and we need to work out the semantics on multis/protos | 18:46 | ||
18:50
renormalist joined
18:57
weinig is now known as weinig|away
18:59
rindolf joined
|
|||
rindolf | Hi all. | 18:59 | |
19:02
pdcawley joined
19:04
neonse joined
19:15
jisom joined
19:24
araujo joined
19:47
theorbtwo joined
|
|||
rindolf | Is there a list of bugs for pugs somewhere? | 19:51 | |
[particle] | t/pugsbugs ? | ||
rindolf | [particle]: OK, checking. | 19:52 | |
[particle]: I cannot find it in the pugs repository. | 19:54 | ||
I'm using svn.pugscode.org/pugs | 19:55 | ||
lambdabot | Title: Revision 15257: / | ||
[particle] | sorry, can't help :( | 19:58 | |
svnbot6 | r15258 | lwall++ | heredoc stubs | ||
allbery_b | I think for the most part the list f pugs bugs is generated by "make test" or "make smoke" | 20:00 | |
TimToady | grep for :todo<bug> | ||
rindolf | Let's suppose I have a list of prime numbers, and I'm generating IDs for them using a method. Now I'm interested in the pair (prime and its ID) with the least ID. | 20:02 | |
What's the neatest way to do it in Perl 6? | |||
diotalevi | ?eval undef.defined | 20:03 | |
rindolf | In Lisp I solved it using a map followed by a reduce with a really hideous lambda. | ||
evalbot_r15258 | Bool::False | ||
tene | what sort of data structure are you storing it in, rindolf? | ||
rindolf | tene: storing what? | 20:04 | |
tene | the pairs? | ||
20:04
justatheory_ joined
|
|||
rindolf | tene: I don't have the pairs to start with. | 20:04 | |
tene | so what do you have to start with? | ||
rindolf | tene: the primes are a list or an array - your choice. | ||
tene | a list and a method? | ||
Okay. | |||
rindolf | tene: yes, a list and a method. | 20:05 | |
diotalevi | ?eval undef.HOW.can( 'defined' ) | 20:06 | |
evalbot_r15258 | Error: No compatible subroutine found: "&can" | ||
diotalevi squints at that. Odd. | |||
allbery_b | I don't think the metaobject stuff is there yet | 20:07 | |
there's a start at an implementation but it';s not hooked in or doing much yet IIRC | |||
diotalevi | /me'd recently implemented "interesting values of undef" in Perl 5 and was looking at Perl 6 for examples. | 20:09 | |
tene | rindolf: one option is to procedurally stuff them all in a hash, then min(%hash.keys) | 20:10 | |
20:11
weinig|away is now known as weinig
|
|||
rindolf | $v = f:x("a") "b" - what does it mean? | 20:13 | |
I'm talking about t/operators/adverbial_modifiers.t | |||
tene | ?eval sub id($n) { $n+100 }; my %hash = map {{foo($_) => $_}}, 1..10; %hash.perl.say | 20:14 | |
evalbot_r15258 | Error: No compatible subroutine found: "&foo" | ||
tene | ?eval sub id($n) { $n+100 }; my %hash = map {{id($_) => $_}}, 1..10; %hash.perl.say | ||
evalbot_r15258 | OUTPUT[{("101" => 1), ("102" => 2), ("103" => 3), ("104" => 4), ("105" => 5), ("106" => 6), ("107" => 7), ("108" => 8), ("109" => 9), ("110" => 10)}ā¤] Bool::True | ||
tene | ?eval sub id($n) { $n+100 }; my %hash = map {{id($_) => $_}}, 1..10; min(%hash.keys) | 20:15 | |
evalbot_r15258 | "101" | ||
tene | or... | 20:16 | |
?eval sub id($n) { 100-$n }; my @primes = 1..10; min(@primes,->$a,$b{id($a) cmp id($b)}) | 20:20 | ||
evalbot_r15258 | 10 | 20:21 | |
tene | ?eval sub id($n) { 100-$n }; my @primes = 1..10; my $min = min(@primes,->$a,$b{id($a) cmp id($b)}); {$min,id($min)} | 20:22 | |
evalbot_r15258 | (\10, 90) | ||
20:22
justatheory joined
|
|||
tene | ?eval sub id($n) { 100-$n }; my @primes = 1..10; my $min = min(@primes,->$a,$b{id($a) cmp id($b)}); {id($min) => $min} | 20:22 | |
20:22
REPLeffect_ joined
|
|||
evalbot_r15258 | (90 => \10) | 20:22 | |
tene | rindolf: any of that work for you? | ||
wolverian | I think @primes.min(&id) should work as well. | 20:23 | |
although I do wonder why [1..4].min doesn't work. | |||
allbery_b | ?eval [1..4].min | 20:24 | |
evalbot_r15258 | [1, 2, 3, 4] | ||
allbery_b | ?eval (1..4).min | ||
evalbot_r15258 | 1 | ||
rindolf | tene: let me see | 20:25 | |
TimToady | ?eval [min] 1,2,3,4 | ||
evalbot_r15258 | Error: ā¤Unexpected "1"ā¤expecting operator | ||
tene | wolverian: are you suggesting that min checks the arity of &by and compares the results of two separate calls if it only takes one parameter? | 20:26 | |
wolverian | tene, yes. | ||
rindolf | tene: let's assume that we map the primes into their prime => id pairs. | ||
tene: and work from there. | |||
tene | rindolf: that's what I did in the first example. | ||
rindolf | tene: ah. | 20:27 | |
wolverian | (it's just a suggestion though, I don't know what it actually does. :) | ||
tene | That sort of cleverness seems potentially bad. | 20:29 | |
TimToady | min should take arguments like sort | 20:30 | |
conceptually min is just first(sort()) | |||
only O(n), we hope | |||
wolverian | isn't it annoying how practicalities get in the way of concepts? | 20:31 | |
rindolf | paste.lisp.org/display/36814 - this is the lisp version | 20:32 | |
allbery_b | ?eval [min] (1,2,3,4) | 20:33 | |
evalbot_r15258 | Error: ā¤Unexpected "("ā¤expecting operator | ||
tene | wolverian: such cleverness would probably lead to unexpected behavior. | 20:34 | |
TimToady | ?eval 1 min 2 | 20:35 | |
evalbot_r15258 | Error: ā¤Unexpected "min"ā¤expecting operator | ||
TimToady | infix:<min> not yet impl | ||
?eval sub infix:<minval> ($a,$b) { min $a.value, $b.value } [minval] :a(1), :b(2), :c(3), :d(0), :e(5) | 20:39 | ||
evalbot_r15258 | Error: Named argument found where no matched parameter expected: ("a",Ann (Pos (MkPos "<eval>" 1 67 1 68)) (Val (VInt 1))) | ||
TimToady | ?eval sub infix:<minval> ($a,$b) { min $a.value, $b.value } [minval] (:a(1), :b(2), :c(3), :d(0), :e(5) | 20:40 | |
evalbot_r15258 | Error: ā¤Unexpected end of inputā¤expecting operator or ")" | ||
TimToady | ?eval sub infix:<minval> ($a,$b) { min $a.value, $b.value } [minval] :a(1), :b(2), :c(3), :d(0), :e(5)) | ||
evalbot_r15258 | Error: ā¤Unexpected ")"ā¤expecting ",", bare or pointy block construct, ":", identifier, term postfix or operator | ||
TimToady | ?eval sub infix:<minval> ($a,$b) { min $a.value, $b.value } [minval] (:a(1), :b(2), :c(3), :d(0), :e(5)) | ||
evalbot_r15258 | Error: No compatible subroutine found: "&value" | ||
rindolf | ?eval: ([3,5],[1,6],[7,9],[8,100]).min({$^a.[0] <=> $^b.[0]}) | 20:42 | |
evalbot_r15258 | Error: ā¤Unexpected ": (["ā¤expecting "::" | ||
20:46
Daveman joined
|
|||
zgh | I think the NBL is Perl 6: steve-yegge.blogspot.com/2007/02/ne...guage.html | 20:57 | |
lambdabot | Title: Stevey's Blog Rants: The Next Big Language | ||
rindolf | ?eval: ().min | 21:07 | |
evalbot_r15258 | Error: ā¤Unexpected ": ()."ā¤expecting "::" | ||
allbery_b | er, rindolf? why "?eval:"? | 21:11 | |
bot doesn't like that colon | |||
tene | ?eval ().min | 21:12 | |
evalbot_r15258 | undef | ||
rindolf | allbery_b: I see. | 21:14 | |
eval: 5+6 | |||
buubot | rindolf: 11 | ||
allbery_b | cute. mixing bot activations :) | ||
21:15
czth joined
|
|||
nothingmuch | ?eval: sub prefix:<:> ($x) { $x } 1+1 | 21:19 | |
evalbot_r15258 | Error: ā¤Unexpected ": sub"ā¤expecting "::" | ||
nothingmuch | =( | ||
rindolf | Hi nothingmuch | ||
nothingmuch | all is fair if you predeclare, i guess | ||
hola | |||
21:21
weinig is now known as weinig|bbl,
justatheory joined
|
|||
rindolf | nothingmuch: what's up? | 21:21 | |
nothingmuch | work | 21:22 | |
21:22
Aankhen`` joined
21:31
Psyche^ joined
21:32
rashakil_ joined
|
|||
gaal | www.youtube.com/watch?v=KyLqUf4cdwc # perl recognized | 21:33 | |
tene | zgh: re NBL post: refactoring tools? IDE support? Are there big plans for those in Perl6? | 21:37 | |
jisom | does he know that open(info) is ok? | 21:38 | |
stevan__ | wow,.. I hope Perl 6 has such advanced Vista intigration | 21:40 | |
jisom | should try that on a system 7 mac... | 21:41 | |
might work better | |||
nothingmuch | "just how easy", eh? | ||
21:41
lichtkind joined
|
|||
jisom | he doesn't try "upper case info"? | 21:42 | |
lichtkind | sorry for rude question but what has changed in perl6 since last 2 month? | ||
merlyn | plenty | ||
do you want my diffs? :) | |||
lichtkind | when i get them? | 21:43 | |
merlyn | give me a few minutes... I have to find a log entry from two months ago | ||
lichtkind | hi merlyn yesterday i praised you before my friends :) | ||
jisom | svn diff r1:r16? | ||
sort of | 21:44 | ||
merlyn looks for something around dec 13 | |||
lichtkind | merlyn no joke i was really surprised how kind you was | ||
merlyn | is there a pastebot here? | 21:45 | |
nothingmuch | pasteling | ||
sial.org | |||
see also the topic | |||
allbery_b | several, actually, but sial.org is the useful one :) | ||
ashelyb_ | lichtkind: dev.pugscode.org/timeline | 21:46 | |
lambdabot | Title: Timeline - Pugs - Trac | ||
pasteling | "merlyn" at 67.171.133.77 pasted "summary of difference between perl6 archive between two months ago and now" (543 lines, 33.2K) at sial.org/pbot/22970 | ||
merlyn | 542 files changed. :) | ||
oh - let me do it with rename and copy detection | 21:47 | ||
lichtkind | shiii i meant more like something like biggest feature chandes | ||
21:47
Psyche^ is now known as Patterner
|
|||
lichtkind | but thanks a lot | 21:48 | |
pasteling | "merlyn" at 67.171.133.77 pasted "differences with rename/copy detection enabled" (529 lines, 32.3K) at sial.org/pbot/22971 | ||
nothingmuch | lichtkind: unfortunately no one is really blogging actively anymore, but that was the best option before, i think | ||
lichtkind | hello nothingmuch | 21:49 | |
ok i try to explain | |||
merlyn | 34067 insertions, 3575 deltions | ||
sounds like we're making progress! | |||
528 files changed | |||
lichtkind | some momth i did some serious effort to write perl6 tutorial | ||
and paused a little | |||
merlyn | here's a big one - src/perl6/Perl-6.0.0-STD.pm | 21:50 | |
lichtkind | now im writing artikel for the new german perl magazin | ||
merlyn | and this one too - misc/pX/Common/redsix/redsix | ||
lichtkind | and just want to be shore not to overlook some new cool feature | ||
nothingmuch | merlyn: i'm not sure that's helpful | ||
merlyn | maybe you want a diff of the status | ||
lichtkind | sounds good | 21:51 | |
21:52
Shai-Hulud joined
|
|||
lichtkind | i copied newest files and made also svn check out | 21:52 | |
Shai-Hulud | hi | ||
merlyn | I track perl6-svn with git - it has nice tools for differences and stuff, including good rename detection | ||
lichtkind | i also ask what from you perpektive important in perl6 | 21:53 | |
hallo robin :) | |||
pasteling | "TimToady" at 71.139.17.198 pasted "synopsis diffs in the last 2 months" (5708 lines, 211K) at sial.org/pbot/22972 | ||
21:53
mako132_ joined
|
|||
nothingmuch | TimToady++ | 21:53 | |
Shai-Hulud | @lichtkind: do I know you? :) | ||
lambdabot | Unknown command, try @list | ||
merlyn | ahh yeah, I've been tracking those as well | ||
lichtkind | thanks tim | 21:54 | |
looks a bit creepy but shurely helpful | |||
Shai-Hulud | yes that's a bit annoying | ||
pasteling | "merlyn" at 67.171.133.77 pasted "perl6doc diffstat for last two months" (10 lines, 422B) at sial.org/pbot/22973 | 21:56 | |
lichtkind | some big thing like intro of captures happened? | ||
21:57
Southen_ joined
|
|||
lichtkind | thanks | 21:58 | |
that should keep me busy a while :) | |||
Shai-Hulud | and your latest red alert game of course *g* | 21:59 | |
I don't even know what I'm supposed to do here, I'm a FORTRAN guy (yes and still not retired) ... bye | 22:04 | ||
22:04
Shai-Hulud left
|
|||
nothingmuch | red alert? he must be really old ;-) | 22:05 | |
pasteling | "moritz" at 80.193.211.68 pasted "Pugs Build Error" (19 lines, 1.1K) at sial.org/pbot/22974 | 22:08 | |
mj41 | lichtkind: hi, I prefer my Synopses diffs :-), e.g. perl6.cz/w/index.php?title=Synopses...oldid=2121 , see perl6.cz/wiki/Synopses | ||
lambdabot | Title: Synopses/S04 - perl6.cz, tinyurl.com/yrkl3x | ||
moritz | any idea why pugs build failed? (see pastebot) | 22:09 | |
lichtkind | nothingmuch no im 30 :) | ||
nothingmuch | not you, Shai-Hulud | ||
lichtkind | hes under 20 :) | ||
perl6.cz eho of you is czech? | 22:10 | ||
s/eho/who/ | |||
allbery_b | I thought the parrot embedding stuff was bitrotted | 22:11 | |
mj41 | lichtkind: I am Czech. | ||
lichtkind | mj41 a jak jse jmenujes? | 22:12 | |
moritz | allbery_b: any way I can prevent it from building? | ||
mj41 | lcihtkind: michal jurosz | ||
allbery_b | I thought parrot foo only built if you had envirobnment variable spointing at a parrot tree | ||
moritz | allbery_b: I had parrot installed previously, but I purged it all | 22:13 | |
mj41 | lcihtkind a ty? odkud jsi ze mluvis cesky? | ||
allbery_b | you might need to make clean to disappear any dangling references, then | ||
PerlJam | make realclean | 22:14 | |
moritz | ok, I'll do that | ||
allbery_b | and go through the configure foo again | ||
lichtkind | mj41 protoze jse nemec :) :) | ||
jsem | 22:16 | ||
PerlJam | nazdar! | 22:17 | |
Jaz se mas? | |||
PerlJam exhausts all the czech he thinks he knows | |||
lichtkind | nazdar vsechno plno cechu tady? | ||
22:17
reZo joined
|
|||
mj41 | lichtkid aha, ja nemecky neumim asi ani vetu :-( | 22:17 | |
lichtkind | mj41 cool you also do wxperl, why i never did you see in the lists? | ||
22:18
polettix joined
|
|||
mj41 | tak to je parada, ja pilne studuju anglictinu, abych se tady domluvil a oni vsichni mluvi cesky :-) | 22:18 | |
lichtkind | mj41 no tak vidis jak ten svet je kruty :) | 22:19 | |
PerlJam not bad for a beginner :) my pozor im native speaker | |||
mj41 co je WxMageApp ?? | 22:20 | ||
PerlJam | lichtkind: my wife was the gym director at a local organization called "Sokol". I heard Czech all the time but didn't really pick up on it (sounded too much like mumbling to me) | ||
mj41 | lichtkid I am php "coder" now, not time for wxperl | 22:21 | |
PerlJam | mj41: me too! | ||
lichtkind | PerlJam ah interesting, but czech is really language for poets | 22:22 | |
PerlJam commiserates | |||
lichtkind | how sad | ||
22:22
dduncan joined
|
|||
lichtkind | mj41 yes but you did write this code so you know what it does wiki.kn.vutbr.cz/mj/index.cgi?Projekty | 22:22 | |
lambdabot | Title: Projekty : MJWiki | 22:23 | |
lichtkind | ja take delal hodnje v wikipedii | ||
chtel rict take hodne | |||
k back to perl6 :) | 22:24 | ||
PerlJam did you recognized some major new features in last month popping into perl6? | |||
22:25
Caelum joined
|
|||
PerlJam | lichtkind: yes I did. It even worried me for all of a few hours :-) | 22:25 | |
lichtkind | PerlJam what do you exactly mean ? :) | 22:27 | |
PerlJam | I worried briefly about the language growing "too big" or "too complex", but then I realized this is how perl has always been. The trick is just in compartmentalizing knowledge so that you can let your associative memory work in your favor. Lucky perl compartmentalizes well :-) | 22:29 | |
lichtkind | like a boss i would say thank for you opinion but thats not what im asked for :) | 22:30 | |
PerlJam i meant new features :) | 22:33 | ||
22:34
weinig|bbl is now known as weinig
|
|||
lichtkind | PerlJam i sometime also bit worried cause too complex, but like larry sad you dont have to use it | 22:41 | |
22:41
Limbic_Region joined
|
|||
lichtkind | the gather blew my mind but im good hope that i will understand | 22:43 | |
22:52
weinig is now known as weinig|food
|
|||
Debolaz | I don't know, I prefer certain things just being modules and the language's job is just to make sure that it's easy to write those modules. That is one of the thing that has made perl 5 so popular. | 22:54 | |
tene | Debolaz: explain? | 22:55 | |
Debolaz | I like perl 5 because it's minimalistic, yet does a very good job giving you the facilities you need to write the functionality you need. I think things such as junctions does not need to be a part of the core language, even though I do see that they are usefull. | 22:56 | |
22:59
Psyche^ joined
|
|||
allbery_b | hm? junctions in core gives you automatic parallelization in core. this is a good thing | 23:00 | |
lichtkind | Debolaz so dont use it, even perl5 is full with tons of features | ||
Debolaz | lichtkind: You completely missed my point. | ||
lichtkind | Debolaz i think the job of a language is to make programming easier, to write everything i need sounds to me more like TCL | 23:01 | |
Debolaz | allbery_b: Yes, automatic parallelization is a good thing but I don't believe junctions neccesarily requires core support in order to achieve this. Perhaps there could be some API to allow delegating tasks to a new thread.. less high level than junctions? This way, more than just junctions could take adventage of it. | ||
lichtkind | Debolaz you made good point but it does not meet perls objectives | 23:02 | |
Debolaz | lichtkind: You wouldn't need to write every single little thing you need. That's completely ignoring the existence of modules. | ||
lichtkind | so you want modules that add core features? | 23:03 | |
Debolaz | No? | ||
Junctions wouldn't need to be a core feature. | |||
REPLeffect_ | I suspect that junctions are to be in the core because there are advantages to having them there ... | 23:04 | |
.. and because | |||
.. they are totally ignorable if you don't want them, so no major advantage in leaving them out of the core. | |||
Debolaz | REPLeffect_: The adventages are autoparallellization, but the "right" solution imho would be exposing an API to allow modules to tell core what it can autoparallellize rather than restricting it to a few included high level builtin functions. | 23:05 | |
lichtkind | Debolaz thats the design philosophy of minimal core | ||
Debolaz | You can of course do both, but this solution would've allowed both junctions and this from the getgo whileas right now there are just junctions. | ||
tene | Debolaz: Junctions *are* an API to autoparallellize things. | 23:06 | |
lichtkind | i understand the need to keep the core small as possible | ||
jisom | if it's running on parrot, wouldn't it just be able to access parrot's threading methods and do it itself? | 23:07 | |
lichtkind | but that was never the perl way to do things | ||
tene | Debolaz: Junctions are *how* you tell perl to autoparallelize. | 23:08 | |
Debolaz | lichtkind: It was imho perl 5's way of doing things. Keeping things minimal, just make it possible for modules to implement things in a good way and not stuff every feature the developers thinks are nifty into the core language. A new language should not be a free ticket to change what made perl 5 popular. | ||
REPLeffect_ | I by no stretch of the imagination an expert on the implementation of junctions, but I suspect there technical reasons for having the implementation be part of the core. Perhaps someone with more intimate knowledge of the design could chime in on that. | ||
tene | What sort of API were you thinking of? | ||
REPLeffect_ | s/there/there are/ | 23:09 | |
Debolaz | tene: My complaint was that junctions were too high level. | ||
23:09
GabrielVieira2 joined
|
|||
tene | Debolaz: howso? Provide an alternate suggestion. | 23:09 | |
Debolaz | A function like async_if_efficient {} for instance, leaving it to the core to determine if a thread should be created. | 23:11 | |
23:12
Psyche^ is now known as Patterner
|
|||
lichtkind | Debolaz: that i way to see ist, i could argue that was made perl popular is Tim Today so you can use junctions, loops or arrays or..., perl was about have an choice and we adding new | 23:12 | |
allbery_b | um, you still can. there are just more ways to do it now | ||
lichtkind | thats a way to see it | ||
allbery_b | it's not like junctions are replacing lists | 23:13 | |
tene | Debolaz: how would you implement junctions using async_if_efficient? | ||
allbery_b | should we rip out arrays because you can simul;ate them with hashes, or vice versa? | ||
lichtkind | but debolaz did very valid psychological point: its all gaining much complexity | 23:14 | |
23:14
IllvilJa left
|
|||
Debolaz | Ultimately, I suspect perl 6 might end up suffering from PS3 syndrome: While technically superior to the competition, it's difficult for developers to really exploit it fully making them prefer xbox 360 which although simpler is easier to take full adventage of. | 23:14 | |
lichtkind | thats one of the biggest PR hrdles for perl 6 | ||
Debolaz: thats possible | 23:15 | ||
but not likely | |||
jisom | nonsense, few will actually take full advantage of perl6, just as many don't take full advantage of perl5 | ||
Debolaz | And of course, you don't *need* to know how to take full adventage of perl 6 in order to use it, most simple stuff doesn't require much more than perl 5 knowledge. And the same is true for PS3, it's got a good ol' powerpc unit running in it. But from there it gets more difficult whileas xbox 360 (In the case perl, that's ruby) is much easier to learn to really take adventage of. | ||
lichtkind | because features like junktions made a whole series of languages inceasingly popular | ||
jisom | how many use regexes in perl5 when they should use pack? | 23:16 | |
tene | Debolaz: I don't see how async_if_efficient could even work... waiting for a return value and spawning off a new thread and returning immediately are extremely different. | ||
lichtkind | thatswhy is to have junction also a question to be up to date | 23:17 | |
jisom made the point, we raise the bars to bottom and to the top | 23:19 | ||
Debolaz is right in the senze that simple languages can be picked up quickly | |||
Debolaz | Saying "nonsense" doesn't make the elephant at the dinner table go away. Perl 6 is a lot more complex than ruby, you can do more with ruby given the same initial learning period than you can do with perl 6 assuming perl 5 knowledge. | ||
diotalevi | Like Scheme! | ||
lichtkind | Debolaz perl6 complexitiy is not mandatory | 23:20 | |
Debolaz | lichtkind: I addressed that above. | ||
tene | I disagree. I don't see very much in Perl6 being very complex at all. | 23:21 | |
jisom | most people don't use the full features of a language, they generally use a subset, and let it grow from there, having many options suits multiple thinking methods to make it easier for a greater portion of people to learn "their" subset | 23:22 | |
tene | Give me some specific examples of thigns in perl6 that are difficult to learn whose counterparts in other languages are easy to learn. | ||
Debolaz | tene: I picked up ruby a lot quicker than I picked up perl 6 and as far as I hear most people that has tried have the same experience. | ||
lichtkind | debolaz i think some things you can do in perl6 less complicated than in ruby | 23:23 | |
moritz | jisom: but it means that in order to understand code from somebody else, you might have to understand language features you never used yourself... | ||
jisom: or possible have never even seen them before | |||
tene | I know that, for me, all I need to learn in order to use a new feature is a little bit of syntax. | ||
Also, there isn't much teaching material for Perl6. | |||
Regardless, I'd like to hear soem specific examples. | 23:24 | ||
lichtkind | debolaz o course your right but as larry said perl optimized for expressivness not lernability | ||
Debolaz | I mostly looked at code examples as well. | ||
lichtkind: I did assume perl 5 knowledge in my statements above though. | |||
moritz | tene: have you seen the code under t/ and examples/ in the pugs repository? | ||
Debolaz | As I assume that is going to be the biggest source of new users. | ||
jisom | reading somebody else's code is generally impossible if they didn't include comments, or your own code | 23:25 | |
moritz | jisom: yes, but it's even harder if you don't know the syntax they are using | ||
Limbic_Region | I suspect anyone who knows perl 5 will pick up 80 - 90% of perl 6 within a few months | 23:26 | |
I suspect anyone brand new to perl will pick up the same within a year | 23:27 | ||
jisom | like if I use perl 5's pack because it's quicker than a regex, and someone reads it and doesn't understand it? it's harder for them, but if they want to understand it it also pushes them to learn more and figure out why it was choosen | ||
lichtkind | Debolaz i do not exactly understand your last sentence but one thought, even if perl6 get more complex, so you can express ideas shorter, more native to a certain logic which can makes programms easier to understand, so it compensates the complexety a bit | ||
Limbic_Region | the remaining 20% may take a lifetime | ||
Debolaz | tene: I don't have any specific examples on the top of my head. But keep in mind, everyone is not a genious. In fact, most developers aren't, they're just trying to get their job done. Ruby, I could understand pretty much by just looking at the code based on my perl 5 knowledge. It's not obvious what $foo!bar means. It's not obvious that you cannot write "is private" when defining something but must use some weird ! syntax. | 23:28 | |
23:28
[M]erk joined
|
|||
jisom | programs are only as complex as the programming | 23:28 | |
not the language | |||
anyway, just document your code :) | |||
czth | IDENTIFICATION DIVISION. | ||
(or, in other words, verbosity isn't always good) | 23:29 | ||
lichtkind | czth your another czech here ? | ||
allbery_b | aaaaaaaaa | ||
allbery_b runs away | |||
diotalevi | % Do some constraint logic programming here instead of the long way with loops and goo. | ||
% :-) | |||
... | |||
czth | no, not czech, sorry | ||
moritz | jisom: you're absolutely right, but it's allways easier to look up a function than some syntax elements | ||
Debolaz | lichtkind: What I meant was that most of perl 6 users will probably come from the group of perl 5 users. | ||
Limbic_Region | diotalevi - your recent foray into prolog and oz - academic exercise only or did you have something real you needed to use it for? | 23:30 | |
czth | maybe we can suck in all the popular open source languages to run on the parrot backend :) | ||
diotalevi | LR, I plan to use it in Perl 6, of course! | ||
jisom | czth, it's possible, tcl's running | ||
Limbic_Region | ok - but for what problem domain | ||
diotalevi | Not having logic programming in perl is a major downer for me. | 23:31 | |
czth | yeah, so i hear, i remember when Will Collada?(sp) I think it was started that project | ||
jisom | it's still going strong | ||
Limbic_Region | #parrot is on irc.perl.org and yes, still going strong | ||
in fact, it is probably the most developed HLL targetting parrot | |||
diotalevi | LR, general application stuff. Very often I find there's things I think could be better expressed using some constraints or rules but because I'm using Perl or another non-logic language I write the search strategy out in normal code. | 23:32 | |
czth | now we need to get python and ruby on board (but ban PHP forever) | ||
TimToady | just need a refactoring PHP to Perl 6 translator to take over the world. | ||
czth | yay | ||
diotalevi | But see, normal code that looks through a search space doesn't have to be that verbose. I think you can abstract all that stuff away. | ||
jisom | I believe the .net->pir converter worked well.... | 23:33 | |
moritz | btw is anybody planning to write a shellscript-compiler with parrot backend? that might speed up some linux boot processes ;) | ||
Limbic_Region | diotalevi - I can see that. Are there features in Perl 6 that will allow you to do that or is there something stock that I just don't know about? | ||
Debolaz | While there's no doubt in my mind that perl 6 is going to get out the door, I'm sceptical about parrot. The project just seems like the typical beurocratic government run project that never really gets anywhere despite the fact that it consumes enormous amounts of man hour. | ||
lichtkind | czth nop :) | ||
czth | moritz: do you really think boot is substantially slowed by the speed of shell script execution? | ||
diotalevi | I don't mind if there's no one but me and some converts using CLP or logic. If it comes to it, it's just something you declare. | ||
jisom | parrot has fewer people than pugs | 23:34 | |
moritz | czth: I'm not quit sure, but there are just so many processes beeing started to do really simple stuff, that just hurts | ||
23:34
weinig|food is now known as weinig
|
|||
moritz | czth: and it would just be a rather cool project ;)) | 23:34 | |
Limbic_Region | diotalevi - well, one primary goal of perl 6 is extensibility so I was wondering if you were planning on adding in a logic grammar plugin, if the language already had the constraint syntax you needed and I didn't know about it, or if it just provided some tools that could be bent to your whim | 23:35 | |
czth | so won't an equal number of processes need to be started for parrot? or do you mean for scripts things like 'true'? | ||
Limbic_Region is honestly interested | |||
czth | i imagine there's some caching going on there | ||
Debolaz | I think it being an official project of the perl foundation is hurting it. Pugs didn't have any beurocratic restraints and got where it is today in incredible speed whileas people has kept bikeshed painting parrot to death. And that's not just my personal opinion. | ||
jisom | moritz: maybe write an init program instead of an init script | ||
lichtkind | Tim Toady sos ..take over the world, but during your speeches you play the humble guy :) | 23:36 | |
diotalevi | I haven't heard anything to say that I can do Prolog or Mozarty things in Perl 6's existing grammar. Actually, with Prolog you have to be very careful to think of execution order so I'm hoping to move on from that. Mozart seems pretty cool by having the search strategies be parameters. | ||
Limbic_Region | Debolaz - I will make a wager with you. When pmichaud finishes his perl 6 compiler to pass the perl 6 sanity test suite (4 failing tests ATM) and the entire perl 6 test suite in pugs (minus a few implementation specific tests) is available to it, that parrot development will take off like dynamite | 23:37 | |
diotalevi | I heard similar things about Mercury but haven't spent time with it. | ||
Debolaz | Limbic_Region: I certainly hope you're right. :) | ||
Limbic_Region: I consider parrot a pretty darn cool idea. | |||
Limbic_Region | Not sure if it is still true but Tivoli used to use Prolog for its custom event monitor | 23:38 | |
diotalevi | I've heard that too, LR. | ||
Limbic_Region | Debolaz - well, there is a LOT already done. The trouble is that natively you need to speak PASM to use parrot | ||
granted PASM is OO | 23:39 | ||
it is still beyond what most want to pick up just to use something changing every day | |||
jisom | you can use pir, far easier | ||
many prefer pir over c even | |||
Limbic_Region | OTOH, if there was a popular HLL that mostly worked - parrot users would sky rocket | ||
Debolaz | Limbic_Region: A lot done, after a *really* long time. | ||
moritz | jisom: that might be the right thing to do, but it would imply to refactor all init scripts | ||
jisom: and that's probably a pain in the ass | |||
Limbic_Region | and hence bug reports | ||
jisom | kind of a hinderence | ||
Limbic_Region | and hence failing test cases | ||
and bug fixes | |||
and .... | |||
yadda | 23:40 | ||
jisom - PIR is a far cry from a HLL | |||
jisom wonders why more perl6 people aren't working on parrot to get perl6 using less than a gig of ram | |||
Limbic_Region wanders off to show some videos | 23:41 | ||
SamB | parrot has so many damn opcodes... | ||
jisom | namespaces, inheritence, object oriented, pge, etc.....it's very high level, most can't be jitted even! | ||
it's a cisc, not a risc | |||
Debolaz | Limbic_Region: At my old job, a government institution, projects like that weren't uncommon. Even seemingly simple tasks took an enormous amount of time because of the bikeshed painting effect. Everything had to be done just right and nobody could agree on what that was and the beurocratic process allowed everybody to keep arguing even insignificant points to death. | ||
23:41
larsen_ joined
|
|||
Debolaz | Installing ldap, just installing the server software, took 6 months. | 23:41 | |
I'm very happy I don't work there anymore. :-) | 23:42 | ||
jisom | even perl6 needed documents saying how it should end up being before you can really get to implementing it...even if those documents change | ||
23:43
hexmode joined
|
|||
moritz | ?eval sub foo(int $i) { PRE { $i < 2; } say $i;} foo(1); | 23:43 | |
evalbot_r15258 | OUTPUT[1ā¤] Bool::True | ||
moritz | ?eval sub foo(int $i) { PRE { $i < 2; } say $i;} foo(3); | 23:44 | |
evalbot_r15258 | OUTPUT[3ā¤] Bool::True | ||
moritz | on my machine it doesn't even compile :) | ||
Debolaz | And I do firmly believe that had parrot been some nonofficial project, it would've at least been running python and perl 5 at production level today. Of course, that's merely speculation since we can't go back in time and change things. | ||
SamB | someone should make a *new* VM... | 23:46 | |
moritz | SamB: not again ;) | ||
SamB | I meant, a tiny bytecode... | ||
or, well, I guess almost any bytecode would be small compared to parrot... | 23:47 | ||
moritz | does size matter? | ||
SamB | yes | ||
jisom | parrot bytecode is not compressed, and using 32 bit ints, which is one of those "space/speed" tradeoffs... | 23:48 | |
SamB | the bigger something is, the longer it takes to do things to it... | 23:49 | |
Patterner | we need an UTF8-like encoding of bytecode :) | ||
SamB | see Glulx | ||
diotalevi votes for UTF-32. | 23:50 | ||
No wait, UTF-64. | |||
moritz offers a generic UTF-2^n | |||
Debolaz | Then we get UTFCube. | ||
moritz | with arbitrary n, of course | ||
jisom | no, cause each opcode is 32 bits, and from the opcode you know how many arguments there are, and read those ints, and it's simpler to read and parse without any weird hacks like you see in intel........a custom compression algorithm for the bytecode would help for the hard drive space though | 23:51 | |
Debolaz | And I'm not entirely sure how to make a pun of Wii and UTF.. | ||
beppu | Wiinicode | ||
weenie code | |||
jisom | wiitf | 23:52 | |
diotalevi | Custom? I vote for gzip or something like that. | ||
beppu suicides self | |||
jisom | eh, that'd still work, but since the data involved is easily known, something else, but even then, people are more likely to run a perl6 script, including compiling it, than saving the pbc file and running it | 23:53 | |
anyway, improving the core is more important than discussing the bytecode size which is trivial to many people | 23:54 | ||
SamB | why do you need so many damn opcodes? | 23:59 | |
jisom | which ones are you refering to? |