🦋 Welcome to the IRC channel of the core developers of the Raku Programming Language (raku.org #rakulang). This channel is logged for the purpose of history keeping about its development | evalbot usage: 'm: say 3;' or /msg camelia m: ... | Logs available at irclogs.raku.org/raku-dev/live.html | For MoarVM see #moarvm Set by lizmat on 8 June 2022. |
|||
00:08
reportable6 left
00:09
reportable6 joined
01:50
frost joined
02:27
frost left
02:30
frost joined
04:02
sourceable6 left,
releasable6 left,
bisectable6 left,
greppable6 left,
reportable6 left,
benchable6 left,
notable6 left,
bloatable6 left,
coverable6 left,
unicodable6 left,
tellable6 left,
quotable6 left,
committable6 left,
linkable6 left,
nativecallable6 left,
evalable6 left,
shareable6 left,
statisfiable6 left,
shareable6 joined,
coverable6 joined,
bisectable6 joined,
tellable6 joined,
committable6 joined
04:03
sourceable6 joined,
bloatable6 joined,
evalable6 joined,
unicodable6 joined,
statisfiable6 joined
04:04
greppable6 joined,
benchable6 joined,
linkable6 joined,
quotable6 joined,
releasable6 joined,
nativecallable6 joined
04:05
reportable6 joined,
notable6 joined
06:03
evalable6 left,
linkable6 left,
linkable6 joined
06:04
evalable6 joined
06:08
reportable6 left
06:10
reportable6 joined
07:10
evalable6 left,
linkable6 left,
linkable6 joined
07:11
evalable6 joined
07:36
[Coke]_ joined
07:37
[Coke] left
|
|||
Geth | rakudo/lizmat-fail-io-socket-inet: 14baac4659 | (Elizabeth Mattijsen)++ | src/core.c/IO/Socket/INET.pm6 Make unsuccessful connect fail rather than die Spotted in stackoverflow.com/questions/726398...socketinet There is no documentation or tests covering the behaviour of a failed connect. It is actually the nqp::connect that throws (which turns out also to be not documented BTW). Having it return a Failure feels more natural indeed. |
08:35 | |
rakudo: lizmat++ created pull request #4957: Make unsuccessful connect fail rather than die |
|||
09:39
committable6 left,
nativecallable6 left,
quotable6 left,
shareable6 left,
greppable6 left,
coverable6 left,
unicodable6 left,
evalable6 left,
sourceable6 left,
reportable6 left,
statisfiable6 left,
tellable6 left,
notable6 left,
bloatable6 left,
benchable6 left,
linkable6 left,
bisectable6 left,
releasable6 left,
coverable6 joined,
nativecallable6 joined
09:40
reportable6 joined,
committable6 joined,
tellable6 joined,
notable6 joined,
shareable6 joined,
greppable6 joined,
statisfiable6 joined,
evalable6 joined,
benchable6 joined
09:41
releasable6 joined,
quotable6 joined,
linkable6 joined,
bisectable6 joined
09:42
bloatable6 joined,
sourceable6 joined,
unicodable6 joined
10:42
linkable6 left,
evalable6 left
10:43
evalable6 joined
10:44
linkable6 joined
11:44
linkable6 left,
evalable6 left,
notable6 left
11:45
notable6 joined,
evalable6 joined,
linkable6 joined
|
|||
patrickb | o/ | 11:52 | |
12:06
reportable6 left,
[Coke]_ is now known as [Coke]
12:08
reportable6 joined
|
|||
Geth | rakudo/rakuast: 24 commits pushed by (Stefan Seifert)++ review: github.com/rakudo/rakudo/compare/c...52d61ec594 |
12:37 | |
13:17
carlmasak joined
|
|||
carlmasak | greetings, #raku-dev | 13:17 | |
lizmat | carlmasak o/ | 13:20 | |
carlmasak | hi, lizmat. it must be mid-afternoon in your part of the world | 13:22 | |
lizmat | yea, 15:23 or so | ||
carlmasak | here in .cn, we start every day a few hours earlier than Europe | ||
must be the work ethic | |||
lizmat | I guess... :-) | 13:23 | |
13:23
Kaiepi joined
|
|||
carlmasak | :P | 13:23 | |
I know I mentioned it before, but I was one of the sad saps who bought a Beat watch from Swatch, many years ago | 13:24 | ||
a "beat" is one thousandth of a 24-hour day, and you write the time like this: @499 | |||
and it's time zone independent | |||
needless to say, this PR stunt from Swatch didn't catch on like wildfire | 13:25 | ||
m: say (60 #`[seconds/minute] * 60 #`[minutes/hour] * 24 #`[hours/day]) / 1000 #`[beats/day] | 13:30 | ||
camelia | 86.4 | ||
carlmasak | ...which makes a beat one minute and 26.4 seconds long. | ||
lizmat | feels a bit like Tau::Station::DateTime? | 13:37 | |
[Coke] | does anything in the ecosystem given an idea of # of downloads/users, etc.? | 13:39 | |
lizmat | raku.land keeps some stats I think | 13:40 | |
patrickb is working on the RCB (Rakudo CI Bot). | 13:47 | ||
Currently implementing the branch matching logic. So when a commit in a PR should be tested it'll search for a matching branch in the respective other repos. | 13:48 | ||
Should a requirement for a branch to be picked be, that a repective PR exists? | |||
Or should it just take any same named branch in either the same project/user that the PR was created (or the rakudo/rakudo, Raku/nqp, MoarVM/MoarVM repos)? | 13:50 | ||
For now I'll go with just taking any matching branch name and not requiring a PR. Please comment if you object. | 13:55 | ||
nine | I think that's a sensible thing to do | 13:56 | |
[Coke] | I think if we were all in on an automated workflow, a PR would be required, but this matching branch-if-exists seems reasonable to me | 13:57 | |
14:24
frost left
14:38
vrurg_ is now known as vrurg
15:24
Altai-man left
15:25
sena_kun joined
16:08
carlmasak left
16:28
sena_kun left
16:30
sena_kun joined
16:55
Kaiepi left
17:24
Kaiepi joined
17:38
kawaii left
18:07
reportable6 left
18:09
reportable6 joined
19:09
evalable6 left,
linkable6 left
19:10
evalable6 joined
19:11
linkable6 joined
19:20
MasterDuke left
19:34
MasterDuke joined
20:38
moon-child left
21:58
evalable6 left,
linkable6 left
22:00
evalable6 joined
22:01
linkable6 joined
|
|||
Geth | rakudo: vlmarek++ created pull request #4959: Todo failing test on Solaris |
22:05 | |
roast: vlmarek++ created pull request #810: Make spectest pass on Solaris |
22:44 | ||
23:07
evalable6 left,
linkable6 left
23:10
evalable6 joined,
linkable6 joined
|