|
Welcome the channel on the development of Cro, a set of libraries for building reactive distributed systems, lovingly crafted to take advantage of all the Raku Programming Language has to offer (cro.services). This channel is being logged for historical purposes. Set by lizmat on 24 May 2021. |
|||
|
00:00
Pe_Elle left
00:19
guifa left
00:27
Pe_Elle joined
00:42
guifa joined
01:30
Pe_Elle left
01:59
Pe_Elle joined
02:28
Pe_Elle left,
Pe_Elle joined
04:31
japhb joined
06:00
japhb left
07:29
sena_kun joined
07:37
Pe_Elle left,
Pe_Elle joined
07:38
sena_kun left
07:42
Pe_Elle left
07:45
Pe_Elle joined
10:09
Pe_Elle left
10:19
Pe_Elle joined
10:24
Pe_Elle left
10:47
Pe_Elle joined
10:49
Pe_Elle left
10:51
Pe_Elle joined
11:45
Pe_Elle left
11:46
Pe_Elle joined
11:50
Pe_Elle left
11:52
sena_kun joined
12:13
guifa left
12:14
Pe_Elle joined
12:18
Pe_Elle left
12:49
Pe_Elle joined
12:59
Pe_Elle left
13:00
Pe_Elle joined
13:06
guifa joined
13:47
Pe_Elle left
13:52
Pe_Elle joined
13:56
Pe_Elle left
14:12
Pe_Elle joined
14:20
Pe_Elle left,
Pe_Elle joined
14:53
Pe_Elle left
14:54
Pe_Elle joined
14:58
Pe_Elle left
15:24
japhb joined
15:29
Pe_Elle joined
|
|||
| librasteve | very nice! appreciate this new feature ... when I asked for this, it seemed the only way to do nested components - but when you made the librasteve.raku example, I better understood that nested Cromponents would work fine without macro feature... please can you describe the status as you see it with the macros ... is this a better way to do nesting and we should stop using the librasteve way, or this this timtowdi | 16:36 | |
| and both will be equal? | |||
| SmokeMachine | No, I think using macro is good when you want to customise the component with template and not component… | 18:27 | |
| librasteve | ah - perfect - thanks for clarifying! | 18:35 | |
|
18:50
japhb left
19:23
Pe_Elle left
19:38
Pe_Elle joined
19:46
Pe_Elle left
|
|||
| SmokeMachine | librasteve: did you have the chance to look at the <MyCromponent>-new? I just thought a better way of doing that and I think I’ll unify that with the original one… if, on template, you call Bla and pass a single instance of Bla it works as usual. Otherwise, it will instantiate a new object using .new() and the arguments you passed… | 19:57 | |
|
20:00
Pe_Elle joined
|
|||
| librasteve | I saw it (actually it echoes an early version of what I tried for functional - to somehow generate two tags) - sounds like your second variant is better - I trust you to do that ... right now I am happy to use the version from a couple of days ago (prior to my PRs) and I am mostly exploring how to bring in CSS atm | 20:50 | |
|
21:03
Pe_Elle left
21:34
Pe_Elle joined
21:39
Pe_Elle left
21:55
Pe_Elle joined
22:13
Pe_Elle left
22:38
sena_kun left
22:42
Pe_Elle joined
22:47
Pe_Elle left
23:31
Pe_Elle joined
23:36
Pe_Elle left
|
|||