|
01:48
ilbot3 joined
04:34
zakharyas joined
06:43
domidumont joined
06:48
domidumont joined
07:10
domidumont joined
|
|||
| nwc10 | good *, #moarvm | 07:25 | |
| lizmat | nwc10 o/ | 07:30 | |
|
08:11
zakharyas joined
12:06
zakharyas joined
13:08
colomon joined
13:59
ilbot3 joined
16:57
domidumont joined
17:07
ilmari joined
17:17
tomboy64 joined
17:18
geekosaur joined
17:19
timotimo joined
18:41
domidumont joined
18:54
FROGGS joined
18:57
FROGGS joined
19:19
brrt joined
|
|||
| brrt | good * #moarvm | 19:20 | |
| nwc10 | good *, brrt | ||
| brrt | this afternoon i had the presentation of my masters thesis ... and it went decently well :-) | 19:21 | |
| nwc10 | excellent | ||
| surely this means that you should be AFK celebrating? | |||
| brrt | no.. i have to write the report still :-) | ||
| timotimo | \o/ | 19:22 | |
| congratulations! | |||
| hoelzro | brrt++ | 19:23 | |
| timotimo | was there another thesis or something you'll have to ... do? | ||
| konobi | hopefully going to be able to rubber duck on a conjecture about NQP/NQP bootstrap soon =0) | 19:26 | |
| brrt | thanks :-) | 19:29 | |
| no, this was my second thesis | |||
| timotimo | neat! | ||
| brrt | my first thesis was finished in march :-) | ||
| nine really hopes there is no third :) | 19:30 | ||
| brrt | well, me too | 19:31 | |
| :-) | |||
| so yeah, maybe i'll be out a bit later :-) | 19:32 | ||
| timotimo | yay :) | ||
| brrt | did you see the larry wall interview? | 19:44 | |
| i should say TimToady interview | 19:45 | ||
| okay, afk now :-) | 19:47 | ||
| timotimo | yeah | ||
| i did see it | |||
| brrt | it was interesting i thought | 19:48 | |
| dalek | arVM: 4a56a65 | timotimo++ | src/6model/reprs/CStruct.c: work around NULL from name_to_index_mapping not entirely sure how it gets in there - or if it's in there at all? potentially should have guarded with existskey before at_key. |
||
| arnsholt | timotimo: The NULL is probably returned to indicate "no such mapping" | 19:49 | |
| So either existskey or checking for NULL like you put in should be acceptable, I think | 19:50 | ||
| timotimo | i'm glad the commit is fine :) | 19:51 | |
| i didn't really get what fixed xliffs code right now | |||
| arnsholt | Far as I could make out, he didn't obey the protocol for nqp::bindattr | 19:53 | |
| The type object passed has to be the type where the attr is *declared*, not the type of the object you're passing in (which is what he was doing) | |||
| So if you pass in the B object, but the attr is declared in A the name to attribute map will return NULL | 19:54 | ||
| Because the attr doesn't actually exist in B, it's in A | |||
| [Coke] | timotimo: which timtoady interview? | 20:00 | |
| arnsholt | [Coke]: developers.slashdot.org/story/16/0...larry-wall | 20:02 | |
| [Coke] | ah, slashdot. danke. | 20:09 | |
| timotimo | OK, that makes a lot of sense | 20:15 | |
|
20:29
Ven joined
|
|||
| [Coke] | Does he need to be using nqp ops here? | 20:34 | |
| timotimo | the code here is golfed; dunno how the original code looks, so can't answer that | 20:36 | |