01:00 jnthn joined 06:44 domidumont joined 06:49 domidumont1 joined 07:29 domidumont joined 08:24 FROGGS joined 09:25 nebuchadnezzar joined 15:12 domidumont joined
nebuchadnezzar domidumont: I saw your reply, I'm not sure if it's better to use libffi than dyncall on arm64, I would like to have the MoarVM team opinion on that 15:55
timotimo: you answered my question on dyncall/libffi last time, you may be the more appropriate on that topic? 15:57
timotimo hmm, on arm64? i don't know much about that platform at all 15:58
in general i think libffi and dyncall will both fully implement NativeCall, so it's up to you what to use? 16:00
nebuchadnezzar thanks, we will stick to moarvm default choice for now, we may switch to libffi one day since it's packaged in Debian 16:45
19:00 FROGGS joined 19:53 mst joined
dalek arVM/line_based_coverage_4: ea8ddae | (Zoffix Znet)++ | tools/parse_coverage_report.p6:
Turn on interpolation for the generated-on date
23:43
arVM/line_based_coverage_4: ec17535 | timo++ | tools/parse_coverage_report.p6:
Merge pull request #413 from zoffixznet/patch-1

Turn on interpolation for the generated-on date