|
01:13
MasterDuke left
|
|||
| Woodi | if memory is not shared (except lower subsystems like gc) then thread that own that objects can be put to sleep and things could be updated with parent pointer switching to copy ? or that thread need to do all coping and nothing else... | 08:41 | |
| atomic is wrong name transactions are needed. I read somewhere that all software is just database anyway :) pity cpu's do not give that functionality | 08:42 | ||
|
11:19
lizmat left
11:22
lizmat joined
12:51
Woodi left
12:53
Woodi joined
18:21
gfldex left
18:25
gfldex joined
20:54
MasterDuke joined
|
|||
| MasterDuke | jnthn: is there any reason github.com/MoarVM/MoarVM/commit/51...6174b11ce6 couldn't be done for the jvm? | 20:54 | |
| jnthn | MasterDuke: Can't think of one, iirc the array type in Java even has a built-in BS method | 21:12 | |
| MasterDuke | cool, thanks | ||
|
23:28
coleman left
23:30
coleman joined
|
|||