|
02:48
ilbot3 joined
04:37
samcv joined
05:37
TimToady joined
07:20
brrt joined
07:27
domidumont joined
07:33
domidumont joined
08:22
zakharyas joined
08:53
domidumont joined
11:49
domidumont joined
11:56
domidumont joined
12:52
brrt` joined
13:15
ggoebel joined
13:21
domidumont joined
|
|||
| brrt | to add to japhb and timotimo's answers: we don't use luajit per se, we use a piece of code that was developed together with luajit but has no 'system' relation to luajit | 14:02 | |
| we use one of the tools that luajit also uses | |||
| and if you went the way of the LLVM, you'd first want to make sure that LLVM can actually generate good code, which means you have to (re)structure your VM/interpreter to simplify structure accesses | 14:03 | ||
| which is the *actual* difficult bit of having a high-performance VM | |||
| especially when you'd wish to combine that with 'portable' | 14:04 | ||
|
14:04
domidumont joined
|
|||
| brrt | and once you are there, then in all probability, LLVM or whatever backend will provide benefit in the order of percentages compared to what you could hack together yourself | 14:05 | |
| so the interesting metric is, I think, 'system-complexity versus performance-gain-on-naive' | |||
| case in point: CPython want to minimize the system complexity part, and PyPy guys want to maximize the performance part | 14:06 | ||
| I guess we'd be in the middle of that | 14:17 | ||
| neither afraid of complexity nor racing headlong into it | 14:20 | ||
|
15:10
domidumont joined
|
|||
| nebuchadnezzar | hello | 15:36 | |
| yoleaux2 | 31 Oct 2016 10:23Z <FROGGS> nebuchadnezzar: Is there anything else I can do for you? otherwise I'd leave it in this state: gist.github.com/FROGGS/9c06ac23b49...aa1687a43c | ||
| 6 Nov 2016 20:40Z <FROGGS> nebuchadnezzar: can we somehow put /usr/share/perl6/site/bin in PATH? | |||
| 6 Nov 2016 21:45Z <FROGGS> nebuchadnezzar: forget what I said :o) | |||
|
15:39
FROGGS joined
|
|||
| FROGGS | o/ | 15:39 | |
| japhb | o/ | 15:40 | |
| [Coke] | o/~ | 15:42 | |
| japhb | [Coke]: Waving a pennant? Rythm gymnastics? ASCII 8th note? | 15:44 | |
| FROGGS | mst / nine: thanks again for the help yesterday evening | 15:45 | |
|
15:45
hoelzro joined
|
|||
| mst | FROGGS: did you get a resolution? | 15:45 | |
| FROGGS | mst: I was able to prove that that bug does not exist anymore | ||
| mst | awesome | ||
| FROGGS | (on a debian testing system) | ||
| [Coke] | japhb: why not... armpit hair? | 15:49 | |
| FROGGS | I was thinking you were fighting a "laser" beam with your lightsaber | 15:50 | |
|
15:51
zostay joined
|
|||
| japhb | [Coke]: Armpit hair almost as long as your arm? That's ... impressive? | 15:53 | |
|
15:54
zakharyas joined
15:55
geekosaur joined
15:57
domidumont joined
16:43
brrt joined
|
|||
| brrt | damnit kids.... I had a whole bit about killing tile->template and I find I haven't even shaved that yak yet | 16:43 | |
| japhb | brrt: Please shave all the yaks. kthxbye. | 16:46 | |
| ;-) | |||
| brrt | hehehe | 16:47 | |
| so much to do, so little time... | |||
| at least I've implemented the heapifying logic | |||
| japhb | .tell brrt No fair asking me questions via PM and then going offline. Ah well, ping me when you're back online again. | 17:19 | |
| yoleaux2 | japhb: I'll pass your message to brrt. | ||
| FROGGS | nebuchadnezzar: hi, is there a reason that some bugs in moarvm/nqp/rakudo do not get closed, even though they are resolved? | 19:16 | |
| nebuchadnezzar | FROGGS: they are close only when a new package enter unstable with a changelog containing Closes #<bugID> | 20:24 | |
| FROGGS | ahh, so one cant close them just now? | 20:25 | |
| sad | |||
| nebuchadnezzar | FROGGS: they can be manully set to pending if the fixes are in repository waiting for new packge | 20:28 | |
| FROGGS | I see | 20:29 | |
| well, then we have to wait for a new package to contain said Changelog lines | |||
|
22:46
flaviusb joined
23:47
geekosaur joined
|
|||