00:00 cognominal joined 01:34 FROGGS_ joined 01:39 jnap joined
TimToady m: say *.foo ~~ Callable 03:14
camelia rakudo-moar 851811: OUTPUT«True␤»
TimToady [Coke]: ^^
WhateverCode does not propagate through ~~ 03:15
(on either side, or you couldn't do $string ~~ *.chars either) 03:16
the ~~ operator is special; it's really just a very small given/when sort of thing 03:17
03:30 btyler joined 06:58 zakharyas joined 07:00 FROGGS[mobile] joined 07:55 donaldh joined, colomon_ joined 07:59 oetiker joined 08:05 lee_ joined 08:57 dalek joined 10:29 donaldh joined 11:59 colomon joined 12:08 odc joined 12:19 jnap joined 12:29 brrt joined
brrt hi #moarvm 12:48
timotimo hey brrt!
nice to see you again :)
brrt :-)
timotimo i was recently quite surprised to see that the midterm evaluations are almost just around the corner 12:49
brrt i should've been here a bit more, shouldn't i
really?
:-o
ow
timotimo 4 weeks
my perception of time is ... interesting :)
brrt i've been preoccupied by finishing my 'research course'
well, 4 weeks is fast, i grant you that
timotimo that's probably all right
brrt how's moarvm been? 12:51
[Coke] github.com/cosimo/perl6-lwp-simple/issues/30 12:54
brrt oh 13:02
i kind of need to get myself a new computer 13:08
FROGGS famous last words *g* 13:09
brrt well, or continue working on an 2010 eee pc 13:12
timotimo oh, ouch :)
brrt it works 13:14
acceptably
but newer would probably be better :-) 13:15
timotimo hasn't been putting work into moarvm recently :( 13:18
FROGGS heh, that seems like you will be your best user when the JIT is going in :o)
timotimo: me neither
brrt my personal, non-public aim is: an mp3 player in perl6
ought to be doable, right?
/me afk 13:20
timotimo depends on whether or not you want to do the decoding in pure perl6 :) 13:21
13:50 btyler joined 15:03 zakharyas joined 15:25 brrt joined 15:54 brrt joined 17:59 btyler joined 18:23 brrt joined
brrt if its not in perl6, why bother :-) 18:26
lizmat feels to me that that would be an excellent JIT opportunity ! 18:32
and if that works, why stick to mp3, why not go mp4 all the way :-)
TimToady or mp5 even
brrt mp5 isn't a thing, is it? 18:33
tadzik in military it is
lizmat we used to have S5 in the Dutch military 18:34
it meant you would qualify as a Perl programmer
brrt seriously? i'm amazed 18:35
TimToady brrt: it isn't a think YET! you need to invent it...
brrt the dutch military trained perl programmer?
s
TimToady *ing
brrt :-) the name will be claimed soon enough i think 18:36
maybe for the h265 codec
lizmat brrt: S1 meant you were mentally very stable... :-)
brrt oh i see
:-D
weird
TimToady the ones you put on your nuclear subs, eh? 18:37
brrt the dutch military emphatically does not have nuclear subs
couldn't pay for it if they wanted, probably
TimToady yes, but it's still true that all your nuclear subs are staffed by S1
s/your/their/ as necessary 18:38
but you do have a .nl address
brrt i'm dutch, yes :-) 18:39
TimToady - not according to classic syllogistics, because the term 'all dutch nuclear submarines' is empty :-) 18:42
18:59 brrt joined 19:27 brrt joined
brrt question - why are operations like goto, if, unless, etc. in MoarVM gc sync points? 19:29
lizmat because they (can) enter new scopes ? 19:35
brrt i guess 19:52
can i take the moment to show my appreciation for the code quality in moarvm? 19:53
lizmat jnthn would know for sure, but he's on Quality Time with his family, afaik
brrt well, thats a good idea for everyone, of course :-)
lizmat glad to hear you like the code quality :-)
.oO( haven't added / changed a single byte in that repo, afaik )
19:54
looking forward to seeing some high quality code being added :-)
brrt huh, can't promise high quality on the first run
:-)
although one can postpone merging until quality is good enough 19:59
lizmat I think the only way to find out about the quality, is to do it in HEAD
only when you increment MOAR_VERSION in nqp, and NQP_VERSION in rakudo, will Perl 6 actually see what you're doing 20:00
and the sooner we find out about problems, the better
brrt thats true 20:01
i'm not yet sure about how to represent JIT-ed code and how to explicitly test for it
short of entering puts("ENTERING JIT...") in every routine 20:02
lizmat macro? 20:05
brrt hmm yes 20:06
i still want to figure out exactly how to access structs with dynasm 20:07
afk, see you tomorrow 20:15
lizmat brrt: sorry, can't help you with that. maybe nwc10 can?
brrt i'll ask arround :-)
thanks
20:16 brrt left 20:20 JimmyZ_ joined 20:21 brother joined 20:28 vendethiel joined 23:54 jnap joined