02:46 ilogger2 left 02:58 ilogger2 joined 15:07 harrow left 15:23 harrow joined 18:32 ilogger2 left, ilogger2 joined 19:13 Geth__ joined 19:18 jjatria left, Geth left 19:19 jjatria joined
patrickb still on my list to get the windows build tool chain for libffi running 19:25
19:39 MasterDuke joined 19:40 MasterDuke left 19:41 MasterDuke joined 19:44 MasterDuke left, MasterDuke joined
MasterDuke well, that was annoying of firefox 19:45
timo: have you looked at github.com/MoarVM/MoarVM/pull/1967 ?
in addition to adding the windows build, the non-windows build needs some `make` trickery 19:46
timo not yet, sorry. for right now I have to spend a bit of time rescuing data from a failing drive 19:51
MasterDuke !! 19:53
there's definitely no particular urgency
timo: btw, another item of no urgency. i recently got to use a bloom filter (well, i started with that and then upgraded to the new hotness of a binary fuse filter) for the first time at work. made me really excited since i wanted to find a use for one ever since i first read about them years ago. but then i got to wondering if there's any place in 20:00
moarvm where one would be beneficial? nothing jumped out at me, but i figure you're 100x more likely to have a good idea
timo i haven't heard of "binary fuse filter" yet
MasterDuke arxiv.org/abs/2201.01174 20:03
timo as long as it's a probabilistic data structure that can give you "definitely not" vs "maybe yes", it'd have the same use cases I think 20:06
MasterDuke yep. slight difference in that binary fuse filters require all the keys in one go during construction and are immutable after being built, but pretty much the same otherwise 20:07
off to go move some boxes around, but thought i'd try to nerd snipe you with those two things 20:18
20:22 MasterDuke left
Voldenet the problem with all xor filters is that they're immutable after construction, so adding an item recomputes the whole filter 21:36
same with binary fuse
I still like bloom filters for having .add operation, despite being a lot larger 21:37
timo bloom filters don't have to be large! you can have just a single bit! in fact, then you can answer any query at compile time already 21:38