brrt timotimo: ping? 09:47
timotimo pong, finally ... 12:29
brrt anyway, i recall having seen perl6 benchmark graphs from when the JIT was just merged 17:19
do you still have that somewhere? 17:21
timotimo i've kept all benchmark html files i believe 19:13
irclog.perlgeek.de/moarvm/search/?n...;q=p6bench 19:14
timotimo did you find the one(s) you were looking for? 20:09
brrt wait very backlog 20:12
wow, for some of the things (especially the native stuff) this pays off 20:13
yeah, thanks :-)
and sometimes it's also slower
although usually by a rather small margin 20:14
timotimo well, we could do another jit vs no jit benchmark run 20:16
brrt i'd like to see that of course
do you have the raw numbers too?
timotimo possibly not
brrt oh, they're in the document itself 20:17
with some work that can be extracted
timotimo brrt: now i've had dinner, which commit should i compare jit vs no jit with? 21:05
brrt ehm, what about the 2014.08 release? 21:06
or is that really annoying?
timotimo no, that's absolutely no problem
what about the 2014.09?
brrt no problem to me
i don't think the results will be that different though 21:07
timotimo maybe maybe not ;)
afaik the push performance improvement happened after that release, though
are you interested in nqp-moar vs nqp-moar-jit, too? 21:08
brrt hmm whichever :-) 21:11
timotimo i'm doing rakudo-moar vs rakudo-jit 2014.08 and 2014.09 21:12
brrt awesome :-) 21:17