|
01:00
jnthn joined
06:44
domidumont joined
06:49
domidumont1 joined
07:29
domidumont joined
08:24
FROGGS joined
09:25
nebuchadnezzar joined
15:12
domidumont joined
|
|||
| nebuchadnezzar | domidumont: I saw your reply, I'm not sure if it's better to use libffi than dyncall on arm64, I would like to have the MoarVM team opinion on that | 15:55 | |
| timotimo: you answered my question on dyncall/libffi last time, you may be the more appropriate on that topic? | 15:57 | ||
| timotimo | hmm, on arm64? i don't know much about that platform at all | 15:58 | |
| in general i think libffi and dyncall will both fully implement NativeCall, so it's up to you what to use? | 16:00 | ||
| nebuchadnezzar | thanks, we will stick to moarvm default choice for now, we may switch to libffi one day since it's packaged in Debian | 16:45 | |
|
19:00
FROGGS joined
19:53
mst joined
|
|||
| dalek | arVM/line_based_coverage_4: ea8ddae | (Zoffix Znet)++ | tools/parse_coverage_report.p6: Turn on interpolation for the generated-on date |
23:43 | |
| arVM/line_based_coverage_4: ec17535 | timo++ | tools/parse_coverage_report.p6: Merge pull request #413 from zoffixznet/patch-1 Turn on interpolation for the generated-on date |
|||