brrt good * #moarvm 08:01
samcv good * brrt 08:02
brrt ohai samcv 08:03
nwc10 good *, *
brrt ohai nwc10 08:05
samcv should get to save a lot of space i hope 08:24
will see how much i save
jnthn morning o/ 09:57
win 4
buggable jnthn, Thank you for entering Accidental /win Lottery! The next draw will happen in 3 days, 14 hours, 2 minutes, and 22 seconds
jnthn oops :)
lizmat and another Perl 6 Weekly hits the Net: p6weekly.wordpress.com/2017/11/27/...ity-first/ 18:46
AlexDaniel` squashable6: next 20:20
squashable6 AlexDaniel`, ⚠🍕 Next SQUASHathon in 3 days and ≈13 hours (2017-12-02 UTC-12⌁UTC+14). See github.com/rakudo/rakudo/wiki/Mont...Squash-Day
nwc10 win 0 20:21
buggable nwc10, Thank you for entering Accidental /win Lottery! The next draw will happen in 3 days, 3 hours, 38 minutes, and 36 seconds
nwc10 aha, so about 10 hours after the draw
dogbert17 jnthn: you around? 20:27
it looks as if IO::Socket::get is not documented, is that method the opposite of IO::Socket::put? 20:28
dogbert17 or print 20:28
jnthn It works like .get on IO::Handle 20:29
yoleaux 18:20Z <azawawi> jnthn: regarding your .oO( Who wants to write Inline::Go? :P ) # New experimental pet project github.com/azawawi/perl6-inline-go (Inline::Go) :)
dogbert17 lools 20:30
(sigh) *looks
jnthn lool: a drooling lol 20:31
dogbert17 :)
so, something like this then ? gist.github.com/dogbert17/61a69811...7c9b11e515 20:35
jnthn m: IO::Socket::INET.chomp 20:37
camelia IO::Socket::INET is disallowed in restricted setting
in sub restricted at src/RESTRICTED.setting line 1
in method FALLBACK at src/RESTRICTED.setting line 31
in block <unit> at <tmp> line 1
jnthn grrr 20:38
Anyway, just check it really does have chomp but I'm pretty sure it does :)
dogbert17 $line = $!decoder.consume-line-chars(:chomp);
jnthn ah, :chomp suggest it's always doing it 20:42
Not passing a :$!chomp or so 20:43
time for a little fresh air; bbiab
dogbert17 jnthn: should be fixed now 20:50
samcv ok so bidi_mirroring_glyph went from 16bits wide to 9, and MVM_COLLATION_PRIMARY from 19 to 15 23:29
jnthn So, smaller DB? :) 23:30
samcv well atm it seems to be the same size 23:31
haven't investigated that yet. but potentially yeah