02:27 nativecallable6 left 02:28 releasable6 left, committable6 left, shareable6 left, sourceable6 left, evalable6 left, greppable6 left, coverable6 left, sourceable6 joined, committable6 joined, evalable6 joined, releasable6 joined 02:32 nativecallable6 joined, greppable6 joined, coverable6 joined 02:37 notable6 left, bloatable6 left, unicodable6 left, coverable6 left, evalable6 left, tellable6 left, bisectable6 left, sourceable6 left, releasable6 left, benchable6 left, committable6 left, linkable6 left, greppable6 left, nativecallable6 left, quotable6 left 02:40 evalable6 joined, nativecallable6 joined, bloatable6 joined, unicodable6 joined 02:41 shareable6 joined, benchable6 joined, sourceable6 joined, releasable6 joined, greppable6 joined 02:42 tellable6 joined, linkable6 joined, quotable6 joined, committable6 joined 02:43 coverable6 joined, notable6 joined, bisectable6 joined 08:18 librasteve_ joined 16:22 nine left, nine joined 17:28 librasteve_ left
patrickb Noob question: Using the moar debug server, is it possible to access the package hierarchy? I know too little of how and where Raku searches for symbols. But I kinda expected to find an entry point to all of the accessible packages when traversing the outer chain, but I didn't. 22:30
22:44 mc2 left
lizmat I just had a similar quest the past days... trying to find out the language revision of a given callframe 22:45
that's now in HEAD as CallFrame.language-revision
now, that solution didn't help much, but you *can* get at the package of a given callframe 22:46
CallFrame.code gives you the Code object, and that gives you the package 22:48
m: package A { sub a() { dd callframe.code.package }; a }
camelia A
lizmat hope this helps... :-) 22:49
s/didn't help/doesn't help you/
patrickb There is stackoverflow.com/a/44861596 but I'd love to be able to do that without having to fall back to evaluating code on the debug server... 22:52
lizmat I guess timo may know 22:58
lizmat has an early morning tomorrow, so sleep&
patrickb sleep well!
timo there used to be no way to get an object's WHO, but I created a command for this purpose last year or so 23:12
oh, hm, did i not merge that to main maybe? 23:30