6macros: discussing the finer points of Perl 6 macros, Qtrees, and how to stay sane | irclog: irclog.perlgeek.de/6macros/today
Set by moderator on 28 July 2015.
07:38 pdcawley joined 13:13 Ven_ joined
Ven_ o/ 13:13
masak I love to be able to answer questions about 007 using 007 itself :) github.com/masak/007/issues/147#is...-225615657 15:27
that's a healthy form of dogfooding, IMO
ven: thanks for all the feedback in the issues today
18:23 FROGGS joined, vendethiel joined 19:13 cognominal joined
cognominal A proposal about slangs. This is not macros. But I want feedback before submitting to a wider audience. gist.github.com/cognominal/d181082...af6d51a42d vendethiel masak ? 19:37
vendethiel i'll read that :)
FROGGS one problem: <~my-slang.a-rule> would not capture 19:39
the rule is: if there is a non-alpha char at the beginning, dont capture
cognominal So that would be an exception 19:41
FROGGS and $~MAIN = (Perl6::Grammar, Perl6::Actions) is just too much magic for me I think
cognominal yea, I don't mind dropping that one :) 19:43
just a convenience
Also I forgot the dollar in many place 19:44
<$~slang.rule>
or to avoid the exception about capture, that should be <slang.capture> 19:50
I don't think this conflict with existing syntax
oops, I meant <slang.rule> 19:51
masak reads 19:56
cognominal I am updating within 1 minute 19:57
updated 19:58
masak cognominal: s/utili<e/utilize/
or even something avoiding the word "utilize", like "make use of", or "use" :P 19:59
oh, you found that typo already
cognominal: looks good.
interestingly, I keep thinking of slangs, but I feel my thoughts wander largely orthogonally to yours 20:00
(which is good, I think)
cognominal nice
masak cognominal: by the way, did you notice our recent 007 self-hosting effort?
it's terribly exciting :>
cognominal One motivation is that am designing different slangs with the same grammar. 20:02
yea, I will watch that 20:03
masak cognominal: let me try to explain where I'm coming from with slangs
I see many things already defined in Perl 6 as being slangs
regexes
qq strings
object literals
basically, any time you're switching "parsing mode", you're switching slangs
heck, the expression parser could be seen as a slang 20:04
from my point of view, a good/rich slang is one that allows bi-directional communication with its host language 20:05
one diretion typically being simply returning values out to the host language
and the other direction typically being a form of interpolation
by pulling that off well, the slang manages to be "transparent", and largely symbiotic with the host 20:06
cognominal yea literals. not necessarily objects, should definitvely exposed as slangs. One may want integer syntax without the whole of HLL::Grammar.
so protoregex are often just a degenerated slang
masak in a sense, Perl 6 is a successful conglomeration of small slangs 20:07
vendethiel JSX! 20:08
cognominal but the compositionality is not sufficiently apparent
masak getting the composability right is the holy grail, yes 20:09
and it's a sliding scale too, in a way -- for example, many of the "special forms", like `if` and `loop` and `sub`, could be considered slangs... but I think it's more fruitful to consider them to be a special case, namely statement macros 20:11
if the goal is extensibility by the module author, then hanging things on the "statement macro" hook is going to be a winning move 20:12
cognominal vendethiel, my project about generating QAST tree with grammar ia getting bigger. Now, besides the AST phaser, I will have an ATM phaser to pattern match on trees. An probably a QAST phaser because AST is writing a QAST tree to write a QAST tree. So better go with an intermediate step.
masak vendethiel: JSX is an excellent example of a symbiotic slang, yes
vendethiel O_o
sounds hug
sounds huge
masak well -- sounds hug, too :D
cognominal masak, are you making progress about macros? I have downloaded papers about scala macros but did not dare to read them. 20:17
masak cognominal: I feel I am making progress, yes 20:18
cognominal Have you seen that Apple has blatantly copied @worrydreams(Bret Victor) with their swift playground ? 20:22
masak yes, I like what they're doing there
I didn't take it as "blatantly copied", more like "hey, we should listen to this guy" and then forging ahead, doing what no-one else is doing yet
cognominal: if you haven't seen gist.github.com/masak/13210c51f034f931af0c yet, I heartily recommend skimming it 20:23
cognominal appleinsider.com/articles/16/06/13/...playground
masak oh, wow
coding on the iPad? sounds excellent!
cognominal if it is a secret gist, I probably not have read it 20:26
About the ipad. It is aaid that stenography is faster than typing. We have yet to invent a stenography of programming 20:33
clicking on existing names instead of typing them would already go a long wat 20:34
vendethiel I'm not feeling awake enough to read your gist right now, cognominal 20:47
will do tomorrow
masak it is a secret gist. I again recommend it.
22:18 cognominal joined 23:21 cognominal joined