»ö« Welcome to Perl 6! | perl6.org/ | evalbot usage: 'perl6: say 3;' or rakudo:, niecza:, std:, or /msg p6eval perl6: ... | irclog: irc.perl6.org/ | UTF-8 is our friend! Set by sorear on 4 February 2011. |
|||
00:02
risou is now known as risou_awy,
risou_ left
00:16
baest left,
baest joined
00:21
ymasory joined
00:24
thou left
00:30
Joe____ joined
00:33
Joe____ left
00:35
lumi_ left
00:36
lumi_ joined
00:40
am0c joined,
whiteknight left
00:48
pernatiy left
01:09
jevin joined
01:52
literal left,
literal joined
01:53
literal left
01:54
ymasory left,
literal joined
|
|||
sorear | good * #perl6 | 02:07 | |
phenny | sorear: 17 May 07:32Z <moritz> tell sorear that t/spec/S05-grammar/action-stubs.t passes 13 tests and fails a few, might be worth looking at | ||
02:20
lateau joined
02:25
lateau left,
lateau joined
02:30
lateau1 joined
02:34
lateau left
02:35
lateau1 left
02:36
lateau joined
|
|||
sorear | hello lateau | 02:38 | |
lateau | goodmorning | 02:39 | |
02:43
lumi_ left
02:44
lumi_ joined,
baest left
02:45
baest joined
02:46
alester joined
|
|||
sorear | poll for native Japanese users: What do you feel the value of "ぎょ".chars should be? +[ "ア" .. "ン" ] ? | 02:51 | |
lestrrat | I don't really get what str.chars is supposed to do :/ | 02:54 | |
length of the string? | |||
PerlJam | depends on context as always :) | ||
02:55
tokuhirom joined
|
|||
PerlJam | but, in item context it should be the number of chars in the string | 02:55 | |
lestrrat | "ぎょ".chars == 2 ? | ||
PerlJam | rakudo: "ぎょ".chars == 2 | 02:56 | |
p6eval | rakudo 5f1bf6: ( no output ) | ||
PerlJam | oops | ||
rakudo: say "ぎょ".chars == 2 | |||
p6eval | rakudo 5f1bf6: OUTPUT«Bool::True» | ||
lestrrat | seems right. | ||
takesako | i agree | ||
lestrrat | so now I have to wonder what sorear's reference to '+[ "ア" .. "ン" ]' is supposed to mean | 02:57 | |
takesako | rakudo: say "き゚ょ".chars | 03:00 | |
p6eval | rakudo 5f1bf6: OUTPUT«3» | ||
03:01
Yappoko__ joined
|
|||
tokuhirom | rakudo: say "よ。".chars | 03:01 | |
p6eval | rakudo 5f1bf6: OUTPUT«2» | ||
03:01
lateau left
|
|||
sorear | lestrrat: .chars is supposed to do the most useful thing in terms of the selected language | 03:02 | |
03:02
lateau joined
|
|||
Yappoko__ | rakudo: say "み。".chars | 03:02 | |
sorear | lestrrat: .graphs has a very specific technical definition (it counts Unicode code points, except for zero-width combining characters) | ||
p6eval | rakudo 5f1bf6: OUTPUT«2» | ||
sorear | every kana or kanji counts for exactly 1 in .graphs | 03:03 | |
so far, every language I've checked out has had .chars matching up with .graphs | |||
takesako | Unicode BOM must be 0 ? | 03:04 | |
lestrrat | rakudo: say "ぎょ".graphs | 03:05 | |
p6eval | rakudo 5f1bf6: OUTPUT«Method 'graphs' not found for invocant of class 'Str' in main program body at line 22:/tmp/AaZuOpXKss» | ||
lestrrat | grr | ||
sorear | I think BOM shouldn't even show up in Unicode strings | ||
but if it does, it should be 0 | |||
takesako | oh, now i see what you mean | 03:07 | |
03:07
lateau left
|
|||
sorear | How often do you look at "ぎょ" and see a single, indivisible thing? | 03:08 | |
lestrrat | without knowing the details of unicode and such, my initial reaction is that it should always be 2. | 03:09 | |
sorear | rakudo: say "ア" .. "ン" # lestrrat: should this be changed to return 46 results? | ||
p6eval | rakudo 5f1bf6: | ||
..OUTPUT«(timeout)アアアアアアアアアアアアアアアアアアアアアアアアアアアアアアアアアアアアアアアアアアアアアアアアアアアアアアアアアアアアアアアアアアアアアアアアアアアアアアアアアアアアアアアアアアアアアアアアアアアアアアアアアアアアアアアアアアアアアアアアアアアアアアアアアアアアアアアアxE3 | |||
03:09
lateau joined
|
|||
sorear | lestrrat: the point of .chars et al is that we want users, especially non-English users, to not have to think about Unicode at all | 03:10 | |
rakudo: say map *.chr, "ア".ord .. "ン".ord | |||
p6eval | rakudo 5f1bf6: OUTPUT«アィイゥウェエォオカガキギクグケゲコゴサザシジスズセゼソゾタダチヂッツヅテデトドナニヌネノハバパヒビピフブプヘベペホボポマミムメモャヤュユョヨラリルレロヮワヰヱヲン» | ||
takesako | www.fileformat.info/info/unicode/ch.../index.htm | 03:11 | |
tokuhirom | where is "ァ"... | ||
takesako | Unicode Character 'COMBINING KATAKANA-HIRAGANA VOICED SOUND MARK' (U+3099) | ||
sorear | takesako: one before the beginning of that list | ||
the .. operator on strings is another place where Perl 6 is supposed to be sensitive to natural language | 03:12 | ||
it knows that some alphabets have a natural order | |||
rakudo: say [ 'a' .. 'z' ].elems | |||
p6eval | rakudo 5f1bf6: OUTPUT«26» | ||
sorear | rakudo: say 'α'..'ω' | 03:13 | |
p6eval | rakudo 5f1bf6: OUTPUT«αβγδεζηθικλμνξοπρστυφχψω» | ||
sorear | rakudo: say map *.chr, 'α'.ord .. 'ω'.ord | ||
p6eval | rakudo 5f1bf6: OUTPUT«αβγδεζηθικλμνξοπρςστυφχψω» | ||
takesako | oh | ||
sorear | note that the .. form is smart and skips over 'ς' (a special form of σ used at the end of words) | 03:14 | |
03:14
lateau left
03:16
lateau joined
|
|||
takesako | Windows .NET String.Length property returns the number of Char objects in this instance, not the number of Unicode characters. | 03:18 | |
sorear | yes, it's horrible | 03:19 | |
that should be .bytes('utf16') / 2 | |||
.codes should count Unicode characters | 03:20 | ||
.graphs counts non-combining characters | |||
rakudo: say "とうきょう".comb.perl # Would anyone expect this to produce 4 elements? 2? | 03:21 | ||
p6eval | rakudo 5f1bf6: OUTPUT«("と", "う", "き", "ょ", "う")» | ||
takesako | rakudo: say "㍑".graphs | 03:23 | |
p6eval | rakudo 5f1bf6: OUTPUT«Method 'graphs' not found for invocant of class 'Str' in main program body at line 22:/tmp/mB21cexQkp» | ||
03:23
Su-Shee_ joined
|
|||
sorear | that is an interesting character! | 03:24 | |
but it will come up 1 eventually | |||
what Rakudo calls .chars today is what the spec calls .codes | |||
03:26
lateau left,
lateau joined
|
|||
takesako | www.drk7.jp/MT/drk/images/090615/img01.jpg | 03:27 | |
03:27
Su-Shee left
|
|||
lateau | rakudo: say "㌶".ord | 03:28 | |
p6eval | rakudo 5f1bf6: OUTPUT«13110» | ||
sorear | takesako: what do you use that symbol for? | 03:30 | |
is it some kind of purist replacement for 七L ? | |||
03:31
lateau left
03:32
lateau joined
03:33
lateau left
03:34
miyagawa joined
|
|||
takesako | unicode.org/reports/tr15/ | 03:38 | |
TimToady | sorear: .chars always means .graphs by default, and cannot have language-specific meanings in the absense of a specific declaration either setting the language or saying where the language is specified | 03:47 | |
'course, in rakudo .chars always means .codes currently... | 03:48 | ||
.graphs tries to be all things to all languages, to the extent that is possible, but it pays no attention to the current language | 03:49 | ||
unicode seems to call ㌶ "square hectares", but that's a silly name for something that's already an area measurement | 03:52 | ||
PerlJam | maybe square hectares are really cubic? :) | ||
TimToady | maybe rectangular hectares are a different symbol :) | 03:53 | |
square hectares would have to be 4 dimensional, meseemeth | |||
sorear | what do square Roentgens measure? | 03:55 | |
takesako | rakudo: say "㍉㌔㌢㍍㌘㌧㌃㌶㍑㍗㌍㌦㌣㌫㍊㌻㎜㎝㎞㎎㎏㏄㎡㍻№㏍℡㈱㈲㈹㍾㍽㍼".comb(/./)>>.ord.join(",") | 03:56 | |
p6eval | rakudo 5f1bf6: OUTPUT«13129,13076,13090,13133,13080,13095,13059,13110,13137,13143,13069,13094,13091,13099,13130,13115,13212,13213,13214,13198,13199,13252,13217,13179,8470,13261,8481,12849,12850,12857,13182,13181,13180» | ||
PerlJam wonders what a round hectare looks like | 03:58 | ||
04:04
PerlPilot joined,
hatsefla1s joined
04:05
patch__ joined
04:06
PerlPilot left,
PerlPilot joined
|
|||
TimToady | I think the "square" part of it merely means it fits into a character cell... | 04:07 | |
04:08
JimmyZ joined,
JimmyZ left
|
|||
TimToady | except my character cells never come out quite square, alas... | 04:09 | |
04:09
stepnem left,
mikemol left,
nsh left,
snarkyboojum left,
PerlJam left,
hatseflats left,
patch_ left,
JimmyZ joined
04:10
PerlPilot is now known as PerlJam
04:11
JimmyZ left
04:12
stepnem joined,
mikemol joined,
nsh joined,
snarkyboojum joined
04:22
colomon left
|
|||
perigrin | TimToady: shody workmanship, find a better contractor and they'll make sure the cells come out square. | 04:30 | |
04:31
cognominal left
04:46
lue left,
lue joined
|
|||
sorear just spent 15 minutes trying to find | 04:48 | ||
whether :x($y) allows passing by the name $y | 04:49 | ||
dalek | ecza: d2e6f22 | sorear++ | src/ (2 files): mergeback; allow passing positional parameters by name |
04:53 | |
05:18
birdwindupbird joined
|
|||
cotto | Who all in here wants Parrot's Select dynpmc to become a thing? pmichaud mentioned that some Rakudo folks wanted to see it, but I haven't had a chance to ask him who. | 05:20 | |
05:22
lumi_ left
05:23
lumi_ joined
|
|||
sorear | cotto: a select op would also be an option | 05:24 | |
cotto | sorear, it would. We already have a dynpmc, but I'm not a fan of the interface. | ||
sorear | cotto: rakudo can't generally use dynpmcs as is (limitations in HLL mapping?); there will be a wrapper regardless of what you offer | ||
05:24
wamba joined
|
|||
cotto | sorear, sure. I would like to know what would require the least wrapping. | 05:25 | |
i.e. what'd be a nice natural interface | |||
sorear | do we want the OS dependancies to exist at the Parrot level or the Rakudo level? | ||
do we want bare bindings to select, poll, epoll, kqueue, etc, or a single unified AIO system? | 05:26 | ||
cotto | That sounds like a Rakudo decision. | ||
but it's also important to figure out what Parrot wants to provide. | |||
sorear | right; I'm sort of asking everyone | 05:27 | |
05:27
alester left
|
|||
sorear | it might make sense to offer both low-level bindings and a MultiIO.nqp library | 05:28 | |
that way HLLs that need to offer select can do so | 05:29 | ||
OTOH, I've been told that Parrot has no interest in providing direct POSIX bindings | |||
cotto | I don't remember such a discussion, but it sounds plausible. | 05:30 | |
maybe I do. | |||
The nice thing about Select as a dynpmc is that we have code for it now. | 05:32 | ||
05:46
jfried joined
|
|||
moritz | good morning | 05:47 | |
05:51
lumi_ left
05:52
lumi_ joined
|
|||
sorear | hi moritz | 05:53 | |
05:59
wamba left
06:07
koban joined
06:10
wtw joined
06:14
cognominal joined
06:16
fhelmberger joined
|
|||
sorear | cognominal: When the Perl 6 text operators are set to French mode, are there any groups of letters that substr() should treat as a unit and not split up? | 06:18 | |
06:19
lumi_ left
06:20
lumi_ joined
06:23
woosley joined
06:25
ggoebel left
06:36
amkrankruleuen left
06:37
amkrankruleuen joined
06:42
amkrankruleuen left
06:44
Su-Shee_ is now known as Su-Shee
|
|||
Su-Shee | .oO(I've just parsed "french maid mode".. need more coffee...) |
06:45 | |
good morning everyone. | |||
06:45
dur-randir joined
|
|||
sorear | hi Su-Shee. | 06:47 | |
it seems TimToady was mostly thinking of German ss and Spanish ch/ll when he created chars-mode; I am increasingly wondering if there are *any* languages that are supported by Unicode, but have use for chars-mode | 06:48 | ||
do we have any expert users of Devanagari and its geographic kin here? | |||
how about Semitic scripts? | |||
tadzik | good morning Su-Shee | 06:50 | |
and everyone :) | |||
06:50
sirelander joined
06:58
amkrankruleuen joined
07:02
f00li5h left
07:17
amkrankruleuen left
|
|||
moritz | sorear: maybe try p6l, it has a wider circle of readers than #perl6 | 07:17 | |
07:18
amkrankruleuen joined
07:19
wamba joined
07:28
amkrankruleuen left
07:31
amkrankruleuen joined
07:49
mj41 joined
07:55
amkrankruleuen left
07:56
amkrankruleuen joined
08:01
wamba left
|
|||
cognominal | sorear, I am not sure I understand the question. I don't know much about Unicode. I suppose that if somehow one can get e' for é as a normal form, this a atomic group of letter you are talking about. | 08:04 | |
But then, how to deal with the string 'e' ? | 08:05 | ||
does my answer make any sense to you? | |||
may be if you point me to some documentation, I will be able t make my mind or do further research. | 08:06 | ||
Su-Shee, you are reading to much the papers about DSK :) | 08:07 | ||
rakudo: say "é".chars | 08:09 | ||
p6eval | rakudo 5f1bf6: OUTPUT«1» | ||
cognominal | rakudo : say "Dès Noël où un zéphyr haï me vêt de glaçons würmiens, je dîne d’exquis rôtis de bœuf au kir à l’aÿ d’âge mûr & cætera !".chars | 08:10 | |
rakudo: say "Dès Noël où un zéphyr haï me vêt de glaçons würmiens, je dîne d’exquis rôtis de bœuf au kir à l’aÿ d’âge mûr & cætera !".chars | 08:11 | ||
p6eval | rakudo 5f1bf6: OUTPUT«119» | ||
cognominal | hum, 119 sounds too much. | ||
moritz | rakudo: say 'bœuf'.chars | 08:12 | |
p6eval | rakudo 5f1bf6: OUTPUT«4» | ||
cognominal | The sentence is a pangram that contains all the accentuated chars known to french. | 08:13 | |
well, that the definition of a pangram. | |||
To be true, the definition of pangram is silent about the presence of ligatures and accentuated chars. | 08:15 | ||
Also there are ligatures that are optional like for word with ff | 08:16 | ||
moritz | cognominal: I understand sorear's question differently: are there any ligatures which are written as two characters, but treated as one in French? | 08:17 | |
cognominal | Many people write boeuf or caetera because they don't know to do a ligature with a keyboard. But if I see these ligatures in the keyboard visualizer when holding the ⌥ key on my mac. Anyway they are so rare that mot people ignore them. | 08:28 | |
moritz | but there are also cases where 'eu' doesn't stand for the ligature, right? | 08:29 | |
cognominal | indeed. Like in "il a eu peur" | 08:32 | |
moritz | phenny: fr "eu"? | 08:33 | |
phenny | moritz: "had" (fr to en, translate.google.com) | ||
moritz had his last french lessons a decade ago | |||
considering that I had basically no practise, it's amazing how much written French text I can still read | 08:34 | ||
cognominal | But the ligature in bœuf is in oe. | ||
moritz | oh | ||
(listening to French is no good, those people just always talk way too fast) | |||
cognominal | I will check antidote, may be the ligature is facultative now. | 08:35 | |
I feel antidote is the best french dictionary, done in Québec, available on mac, pc and iDevices | 08:37 | ||
moritz | 'oe' as non-ligature also exists | ||
08:37
brill joined
|
|||
moritz | coexister | 08:37 | |
cognominal | yes, and antidote says indeed "when the sequence o e represents more than one sound, there is no ligature" | 08:40 | |
for the ligature æ, antidote says it is up to the user to do it or not. | 08:41 | ||
personally, I have never seen before the form "curiculum vitæ" mentionned by antidote. | 08:43 | ||
moritz | "curiculum vitæ" looks like somebody being overly smug :-) | ||
08:44
IllvilJa left
|
|||
cognominal | indeed. That's from latin and I don't think there ligature in latin. | 08:44 | |
*there ere ligatures | |||
08:50
wamba joined
|
|||
cognominal | I am not an expert in typography, bu roman letter were the equivalent of modern upper case, I think. Now, it is possible to do the two french ligatures in upper case but I think it is done more rarely. | 08:50 | |
08:50
brill left
|
|||
cognominal | antidote is apparently silent on that subject even if it talks on a related one, accents for upper case letters | 08:53 | |
09:03
amkrankruleuen left
09:04
guestnan joined
09:05
wamba left
09:07
agentzh joined
09:09
amkrankruleuen joined
09:12
broquaint joined
09:13
jjore left
09:14
donri joined
09:20
lestrrat is now known as o__,
jferrero joined
09:21
o__ is now known as lestrrat
09:28
Mowah joined
09:35
jfried left
09:38
woosley left
09:56
pjcj left
10:08
agentzh left
10:15
tzhs joined
10:16
cognominal left
10:20
woosley joined
10:22
cognominal joined
10:23
ggoebel joined
10:26
estrai joined
10:30
amkrankruleuen left
10:31
amkrankruleuen joined
10:47
colomon joined
10:48
sirelander left
10:49
jjore joined
11:05
Patterner left
11:07
Psyche^ joined,
Psyche^ is now known as Patterner
11:09
amkrankruleuen left,
amkrankruleuen joined
|
|||
arnsholt | cognominal: IIRC monumental inscriptions in Latin will use the AE ligature (think I saw that in Rome) | 11:17 | |
cognominal | arnsholt: interesting | ||
arnsholt | sorear: I can read and write Devanagari | 11:18 | |
Know a bit about Arabic script, but not much more than you can learn from Wikipedia | |||
11:19
woosley left
|
|||
cognominal | indeed, en.wikipedia.org/wiki/%C3%86 talks aboit the AE ligature in classical latin | 11:19 | |
11:23
f00li5h joined
11:25
ab5tract joined,
jjore left
11:28
tzhs left
11:34
pjcj joined
11:36
lichtkind joined
11:38
mtk joined
11:41
jjore joined
11:44
Mowah_ joined,
wamba joined
11:47
mtk left
11:49
ab5tract left
11:52
mtk joined
11:58
sftp joined
11:59
pernatiy joined
12:07
wknight8111 joined
12:08
wknight8111 left,
wknight8111 joined
12:13
jaldhar left
12:15
Moukeddar joined
12:17
jaldhar joined
12:22
lumi_ left
12:23
lumi_ joined
12:29
wamba left,
dju left,
mux left
12:31
awwaiid left,
wamba joined
12:35
mux joined
12:36
am0c left
12:52
Moukeddar left
12:56
amkrankruleuen left,
amkrankruleuen joined
12:59
sftp left
13:01
ggoebel left,
Holy_Cow joined
13:02
ggoebel joined
|
|||
ggoebel | www.google-melange.com/gsoc/proposa...cian1900/1 | 13:02 | |
python3on parrot... | |||
> use 6model. It's full of unknowns and I'm not convinced it can map to Python's object system cleanly and efficiently, | |||
moritz | ggoebel: you missed to quote the rest of the sentence | 13:03 | |
"either use 6model, or..." | 13:04 | ||
13:04
wamba left
|
|||
moritz | ggoebel: which I understand as "evaluate the two alternatives, and use whatever fits better" | 13:04 | |
13:08
bluescreen10 joined
13:15
daxim left
13:19
Holy_Cow left
13:20
Holy_Cow joined
13:21
wamba joined
13:26
ab5tract joined
13:33
jaldhar left
|
|||
pmichaud | good morning, #perl6 | 13:35 | |
moritz | o/ | 13:36 | |
takadonet | pmichaud: morning | ||
moritz | tadzik: FYI I'll be on a conference next week (Sunday - Thursday), and likely have poor connectivity. If you need help with gsoc-y decisions, please defer to masak | 13:37 | |
tadzik: you can als /msg me, I'll read it when I get internet access | 13:38 | ||
13:39
JimmyZ_ joined
13:46
BaggioKwok joined
13:48
isBEKaml joined
|
|||
pmichaud decides to rename "rakbench" to "rpmark" | 13:50 | ||
PerlJam | rpm ark? rp mark? r pm ark? :) | 13:51 | |
pmichaud | "Rakudo/Parrot benchmarks" | ||
and yes, there are other possibilities for it as well :) | |||
moritz | use rpbench instead | ||
pmichaud | yeah, I thought of that too. | 13:52 | |
moritz | "bench" is easier to map to "benchmark" than "mark" | ||
pmichaud | well, "mark" is what we produce. :-) | ||
isBEKaml | r pm ark, sounds a lot gruff. :-) | ||
har har har | |||
13:52
leprevost joined
|
|||
pmichaud | also, I want to preserve the possibility that it'll be used for more than just benchmarking Rakudo :) | 13:53 | |
"rp" gives a few more options | |||
ggoebel | moritz: yes... quoted slightly out of context. I hope 6model fits best. Purpose of mentioning it was to try to connect jnth to lucian if that connection doesn't already exist | ||
pmichaud | I'll decide between rpmark and rpbench in a bit. votes welcome :) | ||
bbiab | |||
isBEKaml | speaking about benchmarks, I vaguely remember util/colomon working on their own benchmarks. Is that still on? | 13:56 | |
colomon: ^^ | |||
13:57
icwiener joined
|
|||
tadzik | moritz: acknowledged, thanks | 14:00 | |
14:02
wtw left
14:03
alester joined
|
|||
pmichaud | isBEKaml: yes, those are in perl6/bench-scripts | 14:12 | |
I'm copying many of those scripts (as appropriate) into rpmark | |||
pmichaud still on fence between "rpmark" and "rpbench" (or even something else entirely) | 14:13 | ||
JimmyZ_ | +1 to rpbench | 14:14 | |
pmichaud | maybe I should call them "onions"... because so far when I open them up, they make me cry. 1/2 :-) | ||
JimmyZ_ | I don't know what does mark mean | ||
isBEKaml | pmichaud: oh, thanks. | 14:15 | |
pmichaud: +1 to rpbench | 14:17 | ||
JimmyZ_: mark as in bench_mark_ | |||
:) | |||
14:18
daxim joined
|
|||
JimmyZ_ | isBEKaml: yes, but it does not give me that impression | 14:19 | |
isBEKaml | JimmyZ_: yes, I guess that's part of the reason we both voted for rpbench. :) | 14:21 | |
JimmyZ_ | yeah | ||
PerlJam | pmichaud: I vote rpbench btw. Makes me think of "bench testing" and such | 14:23 | |
pmichaud | wfm | ||
speed.pypy.org uses geometric mean (of a suite of tests) to compare pypy against other python implementations. is geometric mean a good calculation to use for a "composite index" like this? | 14:32 | ||
i.e., if I wanted to come up with an overall comparison of one build versus another... would geometric mean of the benchmark times of each work? | 14:33 | ||
14:34
BaggioKwok left
|
|||
PerlJam | I looked at speed.pypy.org and really I have no idea what their overall speed score really *means* | 14:35 | |
colomon | my first naive thought would be arithmetic mean of the percentage difference? I'm not sure why geometric mean might be preferred. | ||
PerlJam | It didn't look like it was tied in any way to the importance of the feature being tested | ||
colomon | +1 | ||
pmichaud | I'm pretty sure arithmetic mean of percentage won't be quite right | ||
PerlJam: my guess on speed.pypy.org is this: consider the first two benchmarks -- they have speeds that are .65 and .07 of cpython | 14:36 | ||
so to find "how much better is pypy than cpython", report the geometric mean of the two | |||
although since geometric means are always less than arithmetic means... there might be a bias there | 14:38 | ||
PerlJam | pmichaud: but better at *what*? It presupposes that the benchmarks adequately measure the speed of "important" things and doesn't unduly consider the speed of "unimportant" things | 14:39 | |
pmichaud | PerlJam: that's outside the scope of what I'm trying to do | ||
colomon | "The geometric mean is more appropriate than the arithmetic mean for describing proportional growth..." sounds like an argument for percentages and geometric mean. | ||
pmichaud | the number just needs to say "on this set of benchmarks, build A did X factor better than build B" | 14:40 | |
I'm not trying to make larger claims about the overall improvement | |||
14:41
koban left
|
|||
pmichaud | I'll go with geometric mean of the percentages for now | 14:42 | |
thanks | |||
14:42
Holy_Cow left
14:48
MayDaniel joined
14:52
silent_h_ left
14:54
plobsing left,
plobsing joined
14:56
sftp joined
15:05
ymasory joined
15:08
spq joined
15:15
guestnan left
15:16
cogno joined
15:18
isBEKaml left
15:21
hercynium joined
15:27
MayDaniel left
15:39
cogno left
15:42
kaare_ joined
15:45
risou_awy is now known as risou_,
risou joined
16:07
kjeldahl joined
16:12
leprevost left
16:13
benabik joined
16:16
rgrau joined
|
|||
jdv79 | will these benchmarks be posted somewhere? | 16:23 | |
16:24
nymacro left
16:30
nymacro joined
|
|||
sorear | moritz: to get a useful response on p6l I would need to be much clearer, because it's not as easy to go back and forth... | 16:36 | |
16:40
thou joined
16:41
nym joined
16:45
nymacro left
16:47
mj41 left,
wamba left
16:49
pernatiy left
16:51
jedai left
16:53
jedai joined
16:54
risou__ joined
16:56
risou left
|
|||
moritz | sorear: what you want is two languages, one treating the same sequence of characters as one character, and the other treating them as distinct characters. Correct? | 16:58 | |
17:07
cogno joined
17:15
bluescreen10 left
|
|||
sorear | moritz: basically, yes | 17:15 | |
17:16
bluescreen10 joined
|
|||
sorear | moritz: really what I'm after is cases where a grapheme-level .comb, .length, or .substr goes wrong | 17:16 | |
The Unicode standard itself special-cases Korean, so Korean is definitely not such a language | |||
17:20
cogno left
|
|||
sorear | observation: Rakudo 2011.05 still doesn't have a name | 17:21 | |
Su-Shee | "George-Henry Miller-Whipplesteen"? | ||
sorear | Su-Shee: what county is George-Henry Miller-Whipplesteen.pm in? | 17:22 | |
Su-Shee | *hehe* Absurdistan ;) | 17:23 | |
tadzik | shame there's no masak around, we may be able to go for Zebras.pm then ;) | ||
sorear wonders what ey needs to do to get niecza supported by rpmark | 17:24 | ||
moritz | sorear: I guess test scripts that run both with rakudo and niecza | 17:31 | |
17:34
Chillance joined
17:36
Retromingent left
17:38
risou_ is now known as risou_awy,
risou__ left
17:41
impious joined
17:42
impious left
|
|||
arnsholt | sorear: Ping? | 17:51 | |
17:53
benabik left
|
|||
arnsholt | phenny: tell sorear I'm read Devanagari (of the Sanskrit variety, slightly different rules than the Hindi one) and Wikpedia-familiar with Arabic script. What do you need to know? | 17:57 | |
phenny | arnsholt: I'll pass that on when sorear is around. | ||
18:01
cdarroch joined,
cdarroch left,
cdarroch joined
18:04
birdwindupbird left
18:19
JimmyZ_ left
18:24
fhelmberger left
18:28
starcoder2 left
18:31
bacek left
18:32
starcoder2 joined
18:34
silent_h joined,
ab5tract left
18:39
silent_h left
18:41
djahandarie joined
18:47
ab5tract joined
18:48
icwiener left
18:51
starcoder2 is now known as starcoder3,
starcoder3 is now known as starcoder2
18:56
[Coke] left
19:01
birdwindupbird joined
19:02
[Coke] joined
19:16
benabik joined
19:26
icwiener joined
19:28
wamba joined
19:30
Trashlord joined
19:45
patch__ left
19:47
birdwindupbird left
19:52
colomon left
20:01
ab5tract left
20:05
alester left
20:09
alester joined
20:14
Sarten-X left
20:21
ab5tract joined
20:22
kaare_ left
20:24
mj41 joined
20:28
jevin left
20:30
wknight8111 left
|
|||
flussence | ooh, someone's making a bash script parsing library for GSoC. The fun I could have with that... | 20:32 | |
sbp | link? | ||
flussence | dev.gentoo.org/~qiaomuf/libbash.html | 20:33 | |
sbp | thanks! | ||
20:33
miyagawa left
|
|||
moritz | what's wrong with the parser in bash? | 20:40 | |
bash has the -n option for syntax checking, so it can surely parse without executing | 20:41 | ||
20:42
mj41 left
|
|||
flussence | I think the main reason for this as a library is for embedding in gentoo's package management stuff, because it saves a few hundred forks that way | 20:43 | |
(all the packages are bash scripts, more or less) | |||
20:45
benabik left
|
|||
moritz | and it only needs to parse (and not execute) them= | 20:46 | |
s/=/?/ | |||
20:46
thou left
|
|||
flussence | IIRC, the package format spec says external commands are only allowed in a few specific places, all the metadata should be plain bash syntax | 20:47 | |
(not that people always follow the spec...) | 20:48 | ||
moritz | that's close to the borderline between genious and insanity, or something | ||
flussence | nah, it's a few light years from that line :) | 20:49 | |
moritz | on which side? :-) | ||
flussence | well, people have forked the distro more than once over the state of this stuff, so... :) | 20:50 | |
20:50
ymasory left
20:57
Mowah_ left
21:01
lichtkind left
21:05
bacek joined
|
|||
tylercurtis | o/, #perl6 | 21:06 | |
21:07
thou joined
|
|||
moritz | \o | 21:08 | |
Util | \o | 21:10 | |
21:12
y3llow_ joined
21:13
kjeldahl left
21:14
y3llow left,
y3llow_ is now known as y3llow
21:20
bluescreen10 left
21:26
icwiener left
21:36
benabik joined
21:38
zamolxes left
21:39
daemon left,
zamolxes joined
21:41
f00li5h left,
f00li5h joined
21:43
daemon joined
21:45
ymasory joined
21:48
benabik left
21:49
bacek left
22:00
benabik joined,
benabik left
22:04
whiteknight joined,
ajoe joined,
bacek joined
22:11
ab5tract left
22:12
donri left
|
|||
pmichaud | Latest benchmark results (with updated toolset): gist.github.com/979705 | 22:12 | |
22:14
alester left
22:19
ajoe left
22:25
fhelmberger joined
22:26
dur-randir left
|
|||
PerlJam | pmichaud: smaller numbers are better? | 22:35 | |
22:35
spq left
|
|||
flussence | those are times, so yes | 22:36 | |
PerlJam | just checking | ||
22:55
rgrau left,
thou left
23:05
hercynium left
23:09
cdarroch left
|
|||
whiteknight | is it possible to print some kind of status information to the console during the core.pm build? | 23:12 | |
like, the name of each function as it is compiled | |||
or anything that would show forward progress? | |||
23:13
ymasory left
|
|||
pmichaud | we'd have to add something to nqp | 23:13 | |
er, nqp-rx | |||
whiteknight | does Rakudo use the version of parrot-nqp that's bundled with Parrot? | ||
pmichaud | yes | ||
whiteknight | ok | ||
pmichaud | benchmark results for plum: gist.github.com/979705 | 23:14 | |
whiteknight | I may try to add something to the perl6 actions file, to print out something when we compile a function | ||
if I can find a suitable place to add such a beast | |||
23:15
risou_awy is now known as risou_,
risou joined
23:22
molaf__ joined
23:23
molaf_ left
23:25
cschimm1_ joined
23:26
daxim_ joined
23:27
noganex left,
nsh| joined
23:28
noganex joined
23:30
wamba left
23:32
daemon left,
daxim left,
Vlavv` left,
cschimm1 left,
nsh_ left
23:33
lue left
23:39
Vlavv` joined
23:46
dayangkun joined
23:50
daemon joined,
bacek left
23:52
dayangkun_ joined
23:54
dayangkun left,
risou left
23:55
dayangkun_ left,
dayangkun joined
|