|
This channel is intended for people just starting with the Raku Programming Language (raku.org). Logs are available at irclogs.raku.org/raku-beginner/live.html Set by lizmat on 8 June 2022. |
|||
|
01:13
Kaiepi joined
01:22
discord-raku-bot left,
discord-raku-bot joined
01:30
razetime joined
03:53
Kaiepi left
04:56
sgrs left
|
|||
| Da-ding! | I have a grammar where one rule is essentially syntactic sugar for another rule. Inside an action method, am I able to restructure the match and pass it into a different action method? Or would I have to create a separate subroutine to contain any shared behaviour? | 06:32 | |
| Secondly, to solve this I was thinking of delegating everything to a separate class anyway, leaving pretty much every method in the action class as 'method foo($/) { Bar.foo($/.values.map(*.made)) }`. Any ideas on how I might be able to reduce this boilerplate code? | 06:34 | ||
| Secondly, to solve this I was thinking of delegating everything to a separate class anyway, leaving pretty much every method in the action class as `method foo($/) { Bar.foo($/.values.map(*.made)) }`. Any ideas on how I might be able to reduce this boilerplate code? | |||
|
08:20
Kaiepi joined
09:11
ToddAndMargo joined
10:25
ToddAndMargo left
12:16
sgrs joined
13:24
Kaiepi left
13:40
Kaiepi joined
|
|||
| guifa | Da-ding! you can call one one action method from another one — there's actually not anything particular special about action methods | 13:55 | |
| as to the second one, if you're going to farm out everything to the other class.... why not make it the action class? | 13:56 | ||
| just do :actions(Bar) instead | |||
|
15:47
guifa_ joined
15:50
guifa left
16:38
sgrs left
17:19
razetime left
18:07
sgrs joined
18:28
sgrs left
18:33
MasterDuke left
19:58
n1to left
23:23
sgrs joined
|
|||